- Joined
- Aug 15, 2016
- Messages
- 1,609
- Likes
- 5,849
Not after 90s. Change of priority is also importantBack then we were trying to be self sufficient in food .. perspective is important.
Not after 90s. Change of priority is also importantBack then we were trying to be self sufficient in food .. perspective is important.
The other part of the answer is that we could get very high level technical assistance on the nuke subs from Russia, whereas for her engines I doubt anyone would part with the knowhow behind really critical componentsThat has an easy answer .. we could buy jet engines not nuclear subs.
Is there any reason that we can design and build our own nuclear subs but need foreign partnership for conventional subs?MDL started design of a new Indian SSK.
Video by Alpha Defence - Hindi.
Because we have never invested in R&D of conventional Submarines as much we did in the case of Nuclear submarines. Mostly we put our Focus on Nuclear submarines.Is there any reason that we can design and build our own nuclear subs but need foreign partnership for conventional subs?
The only explanation that makes sense is that the nuclear submarines weren't actually our designs.Is there any reason that we can design and build our own nuclear subs but need foreign partnership for conventional subs?
Diesel & nuclear submarines aren't two entirely unrelated streams of technology. The only major difference is the propulsion setup. And we've had considerable experience with diesel-electric setups in building warships. There's no logical explanation as to why we would think it okay to spend billions on a foreign design if at all local competence existed to the desired level.Because we have never invested in R&D of conventional Submarines as much we did in the case of Nuclear submarines. Mostly we put our Focus on Nuclear submarines.
When you got Russian naval design team and their then ambassador attending the launch ceremony of Arihant in Jul 2009, you know how the answer.Is there any reason that we can design and build our own nuclear subs but need foreign partnership for conventional subs?
Atleast we didn't rip them of like some certain country does and proclaim that as their right to doWhen you got Russian naval design team and their then ambassador attending the launch ceremony of Arihant in Jul 2009, you know how the answer.
The only thing russians helped us in was the PWR reactor design for the submarine. Even you chinese had stolen and copied their designs to build your own subs.When you got Russian naval design team and their then ambassador attending the launch ceremony of Arihant in Jul 2009, you know how the answer.
We built the reactor Completely on our own, the only problem was that the reactor was too large to fit into Arihant's Hull, therefore the Russians helped us in miniaturising/scaling down the hull do that it could fit comfortably into Arihant's Hull.The only thing russians helped us in was the PWR reactor design for the submarine. Even you chinese had stolen and copied their designs to build your own subs.
Yes, there was considerable Russian assistance in the design and validation of the various systems of the first SSBN. What is there to feel ashamed about.The only thing russians helped us in was the PWR reactor design for the submarine. Even you chinese had stolen and copied their designs to build your own subs.
Obviously, your own government doesn't think so. The help was so great that they need the ambassador to attend the ceremony to express their appreciation.The only thing russians helped us in was the PWR reactor design for the submarine.
So? India is doing all this by herself?Even you chinese had stolen and copied their designs to build your own subs.
That is not a simple scaling down the hull! It is scaling down almost every component, from the reactor core to pipeline, etc. That means new materials, new sensors and new design.We built the reactor Completely on our own, the only problem was that the reactor was too large to fit into Arihant's Hull, therefore the Russians helped us in miniaturising/scaling down the hull do that it could fit comfortably into Arihant's Hull.
What does our government think then , tell usObviously, your own government doesn't think so. The help was so great that they need the ambassador to attend the ceremony to express their appreciation.
We took help to design our subs and you stole the tech . That's the differenceSo? India is doing all this by herself?
Oh sorry, my mistake, I meant to say that the Russians had helped India miniaturise the reactor so that it would comfortably fit into the hull of INS Arihant.That is not a simple scaling down the hull! It is scaling down almost every component, from the reactor core to pipeline, etc. That means new materials, new sensors and new design.
Obviously, your own government doesn't think so. The help was so great that they need the ambassador to attend the ceremony to express their appreciation.
(Lol) Do you atleast know why Russian Designers/Engineers who were actively involved in INS Arihant's Development had attended the launch ceremony?When you got Russian naval design team and their then ambassador attending the launch ceremony of Arihant in Jul 2009, you know how the answer.
What nuclear sub we have built?Is there any reason that we can design and build our own nuclear subs but need foreign partnership for conventional subs?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
British nuclear submarine crew boiled to death in indian ocean | Naval Warfare | 2 | ||
The Great Indian Nuclear Submarine Saga | Indian Navy | 1 | ||
Indian Navy accelerates Nuclear Submarine programme | Indian Navy | 0 | ||
Indian Nuclear Forces of the Future...? | Strategic Forces | 21 |