Oh yeah, very well respected indeed
The paper that says India is equivalent to 1930s Nazi Germany is something I would definitely consider a reliable source.
Plus, the information provided in those was already selective and full of strawmans. No big surprise there.
It's quite clear. No one can be so naive as to read Israeli sources about something that would put Israel in a bad light and not corroborate the information. Same with reading Chinese sources about an incident that is embarrassing to China and not corroborate it with other sources. Same goes for every single country, but more so for those that continually lie.
The only reason one would do so is not because he actually wants to find out the truth, but because he has a certain worldview and belief in his mind. Whatever goes contrary to it he discards, ignores or straight up refuses to consider. Anything that confirms his beliefs, he accepts as the Gospel truth.
Like I said, no point in taking this further when you have made up your mind and are dead set in your worldview and would never even consider reading sources that go contrary to your point of view.
One final thing has to be said: The proficiency that the Americans and their lackeys have lying is remarkable. Usually they count on the stupidity of their opponents. When that doesn't work, they either play stupid, quote things that relates to completely different matters, or just pretend that they don't know what you are talking about.
Hard to say what is more remarkable. Their passion at killing millions to serve their interests or their characteristic excellence at lying.
Anything that happens to them is a tragedy, when millions of civilians or babies of the other side die, it's, "They were all jihadis, those kids! They deserved to die, good riddance!".
When it comes to illegally provide nukes, Military equipment and aid to one of their allies, it's okay. When it comes to illegally invading other countries, killing their people and stop them from obtaining nukes that they provide to their allies, that's somehow "actions to ensure peace".
When it comes to helping dictators and mass-murderers that are there allies, it's strategy. When it comes to sanctioning people already suffering under violent regimes, that's somehow okay as well.
The Americans and their lackeys can very well justify anything under the sun to serve their interests, from lying to mass-murder.
Only serves to show that America and its allies must be opposed at every step. After all, it's rightly said:
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."