- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,510
- Likes
- 7,217
aero brakes
aero brakes
I just answered to M2000 and Gripen.You’re talking about a product(MWF) that is not in existence yet. For it to be better than rafale, it’s avionics, EW, engines and radar should also be superior. The one advantage of the MWF will be multiple weapons integration. For it to be truly superior, it needs something equivalent to SECTRA or better.
And selling like hotcakes. Maybe it will do the same.I just answered to M2000 and Gripen.
The other is a paper plane.
The last marvelous paper plane was F35.... not so marvellous in the real life
It is not the plane that is a best seller. It is the uncle sam umbrella.And selling like hotcakes. Maybe it will do the same.
Whether it's the Uncle Sam umbrella or not, problems or not, it is selling and selling well.It is not the plane that is a best seller. It is the uncle sam umbrella.
Note that the FOC is postponed year after year. The basis of the bird are unsane. That's all.
We will laugh in some years,...
Smart thing would've been to commit to a bigger follow on order for Rafales, and increase the order of LCA MK1A's (from 83 to maybe 123) in advance - with staggered payments if necessary.36 Rafales will not be enough for 2 front threat. We need more
F35 is also single engine, and LCA is also a single engine light aircraft still more expensive than Huge Su30mki It’s the era of BVRsingle engine, light, short legs.
Far too expensive for that, no?
The output of an F35 engine is very different than the output of the lca engine( aka F16s engine).F35 is also single engine, and LCA is also a single engine light aircraft still more expensive than Huge Su30mki It’s the era of BVR
there is option for 36 more Rafales but we need to negotiate harder with Frenchies for integration of Meteor and Scalp on Mirage 2000s. Frenchies are sucking us dry with this current deal because they know their weapons systems are the USP.Smart thing would've been to commit to a bigger follow on order for Rafales, and increase the order of LCA MK1A's (from 83 to maybe 123) in advance - with staggered payments if necessary.
Should also speed up the Sukhoi upgrade project and go for 1-2 more squadrons (in upgraded form) to keep the lines running
Gripen and Tejas have much lower RCS (0.1 and 0.5 meter square)than those 40 years old junk called F16 (5 meter square) and Gripen also comes with Meteor just like Rafales Tejas can also be equipped with meteors if we use our own UTTAM AESA Radars instead of Israeli ELTA 2052 Own SFDR missiles are going to be better than meteors I hopeThe output of an F35 engine is very different than the output of the lca engine( aka F16s engine).
Gripen has nowhere close to the radar capability, avionics, ew capability or maneuverability like the rafale.Gripen and Tejas has much lower RCS than those 40 years old junk called F16 and Gripen also comes with Meteor just like Rafales
Rafales are superior to gripens but Rafales are twin engine fighters, But gripens or even our indigenous Tejas mk1A is far superior to F16s , F16 are 40 years old design even USAF wants to replace them Singapore Airforce wants to replace their ageing F16 with F35Gripen has nowhere close to the radar capability, avionics, ew capability or maneuverability like the rafale.
And FYI, gripen is still prototype stage. No combat proven tech.
It’s ground attack role is lacking phenomenally.
Before writing off the F16 as junk, you should know the capabilities of the block 70. You’re not going to learn anything by calling something junk. I’m not saying this to be mean, but it would do you good to learn before belittling something, That should be the attitude. That’s just my opinion and the way I look at things. Cheers!
Like I said. Please read up on the block 70’s. Peace!Rafales are superior to gripens but Rafales are twin engine fighters, But gripens or even our indigenous Tejas mk1A is far superior to F16s , F16 are 40 years old design even USAF wants to replace them Singapore Airforce wants to replace their ageing F16 with F35
You are certainly a well informed person. F-35 was designed from the beginning as a multinational program to reduce costs. The countries operating F-35 had agreed to buy a certain number of jets , then got to make components, small or big , for the whole program. It is similar to the Eurofighter consortium , except that one country has the overall control.Whether it's the Uncle Sam umbrella or not, problems or not, it is selling and selling well.
F16s cost us a lot of prestige last year. Lets not dismiss them like that.Rafales are superior to gripens but Rafales are twin engine fighters, But gripens or even our indigenous Tejas mk1A is far superior to F16s , F16 are 40 years old design even USAF wants to replace them Singapore Airforce wants to replace their ageing F16 with F35
The F-16 Block 70 is quite lethal albeit old but it's packed with very good 4.5 gen abilities. As per Rafale Pilot the F-16 is quite capable and the pilot should be vary. Not to mention, It can deploy the widest set of weapons known from (EU, US, Israeli, Japanese etc.) While it's not suited for India, it's a pretty good consideration for small/medium countries who want decent capability without breaking the bank.Gripen and Tejas have much lower RCS (0.1 and 0.5 meter square)than those 40 years old junk called F16 (5 meter square) and Gripen also comes with Meteor just like Rafales Tejas can also be equipped with meteors if we use our own UTTAM AESA Radars instead of Israeli ELTA 2052 Own SFDR missiles are going to be better than meteors I hope
pakis were trying to get 18 more block 52s and US said no lolThe F-16 Block 70 is quite lethal albeit old but it's packed with very good 4.5 gen abilities. As per Rafale Pilot the F-16 is quite capable and the pilot should be vary. Not to mention, It can deploy the widest set of weapons known from (EU, US, Israeli, Japanese etc.) While it's not suited for India, it's a pretty good consideration for small/medium countries who want decent capability without breaking the bank.
Taiwan deal is a good example with 66 fighters for $8 Billion.
Taiwan secures bargain price for F-16Vs - Asia Times
Taiwan has officially appropriated NT$250 billion (US$8 billion) for buying 66 F-16V fighter jets from the US, and the money to pay for the single largestasiatimes.com
Something tells me, if the Chinese ever go up against the Japanese with their F-15's, or Taiwan with it's F-16's, pound for pound, they're gonna come out very badly embarrassed.The F-16 Block 70 is quite lethal albeit old but it's packed with very good 4.5 gen abilities. As per Rafale Pilot the F-16 is quite capable and the pilot should be vary. Not to mention, It can deploy the widest set of weapons known from (EU, US, Israeli, Japanese etc.) While it's not suited for India, it's a pretty good consideration for small/medium countries who want decent capability without breaking the bank.
Taiwan deal is a good example with 66 fighters for $8 Billion.
Taiwan secures bargain price for F-16Vs - Asia Times
Taiwan has officially appropriated NT$250 billion (US$8 billion) for buying 66 F-16V fighter jets from the US, and the money to pay for the single largestasiatimes.com
F16’s are better than mig21s but Gripen E is far superior to F16. F16 has huge RCS and comparatively short range air to air missiles so in one on one fight F16’s are sitting duck before Gripen E. I won’t make such tall claims about MWF because it’s still on paper but it’s going to be better than F16’s tooF16s cost us a lot of prestige last year. Lets not dismiss them like that.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |