Indo-US Relations

How is obama in regards to indian policies?

  • good

    Votes: 15 11.6%
  • bad

    Votes: 60 46.5%
  • need more time

    Votes: 54 41.9%

  • Total voters
    129
Status
Not open for further replies.

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Toward Realistic U.S.–India Relations


As President Obama prepares to visit India next month, he faces criticism that his administration has done too little to enhance U.S.-India relations. George Perkovich argues that expectations for a partnership between the two countries in the near term are unrealistically high and overlook how their interests, policies, and diplomatic style will often diverge. U.S. policy cannot do much to help India's rise, but it can inflict major damage on global problem-solving efforts if it defers too readily to the narrow, often mercantile demands of the current relationship.

Key Conclusions

Interests are divergent. Careful analysis of U.S. and Indian interests does not show a close convergence in some key areas, and in cases such as China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, they differ in how to pursue shared interests even when both states benefit from each other's successes.

Democracy can divide. Shared democracy is said to make the United States and India "natural allies," but domestic politics and economics often keep each state from adopting policies that would befit a partnership.

Bilateral relations should not be used to contain China. Emphasizing military competition with China, as some do, is counterproductive. For the foreseeable future, the United States, India, and China will operate in a triangular relationship that mixes cooperation with competition and pressure and none will be close partners of the others. Economic development and effective governance are the keys to countering China's rising strength.

Nuclear energy cannot transform the relationship. The civil nuclear cooperation agreement between the two countries has not turned the relationship into a partnership, as envisioned. But it has undermined U.S. leadership credibility in trying to strengthen the global nonproliferation regime.

Global problem solving is the priority. The United States can contribute only marginally to India's success or failure. Washington should focus on global issues—such as trade, nuclear security, peace in Asia, and climate change—that will also affect India's longer-term interests.
"Rather than maintaining the pretense of partnership, a truly pro-India policy would acknowledge that India has different near-term needs and interests as a developing country than does the United States, even as it recognizes that each will benefit in the long run from the success of the other," writes Perkovich. "Most of what the U.S. government can do for India lies in the broader global arena, and most of what India needs at home it must do for itself."

Full Text(54 page pdf)
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
US pushes India to take bigger Asian role




The US is pushing India to lift its role in Asia as one of the continent's leading democracies and largest economies at a time when the region is becoming increasingly anxious about a more assertive China.

Ahead of US President Barack Obama's visit to India early next month, senior US government officials said on Monday they wanted India to take a "more active" role outside of its immediate south Asian region, in trade and political and security co-operatio

"We view India as an east Asian power," said one official. "India is not limited to the context of its immediate neighbourhood."


India has so far not been included in emerging east Asian institutions, which loosely bind China, Japan and South Korea with south-east Asian nations and the US and Australia.

The US comments coincided with a visit by Manmohan Singh, India's prime minister, to Japan on the first leg of a "Look East" tour that will also take him to Vietnam and Malaysia this week.

Mr Singh and Naoto Kan, Japan's prime minister, concluded negotiations on a economic partnership agreement, paving the way for increased Japanese investment in the fast growing Indian economy.

Indian leaders have expressed fears the country is being hemmed in by Beijing's expanding political and trade ties with Pakistan, Burma, Nepal and Sri Lanka.

"Certainly China is a topic of active discussion between our governments," said a US official. "We don't have identical concerns."

New Delhi has also aired its worries about Washington's relationship with Beijing. It was upset last year when a communiqué issued during Mr Obama's visit to Beijing offered China a role in south Asia.

New Delhi is particularly sensitive about China's ambitions in nuclear-armed Pakistan, its rising maritime might and border disputes in Arunachal Pradesh, India's north-eastern state, and Kashmir.

US officials said inviting India to boost its role in Asia was not an attempt to rebalance Washington's relationship with New Delhi and Beijing. But they said that India would have a larger part in Asian regional forums like the East Asia summit.

Although India is not expected to join the US as a defence ally, India has become the US's most frequent military exercise partner, conducting 50 exercises over the past eight years. US officials are keen to develop the inter-operability of India's military hardware to allow support in anti-piracy, peace-keeping and humanitarian operations.

The US describes its relationship with India as having transformed "exponentially" under the presidencies of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and now Mr Obama.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
India, US plan to join hands to counter Chinese influence in Africa




NEW DELHI: As China sweeps through Africa with an insatiable appetite for resources, India and US plan to join forces in that continent to offer what they believe is a credible alternative.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Barack Obama are expected to announce new pilot projects in African countries that will utilise Indian and US expertise together. While these are likely to be training projects, they plan to bring together India's capacities and experience and US' deeper pockets.

The idea was born as a spinoff of an India-US dialogue on agriculture. Significantly, India and the US have also been discussing agriculture as the basis for working together in Afghanistan.

India has even been approached by Japan to examine the prospect of joint activities in Africa.

