LCA TEJAS MK1 & MK1A: News and Discussion

darshan978

Darth Vader
Regular Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
479
Likes
773
Country flag
Breaking...Order of 83 Tejas Mk 1A is finally placed
"Akhir kumbhar gadhe pe bethega hi" a famous saying
Iaf will have to buy tejas in numbers
No option exept supporting own product rather than shelling our billion at other products...
 

doreamon

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
3,007
Likes
15,162
Country flag
price of tejas mk1a is arounf 63 mill $ . why so much high price ? Is it going to reduce ?
 

kamaal

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
513
Likes
1,938
Country flag
Actually that's very underwhelming (expect a few moments), almost lazy. Watch Mirage-2000 maneuvering.
Tejas did much better in Bahrain Airshow! I'm guessing this guy got the ride only in 2017-18 & don't have many hours in it yet.
Agree, LIMA performance was OK compared to Bahrain. But LCA was flown by a test pilots during Bahrain while this time it was flown by a regular pilot with limited flight hour experience. I expected more this time, but then regular pilots are not display/stunt items.

I think Mirage can out-maneuver LCA very easily, especially at high-speed and the biggest point is that, which lets down LCA, is the drag which it generates. Ironically the more draggy jets are highly maneuverable but in LCA's case, it is not so maneuverable. Probably ADA is trying to limit the flight profile as they are not very confident about the Control Laws yet.
 
Last edited:

kamaal

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
513
Likes
1,938
Country flag
price of tejas mk1a is arounf 63 mill $ . why so much high price ? Is it going to reduce ?
There is a committee working on to reduce the cost. But the $ 63 million is derived by dividing the number of jet to the total quoted project cost, which doesn't gives the complete picture.

Lets wait for the committee to release its outcome. There are very few solutions available to HAL & MoD.

1. Avoid some foreign sub-systems, which can be produced locally, especially Israeli.
2. Use UTTAM AESA instead of exported one, Uttam should be made flight worthy within 2 years to make it possible.
3. Increase MK1A orders to 123 from just 83.
4. Produce/Assemble GE-404 locally.

This will help in reducing the cost by $ 4-5 million per piece.
 

Enquirer

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,567
Likes
9,357
There is a committee working on to reduce the cost. But the $ 63 million is derived by dividing the number of jet to the total quoted project cost, which doesn't gives the complete picture.

Lets wait for the committee to release its outcome. There are very few solutions available to HAL & MoD.

1. Avoid some foreign sub-systems, which can be produced locally, especially Israeli.
2. Use UTTAM AESA instead of exported one, Uttam should be made flight worthy within 2 years to make it possible.
3. Increase MK1A orders to 123 from just 83.
4. Produce/Assemble GE-404 locally.

This will help in reducing the cost by $ 4-5 million per piece.
About 5% decrease in cost......................will also come at a 5 year delay in production!!!

Assembly plant for 83 engines?? Ridiculous! Also, these are not decisions that desi babus can make....GE has to agree to it.......not to mention the time it takes to set up the manufacturing facility.

Also, locally assembled/manufactured stuff often comes out MORE EXPENSIVE THAN OFF THE SHELF products!
 

Bleh

Laughing member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,209
Likes
25,999
Country flag
I think Mirage can out-maneuver LCA very easily, especially at high-speed and the biggest point is that, which lets down LCA, is the drag which it generates. Ironically the more draggy jets are highly maneuverable but in LCA's case, it is not so maneuverable. Probably ADA is trying to limit the flight profile as they are not very confident about the Control Laws yet.
I've seen Tejas take impressively sharp turns from time to time, should be always like that!
Like in this video from Lima itself, practice day:
^It did a 16 sec loop at 0:33!
^See the (-)G turn at 1:55 or one at 5:50!

