- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
Finally, we have the answer ..
And sir the Russian media stated it achieved 29.2 knotsThe GOI controlled media called it 32knots. I know that for a ship of this size and non-nuke propulsion, 32 kts is too high a speed.
USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Speed: 33 kts Admittedly, it's not the same size as Viky... it's bigger. I'm not saying the Viky did or didn't go that fast (I wasn't there), but you really need to stop making categorical statements about ships in general without bothering to check first.The GOI controlled media called it 32knots. I know that for a ship of this size and non-nuke propulsion, 32 kts is too high a speed.
Mig-29UPG can carry 3 + 1 CFT at the back.why the Mig 29 can carry a single Drop tank instead of 2 of them in their wings like other fighters
I request you to pls check the top speeds for latest UK ac carriers? Gorshkov is an old ship which has got tons of additional equipment on it making it heavier than original while the propulsion has remained same.USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Speed: 33 kts Admittedly, it's not the same size as Viky... it's bigger. I'm not saying the Viky did or didn't go that fast (I wasn't there), but you really need to stop making categorical statements about ships in general without bothering to check first.
Who the hell said anything about the QE-class? Again, this is what you said.I request you to pls check the top speeds for latest UK ac carriers? Gorshkov is an old ship which has got tons of additional equipment on it making it heavier than original while the propulsion has remained same.
You did not qualify that statement in the least, and the fact remains that many non-nuclear ships of that size (or even bigger) have gone 32 kts or faster. You were wrong... get over yourself. If you want to say the Viky didn't really go that speed because it gained weight, that's fine; but don't make up dumb-shit about how fast ships of a given size can sail.I know that for a ship of this size and non-nuke propulsion, 32 kts is too high a speed.
There is a lot of weight dispensed from it also, newer lighter equipment, unnecessary wirings, and ofcourse those missles. The empty weight of the ship still stands at 45,000 tons. So any increase in weight is marginal. You are right. 32 Knots for that ship is quite normal and nothing great.Who the hell said anything about the QE-class? Again, this is what you said. You did not qualify that statement in the least, and the fact remains that many non-nuclear ships of that size (or even bigger) have gone 32 kts or faster. You were wrong... get over yourself. If you want to say the Viky didn't really go that speed because it gained weight, that's fine; but don't make up dumb-shit about how fast ships of a given size can sail.
Also, it's worth noting that the Kiev-class was specifically designed to chase US carrier-battlegroups, so a 32 kt flank-speed wouldn't surprise me, even with the extra weight.
But his air wings are goes in mach Speedso now the enemy countries will count viky's maximum speed might be any where between 29 to 33, will it hamper the strategy ?
Maybe... Official top speed of Nimitz-class is "30 kts+." Someone tell me how fast vvv this vvv looks (sorry about the dumb track).so now the enemy countries will count viky's maximum speed might be any where between 29 to 33, will it hamper the strategy ?
As a prelude to reguler Malabar excercises with USN, my ship did a small excercise with USN in BOB in 1990. We were on their starboard bow and than we were asked to take RAS station. Replishment at sea station. My CO was a hot rod. He took over the Con himself and being his oow, I was reduced to taking orders from him. He ordered a series of instructions-Stop steam Gens, Start DAs, revolutions 220 on both, hard starboard, OOW give me distance from ship. AND he did a 360* turn without letting the bearing of US ship go ahead. We got into station of 120 feet with US ship without overshooting or undershooting him. The US CO was so impressed that he stated-In his entire life he had not seen such control of a manouever of a ship which he saw that day.why people fighting on silly issues that too with defence professionals,we have lot to discuss rather than cat fight
Which ship was it?1990s, so must be a Rajput class, right?As a prelude to reguler Malabar excercises with USN, my ship did a small excercise with USN in BOB in 1990. We were on their starboard bow and than we were asked to take RAS station. Replishment at sea station. My CO was a hot rod. He took over the Con himself and being his oow, I was reduced to taking orders from him. He ordered a series of instructions-Stop steam Gens, Start DAs, revolutions 220 on both, hard starboard, OOW give me distance from ship. AND he did a 360* turn without letting the bearing of US ship go ahead. We got into station of 120 feet with US ship without overshooting or undershooting him. The US CO was so impressed that he stated-In his entire life he had not seen such control of a manouever of a ship which he saw that day.
I narrated this to highlight the fact that we Indians are capable of much better things and we shud not let our energies be sapped in for stupid causes.
I was a Lt then and doing my sea time on that ship and not CO of the ship.What is a Naval aviator commanding a Frigate when there were two Indian Aircraft carrier's available in 1990
Naval Aviators do sea time in aircraft carriers, especially in 1990 when both Vikrant and Viraat was out at sea, also there was NO Military Cooperation let alone Naval with the USA till 1992. Sorry, your story doesnt float.I was a Lt then and doing my sea time on that ship and not CO of the ship.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ins Vikramaditya Completes 1 Year:220 Days At Sea | Indian Navy | 1 | ||
Crazy S Anandan from "Hindu" reporting on INS Vikramaditya | Indian Navy | 6 | ||
Complete Video MODI on INS Vikramaditya | Military Multimedia | 0 | ||
Air Defense System For INS Vikramaditya | Indian Navy | 5 |