Laser/Beam weapons

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
I think its the only issue. Like I mentioned earlier in 50 years I dont think it will be a problem. Miniature nuke reactors, Highly efficient solar panels, all these are options.
possibly in the future?? But the power requirements would be in the gigajoules enough to power a small city and it would not be continuous only a few possible tries, it would be ideal if this gets developed and nuclear weapons become a thing of the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrj

nrj

New Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
Frankly I don't see denuclearized world even if Beam weapons become reality in 30-40yrs. It can replace nukes as a new potent weapon as maybe dozens of new countries will be nuclear powers due to proliferation in coming time. But these nuke-free world plans look good only on papers.

Airborne lasers can only work in boost phase interception for now that too at limited distance. YAL-1 was the testbed & it didn't prove to be viable. On long enough timeline maybe even teleportation is possible, who knows?

Last year scientists were able to teleport laser beam by distance in Nms with acute wavelength. Its gonna take decades before any of that is possible.

We have more info on these beam weapons in this thread - http://defenceforumindia.com/strategic-forces/3766-laser-beam-weapons.html

Maybe we should merge threads to keep relevance ?

--

Problem is that there not much info on the progress of these researches in public domain. We don't know how close or how far we are in weaponizing this technology. We do not know how successful other nations are.

PS: There is proposal to integrate laser tech for boost phase BMD in F-X fighters post-2030. Is US that close? We do not know until someday when they surprise us.
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
The KALI 5000 weighs 10 tonnes. 10 tonnes is peanuts. It can be mounted on a road mobile system if needed. We should at least start development of an equivalent system that is based on a large ground based radar. Even if the system can shoot down only small birds. Just start development. Learn from mistakes, improve the system. Miniaturization can and will happen as technology improves. Reserach and deployment of this system should go hand in hand with the missile based BMD system.

Assume a scenario where China manages to weaposize such a system and we are still 5 years behind. We are toast. They will simnply grab what they want, pulverize our forces and systems and we wont be able to do a goddam thing. And yeah, their research on particle beam weapons started in the 1950's and it is so secretive that there has not been a shread of news on it.
India on the other hand started only in 1985. We deployed the K5000 in 2003 or 2004. Its been 8 years. Is that not enough time to start some level of weaponization. The K 5000 is more than adequate to bring down a ballistic missile.
 

Falcon

New Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Messages
121
Likes
57
I like the name...Kilo Ampere Linear Injector. Read about this long ago and though it would be used for Industrial purpose only. They used to talk about KALI and anti gravity experiments a lot a that time. Cool projects. Let's see how Indian Scientists en-cash it..
 

nrj

New Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
The recharge interval of KALI 5000 is huge. Once you project the beam, it takes large time to charge up & be ready before another protrusion.

I will not even talk about airborne laser weapon for now. But ship based KALI with maybe nuclear reactor powering it can work.

To establish ground based laser system, as LF said it requires power equal to a powerplant lighting city. Even if we decide to setup such base, first we'll require absolute locations of enemy launch sites. Considering the system is aimed for boost phase interception while range of laser beam is almost thousand kms, it'll require pin-point accuracy otherwise system is of no use.

Everyday enemy is busy mobilizing its BM launch sites & stocking long range missiles in silos. I wonder how useful such system would be against salvo attack? Our geographical position is very complex. We share thousands of kms of border with enemy. Placing beam weapon in such defensive doctrine for a strategic purpose will be hell of a task.

Its different case of US which does not share any inch of border with its enemy. They are much more safe & history has blessed it with significant physical advantages.

--

However the skeptical scenario drawn by beam weapon for defensive purpose washes away when we talk about its offensive capabilities. But again there is great leap in technological advancements which needs to be covered before we talk about space based laser projectors.
 

nrj

New Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
[h=1]LRAD Conquers The Naval World[/h]
The Indian Navy has joined its Western counterparts in equipping its ships, off the Somali coast, with sonic cannon (or LRAD, for Long Range Acoustic Device). LRAD is basically a focused beam of sound. Originally, it was designed to emit a very loud sound. Anyone whose head was touched by this beam, heard a painfully loud sound.

