for jf 17 it have all type of weapon for air to air and air to ground but their integration still in development stage for eg the bvr missiles s10 incorporated but its effectiveness still in tuning state , but same time jf17 pretty much help full in air to ground mission in environment, where less or none SAM or anti aircraft system present ,as matures gradually, jf17 limitations in its dog fight so it always go in pack's with f16 where f16 take the lion share of job , similarly lca is matured for air policing and interception fighter, even with extended range lca payload limitation keep it as a front line interceptor ( the true mig21 replacement) more than a multi role air craft ..hence lca also have very gud technological achievement and flexibility it can only used in limited deep penetration mode along with su30 mki and other deep penetration aircraft along with tanker aircraft §(current mk1 not up to this job) the flexibility with both lca and jf17 is the both can be used as anti ship maritime petrol role with auxiliary target pods and recon pods becoz both compatible with anti-ship missile lunch , where jf17 anti ship role limited due to its radar and flight control system maturity , lca maritime limited by its range and limitation on available anti ship armaments , thus for both paf and iaf lca and jf17 are medium term stoppage measure where in next decade both air-force moves to fifth generation, mark my wards paf go for j31 v2 conifg and iaf go for su57 ( like mki variant something apart from standard model becoz growing pressure from plaf j20 and paf j30 developments )
