Israel - Hamas Gaza Conflict Oct-2023

shade

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
15,344
Likes
91,832
Country flag
if the west had not supported ukraine with everything from money, their latest and best weapons in huge quantities, training, and putting on sanctions and other measures against Russia, then the political capital the west had expended till now in this Ukraine war support would not have been expended to the extent it has. I predicted this and whoever is doing the grand strategy in the Western globalist order should also have seen this coming.

THE THING IS THE MORE THE WEST SUPPORTS UKRAINE WITH MATERIAL AND OTHER SUPPORT, THE GREATER IT MAKES RUSSIA'S EVENTUAL GRINDING VICTORY AGAINST UKRAINE ADN ALL THE WEST WOULD HAVE FOR IT IS A MOTH-EATEN DEPLETED UKRAINE AND THEY WOULD HAVE A SEMI-STALIN LIKE FIGURE IN PUTIN WHERE PEOPLE WILL LOOK AT HIM AS A LEADER WHO PERSEVERED AND PREVAILED OVER SANCTIONS AND GOT BACK THE DONETSK AND LUHANSK, CRIMEA REGION WHICH INCLUDES THE PORT INFRASTRUCTURE.

Remember Russia is only using 1/5th of it's military potential in all this, it needs the other parts to man the other areas where NATO is also present.


If the West had given post-2014 maiden levels of covert support only along with general condemnation like the armenia-azerbaijan conflict, then they would not have expended a lot of political capital and been in the difficult situation they are right now where they are looking for a face-saver (probably why they are loving the Hamas Israel conflict now) where they don't lose 20 percent of the good and strategic landmass of a large European country like Ukraine to Russia IN SPITE OF THE MASSIVE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF SUPPORT.

Alternatively, they could have just tried to court Ukraine in an alternate reality after a russian invasion had taken some land to eventually sign a peace agreement and then station their troops covertly to protect strategic areas on the western side to prevent a total Russian takeover (like in maidan protest) and then overtly after the peace agreement and incorporate Ukraine into EU and NATO making sure to keep the Odesa port under Ukrainian control. This time they would not be seen as supporting ukraine from the start and they could have washed their hands of it saying that Ukraine was technically not part of NATO before and justified the further addition to NATO now. Also then discuss with border European nations to form a barricade and then rearm them heavily.

Now they have sunk a lot of political capital for less than good gains
Literally all they had to do was become friends with Vlad and not try to regime change him and jew Russia.
But nahi, inko freedom aur democrazy failana hai.

So today we have Waleedudeen al-Jhutin, Dost -e- Islam, Hifazatgar -e- Filasteen, etc etc.
 

shaktishivashakti

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2020
Messages
548
Likes
2,016
Country flag
You are missing the best part. The Other Team is ready for physical contact on the ground in the middle east as I said several time ;-)
Photo taken this morning at Beijing...You know what it is, dont you ?

1697644356723.jpeg



Russian, Chinese presidents to meet in Beijing amid ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,966
Likes
48,916
Country flag
You are missing the best part. The Other Team is ready for physical contact on the ground in the middle east as I said several time ;-)
Photo taken this morning at Beijing...You know what it is, dont you ?

View attachment 226912
Americans for a long time were able to send aircraft carriers to most of the world to scare the
shit out of the adversary and as a force multiplier. Now many nations have developed cruise/ballistic
missile designed specifically for these carriers like chinese DF-21,Yakhont,Brahmos etc.... These missiles
fired in salvo could destroy billions of dollars in weapons and investment in the carrier. There will
come a point in the not to distant future where these carriers may not be anything more than sitting
ducks?
 

maximus777

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,444
Likes
6,032
Country flag
Americans for a long time were able to send aircraft carriers to most of the world to scare the
shit out of the adversary and as a force multiplier. Now many nations have developed cruise/ballistic
missile designed specifically these carriers like chinese DF-21,Yakhont,Brahmos etc.... These missiles
fired in salvo could destroy billions of dollars in weapons and investment in the carrier. There will
come a point in the not to distant future where these carriers may not be anything more than sitting
ducks?
But who would dare to strike a US CBG?!? Even a comic book following nutter who believes in afterlife will come to senses once his entire country gets bombed to stone age. Not a fan of unkil, but unkil for sure knows how to mete out punishment.
 

shaktishivashakti

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2020
Messages
548
Likes
2,016
Country flag
But who would dare to strike a US CBG?!? Even a comic book following nutter who believes in afterlife will come to senses once his entire country gets bombed to stone age. Not a fan of unkil, but unkil for sure knows how to mete out punishment.
Then, why did they shy away with their CBG and their UK puppets in 1971 ?
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,966
Likes
48,916
Country flag
But who would dare to strike a US CBG?!? Even a comic book following nutter who believes in afterlife will come to senses once his entire country gets bombed to stone age. Not a fan of unkil, but unkil for sure knows how to mete out punishment.
If you are a country like Iraq who is going to face an existential threatening war and you were able
what would ypu do?? There are other nations who could follow up with more afterwards Iran/North Korea/China/Russia/India etc....
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2023
Messages
508
Likes
3,905
Country flag
Americans for a long time were able to send aircraft carriers to most of the world to scare the
shit out of the adversary and as a force multiplier. Now many nations have developed cruise/ballistic
missile designed specifically these carriers like chinese DF-21,Yakhont,Brahmos etc.... These missiles
fired in salvo could destroy billions of dollars in weapons and investment in the carrier. There will
come a point in the not to distant future where these carriers may not be anything more than sitting
ducks?
The Americans use the carriers to police the world. If one of those billion-dollar cops is sunk, the US government will do what the American police is infamous for - disproportionate response. They will nuke their opponent back to stone age. Against someone like Russians or Chinese, they play it quite safe and never quite park their carriers off their coast (like how they very often parked their submarines off the Soviet coasts in the Cold War) but just sort of sail by their coasts or locations to which their adversary have a claim to. Iran has barely developed nukes and don't have delivery systems that can reach much farther than the Mediterranean, so if it meant wiping out one of the members of the new axis of evil for the measly cost of a carrier or 2, they absolutely will use this method.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top