vampyrbladez
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2018
- Messages
- 10,261
- Likes
- 26,567
I am only following SJW tactics. You interact with NPCs by repeating things.tape recorder is back.
I am only following SJW tactics. You interact with NPCs by repeating things.tape recorder is back.
Obviously, people should be allocated roles according to their merit. If a women is capable of frontline combat, let's not bog her down. Keyword is "capable".Even if you are a guy fighting with a gun or guy who cooks or cleans you are in the indian military you are serving your country.every role has its importance.some simps think only combat frontline is the way to serve the country.
I see your point but do we really need to go through all that hassle just to prove what's obvious??It is not about optimism, but if we are going to deny Indian women any kind of frontline combat role for a long long time, don't we need something a bit more definite and concrete than what studies some X country did ?
That would put an end to the debate, so why not ?I see your point but do we really need to go through all that hassle just to prove what's obvious??
First of all, I doubt there would be even a single recruit who would be able to meet the minimum benchmark. But hypothetically, even if one or two of them do manage to pass, then what?? Do you think they would be sharing bunks and using the same latrines and shit with their male colleagues?? Heck no!! This means you would need to construct brand new facilities just to accommodate those few individuals, which means the Army would need to allocate more land and resources which could have been better spent elsewhere, they are severely cash strapped as it is.Obviously, people should be allocated roles according to their merit. If a women is capable of frontline combat, let's not bog her down. Keyword is "capable".
Because to satisfy some SJW we cannot put military readiness at risk.That would put an end to the debate, so why not ?
Because my brother, then they will inevitably end up succumbing to the pressure and lower the bars for the female recruits!! That's how it has panned out every dame time.That would put an end to the debate, so why not ?
How is conducting a simple study on female capabilities in India going to put military readiness at risk ?Because to satisfy some SJW we cannot put military readiness at risk.
You asked for a domestic study, you were given a link. that’s about it.Isn't this how the Indian Army was created by the British in the first place. Armed forces is a good source of employment for many people.
This is certainly not a revelation of any kind.
I asked for a study regarding female combat/physical competency in the Indian context, however you ended up serving imli ki chatni when asked for aam ka achaar.You asked for a domestic study, you were given a link. that’s about it.
What are you trying to gate keep here ? Is a man's life much less important than a woman's ?The counter being provided is mostly not about national security but rather more about putting Indian females in harm’s way knowing fully well what our enemy does to captured soldiers Saurabh Kalia and abhinandan.
Yup the problem is that some pussy feminists just wanna do that because 'we can do this' ."we can do anything men can do".most women join the forces even in support role for their nation.I asked for a study regarding female combat/physical competency in the Indian context, however you ended up serving imli ki chatni when asked for aam ka achaar.
Don't worry, not a very big mistake.
What are you trying to gate keep here ? Is a man's life is much less important than a woman's ?
If women are capable of fighting well and are ready to go to the front line, I don't think any of us can really stop them.
If we are talking from a strictly evolutionary standpoint, then I'm afraid it is the truth.What are you trying to gate keep here ? Is a man's life much less important than a woman's ?
Therein lies the rub - They are NOT!!If women are capable of fighting well and are ready to go to the front line, I don't think any of us can really stop them.
This Marxist fool thinks tactics used in the West will work here.I asked for a study regarding female combat/physical competency in the Indian context, however you ended up serving imli ki chatni when asked for aam ka achaar.
Don't worry, not a very big mistake.
What are you trying to gate keep here ? Is a man's life much less important than a woman's ?
If women are capable of fighting well and are ready to go to the front line, I don't think any of us can really stop them.
It didn't even work in the west. None of the western militaries deploy their female soldiers in anywhere they are expecting danger.This Marxist fool thinks tactics used in the West will work here.
But in society and politics women are taking over the west and are hell-bent on turning society gender neutral full of qeers and Islamist.It didn't even work in the west. None of the western militaries deploy their female soldiers in anywhere they are expecting danger.
Yes, a man’s life is less important than women’s. there is a reason that during a calamity, women and children are evacuated first. there is a reason there are more cows than bulls in India.I asked for a study regarding female combat/physical competency in the Indian context, however you ended up serving imli ki chatni when asked for aam ka achaar.
Don't worry, not a very big mistake.
What are you trying to gate keep here ? Is a man's life much less important than a woman's ?
If women are capable of fighting well and are ready to go to the front line, I don't think any of us can really stop them.