Indian Economy: News and Discussion

Concard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2020
Messages
1,281
Likes
9,718
Country flag
Example of new construction in Surat. In the last decade, almost few hundred 10-15fl apartment buildings have come up. A giant concrete jungle, but it doesnt look so bad because there are little to no slums in this part of the city.

View attachment 206843

View attachment 206844
View attachment 206845
View attachment 206846
View attachment 206847

But the city needs to build taller and build proper footpaths. a few G+30 towers would look much nicer and spacious compared to 8-10 G+15 towers that property builders like to build in Surat. There is a height restriction in many parts of the city due to the airport though.
Now if they plant some trees in those gaps between buildings, have rain water harvesting system, have solar panels on their rooftops those buildings can last for long and quality of life will be also be better for people as a whole.
 

Haldilal

लड़ते लड़ते जीना है, लड़ते लड़ते मरना है
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
30,040
Likes
115,405
Country flag
Ya'll Nibbiars The LOGOS Property to invest 650 crore rupees to set up a large-scale logistics park at Chakan, Pune in Maharashtra. The co has acquired land for this project, which will be its fifth logistics park in India.
 

Haldilal

लड़ते लड़ते जीना है, लड़ते लड़ते मरना है
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
30,040
Likes
115,405
Country flag
Ya'll Nibbiars








 
Last edited:

jai jaganath

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2022
Messages
5,975
Likes
10,471
Country flag
Ya'll Nibbiars








I am literally seeing infront of my eyes the data centres in NM being built I mean yeah few have started construction but still so many are proposed and certainty is damn high
But I can't find the particular reason for why panvel leading I this front I mean why not other cities like pune etc receiving this yeah I know pune has sizable data centers but still why panvel
 

Haldilal

लड़ते लड़ते जीना है, लड़ते लड़ते मरना है
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
30,040
Likes
115,405
Country flag
Ya'll Nibbiars The Nykaa’s Financials in FY23, Revenue 5,143.8 Crore. Net Profit - 21 Crore rupees.
 

astransastra

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2022
Messages
109
Likes
187
Country flag
Might seem a bit off topic but i am concerned about how the PSUs like DRDO or Space and Technology organizations like ISRO can continue to attract talent if government caps the salaries of its Directors at 2 Lakh 50 thousand per month. For that matter even service chiefs are not eligible to get more than 2.5 lpm ? Back in 1990s these pay scales used to be attractive by then standards of living. But right now in the last 2-3 years the salaries in IT and service sector have hiked so much that, many software engineers who haven't even reached their mid careers are already earning 30 lakh and above salaries. Forget about Director, AVP, VP level employees who are now earning more than 1 crore per month. Please don't get me wrong but now a talented person unless he/she is freakishly patriotic won't be willing to join DRDO,ISRO or any PSUs and ruin their career. It may feel alright for arm chair critics like us to complain about the Tejas Mk1,MK2 missed dead lines and asking for accountability and rolling heads...but seriously we have to question how can the people working with those salaries get motivated when they see their mediocre friends and peers from colleges who are earning above and beyond them just because they are in IT?

Just now googled and found there are 12.3 Lakh people in India paying in the tax group of earning 25-50 Lakhs. This is just the organized sector (also called formal sector which pays taxes), there may be 2 to 3 times that number who earn as much but don't pay taxes. So how can government motivate its PSU employees?
 
Last edited:

johnj

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
1,776
Likes
2,673
Might seem a bit off topic but i am concerned about how the PSUs like DRDO or Space and Technology organizations like ISRO can continue to attract talent if government caps the salaries of its Directors at 2 Lakh 50 thousand per month. For that matter even service chiefs are not eligible to get more than 2.5 lpm ? Back in 1990s these pay scales used to be attractive by then standards of living. But right now in the last 2-3 years the salaries in IT and service sector have hiked so much that, many software engineers who haven't even reached their mid careers are already earning 30 lakh and above salaries. Forget about Director, AVP, VP level employees who are now earning more than 1 crore per month. Please don't get me wrong but now a talented person unless he/she is freakishly patriotic won't be willing to join DRDO,ISRO or any PSUs and ruin their career. It may feel alright for arm chair critics like us to complain about the Tejas Mk1,MK2 missed dead lines and asking for accountability and rolling heads...but seriously we have to question how can the people working with those salaries get motivated when they see their mediocre friends and peers from colleges who are earning above and beyond them just because they are in IT?

Just now googled and found there are 12.3 Lakh people in India paying in the tax group of earning 25-50 Lakhs. This is just the organized sector (also called formal sector which pays taxes), there may be 2 to 3 times that number who earn as much but don't pay taxes. So how can government motivate its PSU employees?
Haw many Indian family earn more than 2l PM ?
How long the people earning 30 lakh and above salaries keep their jobs ?
How many Indians earn 30 lakh and above salaries ?
What about customers - total numbers & competitiveness ?
FYI - people earning/making money more than 10l PM is building a future for human race if you exclude doctors & ads, IT sectors makes a lots of money thanks to ads.
FYI= there is huge difference between IIT & IIM, engineers gets a low salary compared to MBA, only reason IT people getting huge salaries due to foreign currency power, it is similar to a nurse/techiest working in gulf vs Indian village. Engineers makes only less than 1.2l PM, average less than 60k pm and as low as 10k pm.
you can see a large no.of engineering choosing civil services, police, fire force ldc etc due to better salary and future and start up. Engineer salary depends on new innovation or dangerous/challenges involved, IT sector depends on ads.
What is the salary earn by LM engineer and top IT sectors in US ?
 

IndianEagle2000

Regular Member
Joined
May 25, 2023
Messages
78
Likes
299
Germany's GDP fell by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2022, marking the country's second successive quarter of contraction and slide into recession. This was due to the energy crisis unleashed by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which led to dwindling energy supplies and stoked inflation. Household consumption also dropped.

Considering India needs to overtake Germany to become the 4th largest economy. The german recession just fastracked the process.
 

sameer3694

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
825
Likes
5,720


 

IndianEagle2000

Regular Member
Joined
May 25, 2023
Messages
78
Likes
299
Vedanta Foxconn JV appoints Mike Young for overseeing execution of manufacturing at the upcoming semiconductor fab.

With over 34 years of experience, Young will oversee the execution of manufacturing and operational processes.

Before joining Vedanta, Young was CEO of Systems on Silicon Manufacturing Company (SSMC), Singapore. Prior to this, he served as CEO of X-FAB Sarawak, Malaysia.

He has extensively worked in areas of operations, yield, and device engineering with leading companies like X-FAB UK, STMicroelectronics, Siemens, Atmel, and Plessey Semiconductors.
 

IndianEagle2000

Regular Member
Joined
May 25, 2023
Messages
78
Likes
299
Some nice developments related Vedanta Foxconn JV.

40nm node -

Vedanta Foxconn Semiconductors Ltd (VFSL) has signed initial pacts with two companies for technology transfer--US-headquartered GlobalFoundries and European chip-maker STMicroelectronics (STMicro).

VFSL has an agreement with “a technology partner to transfer and qualify a proven, production-grade, high volume, technology with licenses for Integrated Circuit manufacturing in India,” CEO David Reed told ET. “However, we also have in place an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) because of which we are unable to disclose further details.”

28nm node -

For the 28-nanometer technology, the company has an agreement with IMEC.

However, they're an R&D facility, and sometimes things that work in R&D don't perform the same way in high volume. We have most of the know-how for the 28-nanometer technology, and we'll transfer the IMEC flow into the running 40-nanometer factory in parallel. We'll ramp up the 40-nanometer technology first, and then finish up with the 28-nanometer technology.
 