Maybe it's a bit limited by its 8G, but that final day's performance was just... bad, for some reason. Dude probably found free exotic food & ate too much for breakfast. :laugh:
 
Last edited:

Bleh

Laughing member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,209
Likes
25,999
Country flag
I think Mirage can out-maneuver LCA very easily, especially at high-speed and the biggest point is that, which lets down LCA, is the drag which it generates. Ironically the more draggy jets are highly maneuverable but in LCA's case, it is not so maneuverable. Probably ADA is trying to limit the flight profile as they are not very confident about the Control Laws yet.
Nah. I've seen Tejas take equally impressively sharp turns from time to time, but not always for some reason!
Like in this video from Lima itself, practice day:
^It did a 16 sec loop at 0:33 & 7 sec 180° at 0:10!
^See the (-)G turn at 1:55 or ones at 1:10, 3:35, 2:40, 5:50!

Maybe it's a bit limited by its 8G, but that final day's performance was just... bad. Dude probably found free exotic food & ate too much for breakfast. :laugh:
 
Last edited:

Vinod DX9

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
1,356
Likes
4,410
Country flag
Nothing happened. Ninja Monkey mistakenly posted wrong news link, I didn't check.
 

patriots

Defense lover
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2017
Messages
5,572
Likes
21,371
Country flag
Ge is offering a new engine with 110 kn thrust.....for amca...and mwf
But we shouldn't stop our research.....
 

Bleh

Laughing member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,209
Likes
25,999
Country flag
Bro....tejas mk1a not finalized yet................
What do you mean?
...till it starts manufacturing 83 Light Combat Aircraft Tejas Mark 1A fighters by 2023.

“We expect the order for 83 Mark 1A LCA Tejas fighters in one or two months,” the HAL CMD further announced. The problem is that the Mark 1A variant has not yet been developed. But HAL believes that this is not a big hurdle, now that Mark 1 has been certified for combat capability with a Final Operational Clearance (FOC). The Mark 1A variant requires retro-fitment of an AESA radar, and expansion of the avionics envelope.
It's good that Mark 1A order is about to be placed soon, but FOC Tejas delivery is expected to end by 2020-21 fiscal.
That means the 2 Tejas lines meant for filling IAF squadron s are going to sit idle, even it gets export customer/s... unless more FOC Tejas ordered.
2019_aero_india_104_lca_air_force_nm_0.jpg

If they'd start production in 2023 (planned 1st flight in 2021-22) that means Mark 1A is to have constable alterations to the airframe that need to be tested.
 
Last edited:

patriots

Defense lover
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2017
Messages
5,572
Likes
21,371
Country flag
What do you mean?


It's good that Mark 1A order is about to be placed soon, but FOC Tejas delivery is expected to end by 2020-21 fiscal.
That means the 2 Tejas lines meant for filling IAF squadron s are going to sit idle, even it gets export customer/s... unless more FOC Tejas ordered.

If they'd start production in 2023 (2 years afterwards planned 1st flight in 2021) that means Mark 1A is to have constable alterations to the airframe that need to be tested.
I mean.....dac has not cleared procurement of....mk1a....

My post was a reply to a Twitter post which one says mk1a cleared.....
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Hi


Was referring to MTOW. But yes the concern is still like ~40 percent increase in mtow would f414 thrust increase ~18 percent, be again underpowered?
The fighter requires more engine thrust in close combat ( no external stores & half fuel mode)

Also some drag reduction & increased length in Tejas mk2 means better lift to drag ratio,
higher length allows Canard placement which will add further to turn rates,
h
which also increases its load carrying range & close combat specs like ITR & STR, AOA Gs pulled in the same no external stores & half fuel mode

As far as MTOW is concerned you can compare gripen E's MTOW & engine thrust as both tejas & gripen hv almost same engine thrust & MTOW both in Gripen C/D-Tejas mk1 versions

&
will also hv the same combo in Gripen E & tejas mk2 version.

Its enough if Max thrust is able to lift MTOW at ground level.
 

rohit b3

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
818
Likes
1,402
Country flag
They are simply sitting on the Tejas mk1A deal so that they can cry about "Squadron shortage" and blame HAL for "Delays" and then buy more Phoren maal.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top