Indian Navy Developments & Discussions

Gessler

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
2,311
Likes
11,234
Country flag
Make that's because, you're not right & rest of the whole world has not got it wrong?
Have you considered the possibility of they not being as outdated as you would like them to be (...IN really likes new toys, yet they insisted on upgrading this one for longer range & tracking-seeker instead of replacing them). Could it be that the others don't get inferiority-complex, but think that might have be IN's reason for it?

While people are not using it anymore, is not much of a reason.
Unless you know what that reason is, and why it cannot be fulfilled by any other system, the assumption is moot.
 

Neeraj Mathur

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
880
Likes
2,204
Country flag

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,037
Likes
148,578
Country flag
Not only the raised platform in the front (which has BrahMos & Barak VLS) and the platform at the rear, but the platform in the front where the RBU-6000s are mounted can also be used for at least 6 x 8-cell Barak-sized modules (48 additional cells).

View attachment 116756

The RBUs are fed from a magazine underneath so we know there is considerable below-deck space there as well.

View attachment 116755

I frankly don't understand why IN continues to stick with these outdated systems even on P-15B & even P-17A (which can be argued are technologically superior to any Russian surface combatant). When I ask people why don't we move ahead from this, even most knowledgeable people on forum & twitter immediately get inferiority complex and just say IN knows what its doing.

And then come with statements like 'Underwater CIWS'...well, while that's a sound concept, we must realize we are not in 60s or 70s. There are much much better ways of countering incoming torpedoes than with these ancient systems. Look up stuff like SLQ-25 Nixie, Torbuster etc or even our own Kavach, Marreech etc etc

There are much newer hardkill & softkill options available...and which don't take up a ton of space or destroy signature management like RBU-6000 does.

Even the Russians who f@ucking invented the RBU have stopped using it on their newest combatants like Gorshkov-class frigate:



It should tell us something when even the cash-starved Russian surface fleet (subs get all the money) admit that the Soviet RBU doctrine is outdated and move on to newer & better stuff.
Want to understand this more, what are the Russians and Americans using in RBU role?
 

Haldilal

लड़ते लड़ते जीना है, लड़ते लड़ते मरना है
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
29,530
Likes
113,460
Country flag
Want to understand this more, what are the Russians and Americans using in RBU role?
Aren't both meant for ASW?
Ya'll Nibbiars RBU 6000 are Unguidede Short Range Hard Kill ASW systems.

Ya'll Nibbiars

Vertical Launch Short Range ASW Missile systems.

RUM-139 VL-ASROC.



RPK-9 Medvedka.
 
Last edited:

Okabe Rintarou

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
2,337
Likes
11,988
Country flag
Aren't both meant for ASW?
RBU is meant as CIWS to defend ship from torpedoes or as expensive fishing rod. If you have a hostile submarine close enough for RBU to engage, you might want to check your ship for a couple of holes in the hull.

SMART is meant for wide area ASW.

Aren't both meant for ASW?
Muricans and Russians use VL-ASROC. In terms of range, its around 30 km, between SMART (600km) and RBU (6-7km). VL-ASROC has a light torpedo as the warhead, so meant for ASW, like SMART.
Basically, RBU is mortar. VL-ASROC is howitzer. SMART is Ballistic Missile.
 

Okabe Rintarou

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
2,337
Likes
11,988
Country flag
This is Russian equivalent of Pentagon and sorry to say we are years away from such facility
The only capabilities that this HQ has that our HQ doesn't is:-
1.) Ability to monitor remotely work in factories.
2.) Supercomputer employing predictive algorithms
3.) Weighing of personnel at entrance.

Literally everything else shown in the video is present in our HQs as well.
 

Bleh

Laughing member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,212
Likes
26,018
Country flag

Kuldeepm952

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
944
Likes
4,958
Country flag
Make that's because, you're not right & rest of the whole world has not got it wrong?
Have you considered the possibility of they not being as outdated as you would like them to be (...IN really likes new toys, yet they insisted on upgrading this one for longer range & tracking-seeker instead of replacing them). Could it be that the others don't get inferiority-complex, but think that might have be IN's reason for it?

While people are not using it anymore, is not much of a reason.
There is no tracking sensor, please quote source If I am wrong. The Rbu 6000 rockets i.e. RGB 60 we manufacture are dumb ones and are not guided ones like Rpk 8 complex i.e. 90r rockets. So, having this space gobbler really doesn't makes sense when you can have around 16 vl-asroc (much smaller, don't confuse with SMART) equivalent system with much better payload delieverd to target with high kill probability.
I guess the present choice is more due to the systems available to us rather than their efficacy.(Not saying Rbu are useless but comapritively)
Also read somewhere that Rbu were really meant for close engagements as the Soviet heavy asw torpedos had some problem engaging targets nearby.
It's pretty much same combo of your old Soviet asw armament.
 

Kuldeepm952

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
944
Likes
4,958
Country flag
Want to understand this more, what are the Russians and Americans using in RBU role?
For ranges upto 12 km range, western platforms generally use lightweight torpedo fired from ships (most of our ships have twin tube heavy torpedos), anything further than that you got your vl-asroc system with much higher range. And you always have a ship's best asw buddy- a helicopter.
 

Haldilal

लड़ते लड़ते जीना है, लड़ते लड़ते मरना है
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
29,530
Likes
113,460
Country flag
Don't understand why Forces still insist on their own HQs.

NDA common hosakti hai...lekin HQ nahi hosakti?

Cough...Pentagon...cough

I have this wet dream that just like the iconic Pentagon of America, India will have "The Trident". Within a building shaped liked a Trident (when seen from above, like Pentagon looks like pentagon when we look from above, otherwise a normal looking building). Each prong of the trident will be the HQ of one of the three services and the long rod part of the trident will house HQ IDS, DSA, DCA, AFSOD (all upgraded to Commands rather than Agencies) and maybe even some R&AW detachment to liaise with AFSOD for intel-led Black Ops.
This is Russian equivalent of Pentagon and sorry to say we are years away from such facility
Ya'll Nibbiars the people who are making fun of this don't have any idea that's this is not a small complex but has an area of 13 lakhs Sq. Ft. Including the Vayu Bhavan on the other side of the road.

From stables to this buildings.

images - 2021-10-31T160410.117.jpeg
E_bCeX9VEAAwPCL.jpg
 
Last edited:

Akula

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
2,895
Likes
10,850
Country flag

Global Defence

Articles

Top