India's Vietnam

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,585
The Sri Lankans are dreaming about Hambantota. The max depth that can be achieved even through dredging is 20 - 21 m. The Vizhinjam port has a natural depth of 24 meters. The International shipping lane, is less than 10 km from the Vizhinjam port unlike Hambantota which is 20 km away. So Vizhinjam is a deeper and larger port, closer to the shipping lane. Where do you think the ships are going to dock?

The Chinese know all this. The Chinese are building the port there for military docking and they will pay SL a small amount of money for that. SL wont have a choice as they need some money rather than nothing.

This is the simple reason why India backed away from Hambantota when SL offered it to us. The issue is that our strategists overlooked the possibility of China misusing it for military purposes. That can be corrected however, if strategic situation so demands, by a single 3KT tipped Brahmos missile. :)
 

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,385
Likes
603
Country flag
@trackwhack

Than you don't know much. Indian PMs don't involve the Parliament on international issues; more so when it is RAW at work. Asking the parliament for RAW to act is the most ridiculous thing I've heard! It wouldn't be much of a secret agency if that was the case, now would it?
you contradict yourself

I surely hope that you also return India's money which it has bloody given away for free to develop the Kankesanthurai port and the millions they are giving away to develop industries and infrastructure in Northern Sri Lanka. Maybe we should "invest" this money too. Ridiculous!
India giving money for northern SL because of TN pressure....... or else name any other project India started in the Sinhala majority areas for free....

60 years? Lets see, the Sinhalese put in place the "Sinhala Official Language Act" which failed to give official language recognition to the Tamils which resulted them in being singled out and kicked out of government jobs, your government banned all imported media or literature of the Tamil language, your government took the discrimination to universities where the qualifying marks required for Tamil students were significantly higher than what was required for Sinhalese students, a "district quota" system was introduced in place of nation wide merit simply to discriminate the Tamils from being able to receive higher education; and if all that wasn't enough, the Sinhalese government stripped away the citizenship of millions of Tamils so that they couldn't vote and the Sinhalese could get 2/3 majority in Parliament (not until 2003 those Tamil's citizenship was restored).
1. Sinhala only act didn't kicked Tamils out of jobs rather many Tamil civil servants learnt Sinhalese...... also when Brits were in control neither Tamil nor Sinhalese was the official language why not Tamils objected about that? naturally Sinhalese have the right to call Sinhala the official language based upon the majority....... anyway no major Tamil politician even objected to Sinhala only act.

"the Social Diasbilities Act No. 21 was passed in parliament in 1957 giving lower castes the right to attend schools & kovils. Its good for the western world to know that it was a Sinhalese who opened the doors for low caste Tamils to attend schools & kovils – places that were taboo to them by their own Tamil brethren. No sooner the Tamil high castes & high classes realized the dangers of mainstream parties courting the low castes they devised their response. It was to create the best division possible. A rift between the Tamils & Sinhalese which would strike better success than low caste-high caste divisions. Who remembers the satyagrahas, the tarring of Sinhala letters on vehicle registration numbers. All launched by the ITAC & Tamil Congress – both high caste/class political parties.

It is important to note that all these happened a year after making Sinhala the official language. Why did the Tamils not cry foul over the Sinhala Only Act in 1956 but oppose the Social Disabilities Act on 1957 with such venom? It is because Tamils wanted to deprive their own."
LankaWeb – Eelaam Homeland struggle was to hide Tamil Caste difference & unify discontented Tamils

2. Where and when SL government banned Tamil literature give further details to this allegation...

3. Government introduced university standardization in 1973 those that opposed were those who were against equitable distribution. Students of all ethnicities from Colombo, Jaffna, Kandy, Galle who had been privy to education opposed opportunities that would be enjoyed by students from Batticaloa, Vanni, Nuwara Eliya, Monaragala & other less developed districts. While the composition of the ethnicities did not change entrance, for Tamils it meant not only the Vellalar caste but lower caste Tamils too would gain university entrance. This was why Tamils opposed the 1973 standardization.

if you aren't sure check Wikipedia Policy of standardization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

4.Those Tamils that their citizenship was striped were Indians coolies brought to SL by Brits to work in tea states... however we kept half the number of them in SL.... and does Sinhalese majority fades away for million of Tamil collie votes? you should also remember that the politician who represents the Tamil collies in SL are always stayed with the central government and not with separatist parties like TNA.

And you dare to compare such discrimination with Muslims in India? A country which has seen 4 Muslim Presidents, 3 Muslim vice-Presidents, including the present one, Mohammad Hamid Ansari, where the prime lingua of Indian Muslims, Urdu, has been accorded official language status since Independence, and even their religious Sharia law given place in family-law courts! How dare you compare Sinhalese discrimination of Tamils with the Muslims of India!?
I'm not going to mention everyone but Muralitharan.... also from hill country (an Indian Tamil descended)

And interestingly, I would like to ask you, so what exactly do you want the Indian government to do, concerning Sri Lanka? This is what boggles my mind. This government has probably been one of the most pro-SL government which has come to power in Sri Lanka and if you're still complaining than I really want to know what exactly you want.
what SL needs from GoI is that to stay resolute to TN demands.... we know that TN leaders and most of TN people take decision not from the brain but by the heart...... we need GoI to learn the truth and stay with SL in UNHR..... we want GoI to help in SL development without and hindrance form India.....

The Sri Lankans are dreaming about Hambantota. The max depth that can be achieved even through dredging is 20 - 21 m. The Vizhinjam port has a natural depth of 24 meters. The International shipping lane, is less than 10 km from the Vizhinjam port unlike Hambantota which is 20 km away. So Vizhinjam is a deeper and larger port, closer to the shipping lane. Where do you think the ships are going to dock?
here is the typical east-west trade route running through Indian ocean





now you can see which one is the closest to the trade routes.....
 

Tronic

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
1,915
Likes
1,279
you contradict yourself
In regards to what?

You are claiming that Indian PM didn't act alone as RAW was involved, therefore India is the culprit.

So what are you suggesting? That Premdasa is the sole culprit as it was he himself who drove a truck filled with concrete and Ak-47s and delivered them to the LTTE to use against Indian soldiers?

What logic.


India giving money for northern SL because of TN pressure....... or else name any other project India started in the Sinhala majority areas for free....
India is developing the Tamil areas because they are the most underdeveloped part of your country and have been the epicenters of the civil war! If you still consider Tamils as part of your country, you should be happy that India is taking the initiative to develop those parts of your country! Secondly, India has been providing training to your soldiers and police, most of whom are Sinhalese. Also, dolling out business to Sri Lankan yards by handing out ship construction orders for Indian coast guard ships. Last I checked, Sri Lankan yards were handed over business to construct 80 fast interceptor crafts for the Indian navy.

As for "TN pressure", learn a bit about who is sitting in power in Delhi before criticizing them blindly. The TN government has zero say in India's foriegn policy at the moment as they are not part of the ruling coalition. Hell, the TN government is not even part of the main opposition! You are just paranoid about TN, it has zero say in India's national policies at the moment.


1. Sinhala only act didn't kicked Tamils out of jobs rather many Tamil civil servants learnt Sinhalese......
"Many" Tamil civil servants may have learnt Sinhalese, but the majority didn't and got kicked out of their jobs.

And, even if, had every single Tamil learnt Sinhalese to keep their job, it is still discrimination.

also when Brits were in control neither Tamil nor Sinhalese was the official language why not Tamils objected about that?
English was not a native language of either Sinhalese or Tamils so you both had equal chances; one group wasn't discriminating another, like the Sinhalese did to the Tamils.

naturally Sinhalese have the right to call Sinhala the official language based upon the majority.......
And my point exactly. With a mindset like that, how can you even dare to compare with India?


anyway no major Tamil politician even objected to Sinhala only act.
Yes, they did. A compromise had to be reached, but it was just the start of the discrimination. Eventually, Sinhalese pushed the Tamils off the edge, which resulted in the civil war.


"the Social Diasbilities Act No. 21 was passed in parliament in 1957 giving lower castes the right to attend schools & kovils. Its good for the western world to know that it was a Sinhalese who opened the doors for low caste Tamils to attend schools & kovils – places that were taboo to them by their own Tamil brethren. No sooner the Tamil high castes & high classes realized the dangers of mainstream parties courting the low castes they devised their response. It was to create the best division possible. A rift between the Tamils & Sinhalese which would strike better success than low caste-high caste divisions. Who remembers the satyagrahas, the tarring of Sinhala letters on vehicle registration numbers. All launched by the ITAC & Tamil Congress – both high caste/class political parties.

It is important to note that all these happened a year after making Sinhala the official language. Why did the Tamils not cry foul over the Sinhala Only Act in 1956 but oppose the Social Disabilities Act on 1957 with such venom? It is because Tamils wanted to deprive their own."
LankaWeb – Eelaam Homeland struggle was to hide Tamil Caste difference & unify discontented Tamils
The Tamils protested vehemently against the Sinhala Only Act. Eventually a compromise had to take place in 1958, where the SL government agreed to allow Tamils to use their language, but without according it an official status. That Tamils didn't protest the act is total hogwash. Tamil caste-ism may well have been there, and they may well have been discriminating the lower caste; but, the Sri Lankan government was no saviour. Infact, the percentage of Tamils studying in universities actually dropped after the Sri Lankan government's Policy of standardization! Sri Lankan government started a district-quota system (automatically reserving more seats for the Sinhalese) for admissions to universities and colleges. It was clearly a policy to sideline the more educated Tamils from competing with the less educated Sinhalese.

If you have any doubts about Sri Lanka's racist character at the time; just read the Sri Lankan constitution written in 1972. It re-enforced Sinhalese as the one and only official language, got rid of article 29 of the Soulbury constitution (which ensured a democratic voice to minorities), and made Buddhism the country's prime religion.

And all that, you're telling me, was to protect the low caste Tamils?? Get real.


Government introduced university standardization in 1973 those that opposed were those who were against equitable distribution. Students of all ethnicities from Colombo, Jaffna, Kandy, Galle who had been privy to education opposed opportunities that would be enjoyed by students from Batticaloa, Vanni, Nuwara Eliya, Monaragala & other less developed districts. While the composition of the ethnicities did not change entrance, for Tamils it meant not only the Vellalar caste but lower caste Tamils too would gain university entrance. This was why Tamils opposed the 1973 standardization.

if you aren't sure check Wikipedia Policy of standardization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From your own wikipedia link:

The qualifying mark for admission to the medical faculties was 250 (out of 400) for Tamil students, whereas it was only 229 for the Sinhalese. Worse still, this same pattern of a lower qualifying mark applied even when Sinhalese and Tamil students sat for the examination in English. In short, students sitting for examinations in the same language, but belonging to two ethnic groups, had different qualifying marks.

4.Those Tamils that their citizenship was striped were Indians coolies brought to SL by Brits to work in tea states... however we kept half the number of them in SL.... and does Sinhalese majority fades away for million of Tamil collie votes? you should also remember that the politician who represents the Tamil collies in SL are always stayed with the central government and not with separatist parties like TNA.
Those "coolies" were there even before Sri Lanka, or even India, gained independence. Most of them, if not all, were born in Sri Lanka. They were not citizens of the Indian Republic (even if India may have granted them with OCI status, it does not give them rights in India). Which means that when you took away their citizenship, you rendered them stateless.

And no, you didn't "keep" half the number, rather, India was kind enough to take them despite them not being citizens of India. The other half, sadly, lived in Sri Lanka as stateless people, without any basic rights.

You compare with India; lest I remind you that India is home to people ranging from Africans (Siddis) to Chinese (Indian Chinese) to Persians (Iranis) to the Arabic Jewish people (Baghdadi Jews). Thank god the Sinhalese do not comprise a majority group in my country, if the logic you follow is to revoke citizenship of every person whose origins are from elsewhere.


I'm not going to mention everyone but Muralitharan.... also from hill country (an Indian Tamil descended)
I gave you a whole list of Indian Muslims, a minority which you compared to Sri Lankan Tamils, going on to become the Presidents of India; and you give me an example of a cricket player. Wonderful.


what SL needs from GoI is that to stay resolute to TN demands.... we know that TN leaders and most of TN people take decision not from the brain but by the heart...... we need GoI to learn the truth and stay with SL in UNHR..... we want GoI to help in SL development without and hindrance form India.....
Your fear of TN is nothing but a paranoia. As I have stated earlier, the AIADMK is not in a coalition with the ruling Congress party; they are not even in coalition with the main opposition, the BJP led coalition; so I am totally lost as to how on earth you think TN is calling the shots in New Delhi. That is just an absurd assertion, and borders paranoia.
 
Last edited:

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,385
Likes
603
Country flag
In regards to what?

You are claiming that Indian PM didn't act alone as RAW was involved, therefore India is the culprit.

So what are you suggesting? That Premdasa is the sole culprit as it was he himself who drove a truck filled with concrete and Ak-47s and delivered them to the LTTE to use against Indian soldiers?

What logic.
I'm not saying India is the culprit... what I say is that supplying arms to LTTE was a brainchild of Premadasa and he executed it with the power he has given by the constitution himself.......there fore no one can say SL back stabbed India!

India is developing the Tamil areas because they are the most underdeveloped part of your country and have been the epicenters of the civil war! If you still consider Tamils as part of your country, you should be happy that India is taking the initiative to develop those parts of your country!
there are many underdeveloped areas in SL such as monaragala, nuwara eliya etc. even without suffering from any war... so why only give away free gifts to North only?

As for "TN pressure", learn a bit about who is sitting in power in Delhi before criticizing them blindly. The TN government has zero say in India's foriegn policy at the moment as they are not part of the ruling coalition. Hell, the TN government is not even part of the main opposition! You are just paranoid about TN, it has zero say in India's national policies at the moment.
why not start Seth Samudram project then?




And, even if, had every single Tamil learnt Sinhalese to keep their job, it is still discrimination.
many Tamils live in England, Canada and Australia do those Tamils ask to make Tamil as a official language in those countries.... ? so are those Tamils got discriminated too?

English was not a native language of either Sinhalese or Tamils so you both had equal chances; one group wasn't discriminating another, like the Sinhalese did to the Tamils.
what is the equal chance?

If you have any doubts about Sri Lanka's racist character at the time; just read the Sri Lankan constitution written in 1972. It re-enforced Sinhalese as the one and only official language, got rid of article 29 of the Soulbury constitution (which ensured a democratic voice to minorities), and made Buddhism the country's prime religion.
that constitution is no more legal.. we have a new one created in 1978... so are you holding onto the old parts when SL is trying to do forward!


From your own wikipedia link:
I knew you'd take the pleasure to quote from that articles but haven't you looked at the bottom of it......

Abolishment of standardization

The standardization of university entrance was abandoned in 1977, and 80% of the university places were filled in accordance with raw marks scored by students. The remaining 20% of places was allocated to students in districts with inadequate educational facilities.
Policy of standardization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this was done cuz of the pressure from the Tamil party leaders mainly.....


Those "coolies" were there even before Sri Lanka, or even India, gained independence. Most of them, if not all, were born in Sri Lanka. They were not citizens of the Indian Republic (even if India may have granted them with OCI status, it does not give them rights in India). Which means that when you took away their citizenship, you rendered them stateless.

And no, you didn't "keep" half the number, rather, India was kind enough to take them despite them not being citizens of India. The other half, sadly, lived in Sri Lanka as stateless people, without any basic rights.
Tamil coolies were brought to the hill country for the plantation work as a contract labors. They were merely foreign workers.... no country is legally bind to give any foreigner an legal citizen ship for the time period they stayed in that country illegally.

The reason for the Coolies stay is illegal in SL because that these people were imported to our country by an foreign occupant without any clear concession from the majority!

even so these coolies weren't stayed in our country for no more that 75 years when SL got independence... many coolies arrived during 1900-1920s... there fore you argument of their generation is also invalid....

these coolies were entirely an Indian responsibility.... which India vehemently rejected first..... we were too kind for India for keeping even half the number of them here... if you can see these people now even surpassed the local Tamil population demographically....


I gave you a whole list of Indian Muslims, a minority which you compared to Sri Lankan Tamils, going on to become the Presidents of India; and you give me an example of a cricket player. Wonderful.
well I didn't wanna go far... but if you insist... Do you know that the last four kings of SL are Tamils?
 

Rohan Sharma

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
17
Likes
7
The problem is not about the TN entirely but some of their racist leaders like Vaico... who continues the lies against Sinhalese to increase their vote bank and I also think that SL needs more time to answer all the question that had posted against her.

But we also need India's support also to defeat the UN/EU/US conspiracy against SL.

India already did a lot and help sl with millions of dollars for reforms and This is because of India that there is no sanction on sl trade.

But i think you are really opportunistic people.
Just a moment before you said we saw what happened to mighty India in 62?
And you will side with china as India can't beat them lol.

I don't know whether we can or not but yes we can defend our nation.
Even in 62 more chinese were killed its just that there was a bigger part that had no soldiers then and they occupied it easier but then in arunachal we defeated them.

Anyway not your cup of tea.
Bottom line is in case Sl continue to side with china as you said and if that naval base ever used by chinese navy then mark my words India have a really big arsenal of missiles will not take moment to launch against you.

China will never dare to come in Indian ocean directly against Indian Navy.

Another thing unlike your stupid mentality i meant all the subcontinent that itself meant Indians too.
As far as Hindus are concerned in India Buddha dharma is branch of Hindu Dharma so we don't differentiate with respect to Dharma.

Perhaps somewhere we must admit ethnic violence was somewhere instilled in us by British and poverty.
Lets try to forget but SL must recognize the sacrifice that IPKF did to stabilize the condition.


Also somewhere Gen harkirat singh was really incompetent to led such an operation and what happened to 17 tamil tigers that were arrested by him was the reason things becomes so violent.
IT was obvious SL will never stick to their words so their was no question to let sl government have hem.
Death of them gave LTTE a reason to go against us.

Anyway that time IPKF didn't had a standard rifle.So i think must pray for those over 1200+ soldiers. RIP



IPKF must be praised for what it did by running the democratic election.It was sl part of agreement where tamils had to given political rights.

So IPKF did its part the problem was more political and you don't expect army to come into political matters(unless its pakistan)


I think both nation should praise and give a thanks giving symbol to IPKF.
Whatever may be its losses but it completed the task somehow.

Another thing UN EU or USA did not conspired against sl but they told what is true.
It is well known whats happening to tamils there and whatever they UN is doing is on humanitarian Ground.
No one has personal revenge against Srilanka.
Another thing China can not stand for you and neither it did.
It was and it is India that your diplomats look up for.


In end it will be really stupid to consider all srilankans like you.
As far as china is concerned if we become like them then just like they bullied Taiwan Tibet Mongolia Japan korea myanmar

we could have done the same and perhaps then you will love that even more ???????????




In short it would be better for srilanka to have just trade relation with pak or china.
Any kind of military support will be directly against us.


So an Indian Strike against such elements will be in our interest by the same logic you had earlier.


Another thing if being big brother of Sl we should support you and be concessional then in return we must have a say in bilateral ties as it will include Indian ocean.
Though i don't think srilanka will do that again what it did in 1971 ????? what say
 
Last edited:

Rohan Sharma

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
17
Likes
7
What are the criteria for such a move..... India can't just say SL don't address the Tamil issue.... India has to be more clear and do not act like the TN puppet..... This is why it is always better to choose a strategic partner like China!
Lmao
Ask China what is the Criteria the'll tell you perhaps a bit better than us.

(China in Taiwan myanmar Tibet mongolia korea vietnam phillipines:::::::::::::: Heinz want a criteria:taunt::taunt: )


We don't need to give you any...................:wave::wave:
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

If you can then please do. I might learn something new. :thumb:

Bofors - Is the verdict out? Did Delhi High court said that Rajiv Gandhi was directly involved?
.
Has any Gandhi been acquitted in the scams, can you please throw in some light? So by your logic Congress is the Most corruption free party around:lawl:

Punjab insurgency - Inherited from his mother. Blame Indira Gandhi
Funny enough, he inherited the PM post from his mother too:rolleyes:

IPKF was not a disaster until the clown VP Singh decided to pull out. Brig Ray was there, he might be able to throw some light. Being a Tamil, you have different sensitivities than me related to this particular issue.
It would have been a greater disaster had he not pulled out. both the SLG and LTTE was hostile to IPKF
 

blueblood

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,475
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

Has any Gandhi been acquitted in the scams, can you please throw in some light? So by your logic Congress is the Most corruption free party around:lawl:
Are you blind mate? :p Point out where I said that Congress is clean as a whistle. I too know what Congress is and no, I am not a Congress sympathizer either. Has Delhi high court found him guilty yet or are you a bigger authority than the Delhi High court?

Funny enough, he inherited the PM post from his mother too:rolleyes:
So he is guilty of what exactly?

It would have been a greater disaster had he not pulled out. both the SLG and LTTE was hostile to IPKF
Seriously, I never knew that LTTE was against IPKF. When did that happened?

As for SL Army, All I can tell you that Indian officers didn't even liked to have breakfast with their officers let alone fighting by their side. Indian army had time and and again gave middle finger to SL Army.

Had the IPKF stayed, no genocide would have had happened.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

Are you blind mate? :p Point out where I said that Congress is clean as a whistle. I too know what Congress is and no, I am not a Congress sympathizer either. Has Delhi high court found him guilty yet or are you a bigger authority than the Delhi High court?
I think your logic failed you here. I asked you in which court have the Congress leaders aka the Gandhis have been acquitted? So by that logic Sonia Gandhi is cleaner than any any other leader in India:rolleyes:

So he is guilty of what exactly?
Guilty of spreading communal hatred????

Also heard of Shao bano case and the subsequent appeasement of Hindus by opening up of the Ayodhya issue?

Seriously, I never knew that LTTE was against IPKF. When did that happened?

As for SL Army, All I can tell you that Indian officers didn't even liked to have breakfast with their officers let alone fighting by their side. Indian army had time and and again gave middle finger to SL Army.

Had the IPKF stayed, no genocide would have had happened.
Why do you think LTTE killed him? For helping them out?:rolleyes:

Seriously though, as Indians we conveniently "forget" killings done by IPKF on SL Tamils-Fact
 

blueblood

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,475
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

I think your logic failed you here. I asked you in which court have the Congress leaders aka the Gandhis have been acquitted? So by that logic Sonia Gandhi is cleaner than any any other leader in India:rolleyes:
For all the cases registered against Gandhis are still in court.

Now you tell are you a bigger authority than Delhi high court? :laugh:

Guilty of spreading communal hatred????

Also heard of Shao bano case and the subsequent appeasement of Hindus by opening up of the Ayodhya issue?
Proof?

Appeasement of Muslims have been going on from day one. Not exactly a crime by Indian Penal Code.


Why do you think LTTE killed him? For helping them out?:rolleyes:


Seriously though, as Indians we conveniently "forget" killings done by IPKF on SL Tamils-Fact
Why do you think that happened? Is our army full of mad men and lunatics?

"We Indians " are supposed to care only about ourselves. Sri Lankan Tamils are SRI LANKANS not Indians.

As for you mate, you chose to ignore a man who served in the Army and just told you that SL intervention was not a military disaster. So I don't what or who will convince you to believe otherwise.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

For all the cases registered against Gandhis are still in court.

Now you tell are you a bigger authority than Delhi high court? :laugh:
Proof?
So you are saying all gandhis are innocent as there is no acquittal . What a logic :rotflmao:

Gandhis sure are the least corrupt leaders of India as there is no corruption acquittal against them by Mr.Blueblood's logic-:truestory:

Appeasement of Muslims have been going on from day one. Not exactly a crime by Indian Penal Code.
And you just did a big flip flop:frusty:. Atleast be consistent in what you say. Appeasement is communalisation of Politics

Apparently, you have a very good sense of catching sarcasm:pound:

Why do you think that happened? Is our army full of mad men and lunatics?

"We Indians " are supposed to care only about ourselves. Sri Lankan Tamils are SRI LANKANS not Indians.

As for you mate, you chose to ignore a man who served in the Army and just told you that SL intervention was not a military disaster. So I don't what or who will convince you to believe otherwise.
I think your logic meter is doing somersaults. I stated the truth, which you will not open your eyes and read let alone believe.. I dint support what they did. Get that into your brain.

Answer my question, if you think the Army there was against SLA and pro LTTE then why was Rajiv Gandhi killed by LTTE, surely they are not morons, actually they are morons, for wagging their tail in Indian territory, committing a strategic blunder, but thats for another day, but its not because Rajiv Gandhi was "Helping" them. I dont think they would have wanted to kill their helping hand, do you?:confused:

And also, stop bloating about the creation of Bangladesh as a Humanitarian shit anyway. Indians are as Hypocritic if not more as the west
 

blueblood

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,475
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

So you are saying all gandhis are innocent as there is no acquittal . What a logic :rotflmao:

Gandhis sure are the least corrupt leaders of India as there is no corruption acquittal against them by Mr.Blueblood's logic-:truestory:
Never said nor implied. Now answer the damn question. Are you a bigger authority than the courts?:rofl: If no, then stop passing judgement.

And you just did a big flip flop:frusty:. Atleast be consistent in what you say. Appeasement is communalisation of Politics
Is that a crime by IPC? :p

Apparently, you have a very good sense of catching sarcasm.
Actually I have but apparently you don't.:laugh:

I think your logic meter is doing somersaults. I stated the truth, which you will not open your eyes and read let alone believe.. I dint support what they did. Get that into your brain.

Answer my question, if you think the Army there was against SLA and pro LTTE then why was Rajiv Gandhi killed by LTTE, surely they are not morons, actually they are morons, for wagging their tail in Indian territory, committing a strategic blunder, but thats for another day, but its not because Rajiv Gandhi was "Helping" them. I dont think they would have wanted to kill their helping hand, do you?:confused:
My logic meter is fine buddy. But you just accused "INDIAN ARMY" of being mass murderers and war criminals. You also ignored the only person on this forum who was there in uniform. Good going.:thumb: We are proud of you.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

Never said nor implied. Now answer the damn question. Are you a bigger authority than the courts?:rofl: If no, then stop passing judgement.
Answer my question first. You made an absolutely ridiculous statement that Rajiv Gandhi is corruption free:lawl:

And you also gave the reason/logic for that. I ridiculed that logic with a counter. answer my counter question Logically, straight without deflecting, since no court has acquitted the Gandhis so far, are they the least corrupt leaders of this nation? IF you cant answer stop wasting my time.

Is that a crime by IPC? :p
No, but your points become less valid as you post more of these flip flops

Actually I have but apparently you don't.:laugh:
So you agree with what I wrote in that point? Then good:dance:

My logic meter is fine buddy. But you just accused "INDIAN ARMY" of being mass murderers and war criminals. You also ignored the only person on this forum who was there in uniform. Good going.:thumb: We are proud of you.
You dont have to be proud of any thing really. I have great opinion on you the moment you claimed Rajiv Gandhi was corruption free and doing flip flops to prove your point.

