Israel bars AESA radar export to India

neo29

New Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
1,284
Likes
30
The Israeli defence ministry has blocked the potential export sale of Israel Aerospace Industries' EL/M-2052 active electronically scanned array radar to a number of countries, with its action having an immediate impact on the Indian market.

The restrictions were imposed following pressure from the US administration, which has outlined its concerns to Israel several times in the past two years.

Washington's position is driven by an assumption that exporting IAI's advanced radar would undermine the sale of US-made systems on the international stage, sources say.

At one stage, Saab had considered offering the EL/M-2052 as part of its Gripen NG proposal for the Indian air force's medium multi-role combat aircraft requirement, but instead opted for Selex Galileo's ES05 Raven AESA.

IAI had also viewed the Indian Aeronautical Development Agency's Tejas light combat aircraft as a potential candidate for the AESA radar. The modular design weighs 130-180kg (286-397lb) and consumes 4-10kVA, depending on the design configuration, and has built-in growth potential, the company says.

Developed by IAI's Elta Systems subsidiary, the EL/M-2052 uses an array of solid-state transmit/receive modules designed to dynamically shape the radiation pattern using an ultra-low side-lobe antenna. It can perform simultaneous multi-mode operations, detecting airborne threats and supporting navigation and mapping, by producing high-resolution synthetic aperture radar imagery.

The sensor can detect and track up to 64 airborne targets from long range, and enable a pilot to engage several simultaneously using air-to-air missiles, IAI says. The sensor can also provide long-range target detection, classification and tracking in the anti-ship role.

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/01/11/351666/israel-bars-aesa-radar-export-to-india.html
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,159
From first impressions its a pressure tactic for MRCA from the US , one more point to bargain for the US ....lets hear details , but firm indications this will be altered to present india's case ,why ? because :- money speaks , talks , walks and done even more and jews are too intelligent to miss this
 

thakur_ritesh

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
4,435
Likes
1,733
i think avi is right, cross posting from the mmrca thread and this news is the front page and top most headlines on the tribune today and if it is coming from tribune there should be a lot of weight-age to it:


http://defenceforumindia.com/showthread.php?t=12796&p=220727&viewfull=1#post220727

A Tribune Exclusive
More muscle to India's air might Eurofighter ahead in IAF deal Likely to pip Russian, US, French jets for $10-billion 'deal of the decade'
Man Mohan
Our Roving Editor

New Delhi, January 10
The buzz has started about which new 'fighter bird' will rule the Indian skies as well as those of enemy. The Eurofighter aircraft, it seems, has emerged the winner after a long 'dogfight' among six foreign 4.5th generation jet planes to clinch over $10-billion Indian Air Force deal for 126 Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA). The second runner-up is said to be the French fighter Rafale.

Despite the aggressive business-oriented visit of US President Barack Obama recently, two major competing American military aircraft makers, Boeing and Lockheed Martin, have lost their pitch.

Growing Indo-US strategic relations have not helped the American diplomatic and arms lobbies to get either of the two planes touch the winning mark. India had shortlisted six aircraft: American Lockheed Martin's F-16IN 'Super Viper', US Boeing's 'Super Hornet' F/A-18IN, European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company NV (EADS)' Eurofighter Typhoon - EADS is a consortium of British, German, Spanish and Italy firms - French D'assault's Rafale, Swedish Saab's Gripen, and Russian MiG-35. The MMRCAs induction is likely to start by 2015.

When the file related to the final evaluation of rival aircraft was shown to Defence Minister AK Antony, highly reliable sources told The Tribune that he said that if this was the case, let it be. The Prime Minister's Office has been made aware about this. Now, a 'political decision' is awaited on this mega deal.

Interestingly, on the New Year eve, an important file relating to the deal was found on the roadside in the Khel Gaon area. The file was supposed to be in the custody of an IAS officer of the rank of director in the defence production wing of the Ministry of Defence. An inquiry has been ordered.

The IAF intends to purchase the MMRCA combat jets to replace its aging Russian-made MiG-21 fleet in phases and help in curbing the recent trend of the depleting squadron strength.

