Know Your 'Rafale'

PaliwalWarrior

New Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
844
Likes
319
mirage 2000 tech

yes we will make a sabji/parathan out of it now that it is being phased out world over
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
P2prada, Correct me if I m wrong but regarding MKI ToT we are still importing LRU's from Russia besides the kits for Radars & Engines.
Everything is made in India. Raw materials for the main aircraft come from Russia while spares use Indian raw materials. Titanium forges comes from Russia because it is not feasible to make them in India at lower costs. Meaning, it is cheaper to get the forges from Russia. It is the same with landing carriage, it is made in Russia because HAL couldn't make is at acceptable rates in India. Ejection seat is imported too. Everything else, including radar and engine, is made in India.

As far as ToT goes and the host countries reluctance, a case in point is FGFA where even though we are investing half of the capital we get taken for a ride as per the given link :

Indian Air Force unhappy at progress of PAK-FA fifth-gen fighter | idrw.org
Fake news. Contract cannot be negotiated without transfer of technical documents. Air Chief Marshal confirmed that the documents were transferred.

Fake news again. T-90 contract was actually signed in 2006, not 2001.

Ex Army Chief Shankar Roy Chaudhary's statement in the end of the above mentioned link is very informative since he himself was a tankman!!
Unfortunately, the Arjun was too late. It became pointless.

And the General turned out to be wrong since all ToT for T-90 was transferred.

DRDO had to sort out the gun issue themselves without Russian support coz if DRDO gets hold of the mettalurgical tech than our artillery woes will be sorted out domestically.
The Russians have always transferred their gun technology to us since the T-55. Even the T-72's gun technology was transferred, along with the rest of the tank. The T-90 originally used the T-72's gun which IA rejected. Today, we manufacture the T-90's gun indigenously.

Artillery is an entirely different problem. Bofors ToT was given and now a new gun is being developed.

India, Russia resolve T90 technology transfer issues - Indian Express

Russia to deliver T-90 gun barrel technology | Zee News

Coming to Rafale I can only say wait and watch especially regarding the M88 !!
If we just wait and watch, then contract won't be fulfilled and Rafales will not be manufactured. And Dassault won't make money. The contract asks for indigenous manufacturing of a lot of Rafales. It cannot be done without ToT. If Dassault does not honor the contract for whatever reasons then Rafale production will halt, like it was the case with Scorpene production which halted until MDL could absorb ToT.

It is the same with MKI. MKIs are being manufactured today because ToT was given. If ToT wasn't given then MKI manufacturing would have halted a long time ago. Common sense, isn't it?

It is the same with T-90. A new indent for manufacturing 200+ tanks was given. That means T-90 ToT was also complete. Without ToT what's the point in securing the new order?
 

lcafanboy

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,875
Likes
37,838
Country flag
Mistral row: France risks losing Rafale contract in India
September 5, 2014 Alexander Korablinov, RIR
A leading French analyst believes that France's credibility as a reliable supplier of weapons is at stake if it refuses to send the Mistral-class amphibious warships to Russia.
France risks losing a contract to supply 126 fighter jets to India due to its refusal to deliver Mistral-class ships to Russia, a leading French analyst told the Delovoi Peterburg website. French officials said this week that they will not deliver the first Mistral-class amphibious warship that Russia had ordered as part of a $1.7 billion agreement for weapons sale.
пустым не оставлять!!
Military sanctions against Russia: Who is the real loser?
The biggest repercussion would be a loss of reputation for France as a reliable supplier, Arnaud Dubien, a Russia research associate at the Institut de relations Internationales et Strategiques said. "Officials from the French Ministry of Defence, in private conversations acknowledge that if they fail to deliver the Mistral to Russia, then France will lose its contract to supply 126 fighter jets to India," Dubien said.
Dubien believes that the decision of French President Francois Hollande, to suspend the delivery of the Mistral, is not final, and was taken under tremendous pressure from the United States and Germany. He added that a final decision would be taken by November on the delivery of the warships, and a lot would depend on how the situation in Ukraine panned out.
A source in the Indian Defence Ministry said that India was "watching the developments closely." The source added it was too early to say if this would factor into the government's decision to sign a contract. "When such a large amount of money is paid and then a supplier uses geopolitics to delay or suspend deliveries, it does raise eyebrows," the source, who was not authorised to talk to the media, said. The Indian Ministry of Defence could not be immediately reached for official comment.
Military
Read section:
Defence and Security
India is continuing its final negotiations for acquiring 126 French Rafale fighters in a deal that would cost around $22 billion. France's Dassault Aviation won a bid to supply India with Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircrafts and a final contract is being dubbed as the "mother of all deals," by many sections of the Indian media. Russia, Britain, the U.S. and Sweden have all made attempts to re-enter the race to sell their aircrafts.
Indian Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha told the Hindustan Times that a deal for the Rafale is "going to happen soon." Industry watchers in Delhi however say that there will be growing pressure to reconsider France given the volte-face the country made this week when it came to the supply of the Mistral ships to Russia.
 

Punya Pratap

New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
474
Likes
361
Country flag
Sitaramarao Yechuri7 Sep 2014


inShare
1email
defence manufacturing | defence of india | India France relations | opinion | Rafale jet deal | technology transfer
India is slowly becoming a world power. In the next 25 years, India will have to learn to develop all sorts of weapons technology to defend itself. The technology that comes with the Rafale is just a small part of that bigger picture. (Photo: Joseph Quan on Flickr)
India is slowly becoming a world power. In the next 25 years, India will have to learn to develop all sorts of weapons technology to defend itself. The technology that comes with the Rafale is just a small part of that bigger picture. (Photo: Joseph Quan on Flickr)

The Rafale fighter jet purchase is reaching the final stage after more than 5 years of review and negotiations and the biggest hurdle now is the cost for the 126 fighter jets plus technology transfer, predicted to be almost $20 billion. It is widely believed that if the deal does not go through, then the Indian Air Force will be seriously weakened in the 2016-2024 timeframe. So the prevailing sentiment is to proceed with the purchase regardless of the cost. But is there any reasonable way to reduce cost without weakening the IAF?

Given that Dassault has no foreign customers for the Rafale and badly needs the export orders, careful negotiation could reduce cost, but so far that does not seem to have happened. A cynic might say that once Hollande took over from Sarkozy, the French position hardened on cost of the export. A conservative like Sarkozy may have been business first, but a socialist like Hollande is all about protecting French workers.

So then what are the other factors to lowering cost? First of all, consider what it is that India really wants. Primarily, India wants a credible deterrent to show Pakistan and China. Technology transfer, offset clauses and local manufacturing are actually secondary considerations. On the first days of a war, the IAF is not likely to care about where the Rafale was manufactured, but only whether it works properly and how many squadrons are available. The issues of offset clauses and local manufacturing have to do with boosting the Indian economy and not about defence preparednes and while technology transfer has to do with improving defence capability, it is a long-term consideration.



So now, assume that a war is possible in a few years, what should India do right now? First of all, remember that any decision of this sort has to be made with the full approval of the Indian Air Force because they are the ones who are actually responsible. Everyone knows that the purchase has been delayed by too many years already. So the main goals now are to lower the cost of the purchase, while at the same time giving the IAF 126 good quality fighter jets as soon as possible.

Now, if you think carefully, then it seems clear that requiring technology transfer, increases the cost and at the same time the offset clauses and local manufacturing requirement will delay the delivery of the Rafale to the IAF by several years. So let me ask you a hypothetical question. If the French are willing to deliver 126 fully functioning Rafale to India for a total cost of $12 billion (these aircraft are wholly manufactured in France) and are willing to complete delivery by 2020, would the IAF approve? I think the IAF would be very happy indeed. The French also would be very happy with that idea.

Now, from a long-term viewpoint this approach is obviously not good. Without tech transfer, it is not clear how India can ever develop the capability to manufacture such aircraft on its own. Without offset clauses, none of the $12 billion will be re-invested in India. HAL would be very unhappy with this plan because it would reduce the importance of HAL. But in the end, the main purpose would be satisfied, namely that the IAF will be able to perform its duty to protect Indian skies.

Now, there is actually another side to all this. Even setting aside the cost issue, it is dubious that HAL can actually absorb all of the technology tranfer so well that they can turn around and use that knowledge. The plan right now states that 18 Rafale will be supplied by the French and the remaining 108 will be manufactured by HAL. Would anyone be surprised if HAL announced delays in manufacturing these 108 Rafales? Would anyone be surprised if HAL announced that some of these 108 Rafales are not fully functional because of some unexpected problem? Simply put, the French would not be surprised! Dassault did not want to guarantee that the 108 Rafales manufactured by HAL would be fully functional because they did not have faith in HAL. The Indian Government had to do a lot of arm twisting to make Dassault agree to guarantee all 126 Rafales would be fully functional.

The simple fact of the matter is that when the project is already late by several years, now is not the time for implementing grand ideas. Instead, I think the Modi Government should be realistic about what can be acheived from the Rafale purchase. For now, just concentrate on getting 126 fully functioning Rafale to the IAF by 2020. This is realistic and the French can do it. This does not mean that India has to give up on technology transfer completely. Since India is making such a large purchase, it can impose a few conditions. The technology transfer of a few targeted technologies can be agreed upon and signed now with the project being completely independent of the Rafale contract. In other words, tell the French that in return to make this purchase, India also gets the option to obtain technology transfer at a later date. This is an option you won't pay for until you exercise the option. HAL can use the option when it is ready.

Think of it like this — learning takes time. Why do you want India to learn in a hurry and then do a half-baked job in building the 108 Rafales? Instead, let all the 126 Rafales be 100 per cent certified by the French. The French will be happy and lower the price significantly. The Rafales will arrive at least five years earlier than if you ask HAL to build them. Tell HAL to use the option for technology transfer when it is ready to develop the next generation Tejas. There are also other options to learn. After all, India is also buying the Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 in the future.

India is slowly becoming a world power. In the next 25 years, India will have to learn to develop all sorts of weapons technology to defend itself. The technology that comes with the Rafale is just a small part of that bigger picture. What India needs to learn is not just how the weapons systems work on the Rafale, but rather how they can be made to work on any fighter jet. Believe it or not, it is important to involve private companies and universities in addition to HAL to build a robust capability for weapons design and manufacture. Every major Government lab and every major university should participate in learning to some extent, that is how it is done in Western countries and that is how it needs to be done in India as well.
 

Punya Pratap

New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
474
Likes
361
Country flag
The Russians have handed over all important technologies related to what we manufacture here. MKI, Brahmos, T-90 etc.Dear p2prada please note no matter how much ToT you might want you get what the source nation wants to hand over for example even though we are equal partners when it comes to investing we are getting 13% share in development with FGFA :

Indian Air Force unhappy at progress of PAK-FA fifth-gen fighter | idrw.org

The French have made assurances, like Snecma made it public that 100% of the engine will be manufactured in India.
The French made assurances for Scorpene and yet DCNS is causing delays with supplies...imagine this happening during war time!!

French supplier faltering, deadlines breached; Scorpene may take another hit says defence shipyard : India, News - India Today

China's geopolitics and industry were 0completely different. Their economy is also entirely different.
Let us not come with obtuse and vague excuses such as geopolitics and industry when it comes to emulating our face paced neighbour. The below link clearly answers to the geopolitical excuse sinc eChina no matter how much Russia objects has managed to reverse engineer the Su 30 mkm with its J16's !Link : Russia unhappy about China's production of J-16 fighter | idrw.org

As for your answer to INDUSTRY...I will like to point out your own argument regarding the ToT and what we have done with it till date... As mentioned by you we have full ToT of MKI's and HAL is currently on Phase III of MKI production with highest indiginization but yet we cannot sort out the Kaveri engines. That is a total wastage of ToT specialy if you cannot benifit out of it. As long as whatever skills HAL has acquired out of the MKI ToT is not utilised for domestic production we are simply wasting money! Look at Pakistan which we all agree is a state in utter ruins but they are surging ahead with Shaheen exports to Ajerbaijan and JF 17 marketing while we are still stuck here haranguing. We all know Brahmos has potential to catapult us into exports but BATL is in financial ruins and needs to be refered to the Finance ministry as a sick unit that needs help!

A virtual blame game between DRDO, HAL and our armed forces instead of pooling together their resources and accumen for national interest and best part is we Indians throw unimaginable amount of dirt on each other over Discussion Forums like this for our different point of view..... we call each other the eggspert or the Arjun Brigade!! Have we thought whether our One Upmanship serves our nations interest same as whether the IAF/IA or DRDO/HAL think?? Sorry to say IN Chief Robin Dhowan is right in boasting that IN is a "makers Navy" and will be a Blue Navy even before IA or IAF can become something!! I think the IA & IAF senior brass ought to told by GOI to either get involved to sort out Tejas/ARjun or get disciplined!! If you cannot help sort out porblems than for heavens sake dont add to it!

Yes. They stick to contracts. They have handed over a lot of critical Scorpene ToT as well. They are in the process of handing over critical Mirage-2000 technologies as well, for the upgrade program.
I have replied to this above...DCNS is not supplying essential parts on time for timely deliveries...again I ask what would have happened if it was War time and DCNS was delaying??

The govt has announced that all ToT obligations from the French is already on paper and has been accepted.
What are we going to do with that ToT is my question now....HAL is sitting and sulking for not being involved in Tejas designing same as IAF!! Where is the synergy is my question!

Gun ToT was handed over to India in 2008. In 2009, we inducted the first set of tanks with the new gun. The tanks were ready before that, but IA rejected the tanks because the indigenously designed guns were faulty.
T-90 tank: Technology transfer, supply of assemblies hit Russian stonewall
A decade after Russia contracted to provide technology for building 1,000 T-90S tanks in India, just 150 tanks have actually been built. Pictured here, completed T-90S tanks at Heavy Vehicle Factory (HVF), Avadi


By Ajai Shukla
Avadi, Chennai
Business Standard, 28th Nov 11

India's purchase in 2001 of Russia's T-90S main battle tank (MBT) was touted as a world-class upgrade of our battlefield capabilities at a rock-bottom price. For Rs 3,625 crore, India would get 310 new tanks; a full transfer of technology (ToT) from Russia; and a licence to build 1000 tanks at the Heavy Vehicle Factory (HVF) in Avadi, Chennai.

A decade later, HVF has built just 150 T-90S tanks, hamstrung by Moscow's obstruction in transferring technology and the Russia-built assemblies needed even for the India-built tanks. With India's production line stymied, the MoD bought 347 more ready-built T-90S tanks in 2007, handing Russia another Rs 4,900 crore. Even today, India's T-90S fleet remains seriously constrained; with war clouds looming after the 26/11 Mumbai terror strike, the army told the government that the strike formations were critically short of equipment.

