And then in the last line you will say I am not giving them the clean chit.
You were saying LTTE went against Indian Army, even mukti Bahni would have done the same if India might have supported their crackdown. Simple logic not a rocket science to understand. When your army invaded the things were supposed to fire back at us.
Sheltering the Tamils was as our duty as sheltering muslims of east Pakistan during 1970s who just 23 years ago butchered Hindus to get an independent nation out of us.
Also this is not how refugee crisis and their management occurs. Go read some book on different refugee crisis. UNO always comes late into the picture first their is
uncontrolled movement of refugees and then they are absorbed by generous neighbouring state who are bound by international laws they undersign to give them shelter and refuge. With SL Tamils's case the sea was the physical boundary and then Tamils were not allowed to enter India because Indian navy subservient of GoI was blocking the sea. What happened has been described by many as Sri Lankan killing field.
I don't need to clear my stand I am clear enough to make people understand what I have been saying, it is me asking you a question if you are preaching Realpolitic or morality ? In both the cases you are not backed by deeds of GoI since history of start of Civil war of SL regardless for how much spin you can give to your words.
You a haven't understood my point, It is central govt. who make decision on national security and foreign policy. People accepted Tashkent agreement of 1965, will accept any agreement of J&K, people need excuses endorsed by central government and then they all will side with GoI.
if any good day GoI decides to help SL Tamils in distress they will do it without thinking twice what other sane minds ('jara hat ke, zara bach ke' types) have to say.
East Pakistan crisis is as equivalent as Civil War in SL was. Indira Gandhi was right on the money to help Tamils get the justice and was aware how Sinhalese would bite India's back well noted during 1971 war. But then fools like Rajiv Gandhi screwed that tempo big time then what happened next was history for all naysayers to giving it a spin of some rag tag wisdom prevailed. ''jo hota ahai achey ke liye hota hai'' isn't it ?
Yes, excuse is all I am talking about. Excuse is good thing you used it once you could have used it again.
You could have secured the borders by checking the obvious entry points of East Pakistan, heck you had trains for east Pakistanis to enter India , don't you ?
Sri Lanka poses no threat to the Union of India.
Same can be said about West Pakistanis, after 1965 battering they were numb for eternity all time busy with their own internal power plays, whatever they were doing to east Pakistanis was their internal problem.
Yes I know, don't forget to mention Indira Gandhi's support to SL Tamils.
She was failed by his stupid son who even made political crisis worst and then escalated in Kashmir which lead to its tagging with civil war in Sri Lanka. Like
@Yusuf; has stated few post above.
India can run investigation to find out the real reason behind death of Indian soldiers in Sri Lanka. No investigation has been done all we know is govt. lackeys throwing allegations on LTTE but not SL government who wanted us to be kicked out fast and bleed.
I gotta go I will answer rest soon. BTW I am a punjabi, what happens in TN and SL hardy effects me.