- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
Our Economy is growing so does our standards, MICWS is also design as per our country economy ..
MICWS definitely cost more than Excalibur but not even 1/4th of those imported rifles which failed in our terrain, For a 3 million Strong Army this is affordable ..
Excalibur and Improved 1B1 used alloy which has parts of aluminum too, MCIWS use much advance metallurgy as its design is newer to other two ..
Excalibur is mid term solution untill MICWS get into mass production similarly Ghatak ..
=============
MICWS definitely cost more than Excalibur but not even 1/4th of those imported rifles which failed in our terrain, For a 3 million Strong Army this is affordable ..
Excalibur and Improved 1B1 used alloy which has parts of aluminum too, MCIWS use much advance metallurgy as its design is newer to other two ..
Excalibur is mid term solution untill MICWS get into mass production similarly Ghatak ..
=============
I always had a question. Will not MCIWS cost more than Excalibur as the former uses high grade aluminum while excalibur uses steel. I thinks MCIWS should be given to special forces and assault teams rather than provide it for regular jawans. What are the plans of MoD in accommodating these both rifles?
The current day IA foot soldier needs a MASSIVE upgrade and the MCIWS will in fact save costs as a common platform will replace 2 rifles (Ak and INSAS) meaning logistics will be streamlined and this will lead to considerable savings throughout its life time.
Anyone have pics of INSAS with holographic sights
Last edited: