- Joined
- Jan 26, 2021
- Messages
- 7,301
- Likes
- 27,601
DifferentOo so Arya or some other memeber is her??
DifferentOo so Arya or some other memeber is her??
Operation on few members who are too pussy@mods -
As a proud malayali, i also protest the gender imbalance in this forum. What are you guys going to do about it?
As someone currently living on woke (west) coast of US, I identify as a female shuturmurg now. That will help a bit.@mods -
As a proud malayali, i also protest the gender imbalance in this forum. What are you guys going to do about it?
I have never lived in Sri Lanka but have seen some videos on YT and the usual data,. But I have lived in the rural areas of Bihar and UP, been to a lot of rural Bengal- and trust me Lankans seem much better off.I did live on the outskirts of colombo for sometime a year before the final war.
due to lower population and concentration of public services to the south , they have an advantage on metrics like education, per capita income health parameters . sure.
but when it comes to standard of living, it's no different from India both in rural and urban setup. their economic complexity index is on a lower scale than India as a country, due to being an island nation and low population.
Thats why I said, like you brought Delhi, most of tourist places in Delhi are in Chandni Chowk / Old Delhi which is a total chaotic place. Mumbai is another chaotic place. Our cities aren’t worth visiting, but places like Sikkim, Goa, Shimla etc are.General civic sense and manners is what we need- a lot. In Delhi, even the government buses jump the signal like any other day. People jump right into the middle of the road even when the lights are green. Encroachment, and littering is so commonplace- a lot of poorer countries would look better than us. Except hills, deserts and some South and NE East rural places- India isn't much of tourism worthy.
Glorified BRTC on separate pathway.
Frankly India as a country does not suffer from a lack of advertisement for tourism globally.Well we should atleast improve tourism in our own country, can help us make up for the deficits. Most of the times these fake news gora media portrays entire India as a giant slum and shows how pathetic India is (yes Indian cities need a lot of maintenance work which is ignored). Hilly areas like Sikkim, Himachal etc, deserts of Rajasthan, beaches of Goa (already a major international tourist attraction) and various national parks etc have a lot of untapped potential. We lag a lot behind when it comes to tourist arrivals.
Yes we can agree on this, obviously my reference point will not be villages in bihar and UP. lower population makes a lot of difference to how a place looks.I have never lived in Sri Lanka but have seen some videos on YT and the usual data,. But I have lived in the rural areas of Bihar and UP, been to a lot of rural Bengal- and trust me Lankans seem much better off.
Maybe similar to South Indian villages but definitely better than North Indian rural landscape
You naughty Tamilian !!!
As a proud Malayali, i want a fellow Malayali to be my PM ...
so my vote goes to the most awesome super talented most erudite most large hearted forever Young captain ....
View attachment 148407
Comparison of SL to KL will be more natural - historically speaking ...Yes we can agree on this, obviously my reference point will not be villages in bihar and UP. lower population makes a lot of difference to how a place looks.
we can compare SL to Goa (both urban and rural), but with a nice built up capital city.
Actually it was a rant and not a praise of HDI or Sri LankaYou see buddy @Shuturmurg.
Which proves the point that the HDI is flawed, like I said the any development index should consider sustainability. Examples of Venezuela and Srilanka speak for themselves according to me.Human Development index cannot encapsulate everything under the Sun. It was designed for a specific purpose- to put some measure for a general well being of people. It cannot capture the possibility of Putin nuking Ukraine, Sheikhs in the ME going environment friendly and America being a peace dove. Stuff like economic complexity, import dependence, overall trade portfolio get captured in various other metrics
Nope it's a strawman argument. Economic failure of Venezuela or Sri Lanka has nothing to do with an indicator that shows the general well being of their people. A metric cannot fail to indicate what it wasn't designed for.Which proves the point that the HDI is flawed, like I said the any development index should consider sustainability. Examples of Venezuela and Srilanka speak for themselves according to me.
So in a nutshell it is okay to achieve unsustainable human development based on a flawed economy?Nope it's a strawman argument. Economic failure of Venezuela or Sri Lanka has nothing to do with an indicator that shows the general well being of their people. A metric cannot fail to indicate what it wasn't designed for.
Maybe, maybe not. But whether an economy is flawed or not isn't for HDI to address. And at similar per capita economy there're countries with better HDI, then what is flawed here?So in a nutshell it is okay to achieve unsustainable human development based on a flawed economy?
Improvement can always be made to capture human well being better. But Sri Lanka didn't go pauper because they overspent on education or health- they made a lot of stupid choices with expensive real estate loans and pandemic struck them bad.There seem to be many proposals to improve the currently flawed HDI.
HDI clearly has the word 'human' in it. Nowhere does it deal with the health or sustainability of the economy. It's like saying you can't measure distance using the unit kg, so kg is a useless unit.Which proves the point that the HDI is flawed, like I said the any development index should consider sustainability. Examples of Venezuela and Srilanka speak for themselves according to me.
The false sense of "All is well" that current HDI gives is what concerns me. The below link gives the basics of calculating the HDI and from the first look itself I can see the problem. Apart from healthcare the other two factors are misleading e.g. GDP Per capita does not show income inequality and Years of education does not consider the quality of education.Maybe, maybe not. But whether an economy is flawed or not isn't for HDI to address. And at similar per capita economy there're countries with better HDI, then what is flawed here?
Improvement can always be made to capture human well being better. But Sri Lanka didn't go pauper because they overspent on education or health- they made a lot of stupid choices with expensive real estate loans and pandemic struck them bad.