Illogical. No legal basis. You can reject it but provide legal basis for rejecting it? NSG rules apply to France, America and Russia. They will follow them. Their internal law will follow NSG. You will not follow NSG. They can't change their Internal law as it will break international law from 2005 as per America. Even if the international law is only changed in 2011. America, France and Russia can't now go and change their pre-existing internal law from before the Indo-US deal. They refused to change it for you in 2008 standing in New Delhi. Read the statements of French and Russian delegations on ENR. ENR is not part of deal. Why, Internal law. back in 2008. Now in 2011, it's also the international law. You can reject the general compartment or special compartment. The trains belong to NSG not to you. They will give you the reservation not India jumping up and down in parliament. You should run trains to get special compartment not ride in train owned by 44 countries including America, France and Russia.
In law dates matter. It's called interpretation of law. It's how lawyers work. Legal system works. It's not fuss. It's law. Sorry it's the way legal system work and dates are important. Words are important. Words which appear in 2005, 2008 and 2011 are important. Changes between them are important. What's followed by countries as norms is import. Lot's of things. I have shown you how the law works and how we got messed with. Take it or leave it.
In law dates matter. It's called interpretation of law. It's how lawyers work. Legal system works. It's not fuss. It's law. Sorry it's the way legal system work and dates are important. Words are important. Words which appear in 2005, 2008 and 2011 are important. Changes between them are important. What's followed by countries as norms is import. Lot's of things. I have shown you how the law works and how we got messed with. Take it or leave it.
general trumps for all the general categories and not for India category. India is not in the general class. that's what I'm trying to explain you. after 2008 India class is different, automatic superceding of clauses is not for India, but for general category.
again you making fuss about the date of the guideline amendment, I'm argiung about the context of the amendment.
India is not general category, after 2008 India specific guideline is still in place. you just thumping about superceding clauses, I again say that is not thecase for india. they tried to prohibit ENR sale to india in 2008 agreement, but India stuck to its point that nuclear co poration wouldbe for the full spectrum of the civilian nuclear domain. if they were so determined they would put the same restriction in 2008, for the better part would have kept mum on the ENR all together.
they specifically mentiond ENR in 2008 agreement. just because general guidelines has been passed post 2008 and it touch upon the same subject as that of the 2008 agreement, does not mean that it will automatically supercede the India clause. India text is not general text my dear sir. India is not in the general
compartment. for India there is seperate compartment. unless they nullify the 2008 ENR provision for india, 2011 ENR provision will not automatically supercdede India. this is exactly what SM krishna refered to in the parlimanet. you are just thiking that india specific 2008 guidelines are valid only in 2008 for india. after 2008 India automatically falls in to the general category. I'm sorry I completely reject that point of view. India is not general category.
Last edited: