Laser/Beam weapons

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
How scientists turned a living cell into a green laser

How scientists turned a living cell into a green laser


reen Fluorescent Protein (GFP) does exactly what its name implies: when excited by light from the blue end of the spectrum, it emits a satisfying green glow. But its deceptively simple name doesn't begin to convey how it has changed biology. It can be fused with other proteins and made by just about any cell, letting researchers track all sorts of biological processes. Variants have been made that glow other colors. Three people got Nobel Prizes for its development. Glowing animals have even become works of art and pets.

And now it has turned a cell into a laser, although researchers had to put mirrors on either side of the cell to get it to work.

Making something into a laser requires the creation of what's called a population inversion. For most systems, the majority of the molecules present sit in the ground state; only a few are excited to higher energies. To get a laser to work, however, it has to be possible to invert that, and place most molecules in the excited state. That way, when a photon of the appropriate wavelength hits a molecule, it will be in the excited state and not be able to absorb the photon; instead, the excited molecule will emit a photon and drop to the ground state.

GFP, the authors of the new work reasoned, has some properties that make it a good candidate for the sort of gain material that makes a population inversion possible. It can absorb a broad range of wavelengths to put it into an excited state, after which it quickly drops to the lowest energy excited state without emitting any photons; it will stay in this state for up to a few nanoseconds. From there, it can undergo stimulated emission of a photon, which it does with something close to an 80 percent quantum efficiency. Provided a pump can keep things cycling to the excited state faster than that handful of nanoseconds (and the authors have access to a laser that can), GFP should be able to lase.

They started off conservatively, working with a solution of purified GFP protein. (They don't list their purification procedure, but it presumably involved keeping any solutions that glowed green.) A drop of the resulting GFP solution was then placed on a mirror with a hydrophobic surface. A second mirror was brought into contact, and then pulled back until it was a few millimeters away; the surface tension kept the drop suspended between the two mirrors. They then began hitting the drop of GFP solution with a pump laser to keep the protein population in an excited state.

Once the pump laser's energy went above 14 nanoJoules, the output energy "rose dramatically faster with increasing pump energy," and the device emitted a green light that was visible to the naked eye. Instead of the relatively broad emission of the native protein (which can release photons from a variety of excited states), the GFP laser's emission was quite narrow, indicating that most of the photons were being emitted from the lowest-energy excited state. The authors found that they could get lasing with protein concentrations as low as 2.5 microMolar.

And that must have gotten them pretty excited, since the GFP concentration inside cells get into the milliMolar range, quite a bit higher than needed for lasing. So, they took a kidney cell line and inserted DNA that encoded GFP into the cells. They estimate that these cells had internal GFP at concentrations of nearly 300µM, well above the requirements for purified protein. A suspension of the cells was then placed next to two narrowly separated mirrors—capillary action sucked the cells (and some of their growth medium) into the space between the mirrors.

A microscope was then used to locate and stimulate individual cells, which proceeded to lase. This required less than a single nanoJoule of stimulation energy, lower than the requirement for the protein solution. The energy was low enough that the cells survived the whole procedure—when they were done lasing, they could be put back into culture and grown further.

Instead of a single point of emission, however, the cells showed a number of distinct internal areas with intense emissions, and these were often at distinct (though similar) wavelengths. Using a diffraction grating, the authors were able to separate out the individual modes of the cellular laser, and found that different cells created distinct patterns. "The exact patterns and eccentricity of the modes result from the specific cell shape and the gain and refractive index profiles within the cell," the authors conclude. In other words, the light that comes out of the cell provide some information about what the cell is structured like internally, although the authors didn't look into how much you could infer about the cell's structure from this output.

It's an amazing piece of work, and the only thing that spoils it a bit is the discussion. The lasing does provide some information on the structure of the cell, but it's not clear that we can't get even better information from simply imaging the GFP directly, since the protein won't end up evenly distributed throughout the cell. Even more speculatively, they suggest that this technique could be adapted to work inside living organisms without the need for mirrors. This bit of speculation would require getting lasing with surface plasmons to work, which we already know faces a lot of its own issues.