In Africa, though, India wants to retain the equity and systems it has built up over the years. Besides, India wants African countries to have a greater say in the kind of projects they want and the quality of local content. That's how India has been functioning in Africa for all these years, and believes it has built a lot of equity. India would be loath to lose that. Therefore, in any cooperation with the US, India would fight to keep its processes and its systems intact.

Nevertheless, sources in the Indian government say there are lots of things India cannot do and the US would be able to bring in singular expertise.

For the US, it can create developmental equity in Africa by partnering a developing country with which it has the greatest affinity.

But these projects, say sources, is one of the ways India and the US will develop the habit of working together. Besides, it would give both countries a way of effectively countering the Chinese juggernaut sweeping through Africa.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
India is not tilting towards US, says PM


KUALA LUMPUR: India is not tilting towards the US and its foreign policy is an expression of "enlightened national interests", Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has said.

The Prime Minister also told Malaysia's New Straits Times in an interview that New Delhi desired speedy reforms of the international financial institutions so that rapidly growing economies like India were properly represented.

Asked if India, once a vocal champion of non-alignment, was tilting to America and the West, the Indian leader replied in the negative.

"We are not tilting in any one direction. The foreign policy of India is an expression of our enlightened national interests. In the globalised world that we live in, the inter-relations and interdependence of nations have increased enormously.

"Therefore, we seek good relations with all major superpowers - the US, Russia, China, Japan. In our continent, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian) countries have assumed great importance for the orderly management of increased interdependence with Southeast Asia. We, therefore, look to ASEAN countries to promote trade, investment and multifaceted cooperation."

The Prime Minister admitted he was not satisfied with the pace of G20's promised economic and financial reform.

"I think the world economy is not really in robust health. There are uncertainties on the horizon. Therefore, on the promise that G20 had held out, I think a lot more remains to be done to realise it," he said.

"I think the reform of the international financial institutions needs to be pushed at a faster pace than ever before. And the coordination of macro-economic policies of various major countries of the world is something that is not moving at the pace one would have liked or anticipated in London or in Pittsburgh or even in Toronto. So, I think there is scope for accelerating the pace of reform."

Manmohan Singh, who is on his second leg of a three-nation Asian tour, spoke glowingly about Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's January visit to New Delhi.

"It was a landmark visit, and the Prime Minister said all the right things. He committed himself along with me to work together to nurture and promote multifaceted economic cooperation, and these are things which need to be done.

" Malaysia is one of the most important countries of the ASEAN region. Therefore, whatever we can say or do, I think is not enough. I believe the sky is the limit in working together to promote trade and investment and promote cooperation in multilateral and regional fora."

Although India is growing at near nine percent, the economist-turned-politician said the country had a "long way to go in removing the ills of chronic and mass poverty... but I do feel we are on the right track".

"In the current fiscal, we hope to achieve a growth rate of over 8.5 percent. Overall, the Indian economy has performed well despite the effects of the global economic crisis and the severe drought last year."

But he underlined that India's objective "is not just growth but inclusive growth. To do so, we need to accelerate the growth rate to 9-10 percent on a sustainable basis".

"We are making continual improvements in our policy regime and implementation procedures. Our priority is to focus on agriculture, infrastructure, health and education.

"I would be the last to say that there is no scope for reforms. I think we need to move ahead in reforming our financial system. We need to move ahead to put in place a reformed direct tax system, and also a reformed indirect system which would lay a lot more emphasis on goods and services tax as the major source of revenue from indirect sources."

The Prime Minister went on to say that Indian companies today were among the most entrepreneurial and competitive globally.

"We have liberalised the FDI (foreign direct investment) regime because we also welcome and need foreign investment, capital, technology and skills for our development plans. We want to ensure a policy framework that is transparent, predictable, simple and reduces regulatory burden."

Manmohan Singh said he wanted to see a comprehensive free trade pact between India and Malaysia and ASEAN.

"We are quite keen to sign a comprehensive free trade arrangement with the ASEAN countries. The goods section is in place. We sincerely hope that all of us have the political will to move ahead with the remaining part of the free trade area in services as well as investments.

"India and Malaysia have successfully concluded negotiations on the text of the India-Malaysia Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA). Both sides hope to conclude the remaining steps and internal approval processes in the very near future. It is my hope that the agreement will come into force next year.

"I am confident that the bilateral arrangement will qualitatively transform our economic relations and boost trade and investment flows between India and Malaysia...

"We attach high importance to the early conclusion of negotiations on the trade-in-services and investment agreement. Both sides are engaged in intensive negotiations, and we hope that a mutually beneficial and high-quality agreement can be reached soon."

To a query, he said: "Our government is making continuous efforts to improve and streamline the policies and procedures for foreign companies to do business in India. We have taken a number of significant measures to liberalise the investment regime and simplify procedures for foreign companies."

"With the entry into force of the CECA with Malaysia next year, there will be much greater opportunities for the Malaysian business community in the Indian market.

"The sustained growth of the Indian economy and significant new demands in the infrastructure sector present an excellent opportunity for Malaysian companies in the coming years. We welcome investments by Malaysian businesses," he added.

He said that India and China had followed different models of growth best suited to their domestic requirements.

"Our FDI regime in both manufacturing and services is liberal and increasingly oriented to requirements of foreign businesses. We received about $35 billion in FDI in the last financial year and we hope that this figure will grow. According to global agencies, India is one of the three most popular destinations for FDI."

The Prime Minister agreed that lack of infrastructure was an impediment to growth. "We are fully conscious of this. We have announced a massive spending programme for infrastructure development. I am conscious it cannot be done by government alone because the resources required are huge.

"The strategy for infrastructure development, therefore, involves a combination of public investments supplemented by private investments through the public-private partnership (PPP) route.

"Malaysian companies are already participating in our highway and power projects. We welcome much more participation from Malaysia.

"We will continue to improve the terms and conditions on which PPP projects are awarded to ensure that the process is transparent, bidding is competitive and, at the same time, public interest is adequately safeguarded."

India, he added, was committed to resolving all outstanding issues with Pakistan through dialogue.

"I met the Prime Minister of Pakistan on the sidelines of the SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) Summit in Bhutan in April. Both of us have charged our foreign ministers and foreign secretaries with the responsibility of working out the modalities for restoring trust and confidence in the relationship and paving the way for a substantive dialogue on all issues of mutual concern."
 

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
"We view India as an East Asian power"

This statement should be unaccetable to Indian policy makers. India is equally an East as well as West Asian power. Obvioulsy the US does not want India to "interfere" into its monopoly in West Asia but also to placate Pakistan.

India on its own however needs to maintain its power projection capabilities and influence from the Gulf of Aden to the Straits of Malacca which includes the Indian Ocean RIM region and definiltey includes the Persian Gulf.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
"We view India as an East Asian power"

This statement should be unaccetable to Indian policy makers. India is equally an East as well as West Asian power. Obvioulsy the US does not want India to "interfere" into its monopoly in West Asia but also to placate Pakistan.

India on its own however needs to maintain its power projection capabilities and influence from the Gulf of Aden to the Straits of Malacca which includes the Indian Ocean RIM region and definiltey includes the Persian Gulf.
Pentagon always see india under pacific command so its always the pacific command forces which exercise with indian forces. pakistan always came under centcom hence only centcom forces exercise with pakistan.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1101028/jsp/nation/story_13110303.jsp


Roemer's remarks appeared to be in reply to the Indian assumption that Headley was a US double agent, which is why information about him was not shared earlier. Headley was arrested only after he went rogue, Indian intelligence agencies have deduced.

It appears certain that Headley will be discussed during Obama's visit next month. Sources said the counter-terrorism discussion could centre on 26/11 and Headley.

Having learnt a lesson from the Headley experience and given that the US would eventually exit from Afghanistan, the home ministry is planning to de-link India's intelligence gathering from dependence on US assets in West Asia and South Asia. :?:

"We would like to depend on our own network which we would expand and strengthen," said a source. External intelligence agency RAW's mandate would then be expanded.
 

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
Pentagon always see india under pacific command so its always the pacific command forces which exercise with indian forces. pakistan always came under centcom hence only centcom forces exercise with pakistan.
That is true, but the Indians should pursue a new startegic map with the Americans because this unnatural division is not inline with the India world view.

The US should come with a new Indian Ocean Command or a South Asian command. And since they recently created AFRICOM, its time to review this as well.

Middle east ends at Iran, preferably at Iraq. After than it should come under the South/Central Asian purview.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Top US intel official reviews handling of info on Headley


2010-10-28 12:00:00
Last Updated: 2010-10-28 12:09:11
Franklin TempletonAds by GoogleInvest in our fixed income funds Add balance to your portfolio www.FranklinTempletonIndia.com
Washington: The US has launched a review of its agencies' handling of inputs provided by two of the three wives of David Headley about his involvement in the 26/11 strikes, a top Obama administration official today said, even as India expressed disappointment for not being provided specific information on the Mumbai attacks plotter.

Headley: India 'disappointed', US says it shared 26/11 info

"The Director of National Intelligence (Admiral (Retd) James Clapper) has ordered a full review of everything that we knew related to the Headley case," Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communication Ben Rhodes told a group of Washington-based Indian reporters at a special White House briefing on Obama's maiden India trip from November 6 to 9.

"Some of this is vast amount of information within the US intelligence system and the nature of the kind of information that we received in this instance from Headley's ex-wives, which was of a more general nature.

"But we want to find exactly, given the importance of this case... whenever we have that information, whenever the review is completed, we will certainly share that with Indians as well in the spirit of the co-operation and partnership that we have," Rhodes said in response to a question.

US did not share information on Headley, asserts Pillai

However, Rhodes said that with regard to the inputs that has come to light recently, the clear understanding of the Obama Administration is that it shared information that the government had from Headley before 26/11.

"If we had information that could have helped to prevent the attacks and pinpoint specific aspects of the attack, we would have certainly shared that too," Rhodes said.

"The fact of the matter is that the information that we had before 26/11 was not of that nature. It was more just a far more general and less specific. However, after we picked up Headley, we did know a lot about 26/11," he said.

However, in New Delhi, Home Secretary G K Pillai said that Indian agencies were "disappointed" that specific inputs on Headley were not provided by the US, which could have helped it arrest him on his second visit before the attacks.

It could have been Delhi after Mumbai, Headley admits

Rhodes, however, said, "Not only we shared that information, it is signal of strength of our counter-terrorism co-operation, we actually provided access to Headley for the Indian security services so that they were able to ask him questions directly, which continue to flesh out and understanding what took place on 26/11."

"From our standpoint there has always been sharing of information. We share information with India as a partner. Whenever we have something, we think is directly relevant to their security we certainly did so in the sense. It has been even closer in recent years, which is evidenced by the access being provided to Headley for the Indians," Rhodes said.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Top US intel official reviews handling of info on Headley
An eyewash in my opinion. Why is this inquiry now when they know India will be raising this issue strongly on presidential visit ?
 

maomao

Veteran Hunter of Maleecha
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2010
Messages
5,033
Likes
8,354
Country flag
Self-Delete...........................................................................
 
Last edited:

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Obama's security dog named 'Khan': Muslims irked

Muslims in Mumbai [ Images ] are up in arms against a United States military sniffer dog allegedly with name tag of 'Khan' that has landed in the city as part of President Barack Obama [ Images ] security arrangements.

On Tuesday, the German Shepherd arrived in the Mumbai airport from a Hercules C130 transport plane. The German Shepherd allegedly had a tag around its neck which read 'MWD Khan.' MWD stands for Military Working Dog. Khan is alleged to be the name of the dog.

Angry Muslims in the city and the state are threatening to protest this 'insult' to the community.

The issue became a rage when a tabloid had reported the incident and quoted veteran actor Raza Murad objecting to the dog being named 'Khan.'

Though noted lyricist Javed Akhtar [ Images ] had been quoted to ignore the issue and focus on welcoming the VIP guest.

Maharashtra [ Images ] Samajwadi Party leader MLA Abu Asim Azmi also threatened to undertake a protest. He said that the US deliberately wants to incite the Muslims through such acts and the party would stage a protest on the issue.

Prominent Muslim religious heads have expressed anger and dismay on the information of a US dog being named 'Khan.' Maulana Syed Athar Ali said that it is a known fact that Muslims detest pigs and dogs.

"To name a dog a Muslim name by US security agencies is to deliberately incite the Muslim community. We would be meeting soon and devise a strategy to protest and seek apology from the US," said Maulana Athar Ali.

Obama's security dog named 'Khan': Muslims irked - Rediff.com India News
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Obama's security dog named 'Khan': Muslims irked
This is over reaction. In india its fashion to give English or western names to pets . These mullas should oppose that first . westerners can also feel offended but no one has complained till now.
 

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
Indo-US business deals worth $15 bn struck

Washington/Mumbai, Nov 6 (IANS) Ahead of US President Barack Obama's address to CEOs in Mumbai, the White House announced the following deals worth almost $15 billion that will support 53,670 jobs in the US.

The following is the list of deals:

-Heavy Transport Aircraft: Preliminary agreement between the Boeing Company and Indian Air Force on the purchase of 10 C-17 Globemaster-III military transport aircraft. This transaction is valued at $4.1 billion in US export content, supporting 22,160 jobs.

-Engine Sale for the Light Combat Aircraft: Connecticut-based General Electric to supply provide 107 engines for the Tejas light combat aircraft of Hindustan Aeronautics. This transaction is valued at $822 million in US export content, supporting 4,440 jobs.

-Commercial Aircraft Sale: Boeing Company to sell for the sale of 30 737-800 commercial aircraft to SpiceJet, which currently operates 22 Boeing aircraft. This transaction is valued at $2.7 billion, with US expoert content of $2.4 billion, supporting 12,970 jobs.

-Gas and Steam Turbine Sale: General Electric to supply six advanced gas turbines and three steam turbines for the 2,500-megawatt Samalkot power plant of Reliance Power, part of the Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group. The deal is valued at $750 million, with $491 million in US export content, supporting 2,650 jobs.

-Financial Support on Infrastructure: US Ex-Im Bank Agreement will provide Reliance Power, the flagship of Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group, $5 billion in financial support for the purchase of US goods and services for 8,000 megawatts of gas-fired electricity generating units and 900 megawatts of renewable energy.

-Diesel Locomotive Manufacturing Venture: The Indian Ministry of Railways announces pre-qualification of GE Transportation and Electro-Motive Diesel for a venture to make and supply of 1,000 diesel locomotives over 10 years. The estimated US content of contract to exceed $1 billion.

-Motorcycle Assembly Plant: Harley-Davidson Motor Company says preparations underway to open a new plant in India for the assembly of motorcycles.

