Indian special forces carry out cross border operation into Myanmar. Several militants killed

[pmaitra]

A few clarifications for those that try to link the Glorious Past of the Indian Army with the British Indian Army:

The Government of India has declared repugnant some battle honours earned by Indian Army units, which are descended from erstwhile units of the British East India Company. Indian Army units do not inscribe these battle honours on their colours and do not celebrate commemoration days associated with these battles. This decision was taken post-independence regarding those battle honours concerned with the subjugation of India and in some cases, neighbouring countries

 

[SajeevJino]

Are Indian citizens taking orders from the Indian Government?

Answer this question and you will get your answer.

No but sometimes.. so you tell me that Sometimes They were mercenaries sometime Soldiers

..! I think you are diverting my question

Moreover, UN missions are not war missions. They are peace keeping missions.

Yeah peacekeeping, but they can engage the enemies

 

[pmaitra]

No but sometimes..

No, but sometimes what?

so you tell me that Sometimes They were mercenaries sometime Soldiers

So I tell you exactly what I have stated repeatedly.

mercenary

A professional soldier hired to serve in a foreign army.

(This definition is from Oxford Dictionary. If you disagree with this definition, please take it up with Oxford Dictionary.)

..! I think you are diverting my question

I think you are trying to put words into my mouth.

Yeah peacekeeping, but they can engage the enemies

Yes, but this is just an aside. Even if they were deployed for fighting wars, they are not serving in a foreign army. They are still serving in the Indian Army.

 

[SajeevJino]

.
@pmaitra

A professional soldier hired to serve in a foreign army.

what i think was Mercenary means someone who comes out from the army with weapons and start working for some private agencies

(This definition is from Oxford Dictionary. If you disagree with this definition, please take it up with Oxford Dictionary.)

yawn time to take up with Oxfored

 

[cobra commando]

Still no official confirmation
from the MOD on the militant casualty numbers, but for now plis to take chai biscut and news from teh "sources" se kaam chalao

Govt believes 83 rebels killed in Army raid in Myanmar

NEW DELHI: Even as there is no official confirmation yet on the casualties suffered by NSCN(K) and other insurgent outfits in Tuesday's Army crackdown on their camps in Myanmar, intelligence reports with the home ministry indicate that at least 19 insurgents killed on Tuesday were given a soldier's farewell on Thursday, with a burial in the presence of a Buddhist religious leader. The information regarding the burial of insurgents' bodies in the presence of a Lama came from intelligence assets both on Indian and Myanmar side of the border, said a home ministry official. The ministry has also learnt from multiple sources, including those based in villages dotting the Myanmar-Manipur border and trusted aides in touch with Myanmar authorities, that around 49 bodies were removed from the site where the camps stood after the Army raid flattened them. In addition, as many as 60 injured cadres were shifted out in 12-13 vehicles to safer locations in Kalemyo, Mandalay and beyond.
The estimated 68 casualties in PLA and Manipur Naga Revolutionary Front camps across the Manipur border is over and above the 15 NSCN(K) insurgents believed to have been killed as they vacated a camp across Nagaland-Myanmar border soon after the Army special forces struck on Tuesday, a source told TOI.


Read more:
Govt believes 83 rebels killed in Army raid in Myanmar

 

[ersakthivel]

Peace again at stake in Nagaland

Namrata Goswami

Comment · print · T T T+ · T-
Tweet
[Pin It]
TROUBLE: “The NSCN (K) ceasefire with Myanmar was opposed by other Naga armed groups including the NSCM (I-M).” File photo shows Naga boys with their weapons during the 33rd Republic Day celebration of the NSCM (I-M) in Nagaland.
The Hindu
TROUBLE: “The NSCN (K) ceasefire with Myanmar was opposed by other Naga armed groups including the NSCM (I-M).” File photo shows Naga boys with their weapons during the 33rd Republic Day celebration of the NSCM (I-M) in Nagaland.
TOPICS
India
Nagaland
With the NSCN (K) withdrawing from the ceasefire, trouble could brew once more in Nagaland, putting the government’s ambitious plans for an ASEAN trade gateway at risk

When the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government took power at the Centre, it fast-tracked a solution to the long-standing Nagaland issue and set a deadline of 18 months in November 2014. The renewed focus raised the stakes for the Naga people to achieve an accord. A further impetus came via the plan to transform Nagaland and Manipur into India’s trade gateway to the ASEAN countries. This made peace even more urgent.

