You are missing my point. An army that can draw recruits from 100% of the population is going to do better than an army that can only draw recruits from 50% of the population.
Study on military advances in the medieval history and upto pre-Industrial Age societies. During that time, you had to be highly trained in archery or certain forms of combat warfare and it was extremely costly and excessive screening took place to find acceptable candidates. Then Napoleon came along and came up with the idea of one million man army that were drafted from the masses with little or no training or skills and yet was able to beat more professional armies that took years to create and train and supply and drew from the upper class of society. The nature of warfare changed at that point.
If you can field an army that can fight tomorrow's battles effectively while drawing recruits from 100% of the population, you will beat an army that can only draw recruits from 50% of the population because your army tend to have more flexibility, more strengths & pros, and greater ability to overcome any adversity.
So yeah female soldiers will have weaker physical strength and stamina than male soldiers. But however if an army has figured out how to minimize that weakness and exploit the strengths of female soldiers and combine it with male soldiers and produce a highly capable force, that army will do very well in tomorrow's conflict.
Your rant is meaningless as your base argument is military should not close door to women, last time I checked Women are still joining services as officers and soldiers/sailors etc,No one is talking against women aviators or women in intel or women in logistics, Its about women in combat specifically sof, how are you going to minimize weakness or exploit strength when you are assaulting a mountain feature with a ruck that weighs more than you, stop with this woke shit, women can be used in military in non-combat or aviation role and anything else is a no go, tell me one nation who has successfully
employed women in combat.
""if an army has figured out how to minimize that weakness and exploit the strengths of female soldiers and combine it with male soldiers and produce a highly capable force, that army will do very well in tomorrow's conflict.""
No army has figure out how to do it because its not possible for now.
Acc to you more people= better military,
Why dont we start making child soldiers , India has a young population ,
Your whole argument is flawed to its core