Veteran Hunter of Maleecha
- Apr 7, 2010
LOL I doubt Indian RW is simply put 'commie + cow'. RW usually believe in social welfare which is different from even borderline communism known as socialism. Nordic countries, canada (even US) etc spend more on social welfare than China or Cuba, yet they are called capitalists for a reason!Expecting the resident commie to derail the thread just like he derails every thread on leftists
Its a shame that Nazis who killed 6million people are hounded and shamed worse than the commies who have killed 100million+ people
And of course, is there any difference between those commies and the leftist cabal in India ? Of course not! And yet, we have no true Scotsman fallacy in full swing here too, typical of their kind, whenever they sell their brain dead ideology to masses.
And frankly, its a wonder why so many here in DFI even hate commies, considering that many are closet commies themselves and Indian rw is nothing more that commie+cow
But, they spend on welfare rafter becoming wealthy. Ever since they adopted welfare state, they have been stuck in their incomesLOL I doubt Indian RW is simply put 'commie + cow'. RW usually believe in social welfare which is different from even borderline communism known as socialism. Nordic countries, canada (even US) etc spend more on social welfare than China or Cuba, yet they are called capitalists for a reason!
Also nothing is in isolation, i.e ideology can be guessed by appearance or correlated genetically.But, they spend on welfare rafter becoming wealthy. Ever since they adopted welfare state, they have been stuck in their incomes
For example, USA and Nordic countries had the same income levels during 1960 when the Nordic states adopted more and more income distribution and welfare while USA did its best to curb the socialist retards.
And the result today is, USA has more than 100% higher income than Nordic states. Even the average income of African american communities in USA , which is the lowest for any demographic in USA and is the poorest among the USA , is still higher than the average of Nordic countries
Despite having a higher income, USA still has higher growth rate in GDP(meaning they will still get richer each year) while Nordic countries are stagnant.
What model do you think is better among the two?
Do you think India can afford to be stagnant like Nordic countries?
And of course, countries like Brazil, Chile, Argentina which all were promising markets once had their potential destroyed and are trapped in middle income, which you might have read about in the articles which warn the same- middle income trap if India does not transform itself into a true market economy . why do you think it happened? Because they prematurely experimented with socialism(or welfare as you say it). And commie turds usually cite Latin America, which they have fucked beyond repair as how they have a huge and growing support in the world
Do you want that to India to have the same? To be trapped in middle income forever?
Intentions mean Jack and only results matter. Just because you have best interest of poor at heart when you advocate for welfare does not mean we would get best results from welfare for the poor for the poor.
@mikhail you too. Which model you think is better among USA and Nordics ?
I don't know from where you got your Jewish connection, but rest I agree.Also nothing is in isolation, i.e ideology can be guessed by appearance or correlated genetically.
Socialist policies go hand in hand with dsb sickular policies.
Sweden is world rape capital yet it is 2-3% Muslim population males doing it.
America under 1cr black males doing 55k+ rape per year + lakhs of prison rape.
Both countries are committing suicide.
Canada has world's fastest growing Muslim population. Toronto my former 'home' has north America's largest & it doubles twice every decade.
Commie + cow is understatement.
There is obviously limit to 'right wing' but America was more or less fine until it sold itself to Jewish interests.
Jewish angle can't be ignored when it comes to the massive deregulation (to prevent monopolies) plus nanny state bs that came since 70s.
Argentina was developed country in 20s, Brazil was the 'china' of the 70s.
Chile was strong before as well.
Government should end at village gate,
I.e road, infrastructure, basic healthcare & primary schooling. Defense against melech
And right now tbh, worrying about where government should 'end' doesn't matter as that's cultural question.
Current gov does not follow our culture, state is weak & overstretched. Geopolitics always submissive to biopolitics
State is meant to supplement population not 'rule or control' it. That is king's job & even then look at what megasthenes or fa-hien wrote.
"Shudra was un-burdened & care-free"
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|W||ISI Assassinates Baloch Journalist In Sweden||Pakistan||2|
|T||ISIS chief baghdadi killed?||Americas||36|
|Pakistani accused of plotting ISIS-inspired terror attack in Queens New York||Americas||8|
|BrahMos engineer arrested for leaking missile info to ISI||Internal Security||121|