And I think you have comprehension difficulties. I said, IPKF killed Tamils there too. It was against your claim that IPKF was helping Tamils there.

And I also said both SLA and LTTE hated IPKF. Ask Ray sir yourself if it was true or false?

I also gave a logic for that, which you wont comprehend it seems

And I see that you ignored my point and deflected it in the quote of mine and made some adsurb stupid statements instead:laugh:
 

blueblood

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,475
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

Answer my question first. You made an absolutely ridiculous statement that Rajiv Gandhi is corruption free:lawl:
How the hell would I know? I am just a common citizen who believe things the courts say. But not you sir, you are the judge, jury and executioner all by yourself. :taunt:

No, but your points become less valid as you post more of these flip flops
Lol. Answer the question mate if you dare. Is appeasement a punishable offence by IPC?


You dont have to be proud of any thing really. I have great opinion on you the moment you claimed Rajiv Gandhi was corruption free and doing flip flops to prove your point.

And I think you have comprehension difficulties. I said, IPKF killed Tamils there too. It was against your claim that IPKF was helping Tamils there.

And I also said both SLA and LTTE hated IPKF. Ask Ray sir yourself if it was true or false?

I also gave a logic for that, which you wont comprehend it seems

And I see that you ignored my point and deflected it in the quote of mine and made some adsurb stupid statements instead:laugh:
Are you freaking retarded? :pound:

Indian Army was there to eliminate the LTTE, even a kid knows that. I personally know few officers and men who were their in SL. As for asking Brig Ray I asked him to share some information and he did. But you conveniently ignored his post.


Seriously though, as Indians we conveniently "forget" killings done by IPKF on SL Tamils-Fact
Your quote not mine. You accused the army not me. Go to sleep mate or else you'll be late for your school.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

How the hell would I know? I am just a common citizen who believe things the courts say. But not you sir, you are the judge, jury and executioner all by yourself. :taunt:
:lol: So you avoided the question, which means you agree with me. There is a reason congress is winning the elections. I can see why. Retards with no capacity for logic what so ever:tsk:

Lol. Answer the question mate if you dare. Is appeasement a punishable offence by IPC?
You did a big flip flop on communal politics by Rajiv gandhi and now talking bull shit:pound:

Are you freaking retarded?

Indian Army was there to eliminate the LTTE, even a kid knows that. I personally know few officers and men who were their in SL. As for asking Brig Ray I asked him to share some information and he did. But you conveniently ignored his post.

Your quote not mine. You accused the army not me. Go to sleep mate or else you'll be late for your school.
What a Moron. The Army was sent to end civil war , not fight LTTE. Here, edcuate yourself kiddo:frusty:---rediff.com: The IPKF in Sri Lanka, 10 years on

Later the fight got between LTTE and IPKF and IPKF was forced to retreat.

Also, the Tamil parties would never have agreed for sending the IPKF in the first place if they were to be sent for fighting LTTE. Anyone with basic ounce of Political knowledge would no that:frusty:

Army is not blameless moron. Thats what I said. Understand what others are saying.

What a freaking retard:frusty:

I should have stopped "debating" with you when you said Rajiv Gandhi is corruption free

The blame is on me for engaging in discussions with such retards:frusty:

Edit: One more for your puny brain kiddo,. Educate yourself. You can check for citations below for knowing about the authencity of ithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valvettiturai_massacre
 
Last edited:

blueblood

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,475
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

So you avoided the question, which means you agree with me. There is a reason congress is winning the elections. I can see why. Retards with no capacity for logic what so ever:
So you still don't have the balls to answer the simple question. Are you a bigger authority than the court? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Who the hell are you to pass judgement when the case is still on? Maybe

:pound::pound:

What a Moron. The Army was sent to end civil war , not fight LTTE. Here, edcuate yourself kiddo:frusty:---rediff.com: The IPKF in Sri Lanka, 10 years on

Later the fight got between LTTE and IPKF and IPKF was forced to retreat.

Also, the Tamil parties would never have agreed for sending the IPKF in the first place if they were to be sent for fighting LTTE. Anyone with basic ounce of Political knowledge would no that:frusty:

Army is not blameless moron. Thats what I said. Understand what others are saying.

What a freaking retard:frusty:

I should have stopped "debating" with you when you said Rajiv Gandhi is corruption free

The blame is on me for engaging in discussions with such retards:frusty:

Edit: One more for your puny brain kiddo,. Educate yourself. You can check for citations below for knowing about the authencity of it1989 Valvettiturai massacre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who gives a ---- what Tamil parties wanted or not? The Army is INDIAN not Tamil. They take their orders from Government of India not the Government of Tamil Nadu.

Learn to read moron.

"According to the Financial Times report, the Indians believe that the incident resulted from a deliberate provocation by the LTTE intended to trigger an overwhelming Indian response "

IPKF retaliated and the civilians were caught between the crossfire. Despite the loss of innocent lives which is very sad ofcourse I would't call Indian Army ( not the Tamil army) mass murderers.

Go to bed son and don't wet your bed today


There is a reason why I told Karthik that it is pointless to discuss Sri Lanka with a Tamil as there are regional sensitives involved.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

So you still don't have the balls to answer the simple question. Are you a bigger authority than the court? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Who the hell are you to pass judgement when the case is still on? Maybe
Dont start crying like a girl. Admit like a man that you got owned by your lack of Logic:taunt1:

Anyway, I should not have even debated with a Moron who thinks Rajiv Gandhi is innocent. My fault for arguing with retards like you:frusty:

Who gives a ---- what Tamil parties wanted or not? The Army is INDIAN not Tamil. They take their orders from Government of India not the Government of Tamil Nadu.
What a Freaking moron, without Tamil parties support, the GoI cant have sent the IA there got it? Which world are you living in?:frusty:

Without the Tamil MPs support, the sending of IPKF would never have been possible. Even a retard like yourself can understand that, I am not sure why you cant:noidea:

"According to the Financial Times report, the Indians believe that the incident resulted from a deliberate provocation by the LTTE intended to trigger an overwhelming Indian response "
Why did it do it moron? It was because both LTTE and SLA hated the IPKF presence.

Here look at your own quote, for you to read and my reply for it:taunt::

IPKF was not a disaster until the clown VP Singh decided to pull out. Brig Ray was there, he might be able to throw some light. Being a Tamil, you have different sensitivities than me related to this particular issue.

It would have been a greater disaster had he not pulled out. both the SLG and LTTE was hostile to IPKF
IPKF retaliated and the civilians were caught between the crossfire. Despite the loss of innocent lives which is very sad ofcourse I would't call Indian Army ( not the Tamil army) mass murderers.

Go to bed son and don't wet your bed today


There is a reason why I told Karthik that it is pointless to discuss Sri Lanka with a Tamil as there are regional sensitives involved.
:pound: Why got tired of ----ing yourself here with your retarded logic?:rotflmao:

Dont masturbate too much son, it will retard your brain further

Look piece of shit, you said, this in your own post, read what what you have written yourself
Seriously, I never knew that LTTE was against IPKF. When did that happened?

As for SL Army, All I can tell you that Indian officers didn't even liked to have breakfast with their officers let alone fighting by their side. Indian army had time and and again gave middle finger to SL Army.

Had the IPKF stayed, no genocide would have had happened.
This is what I replied,
Why do you think LTTE killed him? For helping them out?

Seriously though, as Indians we conveniently "forget" killings done by IPKF on SL Tamils-Fact
 
Last edited:

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
Re: PVN Rao's 91st Birth Anniversary today

Oh god , I have been "debating" with a Mr. Logicopenia who forgets what he wrote every second post:frusty:

Anyway son lets look at our debate and your logic in it shat we?

Rajiv gandhi is innocent because no court has convicted him- Mr. Logic

By that logic no Gandhi is corrupt as no court have convicted them- Le Me

Then the retard avoids the question to bounce it at me asking whether I know more than high Court.

My response now for that is, I atleast have a working logic meter , and Bofors is not the only thing which had corruption tinges, as it was not even logically possible:rolleyes:

Then he claims Rajiv was not communalising politics in his reply to Karthic- Mr. Logic

Then what about Shao Bano case and Ayodhya episode?- Le Me

He does a flip flop to say all leaders are communal and no need to blame Rajiv- Mr. Logic

My response now, WTF? Sudden change of stance in two posts, without even acknowledging that he is wrong:wtf:

He says IPKF is not a disaster- Mr. Logic

It was a disaster as both LTTE and SLA hated IPKF and wanted it out-Le Me

LTTE was not against IPKF- Epic logic fail by Mr. Logic

Then why do you think it killed Rajiv? Le Me

Genocide could have been avoided had the IPKF stayed there- Mr. Logic

IPKF was hated by both LTTE and SLA and it itself was involved in killing of Tamil civilians in SL, which George Fernandes himself accepted as India's fault. Hence it would have been a greater disaster had it stayed on- Le Me

Then he goes apeshit on the Patriotism- on why the Army is blameless:frusty:

Seriously though?:wtf: Who am I arguing with so far?:tsk::tsk:
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top