Islamic extremism in India

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,701
Yup these are politically motivated events but problem is we already have many Abduls in custody and should reach main conspirators by now. UP police can make anyone talk in few hours.

I am just cautious if this turns out to be misplaced anger and congis are exposed as real financers. We already discussed possibility of riots after elections in Indian elections thread.

While these events are despicable, we should retaliate by making these muzzies famous worldwide. Share these tweets with right wingers across the world. Why should their shamelessness be limited to India only?
Most likely it is organised by USA or Arabs. They always have an ulterior motive in doing these things. We can't catch the heads as they are not in India.

Media and twitter only have so much importance. Reality is about control over resource and technology. Media is just a cheap tool. We have to first develop our defence technology. There is no substitute to time. We need to give time for DRDO and scientists to develop technology. The enemies want India and Hindus to attack first.

The drama like some elderly convincing to not burn the bus etc are all pre-planned to provoke without causing human life damage so that if Hindus retaliate, it will be Hindus acting first.

So, Hindus must act only in proportion and not over react.

Bro, Hindus are ill prepared in this! Even in 1947, Muslims were never in Majority in places where they did maximum massacres. Its not cowardice, but total dismantling of Hindu Societal Fabric , which prevents Hindus today to come under one umbrella and help each other in defense.
Hinduism was never one unit. It was dharma. Hinduism is an invented relihrel with no ideology and is savagery. None will help for an invented cause. The dharma was destroyed when people converted to buddhism. Though people reconverted, the Hinduism of today derives most of is tenets from bhakti and buddhist movement rather than dharma. This confusion causec breakdown of social fabric and buddhist element causes cowardice

But muslims didn't manage to do massacres in areas where they were minorities. Hindus did not kill muslims everywhere but even then Muslims could not massacre in places where they were minority. Muslims are crazed and short tempered but are not brave or strong. They massacred only in places where they were majority. The majority of massacre happened in Punjab & Bengal where muslims were majority. Don't exaggerate

We should give these guys free IAS and IPS coaching..that will certainly stop them
How do you know that Modi is not saying one thing and doing another? What if Modi is giving coaching to show his efforts in public but indirectly telling to cut off muslims in UPSC?
 
Last edited:

Longewala

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2016
Messages
379
Likes
1,524
Country flag
A gem from Al-Britannia

We will stop "killing" Muslims, as long as the right honourable mp ask his wife, daughter etc to wear miniskirts and walk around for a couple of hours in some of the Al Brittania muslim areas
 

Absolut_Vodka

Quarantined Abdul
Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
1,413
Likes
6,995
Country flag
Most likely it is organised by USA or Arabs. They always have an ulterior motive in doing these things. We can't catch the heads as they are not in India.

Media and twitter only have so much importance. Reality is about control over resource and technology. Media is just a cheap tool. We have to first develop our defence technology. There is no substitute to time. We need to give time for DRDO and scientists to develop technology. The enemies want India and Hindus to attack first.

The drama like some elderly convincing to not burn the bus etc are all pre-planned to provoke without causing human life damage so that if Hindus retaliate, it will be Hindus acting first.

So, Hindus must act only in proportion and not over react.
Americans or anyone else hijacking jihad narrative for personal gain has always backfired. History is testimony to this fact. Let them try, Arabs will be insignificant in three decades with widespread usage of electric vehicles and USA will be too small in population and all its NATO partners overrun by Jihadis.

Even Turks are complaining on PDF to grab Syrians, Afghanis and Paki by throat and throw them to sharks in ocean.


We will stop "killing" Muslims, as long as the right honourable mp ask his wife, daughter etc to wear miniskirts and walk around for a couple of hours in some of the Al Brittania muslim areas
Ignore this clown. He's jerking off for his votebank.
 

ezsasa

Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,420
Likes
42,582
Country flag
there was an article on R.U.L.L.S in india which came up on twitter in last two months, does anyone have the link to it?
R.U.L.L.S - Random Ultra Low level violence S(something)
 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,701
Americans or anyone else hijacking jihad narrative for personal gain has always backfired. History is testimony to this fact. Let them try, Arabs will be insignificant in three decades with widespread usage of electric vehicles and USA will be too small in population and all its NATO partners overrun by Jihadis.
We are dealing in the present. In 30 years, Arab oil reserves will fully exhaust and there will be no significance of them. So, they are trying to gain as much as possible in next 2-25 years. 25 years is one whole generation. We can't simply consider it as insignificant. WW2, for example, lasted only 5 years.

So, we have to take the fact that Muslims are using their last 30 years to the maximum and trying maximise their gains. We have to be careful and act prudently in this time.
 

ezsasa

Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,420
Likes
42,582
Country flag
We are dealing in the present. In 30 years, Arab oil reserves will fully exhaust and there will be no significance of them.
i used to think this too, this argument is mathematically still sound today?
 

ezsasa

Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,420
Likes
42,582
Country flag
What are your views on this ? What do you think the future of Arab world and Islam is ?
for now in agreement with what @Vijyes has said..
but i have started a new habit of questioning my pre-conceived notions once in every 2-3 years, just to check if they are still valid.
 

LordofLight

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
38
Likes
108
Country flag
Hindus are not violent ideologically, but by choice. Gujarat, Muzzafarnagar and even 1992 Mumbai are examples of what happens when the push comes to shove. The present +35 aged muzzie population in Mumbai today know the consequences and still are afraid of retaliation. In Mumbai it’s the younger inbred population born post 1990 and the muzzie immigrants who are brewing troubles, but even they will be dealt with if push comes to shove.
 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,701
i used to think this too, this argument is mathematically still sound today?
This was always sound argument. As of now global oil reserves is 650 billion barrels of which Muslims have 350 billion barrels. The oil production start say that not Muslim oil except Russian oil will be exhausted in 15 years whereas Muslim and Russian oil will last 30 years.
What are your views on this ? What do you think the future of Arab world and Islam is ?
That will depend on how people act in next 30 years. Muslims know that their time of advantage will start when USA oil exhausts in 2030. How Muslims will try to collapse USA and how others will act will determine everything. It will begin in 2030.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
20,260
Likes
20,389
Country flag
These peacefools from Jharkhand torched a bus trying to burn 40 students aIive to take revenge of Tabrej Ansari
 

LordofLight

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
38
Likes
108
Country flag
This was always sound argument. As of now global oil reserves is 650 billion barrels of which Muslims have 350 billion barrels. The oil production start say that not Muslim oil except Russian oil will be exhausted in 15 years whereas Muslim and Russian oil will last 30 years.

That will depend on how people act in next 30 years. Muslims know that their time of advantage will start when USA oil exhausts in 2030. How Muslims will try to collapse USA and how others will act will determine everything. It will begin in 2030.
US oil will not exhaust by 2030. If anything their production will get more and more cheaper displacing Arab oil in Asian markets. As of now the only advantage that Arab oil has in India is its proximity. They can beat American tight oil when shipping costs are factored. But by 2030 American oil will be dominating the global supply.
 

Absolut_Vodka

Quarantined Abdul
Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
1,413
Likes
6,995
Country flag
We are dealing in the present. In 30 years, Arab oil reserves will fully exhaust and there will be no significance of them. So, they are trying to gain as much as possible in next 2-25 years. 25 years is one whole generation. We can't simply consider it as insignificant. WW2, for example, lasted only 5 years.

So, we have to take the fact that Muslims are using their last 30 years to the maximum and trying maximise their gains. We have to be careful and act prudently in this time.
Doesn't matter if oil reserves exhaust or not, we should not wait for that. What matters is we will be free from clutches of oil supplying nations and thereby excluding our economy from spikes in oil prices for most part. Environmental factors are added advantage.

China will be one of the major leader in this field. Let them pave the way and fight it out with Arab lobby who will definitely try to throw these projects off track.

Remember the 90s when all muzzies of sub continent try to bully us that if you do anything against us then Arabs will stop oil to india?
 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,701
Doesn't matter if oil reserves exhaust or not, we should not wait for that. What matters is we will be free from clutches of oil supplying nations and thereby excluding our economy from spikes in oil prices for most part. Environmental factors are added advantage.

China will be one of the major leader in this field. Let them pave the way and fight it out with Arab lobby who will definitely try to throw these projects off track.

Remember the 90s when all muzzies of sub continent try to bully us that if you do anything against us then Arabs will stop oil to india?
India can use coal liquefaction to cut down on oil supply. The loss that Muslims will endure when India attacks and expels muslims from India and its neighborhood like Pakistan will destroy Islam by starvation. Indian use of coal liquefaction can ensure energy needs are met but Muslims don't have alternative food supply or place of refuge.

