- Joined
- Oct 3, 2009
- Messages
- 11,115
- Likes
- 14,530
first place a referandam on tibat and prove that tibat people accept China as there country than you speak about arunachal and ladak1. It is not an "aircraft carrier".
2. Japan has had "helicopter destroyer" for decades now.
You show your ignorance here.
This encounter with you is more like a practise in indulging juvenile thinking and ignorance on high levels.
The term "british india" was in reference to the fact that China has maintained current position regarding to the dispute since before India become independent. So much for your propaganda brainwashing of U turn. The relevant source was been provided.
The term Bollywood movies was in reference to your unrelated personal opinion like this:
"but the deviousness used to achieve those aims is very much active"
That sentence didnt even make sense in the context of the discussion. That is why I wondered perheps you spend more time watching Bollywood than reading news. Or how else can you explain that your U-turn? ROFL.
Do some readings, son. It will do you good.
Nice... just imagine Japan flying Rafale M!Leaked photo: General Atomics offers possible Japenese helicopter destroyer conversion into aircraft carrier
https://www.google.com/amp/s/defenc...yer-conversion-into-aircraft-carrier.html/amp
This looks like a CATOBAR conversion with F-35Cs as primary figjter compliment.
It could be a possibility but very unlikely...Nice... just imagine Japan flying Rafale M!
What else would they fly from it... the turd known as F-35C that the USN doesn't even want?It could be a possibility but very unlikely...
Repeating that ridiculous claim will not make it true. The USN is committed to F-35C as it has no alternative to it at the moment. Current 4th or 4.5th gen carrier based fighters will have a hard time penetrating high end ADs like that of China in the Pacific. NGAD is still at least 20 years away.What else would they fly from it... the turd known as F-35C that the USN doesn't even want?
They have the Super Hornet, and they just ordered 78 new ones.Repeating that ridiculous claim will not make it true. The USN is committed to F-35C as it has no alternative to it at the moment. Current 4th or 4.5th gen carrier based fighters will have a hard time penetrating high end ADs like that of China in the Pacific. NGAD is still at least 20 years away.
Besides, F-35C will offer commonality with Japan's F-35As.
"it has no alternative to it at the moment"Repeating that ridiculous claim will not make it true. The USN is committed to F-35C as it has no alternative to it at the moment. Current 4th or 4.5th gen carrier based fighters will have a hard time penetrating high end ADs like that of China in the Pacific. NGAD is still at least 20 years away.
Besides, F-35C will offer commonality with Japan's F-35As.
F-35C will destroy any opponent out there. It just have more problems unresolved being the version with the least order and thus least priority (only USN needs it)."it has no alternative to it at the moment"
Great planning putting all your eggs in one basket
They have the Super Hornet, and they just ordered 78 new ones.
US Navy orders additional 78 Super Hornets under $4B contract
There will be even more orders with the addition of the Advanced Super Hornet. The USN is doing everything it can to stop the forced buy of a turd they don't want.