Anyone standing next to them heard nothing. But those hit by the beam promptly fled, or fell to the ground in pain. Permanent hearing loss is possible if the beam is kept on a person for several seconds, but given the effect the sound usually has on people (they move, quickly), that is unlikely to happen. LRAD works. And on a speedboat, you have nowhere to run. The LRAD operator targets the guy operating the outboard engine, and anyone else who tries to keep the speedboat headed for the target.
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
Look at the Chinese approach in all weapons deplyment.
They deploy weapons however crude it is - every weapons system follows this doctrine. From Ballistic missiles to Fighter aircraft.
Now look at the Indian approach - The LCA development time was a disaster. Our approach of design perfection before deployment is stupid.

The world used to laugh at the incompetence of Chinese weapons systems. But their approach of trial and error could prove to be a much faster deployment than our method of design refinement without actually deploying anything. And by the time we do deply the system is already dated.

Lasers and Particle beam weapons are not the same. KALI is a particle beam weapon. We have parallel research for lasers.

There are many ways of solving the recharge time aspect. If a land based system is developed the pulse generator and power source only needs to be decoupled. So at any time multiple power sources can be separately charged.

Irrespective of these challenges. When the PAD shot down a missile, it made the Pukes piss themselves.
Imagine whats going to happen when a weaponized KALI shoots down its first target. It is going to completely change the way we look at offence and defence.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
CROSS POSTED

http://syzygyastro.hubpages.com/hub/Wave-Guided-EMP-Beam


Wave Guided Pulse Electromagnetic Pulse Beam



There are at least three sources of electromagetic pulse and two of them are man made

Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP); is a force that we learned to recon with quite by accident in the early days of atomic testing on Christmas Island and Eniwetok. The discovery was made when H-bombs were detonated and put out street lights several hundred miles away in Hawaii and affected radio stations in Australia in the early 1050s. It can also come from the sun during a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) event. This we discovered in 1968 when there was a massive power failure in the north east of the US and Canada and a ruptured pipeline in the north west that was ultimately tied to the sun during the sunspot maximum of that year. At that time, most people were not even aware of CME events, but with a world dependant on communications technology, we now sweat whenever we here of a CME coming our way from the sun to the earth. A lot was learned from these various events. Initially, we thought that it could only be done with H-bombs, but by understanding the Compton Effect, first described in 1920, and causing a near instantaneous burst of intense electromagnetic radiation, we learned how to do it with conventional explosives and surges generated by suitable electrical equipment. By now, we can create it using conventional explosives, or high powered electrical discharges in a powerful electrical surge over a period of nanoseconds. We have also learned how to concentrate this energy burst in a highly concentrated and directional manner. With this, we can now pinpoint a specific target instead of taking everything out whether we wanted to or not in a radial pattern from the point of emission. Now the emission can be targeted like a laser beam.


EMP works somewhat like induction where a pulse of current is captured by a closed circuit. Only in this case, it is analogous to overloading and blowing an amplifier, only in an electrical circuit or more specifically, electronic devices. The sudden pulse of current overwhelms the device and literally melts the circuitry rendering it useless. In the case of computers, cell phones and other such devices, where everything is designed for small amounts of electromagnetic energy, a sudden surge measuring in the tens of thousands of volts and amperes is enough to melt the entire device and even start fires that will bring down the rest of the infrastructure that is non electrical. EMP bombs mounted on cruise missiles were used in Desert Storm in 1991 to "soften" the principle target, Baghdad, in Iraq.


Just as we can focus electromagnetic radiation in a laser and focus sound beams in a LPAD crowd control device, there is no doubt that an electromagnetic pulse can be similarly focused in a narrow and coherent beam against small targets like incoming missile and jet assaults. This is done using a parabolic reflector, so that noting is harmed except in the direct path of the beam. Having a beamed device of this sort means that there are little in the way of transmission losses as the beam is "coherent" instead of spreading out. In a beam of this type, there is no square of the distance falling off of the energy, so the beam is effective a thousand miles away as it is locally for a region within eyesight. With a beam, specific targets can be selected, while the rest is left unharmed.


