SARTHAK
Regular Member
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2020
- Messages
- 632
- Likes
- 1,326
irst is very obvious ,low band jammers i think would be internal rather than pods ,aren't rwr already there?
irst is very obvious ,low band jammers i think would be internal rather than pods ,aren't rwr already there?
Spectra don't naturally cover these low bands. It's a previous add on.irst is very obvious ,low band jammers i think would be internal rather than pods ,aren't rwr already there?
----------------------------------------------------No, it's not the last 3.
One remains in France and will be delivered in march or april.
Thanks a lot. I am eager to see all the remaining Rafales Arrive in India.As when you ordered the first batch, after Egypt and Qatar !
I just hope for you Indonesia not ink a deal soon....
As for now, 35 are on your soil !----------------------------------------------------
Thanks a lot. I am eager to see all the remaining Rafales Arrive in India.
Merci
35? I thought the Actual number present with the IAF was 33. I guess I am confusing something with regards to ISE Rafale. Let's see. I am eager to see the last Rafale Arrive in India.As for now, 35 are on your soil !
I was hearing this rumors for past some times. We are looking at ELL-8251SB Scorpius - SJ AESA Support Jammer System (SJS) for past some time.are we gonna integrate israel's electronic attack pods ??
skyshield
there is a news coming regarding this.
Most jammers are ineffective against AESA that have agile frequency hopping and high power output. This ELTA jammer is itself an AESA based jammer but it doesn't mean it can jam all AESA radars.The problem is our current generation of jammers are not particularly effective against AESA Radar and seekers.
For all talk of Spectra EW suite, its appears to be quite ineffective against AESA radar or seeker.Most jammers are ineffective against AESA that have agile frequency hopping and high power output. This ELTA jammer is itself an AESA based jammer but it doesn't mean it can jam all AESA radars.
Jamming is based on two principles: one is deception and second is noise. Deception jamming is basically sending wrong signal back to emitter to confuse it. It works well with pulse Doppler radars that cannot change its frequency too much or too rapidly. But AESA can hop frequency unlimited times! So deception jamming is extremely difficult.
The second option is noise jamming which is basically saturating entire spectrum with excessive "EM noise" to obscure all signals. Unfortunately, AESA radars with enough power can guide missiles with "home-on-jam" ability and "burn through" noise to attack noise emitting jammers. A powerful SAM system with large AESA would do just that.
I don't know the details of this particular jammer but it probably (I hope) employs the second technique with powerful beam to block all operating frequencies of hostile AESA (noise jamming). If the power of hostile radar overwhelms the jammer, it will be exposed. Deception jamming is just too difficult against AESA threats.
As far as I know last one is N°20are there any new fox 3 rafale magazine editions for 2021
Do you have any source to backup the claim. AFAIK their is no current program officially underway. We are still validating our Uttam AESA and our AESA seeker.drdo is already developing AESA GaN jaming pods and radars so we not much far away
We are waiting a confirmation from our defense minister, during the following days trip in Indonesia.Indonesia, the new customer ?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 6 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |