Assassin 2.0
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2019
- Messages
- 6,087
- Likes
- 30,705
Well see enemies certainly don't need to military march inside the China ( it will be suicidal for a country like US to manage to do that) but in order to maintain influence and strong hold in the region aircraft carriers act as symbol of naval power they are big filled with top end equipment. Americans claim that it's 90K ton of American territory.you really can’t threaten China with only 2 carriers especially full of lots sick soldiers.
no offense.
Well in naval conflict wise let's be honest post world war and post cold war only American navy have deceive know how about maintaining long range logistics and bases.
Americans and others Don't certainly need to defeat China in total war but if they saturate Chinese in a decisive naval conflict it will be enough to humiliate CCP beyond recognition
Third Taiwan Strait Crisis - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Something like this? Maybe? Anyway Chinese navy is big and in boats even match Americans but in quality tonnage it's quite behind but i believe in next decade or so Chinese will be able to field more ships than USA navy.
That is one of the few reasons why Americans focus on indo pacific alliance.
Why China isn't ahead of the US Navy, even with more ships | Brookings
If you want to think about the size of navies, think mostly aggregate tonnage, not numbers of ships. By that measure, for what it's worth, we are still way ahead.
www.google.com
World is becoming interesting.