From multiple interviews with officials who handled this contract, and from a visit to HVF Avadi, Business Standard has pieced together the full saga of the T-90S. It is an account of Russian duplicity in the face of Indian submissiveness. Moscow's readiness to disregard signed contracts was recently highlighted through its additional demands for money for the Gorshkov aircraft carrier. But the T-90S arm-twisting came before that; and constitutes a blow to the heart of Indian defence.

The Embassy of Russia in New Delhi has ignored an email asking for their comments on this issue.

Here is what happened. After the T-90S contract was signed on 15th Jan 2001, the 310 made-in-Russia tanks began to flow in quickly from Uralvagonzavod, the Russian facility that builds them. But the transfer of technology (ToT) and the supply of assemblies for building the 1000 tanks in India quickly hit a Russian stonewall.

First it took one and a half years to transfer to India the ToT documents required for building the T-90S in India. The tonnes of documents that finally arrived were found to be in Russian; translating them into English took another one and a half years.

Then HVF officials discovered that Russia had withheld key T-90S technologies without valid reason. This included technology for crucial components like the tank's main gun and a key section of the turret armour. When New Delhi demanded those technologies, Moscow blandly responded that they were secret. To this day, Russia has not transferred full technology for building the T-90S in India.

The MoD has not responded to emailed questions about this issue. But when Business Standard asked MSN Rao, General Manager of HVF Avadi, how the T-90S was being built without these technologies, he confirmed: "We developed the tank gun indigenously in Central Ordnance Depot, Kanpur, and the turret armour component in CVRDE (Combat Vehicles R&D Establishment), Avadi. This is still a sticking point between India and Russia."

That this remains an irritant is evident even from the careful language of MoD press releases. On 5th Oct 11, Defence Minister AK Antony met his Russian counterpart, AE Serdyukov, in the apex Indo-Russian Inter-Governmental Commission on Military-Technical Cooperation (IRIGC-MTC). The Indian press release noted, "Shri Antony drew the attention of the Russian side to the vexing issue of delayed export clearances for vital repair equipment for already contracted weapons systems. This has been affecting supplies of defence equipment and spares."

By end-2007, Russia's blockade of contracted T-90S technologies and components had stalled indigenous production for almost 7 years. Under pressure from the army for more tanks, the MoD capitulated to Moscow rewarding Uralvagonzavod with an order for 347 more made-in-Russia T-90S tanks. Only after this additional contract was signed did Russia begin supplying components for building the T-90S in HVF.

An Indian Army officer who voiced his frustration to his Russian counterparts recalls the taunting Russian response: "Starting T-72 production took you 10 years. How do you imagine that you will produce the T-90 in just 6-7 years?"

Meanwhile the army was struggling with a more immediate issue. In 2002, poised for war with Pakistan, the army found that the newly inducted T-90S fleet was not battle-worthy. The Thales-Optronika thermal imaging night sights supplied with the T-90S --- essential for firing tank weapons at night --- proved unable to function in the blistering desert summer. This remains a problem; in 2008 the MoD approached international vendors to air-condition the T-90S.

"If we manage to reduce the temperature by ten degrees, the performance of the electronics will be improved," says Sudhakar K, Joint General Manager, HVF.

Veteran tank commanders ridicule the idea of air-conditioning a tank. "It would add weight, and consume more power from the tank's limited supply. And what happens if the air-conditioning breaks down? Every tank system must function in the environment of the battlefield," says Brigadier (Retired) Vijay Nair, a former armoured brigade commander.

During that crisis with Pakistan, the army also discovered that the T-90S sights were not calibrated to Indian tank ammunition, which was falling well short of the targets that it was fired at. A panicked MoD appealed to the DRDO and other research institutions to re-orient the T-90S's fire control computer to Indian ammunition. Meanwhile, shiploads of tank rounds were ordered from Russia at great cost.

A simultaneous crisis developed around the T-90S's Invar missile, earlier cited as a clinching reason for buying the tank. But the Invar missiles that came were unusable and they were quietly returned to Russia. On 2nd March 2006, Antony told Parliament, "The Invar missile on T-90 tank is not a failure. However, the completely knocked down kits received for assembly have been found to be defective."

Russia's status as India's premier arms supplier is being eroded by the US, France, Israel and the UK; and by indigenous advances in areas like tank building that have long been Moscow's stamping ground. The recent success of the indigenous Arjun tank; and any progress in developing the planned Future Main Battle Tank (FMBT), would ensure that the T-90S is the last tank that India buys from Russia.

My experience following the industry and the military has made it very easy for me to figure out which information is true and which is false.[/QUOTE
I think you are a well intentioned person who believes there are only white and black in defense sector whereas the fact is there are more GREYS than White or Black.

Plus you need to factor in the fact that the source nation will not always elect a Govt which is friendly towards India...I have posted an article by My Yechuri in my previous mail which clearly highlights the difference between Hollande & Sarkozy!! God forbid tomorrow a Indophobia grips France of the Socilaist hard right get to power they d tell us to go scr3w ourselves!! Again I say become self reliant and stop begging others for critical techs that never come.... I m sure if DRDO/HAL/Defense forces combine their skills and synergise we can sort out our issues.....its just that as long as we have the option of imports we will never make the effort!
 
