India's Moon Exploration Program

[TopWatcher]

No, it's only this way.
Japan was waiting for ISRO's landing tech since it couldn't make its own.

Why Japan not able to make lander??

 

[TopWatcher]

It ain't over till it's over. Let's wait till Sep 22nd.

Waiting for mars lander... as of now gaganyaan high priority.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Why Japan not able to make lander??

Failed after trying for many years.

India was collaborating with moon landing with Russia but separated Chandrayaan-2 after Russian failure. That’s where Japanese and Indian cooperation begun.

 

[mokoman]

No, it's only this way.
Japan was waiting for ISRO's landing tech since it couldn't make its own.

cant be true ,they landed on an asteroid and returned back samples . few small rovers too i think.

 

[mokoman]

Screenshost
View attachment 220913
View attachment 220914

chinese rover went to sleep and didnt wake up . lets hope our luck is better.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

cant be true ,they landed on an asteroid and returned back samples . few small rovers too i think.

May be because lunar gravity is much higher than asteroids?
Anyway, they still failed to land on moon and it was agreed between ISRO and JAXA that ISRO will land on the moon and that technology will be the basis Indo Japanese joint lunar sampling mission.

 

[TopWatcher]

May be because lunar gravity is much higher than asteroids?
Anyway, they still failed to land on moon and it was agreed between ISRO and JAXA that ISRO will land on the moon and that technology will be the basis Indo Japanese joint lunar sampling mission.

Strange ISRO able to make orbitor, lander and rover but Japan not able to make lander. I think Japan just send a mission to moon, if I m not wrong

 

[Swesh]

Strange ISRO able to make orbitor, lander and rover but Japan not able to make lander. I think Japan just send a mission to moon, if I m not wrong

It was a technical glitch which they ignored caused them faliure it was altitude miscalculation

 

[ezsasa]

May be because lunar gravity is much higher than asteroids?
Anyway, they still failed to land on moon and it was agreed between ISRO and JAXA that ISRO will land on the moon and that technology will be the basis Indo Japanese joint lunar sampling mission.

JAXA moon lander didn’t account for massive lunar craters, when finding the landing spot. autonomous landing calculations went haywire from there.

Japan startup's failed moon landing caused by altitude miscalculation, company says

Japanese startup ispace inc's failed Hakuto-R moon landing mission last month was caused by an altitude miscalculation that meant the spacecraft ran out of fuel, the company said on Friday.

www.reuters.com

 

[TopWatcher]

JAXA moon lander didn’t account for massive lunar craters, when finding the landing spot. autonomous landing calculations went haywire from there.

Japan startup's failed moon landing caused by altitude miscalculation, company says

Japanese startup ispace inc's failed Hakuto-R moon landing mission last month was caused by an altitude miscalculation that meant the spacecraft ran out of fuel, the company said on Friday.

www.reuters.com

Japan SLIM mission to moon. Land around jan 24

 

[omaebakabaka]

There is a place to highlight gender and not get carried away by hype....scientist is a scientist. This is not our santan style to differentiate on gender unless the root of the discussion is to highlight gender...

 

[omaebakabaka]

Failed after trying for many years.

India was collaborating with moon landing with Russia but separated Chandrayaan-2 after Russian failure. That’s where Japanese and Indian cooperation begun.

Not sure if its the failures but in general our efforts are mostly going independent in the core side with partnership in payload type work? Japan's rockets give a feeling of unreliability and they do have quite a bit of failures for advanced component level supply chain....leading to believe more bureaucracy level issues playing role.

 

[RedHood108]

Nice quote by CanberraDSN

They was tracking Chandrayaan-3 during its landing on the moon.

Some foreign space agencies are so interactive on SM, saw this is ESA as well.

 

[omaebakabaka]

It was a technical glitch which they ignored caused them faliure it was altitude miscalculation

Possibly model anomalies and biases....overfitting and underfitting and both may be fatal. This stuff does involve some luck as the science behind it is not 100%....can happen to anyone and ofcourse there may have been other anamolies as long as its not bureaucracy related.

 

[Vamsi]

Offtopic but...

 

[omaebakabaka]

Offtopic but...

Ram Naam Satyah

 

[Swesh]

Offtopic but...

Om Shanti

 

[Varoon2]

For the Vikram lander, did all the sensors finally work, as well as the 4 800N engines? The landing went off superbly, but it would be comforting to know that everything worked anyway. ISRO did say that even if all the sensors, and 2 of the engines fail, a landing is very likely. Still...

 

[Vamsi]

For the Vikram lander, did all the sensors finally work, as well as the 4 800N engines? The landing went off superbly, but it would be comforting to know that everything worked anyway. ISRO did say that even if all the sensors, and 2 of the engines fail, a landing is very likely. Still...

All of them worked flawlessly....the fact that it landed within 360m from the targeted landing site is proof of its excellence....it landed with less than 1m/s touchdown velocity

 

[SavageKing456]

This is cool,future sample return experiments and human!
I'm up for it