ISRO General News and Updates

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
Reduction in velocity more than designed parameters would make spacecraft hover or loose orbit.‍:bs:
A landing spacecraft is supposed to lose orbit as well as hover. Design is concerned with the magnitude of speed. If spacecrafts descends with speed more than its supposed to, it fails while if goes slower than designed for it won't.

In brief, velocity reduction rate has nothing to do with design of a landing module.
 

Jameson Emoni

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,473
Likes
4,250
A landing spacecraft is supposed to lose orbit as well as hover. Design is concerned with the magnitude of speed. If spacecrafts descends with speed more than its supposed to, it fails while if goes slower than designed for it won't.

In brief, velocity reduction rate has nothing to do with design of a landing module.
I agree. It does not matter if it lands few seconds later or earlier. Velocity however is very important during the course correction when the spacecraft transitions from Earth's orbit into Mars' orbit. Here if your calculations are wrong, your spacecraft will end up in a heliocentric orbit and the mission will fail completely.
 

G10

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
461
Likes
621
Country flag
Velocity reduction was less hence chandu crash landed due to more velocity than designed. Velocity reduction was not more. Simple engineering.
 

vampyrbladez

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,260
Likes
26,565
Country flag
Velocity reduction was less hence chandu crash landed due to more velocity than designed. Velocity reduction was not more. Simple engineering.
Paki ******s using VPN as usual. Your goatfuck nation can't even launch a satellite. Forget about a moon mission.

BTW in November 2020 Chandrayaan 3 will be launched again with lander. Meanwhile your awaam will beg for timatar!
 

Deathstar

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
2,333
Likes
7,357
Country flag
Velocity reduction was less hence chandu crash landed due to more velocity than designed. Velocity reduction was not more. Simple engineering.
Why dont u design one and do it yourself? Simple engineering....
 

G10

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
461
Likes
621
Country flag
:facepalm::bs: You guys cant follow logic do you. Stop imagining things and get over with paki labelling. Think about what i said in pervious posts.
 

vampyrbladez

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,260
Likes
26,565
Country flag
:facepalm::bs: You guys cant follow logic do you. Stop imagining things and get over with paki labelling. Think about what i said in pervious posts.
****** first learn to use sounding rockets. Then talk about moon missions.
 

maniacguy

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
182
Likes
857
Country flag
:facepalm::bs: You guys cant follow logic do you. Stop imagining things and get over with paki labelling. Think about what i said in pervious posts.
A person who is against the concept of hindu rashtra- dharma - is a paki for us. This is what makes this country INDIA. Anything other than that and we are nothing but a cesspool.
Dharma will rise again and karma will catch up to deserters.
 

G10

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
461
Likes
621
Country flag
Resultant velocity was high at point of impact and that's what's relevant. How do we shove this up in your mind?
Thats what i was trying to say about bull shit reporting. Reduction of velocity and velocity itself are two different parameters. More reduction in velocity than designed will in no way create more resultant velocity.
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
India looking to buy first insurance policy for satellite

The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is looking to buy its first insurance policy for a domestically launched space satellite, the first since it began launching satellites in 1975.

According to a Times of India report, two factors are influencing India’s space agency to begin purchasing satellite insurance. First is an unexpected setback in Project Chandrayaan-2, which cost nearly INR10 billion (US$139.4 million), and second is the success of ISRO’s Mars mission, which brought down reinsurance rates for Indian space exploration activities.

These have prompted ISRO to talk with insurers about the possibility of insuring future space projects, such as Chandrayaan-3, the report said.


While ISRO has not insured launches conducted on Indian soil, it has typically insured launches done in partnership with other countries, such as Russia and the US. New India Assurance and other state-owned insurers were typically those tapped to provide cover for these projects, with reinsurance from the international market.

One such example is the 1982 launch of INSAT-1A, an Indian-US joint venture. Launched in 1982 via a Delta rocket, its altitude control propellant was exhausted by September of that year, leading to the abandonment of the communications satellite. ISRO lodged an insurance claim and received a payout of US$12 million.

https://www.insurancebusinessmag.co...st-insurance-policy-for-satellite-192874.aspx
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
Japan-India to work on Martian Moon eXploration? The way forward for Asian giants after Asteroid Sample Return Program


By Kazuto Suzuki

Hayabusa-2 has completed its work at Ryugu, a small asteroid in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, and will come back to Earth by the end of 2020. This is the second sample-return mission to collect material to see if how planets are made and if there is any sign that life comes from an asteroid. Ryugu is a C Type asteroid that is rich with carbon, so there is an expectation that the sample may contain some sort of organic matter.

The sample-return mission on an asteroid has a lot of difficulties to be successful. First, it is hard to know the detail of the asteroid beforehand. The only way of knowing the target asteroid is to see through the telescope and to guess the texture of the surface, the gravity and so many other things that need to be known to design spacecraft. In other words, the probe design has to be flexible and able to adjust to different landing scenario. Second, because of the distance, it would be difficult to communicate with the spacecraft. For Ryugu, it will take about 40 minutes to send the command and receive the radio. Thus, it would be difficult to remote control of the spacecraft. Everything has to be pre-programmed and automated with a simple command.