Last edited:

Punya Pratap

New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
474
Likes
361
Country flag
French Rafale Jet Deal and Opportunities in Defence Manufacturing | idrw.org This sounds like a relatively better idea. In this way we can save some money for indigenous research while addressing the immediate need for fighters.
Already posted -- check post no 3587!

As for the contents of the said article...all I can say it is illustrative of couple of important facts :

1) With the change in the French Govt the attitude has also changed as illustrated in the below mentioned sentence from the article:

Given that Dassault has no foreign customers for the Rafale and badly needs the export orders, careful negotiation could reduce cost, but so far that does not seem to have happened. A cynic might say that once Hollande took over from Sarkozy, the French position hardened on cost of the export. A conservative like Sarkozy may have been business first, but a socialist like Hollande is all about protecting French workers.
This worries me immensely since you never know when an unfavorable govt in a source nation comes to power and stops supplies... God forbid if something like this happens during war time!

2) As much as I hate to admit it, the fact remains that Rafale is getting delayed beyond its usefulness as a numbers multiplier for a dwindling squadron problem of IAF. If it is delayed further for whatever the reason (eg. HAL's ineptitude to absorb the ToT) Rafale will become a white elephant amongst the 5th Gen fighter J20 & Jxx

3) Author raises a pertinent question which we need to ask ourselves ... has any ToT really helped us to become self reliant?? Can we show up something substantial out of the MKI, T 90, Mig 21's etc etc ToT's??

4) Can HAL or any PSU absorb ToT and show qualitative and timely results?? Is it not best to have private players step in instead who have a work culture of " Quality foremost and delivery on time!!"
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
Dear p2prada please note no matter how much ToT you might want you get what the source nation wants to hand over for example even though we are equal partners when it comes to investing we are getting 13% share in development with FGFA :
We don't really know the exact figure. And it doesn't matter, FGFA is a 40 year program, eventually HAL will be tasked with more work later on.

For eg: MKI is set to receive a new radar, new cockpit, new avionics and maybe even new engines. HAL should be able to have a much better workshare. so, even FGFA will eventually need such upgrades, so the Indian content will be very high then.

The French made assurances for Scorpene and yet DCNS is causing delays with supplies...imagine this happening during war time!!
Too early to comment on this. Need more time for the news to be authenticated. Half the time Indian defense journalists fart more than write.

Let us not come with obtuse and vague excuses such as geopolitics and industry when it comes to emulating our face paced neighbour. The below link clearly answers to the geopolitical excuse sinc eChina no matter how much Russia objects has managed to reverse engineer the Su 30 mkm with its J16's
Su-30MKM has not been reverse engineered. J-16 is a strike fighter without canards. It is a reverse engineered Su-30MKK. J-15 is reverse engineered from a Su-33.

Regardless, we are in the FGFA, a far superior program compared to either. It shouldn't matter to us.

Reverse engineering works only to a certain extent.

As for your answer to INDUSTRY...I will like to point out your own argument regarding the ToT and what we have done with it till date... As mentioned by you we have full ToT of MKI's and HAL is currently on
Phase III of MKI production with highest indiginization but yet we cannot sort out the Kaveri engines.
What does ToT have to do with Kaveri?

If TATA bought Jaguar, does that mean Mahindra should also be able to make cars similar to Jaguar because TATA bought Jaguar?

Common sense is the answer. The companies themselves are different. HAL received ToT for MKI. GTRE is an entirely different entity and is actually a sort of competitor to HAL.

That is a total wastage of ToT specialy if you cannot benifit out of it. As long as whatever skills HAL has acquired out of the MKI ToT is not utilised for domestic production we are simply wasting money!
Your ignorance and naivety is nobody's fault but yours. MKI's ToT is only for MKI. We are not going to take the Bars radar and then put it on LCA.

Look at Pakistan which we all agree is a state in utter ruins but they are surging ahead with Shaheen exports to Ajerbaijan and JF 17 marketing while we are still stuck here haranguing.
Fart and nonsense.

A virtual blame game between DRDO, HAL and our armed forces instead of pooling together their resources and accumen for national interest and best part is we Indians throw unimaginable amount of dirt on each other over Discussion Forums like this for our different point of view..... we call each other the eggspert or the Arjun Brigade!! Have we thought whether our One Upmanship serves our nations interest same as whether the IAF/IA or DRDO/HAL think?? Sorry to say IN Chief Robin Dhowan is right in boasting that IN is a "makers Navy" and will be a Blue Navy even before IA or IAF can become something!! I think the IA & IAF senior brass ought to told by GOI to either get involved to sort out Tejas/ARjun or get disciplined!! If you cannot help sort out porblems than for heavens sake dont add to it!
IA and IAF have more indigenous production in India than the navy does.

By Ajai Shukla
A quote by Ray.
I am not too in depth about these so called Defence correspondent since they always seem to have an axe to grind, like that chap who is the AC Col, I forget his name.
'Nuff said.

I think you are a well intentioned person who believes there are only white and black in defense sector whereas the fact is there are more GREYS than White or Black.
I know the blacks, whites and the grays. Your naivety is not my fault.