-Mining Equipment: US Export-Import Bank announces approval of more than $900 million in export finance guarantees to Sasan Power, a subsidiary of Reliance Power, supporting the sale of US mining equipment and services from Bucyrus International and other vendors for 3,960-megawatt coal-fired Sasan power plant in Madhya Pradesh. This commitment supports $641 million in US export content, and estimated 3,460 jobs.

-Tunneling Equipment: Robbins Company of Ohio announces an agreement to provide tunnel-boring machines, conveyer equipment, and associated technical services for Mumbai. The Mumbai contract alone is valued at $10 million, with $7 million in US. export content, supporting an estimated 35 jobs.

-Homeland Security Pilot Projects: Palantir Technologies in Silicon Valley announces a strategic partnership agreement with the Maharashtra State Police for pilot program on end-to-end analytical software platform to identify and alert authorities to security threats in order to help keep the citizens of Mumbai and Maharashtra safe.

-Medanta Duke Research Institute: Duke Medicine in North Carolina, one of the leading academic health systems, and Medanta Medicity in Gurgaon, announce joint venture to on clinical research. Duke will be partner Jubilant Life Sciences of Uttar Pradesh to conduct research studies and co-develop promising discoveries.

- Long-range Antenna System for Rural Telecommunications: SPX Communication Technology in Maine in the final phase of the pilot deployment of its long-range antenna system with two leading Indian mobile operators. The value of the initial trial equipment is expected to generate $1 million, with 100 percent US export content.

-Pre-fabricated Housing: Spancrete Machinery of Wisconsin announces the sale of six sets of its hollow core, precast production equipment, including installation, training, and after-sales support, to Hindustan Prefab. This transaction is valued at approximately $35 million, all of which is U.S. export content, supporting 30 jobs.

-Cell Phone Rollout: Intuit of California will launch new mobile and web-based marketing service in partnership with Nokia. This innovative technology will help Indian micro and small businesses.

-Unique Identification Project: L-1 Identity Solutions of Connecticut and other US firms pre-qualified by the Unique Identity Authority of India for the first phase of an effort to register Indian residents with a 12-digit unique number using biometric identifiers.

-Precision Measurement Instruments for Fuel Cell Research: Advanced Materials of Pennsylvania to supply a specially-designed pressure-composition isotherm measurement onstrument to the Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi.

-Trace Explosive Detection Equipment: Implant Sciences of Massachusetts signs contract with the Ministry of Defence to supply its Quantum Sniffer H-150, trace detection devices for the Indian Army to detect the presence of explosive, bomb-making materials that could be used in a terrorist attack. The transaction is valued at $6 million, all of which in US export content, supporting an estimated 30 jobs.

-Helicopter Sale: Bell Helicopter of Texas has signed agreement with Span Air, a private Indian air charter company, for its first Bell Model 429 corporate VIP helicopter in. Bell recently sold its 100th helicopter in India.

-Pre-owned Refurbished Healthcare Equipment: Skelley Medical of New Hampshire to sell refurbished medical equipment to Indian hospitals in second and third tier cities.

-Monitoring Equipment for Greening Buildings: Noveda Technologies of New Jersey finalizing a venture with Chennai-based Wysine Technology to jointly develop and market a new solution for web-based, real-time energy monitoring for greening of buildings.

-Dredges for Maharashtra: Ellicott Dredges in Maryland announces sale of two cutter suction dredges to the state-run Maharashtra Maritime Board. The equipment will be utilized to dredge a fisherman's port and various tributaries in the state of Maharashtra.
 

nawa

New Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
2
Likes
0
Pakistan is not safe enough for the US president to visit.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
The return of the US to Asia

November 08, 2010 7:47:03 PM

B Raman

President Barack Obama's second Asia trip, which begins with his official visit to India, has a larger message: America is determined to maintain its political and military primacy in this region and not to concede it to China. A lot has changed in US-China relations since Obama's visit to Beijing. Understandably, the Chinese are looking closely at this visit

The visit of US President Barack Obama to India, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea will be as important as his earlier swing through the Asia-Pacific region after assuming office in January 2009. His first swing was in November last year when he visited Japan, Singapore, China and South Korea.

Japan and South Korea are figuring in both these swings, indicating the importance attached by him to the US's relations with its two military allies in Asia. Highlighting the US's solidarity with these two countries and its security commitments to them have been an important hallmark of his Asia-Pacific policy. One has again seen this recently in the joint exercises held by the US Navy with the South Korean Navy despite Chinese concerns in the wake of the alleged sinking of a South Korean naval ship by North Korea and in the reiteration by Ms Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, during her current swing across the Asia-Pacific region that the US security commitments to Japan covered the Senkaku group of islands in the East China Sea too. While the US wished for a peaceful resolution of the dispute between Japan and China, its security commitments to Japan will continue to cover these islands too so long as there is no definitive settlement between Japan and China on the question of sovereignty over the islands.

