nongaddarliberal
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2016
- Messages
- 4,080
- Likes
- 23,180
Tanks were always being lost at high rates, whether it was ww2, 1965, 1971, or the arab Israeli wars. Soviets lost 30,000+ tanks in ww2. Israelis lost half their tank fleet EACH time in 67 and 73, even while winning. India erased entire armored regiments from the paki army in 65 and 71.I just think that tanks have started to become obsolete in modern warfare. Even in Ukraine, all it has shown is that tanks are a good way to die a horrific death while being trapped in several inches thick metal armour. But hey, I've not been following warfare anywhere near as long as some of you guys did so I'm curious to see what you think of my conclusion.
Tanks were always meant to be used in large numbers with a high attrition rate. It's only during the gulf War that people got a wrong impression of tanks that they're very hard to destroy and lost only in small numbers
Tanks are meant to be spammed onto the Battlefield to support the wider ground operation, and pummel enemy positions while taking punishment and losses themselves. In that regard, the Russian army and the US army are the only ones which have tanks in appropriate numbers for a real war. (The Americans have 8000+ Abrams in storage).
Last edited:
