gokulakannan
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2009
- Messages
- 159
- Likes
- 2
^^^ i think the problem is supplying of high current(one gigawatt)is a major challenge for us.
The problem is not supplying the high current but of weaponizing the system, making it compact and mobile enough to be used in different locations. No news has been released fo almost 10 years about this weapon, many of these issues may possibly have even been solved and it may even be ready to go??^^^ i think the problem is supplying of high current(one gigawatt)is a major challenge for us.
i got this link when googlingIs USA the only country in the world to have weapons that release laser to destroy incoming missiles?
What are other nations beside USA and India that have been trying to develop such weapons...Russia? China?
I think this might me a rumor, but they have a robust program for the use of ground laser temporarily blinding satellites.it was rumored to that a chinese ground laser etched something in Chinese on a US satellite don't know how true this is??
Do we need to make the Kali mobile? why not have fixed sites along the eastern and western borders which can be attached with military bases for higher security.The KALI would be used primarily as an air-defense weapon so if we keep it in bases close to the border it would still serve it's purpose.The problem is not supplying the high current but of weaponizing the system, making it compact and mobile enough to be used in different locations. No news has been released fo almost 10 years about this weapon, many of these issues may possibly have even been solved and it may even be ready to go??
The Russians had a well developed High energy laser program in soviet times today however i believe the program (like many other soviet era programs ) has fallen into decay,many of the program scientists left Russia to work in china or the U.S (depending on who was paying more)this helped the rapid development of american and Chinese systems immensely. they even had a truck mounted laser .i'm posting some pics from both the Russian and american programs below.Is USA the only country in the world to have weapons that release laser to destroy incoming missiles?
What are other nations beside USA and India that have been trying to develop such weapons...Russia? China?
we had discussed a naval version long back,actually that maybe the easiest possible version with a nuclear power as the power source like in a aircraft carrier. A mobile version would provide more flexibility and could also possibly augment our BMD. I also like the concept of fitting one on IL-76 and also the possibility of using it as an anti satellite weapon.Do we need to make the Kali mobile? why not have fixed sites along the eastern and western borders which can be attached with military bases for higher security.The KALI would be used primarily as an air-defense weapon so if we keep it in bases close to the border it would still serve it's purpose.
Anyhow i'm surprised none of you has come up with the naval component in any mobile system, a naval destroyer is large enough and can carry a large enough power source to fire a system like the KALI. We could jury rig an old KASHIN class destroyer remove the front SAM batteries to make space for the KALI and transfer all the energy from two of it's four gas turbines to the KALI this would give the kali around 35,000 KW of energy to use, should be enough for some low energy firings.
wouldn't an airborne laser be a high value target for the enemy ? we would have to provide CAP like an AWACS to any airborne laser.look at my last post in the Laser/beam thread it says Indian scientist are working on something similar an airborne version which may also be utilized in our BMD program.
A Klub missile with a range of 3000 km huh?GREAT NEWS!!!
Some guys have already started shivering
India To Counter China, Pakistan In Deep Waters Pak Alert Press
That is obviously a typ-o.A Klub missile with a range of 3000 km huh?
Cut that number down to 10% and you'll get its correct range, plus India is barred from purchasing any missile with significant range.
The author over glorifies almost everything. Yes, India bought 10 kilos from Russia, but Russia also sold China 10 improved kilos code:977EKM.
ofcouse if we can miniturised it and put it in geo stationary satellite orbit, that will be greatest achivement, we need help from Isreal and Russia for this.
That's can be a great achievement saya , if done, and in that case we have the platform , we need the modification, but also in my opinion if we have to miniaturise it for putting it to Geo Stationery Orbit, and regarding our current capability I think we should have a miniature version of 2 ton. That can be uphill but I think may not be impossible.
Regards
The KALI's potential for a military role as a beam weapon has made it, in the eyes of the people, "India's Star Wars". However, weaponisation of the KALI will take some time. The system is still under development, and efforts are being made to make it more compact, as well as improve its recharge time, which, at the present, makes it only a single use system.
There are also issues of creating a complete system, which would require development of many more components. There have also been reports of placing the weaponized KALI in an Il-76 aircraft as an airborne defence system. There is also speculation of using the KALI as an Anti-satellite weapon and as a space-based weapon system, although it is unlikely that they would be implemented, given India's stance on those issues.
If weaponized, it is quite likely that KALI would be integrated into India's fledgling Ballistic Missile Defense program.
Satish , does it mean that this type weapon can not put into the space, how ever if it can be done to place this weapon in minituerised form then what can be the source of power , as I think your point is right that the solar panels may not be enough to power this type of weapon.
Regards
Militarization/Weaponization of space is a big No No as it is against the "Outer Space Treaty of 1966". India is a signatory.It atleast needs a miniaturised Nuclear reactor to fire a weapon like this from space.because you have to cross the atmospheric filter. The upper layers of the atmosphere is highly radioactive. So the power of a beam of electrons has to be highly charged to enter through the upper atmosphere layers. The cooling unit must also be powered. And I dont suppose this can be done easily by all the solar panels. A space based laser is a far more Viable option than this.
A particle accelerator is differnt as it boost the speed of a subatomic particles, its a propelsion device. But KALI on the otherhand is like a radiation generator. there is a difference. Also, every weapon begins with a physical experiment mate.KALI is a particle accelerator used in Physics experiments. It's not a weapon.
Wireless transfer of large power is not fictional unless u havent seen lightning =P.A future derivative may be possible, but wireless transfer of large power is fictional as of today.
KALI is a particle(electron) accelerator. I am pretty sure about it. It is just a very big CRT type machine, the one you find in TVs.A particle accelerator is differnt as it boost the speed of a subatomic particles, its a propelsion device. But KALI on the otherhand is like a radiation generator. there is a difference. Also, every weapon begins with a physical experiment mate.
It's a naturally occurring phenomenon and is completely uncontrolled.Wireless transfer of large power is not fictional unless u havent seen lightning =P.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual uses of KALI | Strategic Forces | 5 | ||
16 Most Amazing Predictions for Kali Yuga | History & Culture | 7 | ||
R | Kali is official | Strategic Forces | 14 | |
Procedure of animal sacrifice to Kali mata | History & Culture | 17 |