LME-1100 - ISRO's 100 tonnes Methalox Engine Development Program

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
Use this thread for further discussion on 100 tonnes Methalox Engine being developed for NGLV core only.
@Swesh @Vamsi
Thread for unrelated 2030 kN SCE-200 engine:

Related thread for general discussion of all Indian rocket engines development:

From past:
started developing METHALOX engines in 2019(Pic1,2). These engines may be clustered replace the cryogenic upper stage engines like CE-20(Pic4). LPSC had conducted Cold Flow tests in Oct 2020. It seems there were some more tests in Nov 2020 as well: https://buff.ly/3bwPOey
https://t.co/JZajJ7nA9A
20230521_162049.png

20230521_162051.png

20230521_162053.png

20230521_162055.jpg


I will quote/copy posts of members here from general engine and ISRO general news thread.
FnUT-CVacAEWpFF (1).jpeg
 
Last edited:

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
ISRO's methalox engine tech demonstrator- 20 ton thrust (derived from CE-20). Final one will be 100 ton. ISRO is seriously considering methalox propulsion for the Next Generation Launch Vehicle (NGLV) along with kerolox SCE-200.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
Copied compilation by @RedPhantom:

Newsreader: Liquid Propulsion Systems Centre developed the hearts of PSLV(Vikas engine), GSLV and Mk2(CE-7.5 Cryogenic engine) LVM-3(CE-20 Crogenic engine). Now they are taking up the challenge of making engines for launchers bigger than GSLV, i.e, LOx Methane engine.

Dr. V. Narayanan: Using Liquid Oxygen and methane propellant, we have started a new engine development. A technology demonstrator has been realised and 6 to 7 test (or thrust?) experiment has been conducted using it. He have learned a lot of technology and using this knowledge, are developing a high thrust LOx engine based on the guidelines from chairman ISRO.

Newsreader: The first question is, if we already have liquid cryogenic engines, why do we need a new engine?

G. Nageshwaran: We use liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen. Here we use liquid methane instead of liquid hydrogen in the LOx methane technology demonstrator engine and LOx scientific technology. The primary reason for that is that LNG, which is 95% methane is cheap and freely available. Cryogenic engines can be used in the final stage as well as a booster, so a single engine can be used for designing a rocket.

Newsreader: LOx engine is critical for interplanetary missions.

G. Nageshwaran: Jupiter, Uranus and the far away planets have oceans of liquid methane, which we can harness if we reach there. The speciality of this engine is that we can use that methane to run our engine.

Newsreader: The developments were very fast.

K. S. Bijukumar: Ordinarily, the LOx methane engine is a critical engine. But instead of testing the full engine in the first attempt directly, we tested ignition, which is the most important step. First we ignited the thrust chamber, then we ran the turbines and after that is the part called the gas generator, and after igniting it, we steadied(or studied?) the engine. Within a single year, we were able to realise the entire technology without any failure in the first try.

Newsreader: More powerful and re-usable engines will be a reality with LOx methane engines.

N. Jayan: ISRO is going to develop a 10 ton capacity reusable rocket that can be used multiple times, is very cheap and can compete in the international market, in the next 5 years. The most important component there is the LOx methane engine, and for that, LPSC has started the procedure for designing and developing a 100 ton thrust engine.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
Thread🧵 1/n

RTI reply from LPSC (ISRO's lead liquid propulsion development center).

1. 1000kN methalox engine is being developed. It will be an open cycle (gas generator cycle) engine.

2. No major difference between Isrosene and other forms of rocket grade kerosene.

#ISRO
20230521_163230.png

20230521_163232.png

2/n
3. CE-20 engine will have restart capability in future hopefully.
4. SCE-200 not capable of being reused. I guess that's why they are developing methalox engine now.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
ISRO started the development of 100 Ton LOX-Methane engine for future NGLV & other Launch Vehicles. TD is already tested successfully. Advantage of LOX-M engine is it's reusable & can use as both booster & as upper stages, will replace Cryogenic stage in future Launch Vehicles
20230521_163535.jpg
20230521_163537.jpg
20230521_163539.jpg
20230521_163540.jpg
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
Quoted from main thread.
The question should be what is the advantage of a Methalox engine over Hydrolox engine.
You have to maintain a temperature of -253 degree C in case of liquid hydrogen whereas liquid methane could be stored at -161.5 degree C. So storage becomes a bit easier in case of Methalox.

For every litre of LOX, we need 2.7 litre of Liquid hydrogen, but just .73 litre of Liquid Methane to burn. So a smaller fuel tank is required in case of Methalox compared to Hydrolox.
 

Tejbrahmastra

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2022
Messages
734
Likes
5,341
Country flag

SpeltAsStrength

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
51
Likes
109
Country flag
Wish we could have done it from the very start? Seems like a very logical choice/common sense to use that fuel which is found in abundance, so why didn't they do it? Why every space agency prior to SpaceX was using Cryo engine even though methane was cheaper and its engines reusable? AFAIK methlox engine has lower ISP that cryo, is that the sole reason?
LOX methane engines are often associated with reusable rocket designs. The SpaceX Starship, for example, uses a LOX methane engine and aims to achieve rapid turnaround times between launches, thereby reducing the overall cost of space access. Methane's characteristics, such as its stability and relatively easy handling, make it suitable for reuse-oriented systems.

But Cryogenic engines, typically fueled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, offer high specific impulse, which means they provide efficient thrust for a given amount of propellant. This performance advantage is beneficial for missions that require maximum payload capacity or exploration of deep space.

Also, Cryogenic propellants, particularly liquid hydrogen, have a high energy density and provide extended burn times, making them suitable for long-duration missions. Methane has a lower energy density compared to other propellants like hydrogen or RP-1, which means more fuel mass is required to achieve the same performance.

Both engine types have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the selection is based on factors such as performance requirements, payload capacity, mission duration, cost considerations, and available infrastructure.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top