In addition to Japan and South Korea, his Asia-Pacific focus has been on China, India and Indonesia in that order. The reasons for the priority given to China in his Asia-Pacific policy have been economic as well as military — the impact of China's rise as an economic power on the US economy and the impact of China's rise as a military power on peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region and on the freedom of navigation in the waters of the area. Economic issues such as the alleged Chinese manipulation of the value of its currency in order to maintain its exports to the US to the detriment of the US manufacturing sector and the alleged Chinese use of its monopoly in the production of rare earths as a political weapon against countries such as Japan are increasingly figuring in the diplomatic discourse between the US and China.

China-related issues with military implications such as the increasing assertiveness of the Chinese Navy, the modernisation of its armed forces and Beijing's repeated emphasis on its "core interests" even if they are at the expense of the "mutual interests" of the countries of the region have led to two consequences. First, a US determination to maintain the primacy of its Navy in the Asia-Pacific region and second, its increasing interest in bilateral issues involving China and the countries of the region such as China's disputes with Japan and some ASEAN countries, particularly Vietnam, on the question of sovereignty over the islands in the East and South China Sea.

Mr Obama's enhanced interest in India has economic as well as military origin. Economically, while the Indian manufacturing sector poses no threat to the US manufacturing sector similar to the threat posed by the Chinese manufacturing sector, India's services sector, particularly its lead in the information technology sector, is casting, in his view, a lengthening shadow on the US job market. Hence, his unyielding pressure against outsourcing to India to the detriment of the unemployed in the US. Mr Obama's inability to deal effectively with the US economy has been an important contributing factor to the decline in his popularity and to the set-back expected to be suffered by his party in the current mid-term elections to the US Congress. It could come in the way of his own chances of re-election as the President. Mr Obama's economic pressure against both China — on the question of its manipulated currency — and India on the issue of outsourcing would continue at least till the next presidential elections. Neither China nor India can expect any gestures from him on economic issues.

The military origin of his enhanced interest in India arises from the huge Indian market for military equipment. An increase in the US sales of military equipment to India will have three benefits for the US: an increase in jobs in the US, enhanced US political influence on Indian policy-making and a check on China's power aspirations in the region. The pressure on India to buy more military equipment from the US will continue to be an important component of the US policy towards India. Continuing restrictions on the sale of military-related equipment to China and a gradual relaxation of the existing curbs in relation to India are to be expected in the months to come.

A major enunciation of the US policy towards the Asia-Pacific region came in one of Mr Obama's speeches in Japan during his first swing in November, 2009. He said: "There must be no doubt. As America's first Pacific President, I promise you that this Pacific nation will strengthen and sustain our leadership in this vitally important part of the world." He described himself as the US's first Pacific President because of his birth in Hawaii, his living in Indonesia as a boy and his mother spending nearly a decade working in the villages of South East Asia. He added: "The Pacific rim has helped shape my view of the world."

In his enunciation of what will be his policy in the Asia-Pacific region, he said: "Since taking office, I have worked to renew American leadership and pursue a new era of engagement with the world based on mutual interests and mutual respect. And our efforts in the Asia Pacific will be rooted, in no small measure, through an enduring and revitalised alliance between the United States and Japan."

Explaining why he decided to start his first swing from Japan, he said that he was beginning his journey there in part because of "our common values — a belief in the democratic right of free people to choose their own leaders and realise their own dreams; a belief that made possible the election of both Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama and myself on the promise of change."

He had a message for China too. "The United States does not seek to contain China, nor does a deeper relationship with China mean a weakening of our bilateral alliances. On the contrary, the rise of a strong, prosperous China can be a source of strength for the community of nations. And so in Beijing and beyond, we will work to deepen our Strategic and Economic Dialogue, and improve communication between our militaries. We will not agree on every issue, and the United States will never waver in speaking up for the fundamental values that we hold dear — and that includes respect for the religion and cultures of all people. Because support for human rights and human dignity is ingrained in America. But we can move these discussions forward in a spirit of partnership rather than rancor."

Chinese analysts looked upon his first swing across the region, the subsequent swings of Ms Clinton and other US policy-makers and the increasing US interest in its relations with the ASEAN and its member-countries as "the return of the US to Asia" — to underline that it was determined to maintain its political and military primacy in this region and not to concede it to China. While the Chinese have the confidence that China can compete against the US economically, they do not have the confidence that it can compete against it ideologically, politically and militarily.

After having seen the increased articulation of the US interests in this region after his first swing, they are watching nervously what the second swing will portend for China and its big power ambitions. It is significant that just as Mr Obama chose Japan, a democracy, for the start of his first swing, he has chosen India, another democracy, for the start of his second swing. Just as he emphasised the US's ideological compatibility with Japan in his address in Tokyo, the spotlight during his visit to India will be on the US's ideological compatibility with India.

What would this mean in terms of the US's relations with India and China? That is the question to which Chinese analysts are trying to find an answer. They are still confused.

-- The writer, a former senior officer of R&AW, is a strategic affairs commentator.
 