EMP generators can produce pulses of electromagnetic energy that can destroy the sensitive electronics in computers, microprocessors and electronic controls. Destabilized EMP circuits can produce multi=megawatt pulses by using an explosive wire disruptive switch. These high power pulses can be coupled into antennas, conic sections, horns, parabolic reflectors, etc for very directional effects. The fact that antennas can be used suggest that EMP can be tuned to specific frequencies for specific targets, while leaving unharmed anything that is off frequency and non resonant. Research is currently being undertaken to disable vehicles at a distance with the police or military using beamed EMP devices, thus avoiding dangerous high speed chases. The trick is to generate a high enough power pulse to fry the electronic control processors and rendering the rest of the vehicle inoperative. This is a lot simpler if the vehicle is covered in plastic or fibre glass rather than metal. As newer vehicles are made of composite materials, this renders them more susceptible than older ones that use sheet steel or aluminium. The shielding of the metal body offers a challenge to the researcher to develop a practical system. This shielding is also known as a Faraday cage that absorbs such pulses and deflects them from the sensitive electronics inside. However, for a Faraday cage to be completely defective, it needs to be grounded, which is not always possible, especially for an aircraft that must have other means of dissipating the energy harmlessly or channelling it around the vehicle envelope, A system could be built that would penetrate metal but this is costly, cumbersome and produces collateral damage to friendly targets. In such cases, it might be better to first penetrate the envelope with a high intensity laser fallowed by an EMP burst in the same path.


Basic components


Scyllac Type 1.3 Microfarad 100,000 Volt Energy Storage Capacitor: This is the holy grail of high energy fast discharge capacitors. These large units are the dream components of many high voltage, high energy experimenters. The capacitor is rated 1.3 mfd at 100,000 volts at a 60,000 amp discharge capability. Ultra low inductance is excellent for shock pulsers, wire exploding, EMP generation, neutron generation, etc.. These capacitors are used but are guaranteed to output between 80 and 90% of their original ratings. Units measure 14"L x 11"W x 25"H and weigh 220 pounds with ground ring terminations.

Antenna, Cone or Parabolic reflector: This is mounted on the business end of the device and it collects most of the pulse from the point source that is radiated outward in all directions. The parabolic design is set with the emitter at the focus deep in the reflector. This way most of the beams bounce off the reflector and are directed out from it in a parallel manner. What "leakage" there is comes from the emitter and is not reflected will be insufficient at distance to cause damage away from the beam. Proper design will reduce this to near zero, even at close range.

Switch, either triggered or remote controlled: For the hand held unit, the trigger is a basic switch that closes the circuit and iniates the rapid discharge of the capacitor that dumps all of its stored energy into the circuit at the same time and thus creates the EMP capable of destroying other circuits at a distance via induction. The remote controlled switch is triggered from a ground or satellite signal and does the same thing. This is useful on "more than a single use" device that can be brought back for a recharge and deployed again. For the single use bomb, the switch triggers an explosive that acts on a heavy duty coil to create the EMP surge.

The circuit: consists of heavy duty copper cable capable of handling the kind of electrical surge over a period of a few nanoseconds without melting. It incorporates the capacitor and the switch.

The charger or charge connection: The purpose of the charger is to store vast amounts of potential electrical energy into the capacitor bank where it remains until the circuit switch is closed. The Charger is usually not in the remote controlled EMP device, but on ground models there may be a semi-permanent connection between the charger and the capacitor bank of the device.

Sighting scope or laser pointer: For a beamed defensive weapon, the scope is essential and must be lined with the beam of the weapon when fired. As EMP propagates at the velocity of light, sighting the target accurately at the moment of discharge is all that is required to effect almost instantaneous results. An alternative is to couple a laser pointer that is aligned with the weapon beam.

Superstructure: This is the frame that holds all the pieces together as a working whole. The superstructure could be a flying drone or a rifle like configuration. It could even be a satellite that is charged by solar panels and ready to fire at a moments notice.


EMP bombs started popping up in headlines only recently (1991), but the concept of EMP weaponry has been around for a long time, virtually from the moment of discovery. From the 1960s through to the 1980s, the United States was most concerned with the possibility of a nuclear based EMP attack from a low earth orbit position. This idea dates back to nuclear weapons research from the 1950s. In 1958, American tests of hydrogen bombs yielded some surprising results.