Plus you need to factor in the fact that the source nation will not always elect a Govt which is friendly towards India...I have posted an article by My Yechuri in my previous mail which clearly highlights the difference between Hollande & Sarkozy!! God forbid tomorrow a Indophobia grips France of the Socilaist hard right get to power they d tell us to go scr3w ourselves!!
The worker unions in France are as powerful as govts. Nothing will happen as long as we don't invade any country except Pakistan.

Again I say become self reliant and stop begging others for critical techs that never come.... I m sure if DRDO/HAL/Defense forces combine their skills and synergise we can sort out our issues.....its just that as long as we have the option of imports we will never make the effort!
You are like a kid who dreams of being the CEO of a large company when you can't even pass 10th standard. I will say it again, your naivety is nobody's fault but yours.

DRDO and HAL need military management, that's the only way to remove imports. A second option, but very risky, is to privatize them.
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
Why would it be risky? I thought it might be the only option viable!
It's because no private company in India is yet capable of handling defense research at the level DRDO is.

Private companies today do not want to commit resources to research at the same level as DRDO, they just want to manufacture post-development.

If you ask them to design and induct a helicopter, nobody will readily participate. If you ask them to manufacture a HAL or a Lockheed designed helicopter, they will all jump in line.

It will take them at least 20 or 30 years of continuous investment in research if they are to reach DRDO's level. Hence why privatization is very risky.

Basically, if LCA was being developed by a private company, they would have shut shop years ago, probably back in 2004 or even 2008. If you have noticed, PSUs continue working even if they make a loss year on year.

At the same time, be it a DPSU or a private company, they want monopoly, like L&T with Arihant, or a competition where foreigners are not involved. If you look at the FICV program, only Indian private companies are allowed to participate along with a foreign partner with a minority stake who will provide technology. If suddenly General Dynamics is allowed to compete, you will see all the Indian companies withdraw because not one Indian company will be able to go toe to toe against GD, even with foreign help.

The military only want stuff that fulfill requirements, they won't accept half-assed products for obvious reasons. So, if a private company takes over DRDO, and they realize that the military is no longer interested in a project, say the Arjun, they will simply cut funding and stop development. But under govt control, DRDO will continue developing the Arjun to make the next iterative model which will eventually help in the development of an entirely new line of tanks like the FMBT. A private company will put an end to everything instead, which is not desirable. DRDO is not at the level of western companies where cutting or canceling a project will kill the talent. So, this poses a huge risk to the future of the industry.
 

Ripples

New Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
64
Likes
26
@Punya Pratap I think it will be highly inappropriate of Indians to indulge into any kind of paranoia given to the fact that during 1999 when India had far lesser economic and political clout than what she has now France exhibited praise worthy support to modify Mirage 2k at short notice to accommodate Israeli bombs. What we see right now in the case of P 75 project is covered by usual opacity. There is no denying that DRDO lies through it's teeth. So blaming it on France may not be very prudent at this moment. This may even happen that this is just a matter of arm twisting by french to clinch pending defence deals without further delay. Without elaborating much i would simply like to state that since early 80's Indian defence forces have been using some very critical french systems. These may not be large in numbers but are certainly crucial enough to provide India with necessary edge over its adversaries and as of now very little has been heard about any unfair play from french side. Therefore with fast growing economic and political clout along with unprecedented US support (which is far from the optimal level and will grow many fold in coming years) it is very very unlikely that in war scenario France will create any trouble for India.

Having said this there is no denying that purchase of Rafale may be the worst misuse of hard cash for a poor country such as India. Spending 20 billion for a stop gap measure is utterly nonsensical. With the passing time I am generating a clear feeling that some how Indians are convinced that China is just not up to what they appear to be. Its my personal opinion that USA is playing a part here by creating a false sense of security among the top brass of Indian defence. The comment of BARBORA was just a reflection of that. The only thing that could justify this MMRCA deal is a firm intelligence that China will take at least 15 years from today to develop j 20 and absorb the system into it's armed forces with effective training and a war doctrine just as conjectured by @p2prada. Even if the MMRCA contract is signed tomorrow India will take at least 8 to 9 years before she inducts most of the fighters in IAF with enough training and meaningful doctrine. This will provide India with a window of about 6 to 7 years of technological edge over China before IAF faces a full fledged chinese J 20 flown by a well trained pilots with enough tactics to exploit the capabilities of this 5 th gen fighter. Again as I mentioned earlier it all depends on how fast China can prove us all wrong. Let me remind to you all that it was USA which was indirectly responsible for the Pakistani attack 1965, since The american assessment of Indian capabilities was highly misinformed and Pakistan took them seriously. How the hell Barbora can make such irresponsible comments in Vayu-Stratpost is anybody's guess but if this is really in the psych of Indian defence policy makers then a repetition of 62 is very much a possibility but only with a much larger proportion and ramification.

Now Talking about PAK-FA, I seriously doubt the Russian capability to successfully handle such projects which is a conglomeration of a lot of extreme technologies in various fields of physics and applied physics. Next generation fluid dynamics and stealth shaping requires huge computational abilities an area in which Russians are steadily declining. India is asking for the technical details but what concerns me more is whether anyone in HAL /DRDO is even remotely capable of understanding that data? Lets see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Punya Pratap

New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
474
Likes
361
Country flag
We don't really know the exact figure. And it doesn't matter, FGFA is a 40 year program, eventually HAL will be tasked with more work later on.

For eg: MKI is set to receive a new radar, new cockpit, new avionics and maybe even new engines. HAL should be able to have a much better workshare. so, even FGFA will eventually need such upgrades, so the Indian content will be very high then.



Too early to comment on this. Need more time for the news to be authenticated. Half the time Indian defense journalists fart more than write.



Su-30MKM has not been reverse engineered. J-16 is a strike fighter without canards. It is a reverse engineered Su-30MKK. J-15 is reverse engineered from a Su-33.

Regardless, we are in the FGFA, a far superior program compared to either. It shouldn't matter to us.

Reverse engineering works only to a certain extent.



What does ToT have to do with Kaveri?

If TATA bought Jaguar, does that mean Mahindra should also be able to make cars similar to Jaguar because TATA bought Jaguar?

Common sense is the answer. The companies themselves are different. HAL received ToT for MKI. GTRE is an entirely different entity and is actually a sort of competitor to HAL.



Your ignorance and naivety is nobody's fault but yours. MKI's ToT is only for MKI. We are not going to take the Bars radar and then put it on LCA.



Fart and nonsense.



IA and IAF have more indigenous production in India than the navy does.



A quote by Ray.


'Nuff said.



I know the blacks, whites and the grays. Your naivety is not my fault.



The worker unions in France are as powerful as govts. Nothing will happen as long as we don't invade any country except Pakistan.



You are like a kid who dreams of being the CEO of a large company when you can't even pass 10th standard. I will say it again, your naivety is nobody's fault but yours.

DRDO and HAL need military management, that's the only way to remove imports. A second option, but very risky, is to privatize them.
Oh well since you insist here is what FGFA is all about :

Is India handing over Blank Cheque to Russia for Pak-Fa Project ? | idrw.org

Go through it with a minute comb and you will find what is extremly obvious is that we are on a joy ride with FGFA. We are funding a 5th Gen project for the Russians who have the majority stake with techs and IP's and even royalty. HAL will not get more than 15% and even IAF has raised concerns about it .... though we are shelling out 50% of the entire cost!! We wont even have IP or get Royalty out of the said investment in FGFA!

As for my naivity the above link answers your opinion.

Secondly about the Scorpene the situation is serious enough for the RM to step in and exert influence.... that is on the record and I suppose your standard arguement (as always) is its all cock and bull!
So what compelled the who incidentally is also a FM to go and check on the Scorpene production line??

When ever a fact is furnished through links to substantiate you have always called it rumours/lies or fabrications! So may be RM never visited MDL!!

As for the points I raised about ToT you still have nt grasped the arguement...... HAL is an independent agency comapred to GTRE which is a DRDO lab but what is the benifit of a ToT going to a manufacturing unit where as the same said ToT is required for accelerating our defense products which are incidentally designed by DRDO! I am arguing again that DRDO should be the design agency, HAL the Lead integrator and get private players to help with LRU's....if this is a naive suggestion than please enlighten me with your intelligence and come up with a suggestion from your own side.
Or are you just good enuff to point out flaws with everything but can never come up with a solution !

Now for the other rebuttals :

1) You said "Fart and Nonsense" for my claim regarding Pakistan exporting arms heres's a report for your consideration (I expect you to call it false news)

Did Pakistan Supplied medium-range missiles to Azerbaijan ? | idrw.org

2) You said IA and IAF has a far higher domestic arms compared to IN...now you are missing the trees for the woods....everyone knows IN is inducting DOMESTICALLY DESIGNED AND BUILT PLATFORMS WHEREAS IA / IAF ARE NOT!! PM & RM are exceptionaly pleased with IN and the frequent visits illustrates that and you will see this happening more and more infact heres' an article to prove :

Navy chief Admiral Robin Dhowan has caused peer envy and raised the profile of his controversy-hit service.

His 100-day achievements include roping in PM Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Arun Jaitley for a string of photo-ops,the induction of INS Vikramaditya,commissionings of INS Kolkata and INS Kamorta and a tour of the under-construction Scorpene submarine line at Mazagon Dock Ltd.

With two more Kolkata-class destroyers being readied for commissioning in the next 18 months,it is likely that he will stay in the spotlight.

Read more at: Navy chief Admiral Robin Dhowan raises his profile in service : Glass House - India Today

Key word here is Domestically Designed Platforms which makes you self reliant whereas the said ToT's we have had has only given us screwdriveri license!

3) Now Your naivity is astonishing since you are turning my arguement on its head by giving the M&M v/s TATA example. Your argument is like comparing chalk and cheese where as the point is what is the use of a ToT which is limited to producing a single series be it MKI/Mig 21 or T90? All you have learnt is how to manufacture those foreign arms but have nothing to show when it comes to those said ToT's helping us produce our own!! All you done is financed a project for a foreign country such as MKI which is proving a very profitable export material.

4) A non entity called Ray has more weight age than a long time defense industry insider called Ajai Shukla?? Impressive argument p2prada you have left me speechless!!
 

Zebra

New Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
Our PSUs are not that bad. Basically they are companies owned by govt itself. Let them work like a company and not like a government department.

Appoint someone who can lead them as a CEO leads the company.

Modi proved it in Gujarat. He improved major state PSUs as one of the 'Fortune India 500' list.

5 Gujarat PSUs in Fortune India 500 list | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis

Let him do it at all India level in our central govt's PSUs.

It may help.
 

Zebra

New Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
Few of French govt / state owned (full or partly owned) companies.....(just bcz this is a French Rafale thread, I took France as an example)

Areva
Nexter
Peugeot
Airbus/EADS
Safran
Renault
Thales
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
So what you are pointing out to is that Rafale does nt have any edge over Su35??

Since we know China is going to buy Su35 ... Rafale shall get shot out of the sky even before it can detect the Su35 !!

Mighty fine waste of 22 Billion Us$ and mighty fine thinking on the part of Chinese who thought of buying the Su35 at a cheaper price than Rafale per unit to counter the IAF Rafales'

So much for not putting all eggs in one basket theory ... Lets not buy Russian any more but lets get our A$$ kicked by PLAAF Russian fighters !!
This much is common knowledge.
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
Few of French govt / state owned (full or partly owned) companies.....(just bcz this is a French Rafale thread, I took France as an example)

Areva
Nexter
Peugeot
Airbus/EADS
Safran
Renault
Thales
Only indian DRDO is dud. A french firm fitting the smallest ASEA radar on the costliest 4.5th gen fighter is always brilliant.

It is only the stupid DRDO which fits a larger radar on a smaller fighter like tejas and destroys the IAF.
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
Mistral row: France risks losing Rafale contract in India
September 5, 2014 Alexander Korablinov, RIR
A leading French analyst believes that France's credibility as a reliable supplier of weapons is at stake if it refuses to send the Mistral-class amphibious warships to Russia.
France risks losing a contract to supply 126 fighter jets to India due to its refusal to deliver Mistral-class ships to Russia, a leading French analyst told the Delovoi Peterburg website. French officials said this week that they will not deliver the first Mistral-class amphibious warship that Russia had ordered as part of a $1.7 billion agreement for weapons sale.
пустым не оставлять!!
Military sanctions against Russia: Who is the real loser?
The biggest repercussion would be a loss of reputation for France as a reliable supplier, Arnaud Dubien, a Russia research associate at the Institut de relations Internationales et Strategiques said. "Officials from the French Ministry of Defence, in private conversations acknowledge that if they fail to deliver the Mistral to Russia, then France will lose its contract to supply 126 fighter jets to India," Dubien said.
Dubien believes that the decision of French President Francois Hollande, to suspend the delivery of the Mistral, is not final, and was taken under tremendous pressure from the United States and Germany. He added that a final decision would be taken by November on the delivery of the warships, and a lot would depend on how the situation in Ukraine panned out.
A source in the Indian Defence Ministry said that India was "watching the developments closely." The source added it was too early to say if this would factor into the government's decision to sign a contract. "When such a large amount of money is paid and then a supplier uses geopolitics to delay or suspend deliveries, it does raise eyebrows," the source, who was not authorised to talk to the media, said. The Indian Ministry of Defence could not be immediately reached for official comment.
Military
Read section:
Defence and Security
India is continuing its final negotiations for acquiring 126 French Rafale fighters in a deal that would cost around $22 billion. France's Dassault Aviation won a bid to supply India with Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircrafts and a final contract is being dubbed as the "mother of all deals," by many sections of the Indian media. Russia, Britain, the U.S. and Sweden have all made attempts to re-enter the race to sell their aircrafts.
Indian Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha told the Hindustan Times that a deal for the Rafale is "going to happen soon." Industry watchers in Delhi however say that there will be growing pressure to reconsider France given the volte-face the country made this week when it came to the supply of the Mistral ships to Russia.
There is no way we can place france above russia in reliability list.

Other than big MMRCA daddies of IAF, everyone else in the world knows this.


They have a panting urge to deposit 20 billion dollar in Dassault account knowing this full well.

Eventhough Tejas has an american engine in a decade's time it can certainly replaced by an improved kaveri version and the engine tech that will be developed for AMCA can be used to design an engine to replace both GE-404 and 414 in tejas mk1 and mk2.SO atleast from 2025 we will have a substantial portion of our air fleet free from foreign influence(provided the 20 billion dollar for rafale is diverted to 300 plus tejas mk1 and mk2 and new engine tech effort with nationwide participation ).

It is pertinent to note that china will reach the same position with WS series of engine development by 2025 , freeing most of its fleet from foreign influence. By losing this chance we are confirming our position as no-1 client state for the next two decades.

With Rafale we have no such options.
 
Last edited:

Articles

Top