piKacHHu
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2015
- Messages
- 323
- Likes
- 994
Then do it yourself
Who is stopping you.
Seems you got a hit by a contrary argument !
For comparison part, I would certainly like to contribute for comparing LCA development time with M2K/F-16 program. Will post it soon.
1. First tranche of time line of evolution of F-16/F-18- Entry to 4th Gen Era. I would add the Mirage 2000 & Mig 29 evolution later; This time line is important as M2K & MIG 29 were, in fact, developed under influence or to counter these teens inducted by the US armed forces.
2. Lots of points to debate about particularly w.r.t Tejas, guiding its development and evolution to a logical end with lessons learnt from history.
3. Going through the literature, I could sense that ++/0.5 addition to 4th Gen fighters is more attributed to element of stealth, composite airframe, & kinematic performance in terms of maneuverability & super-cruise. Su-35, however, is an odd fellow with huge RCS; may be the feature of active cancellation has been taken as stealth feature. Sensors (RADAR, RWR, Jammers etc) could be fitted with ease to F-4s with its big nose cone & airframe, however, it will not result into 4++ gen fighter.
4. Information shown in the timelines are available on internet; mostly on wikipedia. I also referred other open literature for checking its authenticity.