It is also difficult to know what is going on around the spacecraft due to the limited bandwidth and delay of transmission. Third, even though the spacecraft requires a lot of fuel to travel a long distance, but it has to be small in order to gain speed to leave the Earth’s gravity. Hayabusa found the solution to use the ion engine to carry a limited amount of fuel. The ion engine is to use an electronic propulsion system that requires a small amount of chemical propellant.

Also Read | Upcoming Eclipses in 2020: Solar and Lunar eclipses within a fortnight to be seen in India twice in next 6 months!

Hayabusa-2 was not possible without the first one. The first Hayabusa was quite a drama. Not only it was the first attempt to return from an asteroid with robotic sample collection, but it also faced a lot of difficulties to manoeuvre. Because of the miscalculation of the landing point, the probe bounced on the surface of the asteroid, which caused the failure of some engines. The mission was rescued by some improvisation of engineers by using the engines in a not designed way. It was like Apollo 13 mission which returned with full creation after an unexpected accident happened. The first Hayabusa attracted a lot of attention of Japanese as well as the world if it can bring back the samples from Itokawa, the asteroid.

Some Japanese cheered the probe by drawing personified spacecraft as a fragile little girl with full of wounds. The efforts of the team of engineers, headed by Prof. Kawaguchi, became three different movies. When the returning capsule reenters the Earth’s atmosphere, it sent a picture of the Earth that seemed to be a dying message as well as strong evidence that the Hayabusa mission overcame the hardship.

Personified cartoon character of Hayabusa.
Such a dramatic ending of Hayabusa, despite the limited scientific achievement, became a national sensation. Also, robotic sampling from asteroid was the first time that Japanese space activity earned the prize of “first in human history”. The first Hayabusa, therefore, quickly became the symbol of Japanese technological success and achievement. Thus, politicians put higher priority for a follow-on program, Hayabusa-2, to secure Japan’s position as the champion of sample return missions.

Lessons from the first Hayabusa, together with political prestige and popular support, were fully reflected the design and development of Hayabusa-2, which leads to the success of Hayabusa-2 so far. It completed to collect rocks and sands with two touchdowns, and also successfully shoot a bullet to create a crater for investigating the inside of the asteroid. It scored near-perfect success on each event, which created less dramatic scenes to attract attention from politicians and people, but this is what scientific mission supposed to be.

JAXA is now preparing for the follow-on program for sample return. However, the next mission is not going to be on an asteroid but on a satellite of Mars which is called MMX (Martian Moon eXploration). Such a new project will create a golden opportunity for Japan and India to work together. India is the first country in Asia and the third in the world to successfully send a probe in Mars orbit. Japan had tried to launch Nozomi (PLANET-B) to Mars but was not able to reach. The experience and technology of India to send spacecraft to Mars would increase the reliability of the project, and Japanese experience on sample return will contribute to collect samples from Martian Moon. This project will provide a lot of data on the formation of the planet in the solar system.

The MMX is planned to be launched in 2024 and will return to Earth in 2029. There is a lot of time for both Japan and India to work together to design and plan for this mission. The experience and knowledge of both countries will supplement each other and will provide a strong base for further space cooperation.

(The author is Professor of International Political Economy, Graduate School of Public Policy, Hokkaido University. Views are personal.)


https://www.financialexpress.com/li...after-asteroid-sample-return-program/1774291/
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,277
Likes
56,182
Country flag
For who is upset due to lower launch frequency (just 5 launches this year) this year (particularly because Chandrayaan-2 took away lot of time), ISRO chief has declared 13 missions in 6 launch vehicles before March. Missions include landing tests of RLV-TD too. @Haldiram

Wish I'm proved wrong and ISRO executes plans successfully on deadline. But ISRO needs a budget of $3-5 billions per year in next few years and additional factories (sub-contractors may work here). Modi has put too much of load. Budget should exceed that of Roscosmos if not equal to ESA.
Quoting the post for cross posting. So, as the construction of third launch pad was delayed, they are going to refurnish older one.
It's been too much of load put on ISRO in past 6-7 months and it will cost a bomb. ISRO's Budget should exceed that of Roscosmos at least to complete in time.
Till 2022:
  1. GSAT-20
  2. IDRSS satellites – DRSS-1 & 2 (must for Gaganyaan)
  3. SPADEX
  4. AstroSat-2
  5. XPOSat-1
  6. 2-3 GISATs
  7. 3-4 RISATs
  8. 3-4 CartoSats
  9. GSAT-20 (needs GSLV MkIII)
  10. Two unmanned launches of modified GSLV MkIII (must for Gaganyaan).
  11. Chandrayaan-2R/Chandrayaan-3 (needs GSLV MkII or MkIII).
  12. Landing test & Return flight experiment of RLV-TD.
  13. NASA-ISRO synthetic aperture radar.
  14. Operationalizing SSLV.
That's enough to hinder the current regular launches that are useful for revenue or communications and even then not getting fulfilled.

Six GSLV MkIII launches in two years + conducting regular launches? Seriously? This elephant alone wastes 2-3 months for its launch preparations.
 
Last edited:

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top