We'll have to wait for the authors (or someone else) to determine if the laser's profile can actually be used to extract structural details that elude more conventional imaging techniques. In the mean time, we can console ourselves with the thought that they've done something phenomenally cool.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
Through Genetic Engineering, a Single Cell Becomes a Laser Gun | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

Through Genetic Engineering, a Single Cell Becomes a Laser Gun

Scientists have created a "living laser," a single cell that emits laser light. Based on jellyfish DNA, the genetically engineered cell could someday lead to laser-armed cells that can treat themselves or other tissue in the body.

Created by Seok-Hyun Yun and Malte Gather from Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, the cellular laser was made possible via the same protein that gives jellyfish their glow, called green fluorescent protein (GFP). Taking mutant strain of GFP, called enhanced GFP (eGFP), that produces an even brighter glow, Yun and Gather genetically engineered it into an human kidney cell. They published their results in the journal Nature Photonics.

Regular lasers have two essential elements: a gain medium that amplifies the light and a optical system of mirrors to concentrate the light into a beam. With the eGFP-infused cell, the researchers had the first part, but for the second they had to put the cell in between two mirrors that were just 20 micrometers apart. For scale, a human hair is about 50 micrometers wide.

Now the cellular laser was ready. Yun and Gather stimulated it with pulses of blue light. At first, the cell emitted only ordinary fluorescence—until it crossed a threshold. Then the output suddenly changed, shooting out a beam of light that was "pure green" in color, higher in brightness, and in a directed manner (rather than diffuse).

"You can see it with the naked eye," Yun told Scientific American. "As soon as it reaches the threshold you can see it. It's a nice green."

Although the laser is weak compared to other lasers (like the laser weapons the Navy is building), a cellular-level laser opens up the possibility of operating lasers within a living organism. Yun suggests to Nature that his discovery could be used to build microscopic laser guns, which could be deployed in a patient to seek and destroy invaders or diseased cells. He says that cells that "self lase" could even be in the picture.

Such applications would face the problem of power and light generation as well as the development of practical nano-scale optical cavities, Yun says, so they're likely a long way off. Until then, the technique will likely be used to study cells themselves. When the light-happy cell emits a laser, the beam passes through the cell several times as it bounces between the mirrors, so if there are any abnormalities in the cell, it would affect the light.

"We are now trying to understand whether we can get any information about this cell through its optical properties," Yun says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrj

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
Raytheon Acquires Directed Energy Capabilities of Ktech Corporation

Raytheon Acquires Directed Energy Capabilities of Ktech Corporation

Raytheon has acquired key business assets of Ktech Corporation to expand its capabilities and opportunities in the non-kinetic effects markets. The transaction is not expected to materially impact Raytheon's sales or earnings in the second quarter or full year 2011. Terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Located in Albuquerque, N.M., Ktech will become part of Raytheon Company's Missile Systems business.

"Ktech's expertise in directed energy and pulsed power make it a natural fit with Raytheon's Advanced Security and Directed Energy Systems product line," said Dr. Taylor W. Lawrence, Raytheon Missile Systems president. "Ktech brings world-class people, technology and strong relationships with the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories to Raytheon and its customers."

Ktech is a leader in pulsed power systems engineering. The company's compact pulsed power systems, combined with its high efficiency magnetron technology, will enable increased integration of directed energy weapons on combat platforms.

Ktech is also a leader in development of linear accelerator technology for government and commercial applications. The company brings its high power microwave, compact pulsed power system design, and RF and particle code simulation capabilities to Raytheon, as well as extensive experience in explosive pulsed power, diagnostics and effects testing.