Researchers concluded that the electrical disturbance was due to the Compton effect, theorized by physicist Arthur Compton in 1925. Compton's assertion was that photons of electromagnetic energy could knock loose electrons from atoms with low atomic numbers (based on Einstein's earlier work on the photoelectric effect). In a 1958 test, researchers concluded, the photons from the blast's intense gamma radiation knocked a large number of electrons free from oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the atmosphere. This flood of electrons interacted with the Earth's magnetic field to create a violently fluctuating electric current, which induced a powerful magnetic field. We have since learned that a solar coronal mass ejection (CME) can have the exact same effect, only directly on the geomagentosphere by causing it to fluctuate and vibrate violently and thus generating induction in any long conductor. The resulting electromagnetic pulse induces intense electrical currents in all conductive materials over a wide area such as pipelines, railway tracks, power lines and any other continuous structure including metal fencing around large ranch holdings. The effect can be so intense as to cause not only blackouts but bursting of pipelines, fracturing of rails and arcing from long fences that start wild fires.

During the cold war with the former USSR, the U.S. intelligence service feared the Soviet Union would launch a nuclear missile and detonate it some 50 kilometres (30 miles) above the US to achieve the same effect on a larger scale. They feared that the resulting electromagnetic burst would knock out electrical equipment across the United States. This was to be proven fact in 1991 in Iraq where the first wartime use of EMP was deployed.

Such an atomic attack is a possibility, even from a terrorist who has the means that employs little more than 1940s technology, but this is no longer the United States' main concern. Today, U.S. intelligence is giving non nuclear EMP devices, such as EMP bombs, much more attention as these are even more easily fabricated even from spare parts and war surplus items. These weapons wouldn't affect as wide an area, because they wouldn't blast photons so high above the Earth. But they could be used to create total blackouts on a more local level such as in Baghdad in 1991.
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
CROSS POSTED

Wave Guided Pulse Electromagnetic Pulse Beam


Wave Guided Pulse Electromagnetic Pulse Beam



There are at least three sources of electromagetic pulse and two of them are man made

Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP); is a force that we learned to recon with quite by accident in the early days of atomic testing on Christmas Island and Eniwetok. The discovery was made when H-bombs were detonated and put out street lights several hundred miles away in Hawaii and affected radio stations in Australia in the early 1050s. It can also come from the sun during a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) event. This we discovered in 1968 when there was a massive power failure in the north east of the US and Canada and a ruptured pipeline in the north west that was ultimately tied to the sun during the sunspot maximum of that year. At that time, most people were not even aware of CME events, but with a world dependant on communications technology, we now sweat whenever we here of a CME coming our way from the sun to the earth. A lot was learned from these various events. Initially, we thought that it could only be done with H-bombs, but by understanding the Compton Effect, first described in 1920, and causing a near instantaneous burst of intense electromagnetic radiation, we learned how to do it with conventional explosives and surges generated by suitable electrical equipment. By now, we can create it using conventional explosives, or high powered electrical discharges in a powerful electrical surge over a period of nanoseconds. We have also learned how to concentrate this energy burst in a highly concentrated and directional manner. With this, we can now pinpoint a specific target instead of taking everything out whether we wanted to or not in a radial pattern from the point of emission. Now the emission can be targeted like a laser beam.


EMP works somewhat like induction where a pulse of current is captured by a closed circuit. Only in this case, it is analogous to overloading and blowing an amplifier, only in an electrical circuit or more specifically, electronic devices. The sudden pulse of current overwhelms the device and literally melts the circuitry rendering it useless. In the case of computers, cell phones and other such devices, where everything is designed for small amounts of electromagnetic energy, a sudden surge measuring in the tens of thousands of volts and amperes is enough to melt the entire device and even start fires that will bring down the rest of the infrastructure that is non electrical. EMP bombs mounted on cruise missiles were used in Desert Storm in 1991 to "soften" the principle target, Baghdad, in Iraq.


Just as we can focus electromagnetic radiation in a laser and focus sound beams in a LPAD crowd control device, there is no doubt that an electromagnetic pulse can be similarly focused in a narrow and coherent beam against small targets like incoming missile and jet assaults. This is done using a parabolic reflector, so that noting is harmed except in the direct path of the beam. Having a beamed device of this sort means that there are little in the way of transmission losses as the beam is "coherent" instead of spreading out. In a beam of this type, there is no square of the distance falling off of the energy, so the beam is effective a thousand miles away as it is locally for a region within eyesight. With a beam, specific targets can be selected, while the rest is left unharmed.


EMP generators can produce pulses of electromagnetic energy that can destroy the sensitive electronics in computers, microprocessors and electronic controls. Destabilized EMP circuits can produce multi=megawatt pulses by using an explosive wire disruptive switch. These high power pulses can be coupled into antennas, conic sections, horns, parabolic reflectors, etc for very directional effects. The fact that antennas can be used suggest that EMP can be tuned to specific frequencies for specific targets, while leaving unharmed anything that is off frequency and non resonant. Research is currently being undertaken to disable vehicles at a distance with the police or military using beamed EMP devices, thus avoiding dangerous high speed chases. The trick is to generate a high enough power pulse to fry the electronic control processors and rendering the rest of the vehicle inoperative. This is a lot simpler if the vehicle is covered in plastic or fibre glass rather than metal. As newer vehicles are made of composite materials, this renders them more susceptible than older ones that use sheet steel or aluminium. The shielding of the metal body offers a challenge to the researcher to develop a practical system. This shielding is also known as a Faraday cage that absorbs such pulses and deflects them from the sensitive electronics inside. However, for a Faraday cage to be completely defective, it needs to be grounded, which is not always possible, especially for an aircraft that must have other means of dissipating the energy harmlessly or channelling it around the vehicle envelope, A system could be built that would penetrate metal but this is costly, cumbersome and produces collateral damage to friendly targets. In such cases, it might be better to first penetrate the envelope with a high intensity laser fallowed by an EMP burst in the same path.


Basic components


Scyllac Type 1.3 Microfarad 100,000 Volt Energy Storage Capacitor: This is the holy grail of high energy fast discharge capacitors. These large units are the dream components of many high voltage, high energy experimenters. The capacitor is rated 1.3 mfd at 100,000 volts at a 60,000 amp discharge capability. Ultra low inductance is excellent for shock pulsers, wire exploding, EMP generation, neutron generation, etc.. These capacitors are used but are guaranteed to output between 80 and 90% of their original ratings. Units measure 14"L x 11"W x 25"H and weigh 220 pounds with ground ring terminations.

Antenna, Cone or Parabolic reflector: This is mounted on the business end of the device and it collects most of the pulse from the point source that is radiated outward in all directions. The parabolic design is set with the emitter at the focus deep in the reflector. This way most of the beams bounce off the reflector and are directed out from it in a parallel manner. What "leakage" there is comes from the emitter and is not reflected will be insufficient at distance to cause damage away from the beam. Proper design will reduce this to near zero, even at close range.

Switch, either triggered or remote controlled: For the hand held unit, the trigger is a basic switch that closes the circuit and iniates the rapid discharge of the capacitor that dumps all of its stored energy into the circuit at the same time and thus creates the EMP capable of destroying other circuits at a distance via induction. The remote controlled switch is triggered from a ground or satellite signal and does the same thing. This is useful on "more than a single use" device that can be brought back for a recharge and deployed again. For the single use bomb, the switch triggers an explosive that acts on a heavy duty coil to create the EMP surge.

The circuit: consists of heavy duty copper cable capable of handling the kind of electrical surge over a period of a few nanoseconds without melting. It incorporates the capacitor and the switch.

The charger or charge connection: The purpose of the charger is to store vast amounts of potential electrical energy into the capacitor bank where it remains until the circuit switch is closed. The Charger is usually not in the remote controlled EMP device, but on ground models there may be a semi-permanent connection between the charger and the capacitor bank of the device.

Sighting scope or laser pointer: For a beamed defensive weapon, the scope is essential and must be lined with the beam of the weapon when fired. As EMP propagates at the velocity of light, sighting the target accurately at the moment of discharge is all that is required to effect almost instantaneous results. An alternative is to couple a laser pointer that is aligned with the weapon beam.

Superstructure: This is the frame that holds all the pieces together as a working whole. The superstructure could be a flying drone or a rifle like configuration. It could even be a satellite that is charged by solar panels and ready to fire at a moments notice.


EMP bombs started popping up in headlines only recently (1991), but the concept of EMP weaponry has been around for a long time, virtually from the moment of discovery. From the 1960s through to the 1980s, the United States was most concerned with the possibility of a nuclear based EMP attack from a low earth orbit position. This idea dates back to nuclear weapons research from the 1950s. In 1958, American tests of hydrogen bombs yielded some surprising results.


Researchers concluded that the electrical disturbance was due to the Compton effect, theorized by physicist Arthur Compton in 1925. Compton's assertion was that photons of electromagnetic energy could knock loose electrons from atoms with low atomic numbers (based on Einstein's earlier work on the photoelectric effect). In a 1958 test, researchers concluded, the photons from the blast's intense gamma radiation knocked a large number of electrons free from oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the atmosphere. This flood of electrons interacted with the Earth's magnetic field to create a violently fluctuating electric current, which induced a powerful magnetic field. We have since learned that a solar coronal mass ejection (CME) can have the exact same effect, only directly on the geomagentosphere by causing it to fluctuate and vibrate violently and thus generating induction in any long conductor. The resulting electromagnetic pulse induces intense electrical currents in all conductive materials over a wide area such as pipelines, railway tracks, power lines and any other continuous structure including metal fencing around large ranch holdings. The effect can be so intense as to cause not only blackouts but bursting of pipelines, fracturing of rails and arcing from long fences that start wild fires.

During the cold war with the former USSR, the U.S. intelligence service feared the Soviet Union would launch a nuclear missile and detonate it some 50 kilometres (30 miles) above the US to achieve the same effect on a larger scale. They feared that the resulting electromagnetic burst would knock out electrical equipment across the United States. This was to be proven fact in 1991 in Iraq where the first wartime use of EMP was deployed.

Such an atomic attack is a possibility, even from a terrorist who has the means that employs little more than 1940s technology, but this is no longer the United States' main concern. Today, U.S. intelligence is giving non nuclear EMP devices, such as EMP bombs, much more attention as these are even more easily fabricated even from spare parts and war surplus items. These weapons wouldn't affect as wide an area, because they wouldn't blast photons so high above the Earth. But they could be used to create total blackouts on a more local level such as in Baghdad in 1991.
This is a fantastic article. Beautifully detailed. I think I should try making a small one at home :lol: Seems too easy to not try. Anyway, will mark it down as a potential project.

The important part though is this

In a beam of this type, there is no square of the distance falling off of the energy, so the beam is effective a thousand miles away as it is locally for a region within eyesight.

That is why it will be awesome for DRDO to atleast try experimental tests for proof of concept. That yes, the KALI can actually destroy an incoming missile. Operationalizing can come later. But just a simple proof of concept if successful, wow, will some countries start shitting bricks then!!
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
NASA Aims To Build Tractor Beam - Government - Enterprise Architecture - Informationweek

NASA Aims To Build Tractor Beam


NASA is looking into ways to manipulate objects using laser light, a technology that in science fiction films is more commonly known as a tractor beam.

A team at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center has won $100,000 from the agency's office of the chief technologist to experiment with three methods for gathering particles and then transporting them via laser to an instrument, according to NASA. The agency said the technology--which is not beyond the realm of possibility in the real world--is similar to a vacuum cleaner using suction to move dirt to a bag.


Lab applications for the tractor beam technology would be to transport particles, molecules, viruses, and other lab samples to an instrument using laser light. More grandiose applications NASA envisions for the technology are to use tractor beams to clean up orbital debris, the Goddard team's principal investigator Paul Stysley said in a statement. However, that may be a bit of a lofty goal at the moment, he admitted.

"To pull something that huge would be almost impossible--at least now," he said. "That's when it bubbled up that perhaps we could use the same approach for sample collection."

[NASA is turning to the cloud to boost compute resources for scientific research. Learn more about the agency's plans: NASA Plans Cloud Marketplace For Scientists.]

The team has identified three ways to manipulate light to create what researchers think will be a successful tractor beam: optical vortex or "optical tweezers," optical solenoid beams, and a laser called a Bessel beam.

The first approach creates an optical vortex involving using two rings of light, one of which is alternately strengthened and weakened in intensity, according to NASA. This will heat the air around the trapped particle, which in experiments has allowed researchers to move a particle along the ring of light's center.

The second technique uses optical solenoid beams with intensity of peaks that spiral around an axis, which in testing has been used to trap and exert a force that sends a particle in the opposite direction of the light-beam source, according to NASA.

