I have heard various reasoning for this and one which makes a lot of sense is you cannot tell how bright an area is to anyone with the naked eye and you may end up walking into a bright enough area where the enemy can see you but you don't think they can.
It's a tradeoff of depth perception for better SA albeit at a lack of FOV. People who train extensively on monoculars usually swear up and down that it's better than binods.
Also, depending on how bright it's set at (someone tell me if all NODs have adjustable brightness or some lack that feature), it can take a few hot minutes to readjust to the dark, especially if the readjustment is getting disrupted intermittently by muzzle flashes.
Basically, he's talking along the same lines as the forum members here.
I gave up when some belgian guy started disputing Lt Gen. PC Katoch's claims.
Wait out. As we gather more literature from first hand sources, these jai ho kids will start disputing the claims of former servicemen.
I'll actually seek out Maj General GD Bakshi's interview where he says that NDA back then was much better back then as they used to hire the best of the best as trainers and today, it's no longer the case.
The cope will be immense.
EDIT- Found it. Watch 12:25 onwards.
Ideal special operations soldier according to
@Kumaoni -
View attachment 165929