"Ktech's capabilities will gain greater market opportunity when fused with Raytheon's leadership in directed energy, its global reach and ability to develop high value, differentiated solutions for its customers," said Steve Downie, Ktech president.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
India Looks At Laser Weapons For Air Defense | AVIATION WEEK

India Looks At Laser Weapons For Air Defense


Indian scientists are on the path to develop an airborne missile-intercept system that employs high-powered lasers to destroy missiles during their boost phase.

The Laser Science & Technology Center (Lastec) at India's secretive Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO) has been building up technologies that can intercept missiles early in their flight.

The weapons will also be utilized for crucial exercises by the country's armed forces that will involve space security, cybersecurity and hypersonic technology. These futuristic technologies will be incorporated in the Ballistic Missile Defense system being pursued by India.

Last year, DRDO developed an ultra-compact, hand-held laser sensor capable of giving warning in the form of an audio beep as well as a visual indication to the user of any impending laser threat. The device can be used by infantry soldiers in the battlefield and also can be configured as a helmet-mounted system in a modified package.

Recently, India also tested a laser ballistic missile defense system. The laser weapon is capable of producing 25-kw pulses that can destroy a ballistic missile at a range of 7 km (4 mi.). One of these weapons is the air defense dazzler, which can engage enemy aircraft and helicopters at a range of 10 km.

Last year the U.S. conducted a series of tests of high-powered laser weapons on a modified Boeing 747, the ALTB (Airborne Laser Test-Bed), which directs chemical laser energy to destroy ballistic missiles in the boost phase.

"While these laser-based technologies will take time to develop and be deployed, the DRDO along with Lastec has mapped out the future course of action in these areas," a DRDO official says.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
GA-ASI Awarded Contract for Hellads Weapon System Demonstrator

GA-ASI Awarded Contract for Hellads Weapon System Demonstrator



The HELLADS program seeks to demonstrate a 150-kilowatt laser weapon that weighs less than 2,000 pounds and could be mounted to military platforms as small as patrol ships, fighter and surveillance aircraft, armored combat vehicles, and perhaps even UAS.


General Atomics Aeronautical Systems has announced that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) recently awarded the company a contract for development of the complete Demonstrator Laser Weapon System (DLWS) for the agency's High Energy Liquid Laser Defense System (HELLADS) program.

The contract award follows the successful development and test of the company's HELLADS weapon class unit cell under a previous contract.

"In 2001, GA-ASI pioneered a new concept for electrically-pumped, high energy lasers, and under DARPA sponsorship this technology has developed into a promising new weapon class capable of being deployed on a wide variety of land, sea, and airborne tactical platforms," said Dr. Michael Perry, vice president, Reconnaissance Systems Group, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.

"Under this new contract, we will produce a 150-kilowatt HELLADS weapon system that will be demonstrated against a variety of military targets."

The HELLADS laser concept employs an innovative new approach to electric lasers which combines the high storage density of solid-state with the efficient heat removal of flowing liquids.

The HELLADS program seeks to demonstrate a 150-kilowatt laser weapon that weighs less than 2,000 pounds and could be mounted to military platforms as small as patrol ships, fighter and surveillance aircraft, armored combat vehicles, and perhaps even UAS. In addition to the laser itself, GA-ASI completed prototype power and heat removal systems last year, confirming that the supporting technologies are in place for a complete weapon system.

This latest contract award represents phase four of the HELLADS program. The DLWS will include a 150-kilowatt laser with integrated power and thermal management systems to provide a compact laser weapon system.

Live fire exercises against a variety of targets are planned with the DLWS throughout 2013 at the White Sands Missile Range in south central New Mexico. Current U.S. military plans call for integration of the laser onto a B-1B aircraft following the completion of ground testing at White Sands
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
How long before a pulsed beam weapon??

I am unable to wrap my head around the perceived complexities of a ground based pulsed beam weapon for ballistic missile defence.

We already have the KALI 1000 and KALI 5000. We are in the process of putting together KALI 10000. But do we really need bigger beam weapons. My questions are based on the following thought process.