Our oil needs in terms of fuel supply is never a problem due to coal liquefaction. Oil is needed for petrochemicals and other things which is not substituted easily.

EV or other renewable transport is just wishful thinking. As I said, coal liquefaction can work instead of oil. Fuel is not critical deficiency. So, one must not get Stockholm syndrome and start becoming desperate for EV. EV is not only wishful thinking but doesn't even address the problem of petrochemicals.
 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,701
US oil will not exhaust by 2030. If anything their production will get more and more cheaper displacing Arab oil in Asian markets. As of now the only advantage that Arab oil has in India is its proximity. They can beat American tight oil when shipping costs are factored. But by 2030 American oil will be dominating the global supply.
You are simply assuming that USA oil is infinite and will keep increasing? If it was that large, why did USA not use it between 1980-2010? USA had found these oil in 1970s and the technology for shale drilling had been perfected in 1980 itself. But USA government imposed environmental restrictions to stop the drilling and conserve its oil.

USAA is now simply forced to drill oil to keep its energy independence as Arabs have started to make hard bargains for selling their oil in dollars. So, USA lifted the environmental restrictions and the shale production increased to meet USA energy independence. As of now, USA has met its energy independence by extracting 12mbpd of oil, 1mbpd ethanol from corn, 5-6mbpd of natural gas liquids (like ethane, propane, butane used for plastic & LPG) and 2mbpd of Canadian oil imports.

The shale production has limits and it is a desperate move by USA to maintain energy independence. It is not sustainable and will exhaust by 2030. The abundant shale oil due to some Technology advancement is absurd. The same technology which exists today also existed in 1980 and nothing revolutionary happened.
 

Absolut_Vodka

Quarantined Abdul
Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
1,413
Likes
6,995
Country flag
EV or other renewable transport is just wishful thinking. As I said, coal liquefaction can work instead of oil. Fuel is not critical deficiency. So, one must not get Stockholm syndrome and start becoming desperate for EV. EV is not only wishful thinking but doesn't even address the problem of petrochemicals.
That's how what we used to say about technologies that we have in our hands or laps now-a-days. All it takes is drive and demand. We may not become fully independent of Oil and petrochemicals but we should try to shrink imports, specially from Jihad sponsors, wherever possible. I say North India will be the first one to adopt EVs due to smog factors. Govt may impose pollution tax etc on Petrol and Diesel cars. Infact people will be so sick of smog and bad AQI that they will hate you for driving IC engine, kind of hate that hummer gets in US.

Hyundai Kona and Nissan leaf may upset the market if they make in India. Rest will follow. Let's not digress from topic.

 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,701
Do u know first time govt want to introduce Computers many employees DID STRIKES because ''computers will remove jobs'' and the price of one computer is more than 1 lakh(today ~ 5 lakhs) and we get the same configuration computer for 5k only .... 5 lakh==5k :pound:

Same goes to phones too (mobile per call 30 rupees/minute and phone 20k) now u can get 2k Jio phone with unlimited calls& internet just for 49/- PER MONTH..... still they are getting HUGE PROFITS.

In one decade NO MOBILE PHONE to EVERYONE HAS MOBILE (+90% people) just because LOW PRICE.

Now the Electric vehicles are also in same condition their price is too high but once tech. break through everyone will have CARS with 0(less) pollution.Actually it may happend long ago but somehow oil lobbies thwarted the progress.

My prediction:From 2025 on wards people will stop buying Petrol cars.
For God's sake, the cost of labour always has to be subtracted. What matters is resource efficiency. I am not talking of labour cost anywhere but only of feasibility in terms of practical application.

Computers was never opposed as impractical and neither was mobile phones considered impractical. Only their side effects were queationed. But EV is outright impractical. I am not talking of side effects like closing of oil fields and their jobs etc. I am simply saying that EV is impractical due to unfeasible technology.

That's how what we used to say about technologies that we have in our hands or laps now-a-days. All it takes is drive and demand. We may not become fully independent of Oil and petrochemicals but we should try to shrink imports, specially from Jihad sponsors, wherever possible. I say North India will be the first one to adopt EVs due to smog factors. Govt may impose pollution tax etc on Petrol and Diesel cars. Infact people will be so sick of smog and bad AQI that they will hate you for driving IC engine, kind of hate that hummer gets in US.

Hyundai Kona and Nissan leaf may upset the market if they make in India. Rest will follow. Let's not digress from topic.

How will you use EV to reduce the fuel demand? The biggest advantage of fuel ia that it is a stored energy and can simply be filled and then used to drive engine. EV needs some energy sources to charge ot which makes it difficult to be charged everytime on the go. EV also needs lithium batteries and lithium is quite rare and not easily available everywhere. How will you get lithium if it is unavailable? The amount of lithium in the world is not enough to replace all the cars, forget replacing trucks or commercial vehicles.

EV has other problems because of its need to be charged for long duration. It becomes unfeasible for long distance and use in villages and commercial vehicles. Villages, for example, are hundreds of km from the cities. How do you expect villagers to come to city in EV? As of now, many use bikes which give 60-70km mileage per litre and ply to cities. How will EV replace this?

How will city dwellers charge EV if their hoise is in apartments? Most of city dwellers live in apartments or slums where charging is unfeasible.

Why are you so bothered about fuel saved from EV which is going to be miniscule? Why can't you think properly on what I said - Coal Liquefaction? Coal Liquefaction will remove the needs for 60% of oil supply outright. Why are you simply insisting on impractical solution like EV instead of taking coal Liquefaction route?
As of now, India is not using coal liquefaction due to -
1) prevent unnecessary depletion of coal reserves.
2) Muslims want India to be dependent on their oil to act as a guarantee that India will not have the needed fuel to attack them all of a sudden.

Our solution for fuel dependence on Muslims already has a solution. Making it complicated by behaving desperately and bringing in unfeasible solution like EV only ruins things.

Our Brahmastra to Jihadi oil is coal liquefaction. No need to complicate things. So, as and when jihadis go out of control, it is time to use coal Liquefaction and show them their place
 

AnantS

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
2,588
Likes
4,637
Country flag
Hinduism was never one unit. It was dharma. Hinduism is an invented relihrel with no ideology and is savagery. None will help for an invented cause. The dharma was destroyed when people converted to buddhism. Though people reconverted, the Hinduism of today derives most of is tenets from bhakti and buddhist movement rather than dharma. This confusion causec breakdown of social fabric and buddhist element causes cowardice

But muslims didn't manage to do massacres in areas where they were minorities. Hindus did not kill muslims everywhere but even then Muslims could not massacre in places where they were minority. Muslims are crazed and short tempered but are not brave or strong. They massacred only in places where they were majority. The majority of massacre happened in Punjab & Bengal where muslims were majority. Don't exaggerate
Nope Nope Nope, I can poke holes into assertions but wont because it would be sheer waste of time trying to explain anything to you. You are welcome to believe what you want to. Best of Luck
 

LordofLight

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
38
Likes
108
Country flag
You are simply assuming that USA oil is infinite and will keep increasing? If it was that large, why did USA not use it between 1980-2010? USA had found these oil in 1970s and the technology for shale drilling had been perfected in 1980 itself. But USA government imposed environmental restrictions to stop the drilling and conserve its oil.

USAA is now simply forced to drill oil to keep its energy independence as Arabs have started to make hard bargains for selling their oil in dollars. So, USA lifted the environmental restrictions and the shale production increased to meet USA energy independence. As of now, USA has met its energy independence by extracting 12mbpd of oil, 1mbpd ethanol from corn, 5-6mbpd of natural gas liquids (like ethane, propane, butane used for plastic & LPG) and 2mbpd of Canadian oil imports.

The shale production has limits and it is a desperate move by USA to maintain energy independence. It is not sustainable and will exhaust by 2030. The abundant shale oil due to some Technology advancement is absurd. The same technology which exists today also existed in 1980 and nothing revolutionary happened.
I would disagree with you regarding their reserves declining by 2030. None of our models and analysis suggest that. Just have a look at how many crude, NGLs and LNG export projects are being built in the US Gulf Coast. No sane company invests billions in such projects if they will make money only for 5-10 years. Anyways I hope what you’re saying turns out wrong, because it’s my bread and butter. Will be out of business if these guys stop investing in shale.:biggrin2:
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top