The third technique has never been proven and exists solely on paper, the agency said. While a normal laser beam appears as a small point when shined against a wall, Bessel beams show up as rings surrounding a central dot. In theory, this could allow for introducing a spray of light, which has been induced by electric and magnetic fields, in the path of the object. This spray would pull an object backward against the light beam, according to researchers.

Phase 1 funding for the tractor beam experiments comes from the recently reestablished NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program, which the agency aims to use to develop innovative space technologies.

Indeed, NASA has keen interest in developing next-generation space technologies now that its space shuttle program is closed. The agency recently invested $175 million in three inventions to promote its plans to send manned missions deeper into space, among other endeavors.
 

JAISWAL

New Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
1,527
Likes
1,027
IAF to use laser cladding to repair engine blades

IAF to use laser cladding to repair engine blades | idrw.org
.
.


The Indian Air Force has developed a laser-based process that would enable repair of turbine blades in aircraft engines that would otherwise have to be discarded. Called laser cladding, this process would save crores in foreign exchange.
Blades used in aircraft engine turbines, measuring a few inches in height and width, are made of titanium alloys and cost about Rs 1 lakh each. The repair of a damaged or "rubbed-out" blade through laser cladding would cost just Rs 1,500- Rs 2,000.


The process uses a laser to generate a local weld pool on the surface of the component and a specially designed powder-feed nozzle then introduces a powder composed of a similar material into the molten metal. Once cooled, the resulting layer possesses very similar mechanical properties to those of the original component.


"This is for the first time that this technology has been developed in the country. Laser and nanotechnology are new developments being used in engine reclamation process at less than a third cost," Air Cmde Suresh Singh, Air Officer Commanding No.3 Base Repair Depot, where the process has been developed, said. "We are also going in a big way to re-engineer aero-engine parts to cater to our requirements for spares. This does not imply merely copying the existing parts, but involves design and development from scratch," he added.

An aircraft engine, on an average, comprises about 7,000 components and so far about 200 parts meant for helicopters have been indigenised. The IAF has been focusing on indigenisation when availability of aero-spares became a serious issue in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union. All its base repair depots and technical establishments have been since engaged actively in this field and the IAF has also been approaching the industry for local manufacture. Another new innovation by 3 BRD is development of a device to check spurious fire warning in helicopters.
 
Last edited:

Galaxy

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,086
Likes
3,934
Country flag
India working on laser weapons

India working on laser weapons


25/11/2011

Hyderabad, Nov 24 (IANS) India is doing a lot of work on laser weapons, particularly at the technology level, said a top defence scientist.

'We are trying to see how to produce high power lasers, how to get that kind of narrow beam, how to get miniaturized version of laser power device,' said V.K. Saraswat, scientific advisor to the defence minister.

He, however, said India need to graduate from physics portion to the actual portion of engineering and development.

Saraswat, who is also the Director General of Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), was talking to reporters on the sidelines of 22nd annual conference of Indian Nuclear Society here Thursday evening.

He said DRDO, Atomic Energy and academic institutions like Plasma Research Laboratory and National Physical Laboratory were working together on the physics of laser.

The top scientist said while some air borne laser systems and some mobile systems were developed, a lot required to be done in terms of weapons system.

'It is a complex subject with science getting into engineering, engineering getting into technology and technology getting into product. You have to go through that cycle because nobody is going to help you in this aspect. Our own academicians, scientists and engineers have to work together,' he said.

India working on laser weapons - V
 

SPIEZ

New Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,508
Likes
1,021
Country flag
Lasers are the future of Anti missile systems. Unlike missile's, they can be re-used. With the missiles' already flying at a high speed a small amount of LASER radiation will be enough for the missile to blow up before it reaches the target.

Advantages
1) Longer Range.
2) Reusable
3) Although high capital cost, the multiple re-usability makes it more economical.
4) Accuracy can be sure shot if the missile is properly illuminated by the LASER.
5) the missile would already be flying at a high speed so, small illumination time can heat the external layer of the missile.
 

Dovah

Untermensch
New Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
5) the missile would already be flying at a high speed so, small illumination time can heat the external layer of the missile.
Are we talking about premature detonation or merely destroying the vehicle?
 

Articles

Top