India had floated tenders for this deal in August 2007. The exhaustive technical evaluation of the six global manufacturers' bids was completed last year. Starting from Bangalore, the trials took the competing fighters and their weapons to the hot desert region of Jaisalmer as well as high-altitude Leh.

Incidentally, the IAF 'top guns' - after trials at home and abroad - were said to be in favour of Swedish Saab's Gripen fighters. Boeing's 'Super Hornet' also reportedly gave a tough fight to be among the top four. The Eurofighter is said to be the costliest jet among the competitors.

Lockheed Martin's F-16 lost mainly as the Air Force pilots' community raised a critical question: why should India go for the same fighter aircraft that is with our main regional adversary - Pakistan?

The arrival of Lockheed Martin's F-16 fighter plane for trials had made many in the IAF apprehensive, and they feared that its 'selection' - because of over-pitched American lobbying - might become a 'combat disadvantage' for India. Pakistan has been operating F-16 aircraft since the mid-eighties and is currently flying the F-16 Block 50.

The Russian MiG-35 was 'not touched' by the evaluators as New Delhi and Moscow were busy signing a deal for a fifth generation fighter aircraft (FGFA).
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110111/main1.htm
 

Nagraj

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
804
Likes
254
wow !!!!
good going us of A.
and these guys want us as allies!!!!!
let usa prove it's credibility first
let them stop these arm twisting tactics.
untill then we are alone
and we must stand on our own feets.
this is a lesson the all us indians who consider that india has arrived.
and india is already a super power.
we have miles to go before we become one.
and yeah we can traverse these miles.
 

nrj

New Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
Now the unkil start the play.... :) :)
And somebody wanted more stealth fighters...
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,330
Likes
11,874
Country flag
So Israel can't develop and sell anything?it's has a lot of competing defense products.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
This is really a dirty politics being played by Americans. Its the first time Israel has betrayed us but I suspect its a sign of things to come . I am not sure if we have any option to penalizing them for backtracking from promises . It means LCA MK2 is also badly affected .
 

Dark Sorrow

Respected Member
New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
4,988
Likes
9,937
Another reason we shouldn't go for F-18s..
I would say this is the most stupid reason. Arms twisting is done by everyone from a 4-year old kid to multi-national corporate giants to super powers. There is nothing new to this. If we keep on behaving as you said then we will be the only loosers. Remember the ongoing vikramadatya saga.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
I would say this is the most stupid reason. Arms twisting is done by everyone from a 4-year old kid to multi-national corporate giants to super powers. There is nothing new to this. If we keep on behaving as you said then we will be the only loosers. Remember the ongoing vikramadatya saga.
Banning sale of Israeli equipment for Gripen was known to everyone and I dont think anyone reacted badly. something like that can be explained as use of muscle power to get a deal . but what Americans are doing now will affect not only MRCA but our LCA project as well. This is something like a goon holding gun over your son and asking you to sign a deal .
 

Rahul Singh

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,652
Likes
5,790
Country flag
US can force Israel but Israel can always repeat Green Pine. Israel as a economy is largely dependent on defence contracts from India and nobody can stop them when it come to their national interests. One way the other Isreal will take part in JV with LRDE for developing AESA radar for LCA if it is selected.
 

venkat

New Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
907
Likes
203
From the aeroIndia show pictures I could see quite a compact Radar El/M2052 with a rectangular Antenna Array unit rather than the usual circular one used in other AESA models!!! compared to APG79 and RBE2 series and ZHUK this appears to be quite compact and weighs less. India should link its future defence purchases from Israel with this one!!!!Whatever India needed and felt good was always denied to india by spanner throwing USA !!!Even we are not getting free samples from US companies...with all that Obama visit hullabaloo!!!
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
wow !!!!
good going us of A.
and these guys want us as allies!!!!!
let usa prove it's credibility first
let them stop these arm twisting tactics.
untill then we are alone
and we must stand on our own feets.
this is a lesson the all us indians who consider that india has arrived.
and india is already a super power.
we have miles to go before we become one.
and yeah we can traverse these miles.
USA can never ally with large countries. This is strictly buisness. USA is using it's leverage and sending a clear message to India that we have a major role in your MRCA and your LCA programs, this also sends a message in other India-Israeli programs that it has to go thru US approval. There can be anger against USA but Indian govt needs to be blamed for a lot of this. The Indian govt never pursued indigenous programs as aggressively as they should have leaving national security at the hands of foreign companies. The whole MRCA has been a fiasco from the start where all nations involved have been countering the Indian MRCA -Russia,France,Sweden,USA ETC...from the start .When it comes to acquisitions and diplomacy I would say Pakistanis are much better than the Indian politicians they seem to get what they want from USA and China(f-16's,Predator,AWACS etc...) and free at that while our govt while shelling out big bucks cannot do anything right or finish a project or induct anything in a timely manner.
 

Oracle

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,120
Likes
1,566
I say, call the Israeli Ambassador and tell him that if the sale of the AESA radar is blocked, India would recognize Palestine as an independent country instantly.

Pun intended! :)
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag
I say, call the Israeli Ambassador and tell him that if the sale of the AESA radar is blocked, India would recognize Palestine as an independent country instantly.

Pun intended! :)
Let's not get too silly O we still have orders for Phalcon AWACS and BARAK projects.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,868
Likes
23,312
Country flag
Well Israel can do little to stop US from blocking stuff that has American money in it. It is justified in a way you see. US pours a lot of money into Israeli projects and naturally they don't do it for free or due to lot of love for Jews. I will agree with LF that we can neither blame US nor Israel here but GOI alone. Putting pressure on Israel won't do much as you know how much they want to get the contract. Israeli economy relies on arms exports and defence stuff. They will be the most happiest to sell us stuff as much as we want if it not had been for Pentagon nosing around.

This shows that US still cannot let go off its arm twisting hold on other countries and that it hasn't reformed since the days of Pakistan bonhomie. Sanctions are very much a reality and the last thing we would want is 200 jets on the ground because we don't agree with Americans, in case of a war. This makes it all the more reason not to buy US stuff too much and rather become more aggressive indigenously. The TOI article quoted Anthony say that Tejas has reached "semi final" stage meaning that till 2013 induction doesn't formally start of the first 40 jets and only by 2016 we get MK2s. And we are talking about a 25+ year old jet with some 4.5 gen modifications. Is ADA slow or what?

Sanctions is no bull excuse for ADA since even Chinese were sanctioned after 89 massacre in Tiananmen Square. But still they used hook or crook to become indigenous and fast. J-10 is up already whether we call it Israeli design stealing or whatever. In fact its advanced version is also out. I am now casting doubts on whether AMCA will even come into reality by 2025 at this rate. Sarkari dodos are too slow because of paper work, red tapism and decision-making levels.

As for MRCA, we must make it a point that US should NOT get the contract. We don't want to repeat the cycle Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and now Turkey are going to go or have undergone. Those who say US won't do this with us are living in their American Dream:

1- US owns the tech
2- US doesn't transfer the tech
3- US makes clauses that can cause blockage to techs half way if not in their interest (Remember Shivalik engines??)
4- US mandates yearly check by its own officials of all those who buy its equipment.

So do we really need all this nonsense after coughing up $ 12 billion? I think we are better of with European options. If US presses Israel not to supply, we will ask Europeans to show their AESA models, simple. Next time, Israel will twist US administration enough to tell them not to meddle. One contract loss means more than just lost monetary opportunity in defence industry, you know. Especially when it comes to Israel's case. US cannot press Europe and especially France.

Either that or even if Israel doesn't "sell us the radar" it will sell us the tech and know-how that cannot be stopped for a price. How is US going to stop that? Turkey is already out of US control; losing another key middle eastern ally is not something even Obama would want just for some contracts. Let's face it; Jews hold US economy by their walnuts. Israel can only be pushed around that much as long as it doesn't cross the red line.
 

Articles

Top