AirforcePilot

Professional
Joined
Oct 17, 2009
Messages
194
Likes
70
Obama backs permanent seat for India on Security Council

Obama backs permanent seat for India on Security Council

New Delhi, India (CNN) -- In another major sign of growing ties between India and the United States, President Barack Obama on Monday backed a permanent seat for India in the U.N. Security Council.

"In the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member," he said in an address to the Indian parliament.

The statement came as Obama made a wide-ranging address that envisioned closer economic and security ties between the United States and India, standing "shoulder to shoulder" with the world's largest democracy.

In a swift reaction, Pakistan said it is discounting the possibility of such a development. The Foreign Ministry said that "India's aspirations for recognition as a global power notwithstanding, there are reasons enough to discredit this proposed direction of the process of UNSC reforms."

It cites "India's conduct in relations with its neighbors and its continued flagrant violations of Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir," a disputed region that the nuclear rivals have fought about.

Ben Rhodes, a top White House aide, told reporters before the speech that the Obama administration wants to "send as clear a statement as possible" that the United States sees India as a "rising player" on the international stage.

But Rhodes said the United States is "not getting into" details about the time frame in which the United States would like to see India get the permanent seat and whether it will push to get India veto power as well.

Rhodes, a senior staffer on the National Security Council, said the president's endorsement "speaks volumes" about U.S. support for India and the administration will let the key details be "hashed out" by the United Nations itself.

At present, there are five permanent members -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain, and France. All have veto power.

Actually getting India a permanent seat will not be easy. Obama administration officials acknowledged that they and previous administrations have supported Japan, Germany and Brazil at various times for permanent seats on the Security Council without any success so far.

Before Monday's announcement was made, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh alluded to the deal during a joint news conference before Obama's speech to parliament in which he highlighted the close cooperation on major issues typically confronted by the United Nations.

"As states possessing nuclear weapons, we have today put forth a common vision of a world without nuclear weapons, and decided to lead global efforts for non-proliferation and universal and non-discriminatory global nuclear disarmament," Singh said.

"This is a historic and bold bilateral initiative. We have also decided to strengthen cooperation to tackle nuclear terrorism, and we welcome U.S. participation in the Global Center for Nuclear Energy Partnership, which will be set up in India."

Pakistan, noting that reform is a "difficult process and will take significant time," said it hopes that the United States "will take a moral view and not base itself on any temporary expediency or exigencies of power politics."

"Pakistan believes that U.S endorsement of India's bid for its permanent seat in the Security Council adds to the complexity of the process of reforms of the Council," the Foreign Ministry's written statement said.

"Pakistan's position on U.N. Security Council's reforms is based on principles. Any reform of the Council that contradicts the very fundamental principles of the U.N. Charter -- including the principle of sovereign equality; of equal rights and self-determination; and the principle of collective security -- would gravely undermine the system of international relations based on the U.N. Charter principles."

Obama, who mourned the deaths of American citizens in the November 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai and the killings of Indian citizens in the September, 11, 2001, strikes in the United States, said the shared bond is prompting both countries to work together to fight terrorism.

He addressed the conflict in Afghanistan and Pakistan in his speech.

"America's fight against al Qaeda and its terrorist affiliates is why we persevere in Afghanistan, where major development assistance from India has improved the lives of the Afghan people."

He said the United States is working with Pakistan to address the threat of terror networks, such as those in Pakistan that were responsible for the Mumbai attacks, and it welcomes "dialogue" between the governments in New Delhi and Islamabad.

"The Pakistani government increasingly recognizes that these networks are not just a threat outside of Pakistan -- they are a threat to the Pakistani people, who have suffered greatly at the hands of violent extremists," said Obama.

"And we will continue to insist to Pakistan's leaders that terrorist safe-havens within their borders are unacceptable, and that the terrorists behind the Mumbai attacks be brought to justice. We must also recognize that all of us have an interest in both an Afghanistan and a Pakistan that is stable, prosperous and democratic -- and India has an interest in that as well."

Obama said India and the United States "are now ready to begin implementing our civil nuclear agreement," a measure he called a "landmark" deal. At the same time, he talked about the importance of reducing the spread of nuclear weapons.

"The United States and India can pursue our goal of securing the world's vulnerable nuclear material. We can make it clear that even as every nation has the right to peaceful nuclear energy, every nation must also meet its international obligations -- and that includes the Islamic Republic of Iran."

Obama also said Monday that "the world cannot remain silent" as "peaceful democratic movements are suppressed," citing the government of Myanmar, also known as Burma.

"For it is unacceptable to gun down peaceful protesters and incarcerate political prisoners decade after decade. It is unacceptable to hold the aspirations of an entire people hostage to the greed and paranoia of a bankrupt regime. It is unacceptable to steal an election, as the regime in Burma has done again for all the world to see," he said.

He said India shouldn't avoid condemning human rights violations.