Unfortunately, on March 27, the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K) headed by its Myanmar-based Chairman, S.S. Khaplang, unilaterally decided to retract from the 14-year ceasefire agreement with the Indian government, due for annual renewal on April 28. NSCN-K also expelled two senior India-based leaders, Y. Wangtin Naga and P. Tikhak. The two have subsequently formed NSCN (Reformation), a new body.

The NSCN(K)’s move might lead to renewed factional violence, which could stall the plans of connectivity via Myanmar that Narendra Modi announced in his visit to the North-East last year.

Trouble has been brewing in NSCN (K) for a while now. In April 2012, when it signed a ceasefire with Yangon, it was opposed fiercely by the two other Naga armed groups, the NSCN (Isak-Muivah)and the NSCN-Khole-Kitovi, who said that the NSCN (K) could not function like a trans-border group and be allowed to sign ceasefires with two sovereign governments. Then, when Khaplang decided to withdraw from the Indian ceasefire, he closed the Cease Fire Supervisory Board (CFSB), which includes five members each from the NSCN (K) and the Indian government (who will nominate the chairman) to monitor and enforce ground rules. Mr. Wangtin and Mr. Tikhak defied Mr. Khaplang and called a meeting of the CFSB in its office in Mon, Nagaland, where they unanimously resolved to oppose Mr. Khaplang’s ‘unilateral decision’ to annul the ceasefire. The two leaders accused Mr. Khaplang of not consulting cadres in India before taking the decision and challenged him, saying in essence that he had no right to withdraw the ceasefire from India while enjoying a ceasefire with Myanmar.

NSCN (K), meanwhile, defended its action, saying that any solution to the Naga issue without the sovereignty clause was a sham. It also accused India of using the ceasefire as a “psychological ploy” to undermine and demoralise “the patriotic spirit and fervour of the Nagas”.
Ceasefire always broken

The Indian government, for its part, also has a growing list of concerns about the NSCN (K). The latter had agreed not to assist any North-Eastern insurgent groups to set up base camps in Myanmar, but on-ground research reveals that in NSCN (K)-dominated areas of Myanmar such as Lahe, Leshi and Nanyun in Sagaing administrative region, the United Liberation Front of Asom-Paresh Barua faction and the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB (Songbijit faction)) set up camps to carry out attacks in Assam. In fact, a study of the ceasefire from 2001 shows that there has been no let-up in NSCN (K)’s militant activities and active support to insurgent groups from India.

North-Eastern insurgent groups also have access to training and regrouping camps in Myanmar’s Naga Self-Administered Zone, where NSCN (K) has been granted autonomy by the Myanmar government.NSCN (K) cadres are allowed to remain fully armed in the three townships in the Zone, which is geographically contiguous to Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh.

In the aftermath of the breakdown of the ceasefire, there have been renewed attacks on security forces by suspected NSCN (K) militants in Tirap District of Arunachal Pradesh. Even more ominous, the NSCN (K) is supported by CorCom, short for Coordination Committee, an umbrella organisation of six insurgent groups in Manipur. CorCom groups regularly camp and train in NSCN (K)-controlled territory in the Naga-inhabited areas of Myanmar contiguous to Nagaland. With CorCom’s support, the NSCN (K) can retain its insurgent capabilities in this corridor.

Although India has unilaterally declared that it will continue its part of the ceasefire with the NSCN (K), the major security concern in Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland now arises from another aspect. The possibility of internecine violence looms high in the aftermath of the split, if what happened four years ago is any indication.

The ethnic dimension of the latest split is an important factor. Y.Wangtin Naga is a Konyak Naga from Nagaland while P. Tikhak is a Tangsa Naga from Arunachal Pradesh. Between the two, their new outfit NSCN (R) purports to represent the Indian side of the Nagas as distinct from those living in contiguous areas of Myanmar. This is a direct challenge to the sway of the NSCN (K) over the Nagas in India. The situation is best described by Chinwang Konyak, the India-based adviser of the Eastern Naga Peoples’ Organisation (ENPO), who says, “This is a blessing in disguise as the Khaplang group will be left in Myanmar. Let them deal with the Myanmar government. It is better to part ways with them peacefully.” ENPO is a civil organisation with representatives from ethnic groups of Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh and Myanmar. Mr. Konyak’s statement reflects an important new territorial alignment of Naga ethnic groups — along the modern international border rather than the traditional ethnic notions of territoriality.

The fact that NSCN (K) has a Myanmar-based leadership seems to have, therefore, played into and limited its role as a major stakeholder in the Naga issue. In fact, one of the reasons why it has been disgruntled seems to stem from the fact that it has been sidelined in the last 17 years during talks between the NSCN (IM) and the Indian government. It has been dismissive of any talks held with NSCN (IM) but this has not helped it gain a better footing.

But none of this seems to have deterred the active reconciliation process that is going on among the various India-based groups. On the larger front, there have been concerted efforts by Naga civil society to expand the representation of the Nagas in the peace process so that a lasting and widely acceptable resolution to the Naga issue might be found.

If the government is serious about bringing lasting peace in the North-East, the first step is to hold ceasefire signatory groups accountable to ceasefire ground rules. Therefore, it is critical at this juncture that the Centre, along with the Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland State governments, map out the areas with an NSCN (K) presence and shore up security there to limit the possible breakout of inter-factional violence.

It is better to be prepared and deter violence than be caught unawares and react.

(Namrata Goswami is with the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi. E-mail: [email protected])

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/rajeev-bhattacharyya/what-end-of-ceasefire-mea_b_6991148.html

From BR post by JhoneeG,

"
- Connectivity plans have been announced by Modi via Myanmar.
- Khaplang who heads NSCN is a Myanmarese.
- Khaplang unilaterally ended the ceasefire agreement and threw out Bhaarathiya Naga leaders from his group. Those Bhaarathiya Naga leaders formed their own independent groups.
- Khaplang has self-administered autonomous regions within Myanmar where NSCN trains many north-east insurgents.
- So, Myanmar has lost control over these parts of their country.
- This latest ending the ceasefire would be a detriment to the connectivity plan via Myanmar planned by Modi. So, there may be a chinese hand in this whole affair.
- So, Khaplang was running fullscale armed, self-administered autonomous regions within Myanmar. So, these camps could easily have large number of armed insurgents.
- China has deep connections with north-east insurgent groups.
- China has influence on Myanmar also and has been trying to get it under their control.
- US & Bhaarath also have some influence on Myanmar and provide a counter-balance to China. So, there seems to be two factions within Myanmar. One allied to US & Bhaarath and the other closer to China. So, Myanmar itself would be unable to take a clear stand in this whole affair.
- This clearly explains why unilateral attack on these areas is no H&D loss for Myanmar because Myanmar itself is suffering due to the presence of these chinese sponsored insurgents.

Modi's visit to Bangladesh has given transit access to Bhaarath. This could also be one of the reason for the attack. There may be also a Pakistani connection to this via Bangladheshi jihadhis.
"

 

[pmaitra]

While declining to comment on India's surgical strike on militants in Myanmar, the US has asked India and Pakistan to take steps to reduce tensions and move toward resuming dialogue.

"I don't have a comment on that specific operation," the US State Department spokesperson Jeff Rathke told reporters on Friday when asked if the US supported it or was concerned over India's cross border strike in Myanmar, a move that has raised hackles in Pakistan.

Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...r-army-s-myanmar-strike/article1-1358139.aspx

 

[Pulkit]

with a heavy heart posting this here...Sad
A fcked paki anchor referred to DFI to defame IA

 

[ersakthivel]

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/inside-the-culture-of-covert-killing/article5674426.ece

"
Killing is a lot easier to do than building capacities for surveillance, investigation and prosecution. The Ishrat case is about a republic that’s allowing itself to dissolve into a state of criminal injustice
Early in the summer of 1988, as scorching winds of death blew across Punjab, a short, wiry man entered the Golden Temple, invisible among the great throngs of pilgrims gathering at the shrine from across India. Inside, he was greeted as an honoured guest by Surjit Singh Penta, the Khalistan terror commander who had made the temple his fortress. For the next several days, Mr. Penta worked with his visitor, an officer assigned by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Directorate, wiring up the temple with explosives. The threat, he was certain, would deter India from considering storming the temple, as Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had done in 1984.

New Delhi ignored Mr. Penta’s threats: the bombs were duds, and the man Mr. Penta thought was an ISI officer would serve, decades later, as Director of India’s Intelligence Bureau (IB). Nine days into an almost bloodless siege, the terrorists surrendered

Like many intelligence officials, Ajit Kumar Doval has never discussed what happened in the Golden Temple. Those who served during the period, though, speak of skilful deception operations that allowed the penetration of the networks linking Mr. Penta to the ISI; of the interception and disappearance of the Pakistani intelligence official as he made his way across the Punjab border to Amritsar.

The President of India later handed Mr. Doval a small silver disc, embossed with the great wheel of dharma and a lotus wreath, and the words Kirti Chakra.

Now, as former Intelligence Bureau (IB) special director Rajinder Kumar faces trial for the extra-judicial execution of Mumbai college student Ishrat Jehan Raza and three others, Mr. Doval’s story tells us something important. The Ishrat case is just part of a culture of killing. That culture is, in turn, a symptom of a much larger dysfunction. For decades now, India’s government has dodged a serious debate what a viable legal framework for counterinsurgency and counter-terrorism might look like, how it is to be administered and who will make sure it isn’t abused. It has simply ignored hard questions of capacity-building and accountability.

Delivering death

Few in the IB privately dispute the contours of the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) case — whatever Mr. Kumar’s individual culpability may or may not have been. In February 2004, the IB was able to locate two Gujarat-based jihadists, trained in Pakistan, on the basis of information recovered from the body of a Poonch-based Pakistani Lashkar-e-Toiba operative, Ehsan Illahi. The two Gujarat-based men, referred to in CBI documentation as just C1 and C2, were persuaded — or intimidated, or bribed — to change sides. C1 and C2 informed their Lashkar handler, Muzammil Bhat — the key military commander of the 26/11 plot — that they were ready to stage an attack against top political leaders in Gujarat, including Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The IB was waiting for Gujranwala-based Lashkar-e-Toiba operative Zeeshan Zohar, despatched to Gujarat in April on Mr. Bhat’s instructions. They were waiting for his Sargodha-born colleague Amjad Ali Rana — earlier injured in fighting in Jammu and Kashmir. They were waiting, too, when Pune resident Javed Sheikh showed up — but with a young woman who hadn’t, until then, figured in the story.

From immigration records, we know this: on March 29, 2004, Pune resident Javed Sheikh flew to Oman, on passport E6624023, identifying him as Praneshkumar M. Gopinath Pillai — a travel document obtained illegally, in addition to an earlier one in his Muslim name. He flew back to Mumbai on April 11. He purchased the second-hand car that was to carry him to his death. And he repeatedly communicated, the IB says, with Mr. Bhat — who finally authorised him to travel to Gujarat in June, believing C1, C2, and the two Pakistani fidayeen were ready to initiate their attack.


No one knows what Ms Raza Ishrat was doing with Sheikh; nothing, bar 26/11 convict David Headley’s second-hand claim that she was a suicide bomber, is on record. Her family insists she was just an innocent teenager, hired by Sheikh for a non-existent perfume business.

From witness statements recorded by the CBI, there’s reason to believe the officers involved considered sparing Ms Raza’s life, with some arguing that she would be too terrified to speak about what she had seen. There were others, though, who weren’t willing to take the chance.

There’s just no way any democracy can countenance their choice. Leave aside moral questions: police officials who have the power over the life and death of terrorists today can, tomorrow, use it against political opponents and all the rest of us. Encouraging such acts isn’t patriotism: it is a sure-shot way of turning us into Pakistan, or worse.

Yet, few principles survive encounters with reality unscathed. Everything has a context — and so did Mr. Kumar’s acts.

The dilemmas of democracies

From history, we know this: the values democracies espouse are at some distance from what they actually do: nothing Mr. Kumar is alleged to have done is different, in its ethical elements, from the Central Intelligence Agency’s drone war or Russia’s secret wars in the Caucasus. Last year, a bipartisan investigation held the United States guilty of torture through its post 9/11 wars. In 2009 alone, 33 separate allegations of torture were brought against British soldiers in Iraq. The U.S. practised large-scale torture and secret executions in its war against Vietnam. And Kenyan veterans of the Mau Mau rebellion of the 1950s won the right to sue the United Kingdom for what their lawyers say were “unspeakable acts of brutality.”

Even the most ethical of all wars, the great struggle to defeat German Fascism, was riven through by gigantic atrocities: the Nazi death camps; the firebombing of Dresden; the Soviet war atrocities during their epic advance into Berlin. There is no moral equivalence between the fascists and their enemies, but the actual practice of war doesn’t have victims and villains. Fritz Knöchlein, executed in 1949 for murdering 126 British prisoners of war, is now known to have himself been tortured in the London Cage, a secret camp hidden among the posh villas of the Kensington Palace Gardens.

For influential traditions of human rights discourse in and outside India, the law represents a kind of secular version of divine will: a credo that will build a utopian order, free of the filth of politics. “The law liberals venerate,” John Gray has noted in a stellar essay, “isn’t a free-standing institution towering majestically above the chaos of human conflict.”

Instead, Gray pointed out, “modern law is an artefact of state power.” “Western governments,” he went on, “blunder around the world gibbering about human rights; but there can be no rights without the rule of law and no rule of law in a fractured or failed state.”

The Indian republic, fractured from the moment of its birth, faced stark choices between order and law — which are not, as we fondly imagine, the same thing. Its ill-trained, ill-equipped and understaffed criminal justice system just didn’t have the resources to deliver justice. Killing is a lot easier to do than building capacities for surveillance, investigation and prosecution. Torture thus came to substitute for criminal investigation; the bullet through the back of the head for prosecution and punishment.

The awful truth is this worked: each life not lost in Punjab or Tripura or Andhra Pradesh is a powerful argument for the proposition that the morally-condemnable can also be praiseworthy.

The costs of victory

Yet, these victories have come at an unacceptable price. They absolved governments of responsibility for actions that engendered crisis in the first place: there’s never been a Commission of Inquiry into Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s sponsorship of religious reaction in Punjab, to cite just one example. They also freed the state of any compelling incentive to change its behaviour. India's police and intelligence services aren't fundamentally better off than they were decades ago. Police forces, the government's own data shows, don’t meet even basic norms. The intelligence services are grossly understaffed and underskilled, with the bulk of staff committed to duties which have nothing to do with national security.

India’s security services may be able to stamp out insurgencies, but not ensure the maintenance of a public culture based on law, the keystone of a democracy. We’re left, thus, with a perpetual-motion machine of killing, unable to stop the republic from dissolving into a state of criminal injustice.

[email protected]

Strangely this article is also written by Swami who could mange to count just seven bodies from the raid by 70 commandos!!!!

bu for reasons only known to him mr swami links Doval's golden temple ops to isharath jahan murder case!!!! ofcourse if he did not it wont be a Parveen Swami article in THE HINDU!!!!

Praveen swami's words that "few in IB dispute " are as usual his own lies. there is no way Mr swami and THE HINDU could have conducted an opinion poll among IB guys and came to this conclusion!!!!

THE HINDU always does these kinds of deceptive articles joining things that are as different as chalk and cheese and expecting us to believe , tricking us with age old reputation !!!
"

 

[pmaitra]

with a heavy heart posting this here...Sad
A fcked paki anchor referred to DFI to defame IA

This guy is simply making things up:

• India never said anything about doing anything inside Myanmar. The spokesperson said "along the border."
• Myanmar never said anything about radars.
• The picture of the helicopter is indeed fake and this was propagated by ANI news, and was already debunked by Hindustan Times, which I have posted earlier. Credit goes to Hindustan Times, not this bozo.

 

[pmaitra]

With large swathes of territory of Myanmar virtually ruled by Khaplang, it is all the more important for India to continue to strike deep inside Myanmar, and neutralize these terror bases. There will be collateral damage, and many ordinary people in Myanmar, if hurt, will begin to resent India.

I am not in favour of hurting civilians, but we cannot sit idle if our civilians or soldiers continue to lose their lives. In such cases, we have to prioritize the lives of our people.

Precision strike capabilities are necessary. It is also true that a defensive posture will not work. One has to preemptively strike these groups. Myanmar Army has to be brought in confidence. They should be encouraged to neutralize these and take their territory under their control, or allow India to carry out operations. We should also reward the Myanmar Army every time they neutralize India's enemies.

On a holistic level, India needs to empower the pro-India faction in Myanmar, so that the pro-PRC faction is weakened, and this menace of insurgency is culled once and for all.

 

[ersakthivel]

"No one knows what Ms Raza Ishrat was doing with Sheikh; nothing, bar 26/11 convict David Headley’s second-hand claim that she was a suicide bomber, is on record. Her family insists she was just an innocent teenager, hired by Sheikh for a non-existent perfume business."

Parveen swami displays his creative skills by portraying David headly's claim as second hand, but we are expected to believe what ever he writes as first hand eyewitness evidence!!!!

 

[pmaitra]

Interesting perspective, and I agree. The focus should be elimination of the insurgents without embarrassing Myanmarese Army, as we need to keep them on our side.

Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore’s statement that the operation was a message to all countries inimical to India, predictably set off a furore in Pakistan.

It is unfortunate that the action in Myanmar has triggered a fresh slide in relations with Pakistan on account of breast-beating and credit-hunting by the Modi government. A robust response to the killing of 20 soldiers in Manipur on June 4 was called for, but safeguarding the space to conduct such operations in the future is also critical for India’s long-term strategy. As military analysts have pointed out, the June 9 operation is not the first of its kind undertaken by the Indian Army — which as a force will continue to need the support of the Myanmar authorities. So, while guarding the sanctity of India’s borders and the lives of its soldiers and citizens, the long-term strategy must be to erode the militant strength. In fact, that must be the single-point strategic agenda.

Source: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/lift-the-fog-on-the-operation/article7310192.ece

 

[ersakthivel]

So we now know why MSM guys like PRAveen swami, sekar couptha and cong spokesmen Anand sharma are crossed with this Modi governemnt on this raid!!!

 

[brational]

with a heavy heart posting this here...Sad
A fcked paki anchor referred to DFI to defame IA

Bakistani Chu**yas are doing good work in Bakistan to demean IA's efforts, so does our own Media houses. There must be a basic hygiene on news reporting. Time for a regulatory framework for false and misleading depiction of events by News Agencies. These guys are messing up everything.

 

[aliyah]

Following inputs provided by Border Security Force,
authorities in Bangladesh have begun flushing out northeast
militants hiding in that country, a senior BSF official said
here on Friday.
“We have been informed of operations taking place in
Bangladesh to flush out militants from their makeshift
camps which the BSF had from time to time shared with the
Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB),” a senior BSF official told
PTI.
The BSF came to know about this during a Border
Coordination meeting with BGB which concluded here on
Thursday.
During the conference, the BSF handed over BGB a list of 39
camps of various outfits in different parts of Bangladesh and
sought their cooperation in raiding the camps and arrest the
militants, the official said.
READ ALSO: Myanmar flushing out Naga militants from
camps, forcing them towards Indian border

 

[Bhadra]

.
@pmaitra



what i think was Mercenary means someone who comes out from the army with weapons and start working for some private agencies

Mercinary is a man who picks arms for a profit for a private enterprises or undeclared govt missions without being member of the regular armed forces or militia of that country.

yawn time to take up with Oxfored

For this guy the oxford dictionary overrules the UN Convention on Mercenaries Hence he calls all those who served British Colonials as mercenaries ( as per British dictionary).... He bears a US flag and defines patriotism for Indians..

 

[blueblood]

with a heavy heart posting this here...Sad
A fcked paki anchor referred to DFI to defame IA

Why the heavy heart? Let me repeat myself, this is to assure the 200 million Porkis who are shit scared.
It is the 2015 version of 1 Pakistani = 10 Hindu.

Lol at Qureshi. Pak is going to international courts for Bangladesh.
Good luck with that.

 

[OneGrimPilgrim]

So we now know why MSM guys like PRAveen swami, sekar couptha and cong spokesmen Anand sharma are crossed with this Modi governemnt on this raid!!!

if you watch a show named 'chaukas hain hum!' which's being broadcast on Loksabha TV (aired y'day night, repeated half-an hr back, and may be will be repeated today again), one panelist, retd. lt/maj gen Chikara clearly tells in it how Nagaland has/had been compromised because of the nexus between politicians and militants.

am going to share this screen as much as i can. the behooda anand sharma & his gang should've been spanked by BJP spokespersons across the media and TV channels just based on this alone!

P.S. - given the history of the vile tactics of the congress of trading votes for Bible in the NE elections during Indira Gandhi's regime (and no reason to think may not have happened later too), this doesn't come as much surprise after all. i wonder why and how our Forces have kept enduring such leeches at the cost of their countrymen's & their own lives; these sods should've been bumped off indiscriminately!

 

[Pulkit]

Why the heavy heart? Let me repeat myself, this is to assure the 200 million Porkis who are shit scared.
It is the 2015 version of 1 Pakistani = 10 Hindu.

Lol at Qureshi. Pak is going to international courts for Bangladesh.
Good luck with that.

they can anytime do that.... It was the reference to DFI which made me sad....



@admin @Singh @Kunal Biswas can you sue the channel....using content without permission or something like that... what does the rule say