1) It takes only 300 volts per sq. cm to fry an Incomming ballistic missile. The KALI 5000 is capable of projecting beams several times that.
2) Satellite based reconnisance systems can pinpoint missiles in the boost phase itself, we have this capability, probably superior or at least as good as anyone elses's. Particle beams can be bounced off the ionosphere to take out an enemy missile in the boost phase itself.
3) There is no need of an LRTR, though this may be used as a secondary system if boost phase interception fails.

In my opinion, instead of DRDO's regular approach of refining a system several hundred times and therefore ending up with ridiculous weapons development and deployment times, we should target commisioning of the first generation particle beam missile defence system within 3 years. However crude it is, it still will teach us way more than laborotory experiments and simulated design enhancements.
Further, the implementation of such a system will cut China and Pakistan to size. Their posturing will end!
 

sayareakd

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,953
Country flag
can you bend laser beam in space ??? or in line with earths curvature, that is one of the major disadvantage of such system, therefore range is limited of such system.
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
These are not lasers. Lasers are pretty useless as kill time is high and flexibility is limited. These are particle beams which can be bounced off the ionosphere. Even otherwise interception will be several hundred kilometers before the missile reaches target. Several times more than an ABM like PAD or AAD.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
New Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,606

ace009

Freakin' Fighter fan
New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
1,662
Likes
526
Why not use a coil gun or a rail gun for missile interception? Pulsed Beams will have higher attenuation over longer distances. Also to kill a large enough missile you will need a really powerful beam to knock off the electronic detonator or the targeting module. On the other hand a 10 Mach rail gun or a coil gun projectile can knock off the missile even with a glancing blow.
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
New Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,606
You can also pull up some whacky stuff with a Google search.

Most hits actually are for science fiction articles or relate to computer games like Halo.
 
Last edited:

ace009

Freakin' Fighter fan
New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
1,662
Likes
526
So - later on in that article, they are talking about transitioning a metal conductor into an insulator - probably with a large energy dose from a pulsed-beam. Very interesting, although the model does seem a bit simplistic and I could not figure out what the matal-insulation duration would be.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
This kind of weapon would probably not be made public by most governments??
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
I beleive that Pulse Beam weapons are the key to global denuclearization. This is how.

When Pulse beam wepaons prove to be effective missile killers, the sequence of deployment is going to be

a) ground based system that kill missiles in the terminal or midcourse phase.
b) aircraft mounted systems that will kill a missile in midcourse or boost phase
c) satellite based systems that will kill missiles at launch or boost phase.


Now think about it, in 50 years when satellite based systems can kill a nuke warhead in enemy territory or an SLBM in open waters, what good are nuclear weapons? We are talking about track and kill within seconds of launch.
All this hinges on huge energy requirements for these kill satellites, but 50 years is a long time from a technology perspective - huge leaps in solar power efficiencies, maybe miniature nuclear power reactors running satellites.

But whatever we saw in Star Wars is in the near rather than distant future.
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
I beleive that Pulse Beam weapons are the key to global denuclearization. This is how.

When Pulse beam wepaons prove to be effective missile killers, the sequence of deployment is going to be

a) ground based system that kill missiles in the terminal or midcourse phase.
b) aircraft mounted systems that will kill a missile in midcourse or boost phase
c) satellite based systems that will kill missiles at launch or boost phase.


Now think about it, in 50 years when satellite based systems can kill a nuke warhead in enemy territory or an SLBM in open waters, what good are nuclear weapons? We are talking about track and kill within seconds of launch.
All this hinges on huge energy requirements for these kill satellites, but 50 years is a long time from a technology perspective - huge leaps in solar power efficiencies, maybe miniature nuclear power reactors running satellites.

But whatever we saw in Star Wars is in the near rather than distant future.

how would a transportable power supply be developed?? this is probably the main issue.
 

trackwhack

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
how would a transportable power supply be developed?? this is probably the main issue.
I think its the only issue. Like I mentioned earlier in 50 years I dont think it will be a problem. Miniature nuke reactors, Highly efficient solar panels, all these are options.
 

Articles

Top