"If I can be frank, in international fora, India has often shied away from some of these issues. But speaking up for those who cannot do so for themselves is not interfering in the affairs of other countries. It's not violating the rights of sovereign nations. It's staying true to our democratic principles. "

Obama hailed Mahatma Gandhi, who used peaceful non-violence to help India gain its independence, and he noted Gandhi's influence on Martin Luther King and the non-violent resistance that typified the American civil rights movement.

"I am mindful that I might not be standing before you today, as president of the United States, had it not been for Gandhi and the message he shared and inspired with America and the world," the president said.

Obama lauded India's rise on the world stage, saying that "for Asia and around the world, India is not simply emerging; India has already emerged" and he said the country is unleashing an "economic marvel." He envisions, he said, U.S.-Indian relations as "one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century."

He said India has overcome critics who say the country was too poor, vast and diverse to succeed, citing its Green Revolution and investments in science and technology.

"The world sees the results, from the supercomputers you build to the Indian flag that you put on the moon."

Obama praised India's democratic institutions: its free electoral system, independent judiciary, the rule of law, and free press. He said India and the United States have a unique link because they are democracies and free-market economies.

"When Indians vote, the whole world watches. Thousands of political parties. Hundreds of thousands of polling centers. Millions of candidates and poll workers, and 700 million voters. There's nothing like it on the planet. There is so much that countries transitioning to democracy could learn from India's experience; so much expertise that India can share with the world. That, too, is what's possible when the world's largest democracy embraces its role as a global leader," he said.

Noting the country's rise as a world power, Obama said he sees the United States cooperating with India in various international and regional alliances. He praised India's role in the climate change negotiations and its role as a top contributor in U.N. peacekeeping missions.

Obama talked about the two countries pursuing joint research efforts, such as starting green jobs. He talked about reducing barriers to foreign investments, helping India improve weather forecasting before monsoons and aiding families in saving water.

He mentioned improved food processing and sharing India's knowledge with African farmers, with support for India's efforts to battle disease and increase educational exchanges.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/11/08/obama.india.address/index.html?hpt=T2
 

gogbot

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
937
Likes
120
so far we have been the back end of crumbling empires:
I dont understand what you mean there

mughal empire
The Mughal's empire was forged and destroyed in India.
If there was no Indian there would have been India

ottoman empire
not sure how this ties in with India

british empire
We made their empire , without India they would not have been able to fund half the things they did.

Soviet empire
I would beg to differ, the soviets never had an empire to begin with.

Second their rise to power was only in the 1950's and 1960's
India has been with Soviets from that time onwards to the 1990's.

We simply outlived the Soviets. but we were very much there from the start.

US empire
Do you imagine it just disappearing of the face of the planet.

Regardless of what happens the US will remain a major power for our lifetime.
Economically , politically and Diplomatic'y

You took the words out of my mouth... I'm speechless....

Contrast with the Pakistanis who always get the best out of every empire they ally themselves with... They were with the US during the pink of their health and now they seem to be going toward China when China is reaching the pink of its health...
Yhea Pakistan is doing real well.

Religious extreamist's
Failing economy
Useless power grid
Military coups

They have really been able to extract maximum benefit, to get the prestigious status of failed state.

What's going to change with China.

They would not even give them a loan.
So they had to go begging to the IMF.

They camped in front of the US gate and now they want to do the same at the China.

IMHO, that is exactly what we are doing... boarding a sinking Ship...

I agree, the US will militarily remain the most potent nation for a long time to come, but only military force is not enough to achieve what it (or any other nation for that matter) wants... it also requires credibility and backing from other nations in the world (in most cases)

America will have the first, but the second and third seem to be a little difficult, recession or no recession... now that China is asserting itself and punching more than its weight and fair share...
The difference between US and China is still in the Decades. Nothing is set in stone.

Just because we see China or India eclipsing the US someday.

Does not change the fact they will be the worlds largest economy for the next 15 - 25 years.

Does not change the fact we can't get a permanent seat on the US security council without their hepl.

Does not change the fact they have the money and the technology we want.

Lets get one thing straight, the US may be a sinking ship but it is a bloody big ship. Its going to take long time for it to sink if ever.

WE want the Permanent seat on the UNSC , we Want American capital investment, We want American technology and military hardware.

In order to get that we need to give something back as well

For all the Noise people were making on this visit.
It sent all the right message.

Primary issues of Indian institutes on the US export ban list and security council issues were at the forefront.

Frankly what surprises me most in people comments is the fact
that people are surprised at the US looking out for their interests first
and then decide to make a point about that.
We would do the same in their position.
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Obama's security dog named 'Khan': Muslims irked

Muslims in Mumbai [ Images ] are up in arms against a United States military sniffer dog allegedly with name tag of 'Khan' that has landed in the city as part of President Barack Obama [ Images ] security arrangements.
The word 'Khan' has existed before the Muslims. It actually derives etymologically from French 'chan' or latin 'canus' <which goes to show you how old it is>

As Vinod rightly said, it was borrowed into Turkish, and from there into Mongolian, Persian and Arabic where it meant 'prince' or 'chieftain', long before Islam.

It's German variant 'Kahn' is also in widespread use.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top