Crazywithmath

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
2,760
Likes
16,144
Country flag
First of all, the problem is we are not discussing the trade between India and China, but India with ASEAN.
Exports channeled through ASEAN are literally chinese exports with minor value additions; so yes it entirely makes sense to talk about china. China's share in global trade of ASEAN nations is nearing 25% (up from <5% in the 90's) and ASEAN acts as a transit hub of chinese intermediates; with chinese value addition @ an weighted avg of ~ 13% (as of 2018) in finished goods consumed in ASEAN (up from 1% back in china's pre-WTO period). If exports originating from ASEAN are considered; especially textiles and electronics, the share of chinese value addition would go up many times (although the estimates vary from 25-30% to as high as 60% due to constantly evolving natures of supply chain post trade war and covid). Some portions of chinese supply chains were also relocating to economies like - IND, BAN etc and they still are but that is beyond the scope of this rebuttal.

The US admin knew they could not replace suppliers overnight. Hence, pushed whatever little pie they could into other economies and tariffs were specifically designed to hurt finished goods (were slated to be geared towards intermediates gradually).

Of course this is the picture post trade war and covid but as I already mentioned chinese supply chains were already being established in and around ASEAN even before 2010 and only idiots would fail to notice that.

Are you suggesting that India should avoiding any market that Chinese products show up?
That should have been an end goal in itself; it does not make any sense to play fair with a competitor. Does the chinese admin play buddies with JAP or Kor? It is precisely why India opted out of that RCEP shitshow; the interest of the GoI always lies in decoupling from china; to whatever extent it may be possible.

Secondly, yes, it is right that China imposes higher non-tariff barriers, but on the overall trade barriers (including Tariff and non-tariff):

International Trade Barrier Index 2023

Source: International Trade Barrier Index

Non-tariff barriers (the bigger, the better):

Vietnam: 1.33
China: 1.91
Russia: 1.96
India: 2.16
Australia: 2.49
US: 5.52

Yes, India is little better than China on non-tariff barriers, but if you look at the overall trade barrier index:

Overall trade barriers index:
Australia: 3
US: 4.23
Vietnam: 4.75
China: 4.8
Russia: 5.53
India: 5.99


Quote: "India and Russia deployed the most trade barriers greatly restricting trade and imposing other economic and social costs. "

Yes, don't kidding yourselves.
Take a prinout of their report, pack it with some lubes and send it to your local ccp shakha for all I care.

From publishing arbitray quality control measures in chinese (so that cannot be translated easily), very often handwritten to flooding foreign markets with goods produced at dirt cheap rates (old school predatory pricing); from restricting foreign tech giants in the name of muh western propaganda to kicking out foreign IT/consultancy farms, from forcing joint ventures on outsiders to mandatory sharing of know-how' and know-why; from opaque export subsidies to routine dumping and rerouting of cheap (often counterfeit) products; from threatening foreign manufacturers to abruptly halting trades over some random territorial disputes; not to mention the shear scale of industrial espionage and then routinely crying hoax at WTO sessions - all these add up to trade protectionism and no index can measure its true cost. Crying over India's tariffs does not help; at least we are transparent. Even then these so-called thinktanks do not talk about weighted avg tariffs (at par with competitors) which is an even better indicator and bangs their heads over simple avg tariffs (anyway declining since 2020).

Also, did not really intend to compare trade protectionsim; you were subtly trying to act like a typical wumao shitposter and delivering lectures on how India should get chummy with ballooning imports from ASEAN and how we would not be beating chinese exports otherwise while simultaneously ignoring that ASEAN nations have been rerouting chinese products with/without minor value additions for years.

Ultimately, seems alright if we are indeed being unfair to exporters (read ASEAN aka china); it is about time someone shows them the mirror.

You were being arrogant and cocky; got replied in kind. You could consider writing posts on pakistani forums though; those mentally challenged self appointed custodians of Islam would anyway be happy receiving some copium materials amid an everlasting economic collapse or else, (as I already mentioned) pipe down.
 

shade

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
15,344
Likes
91,832
Country flag
Exports channeled through ASEAN are literally chinese exports with minor value additions; so yes it entirely makes sense to talk about china. China's share in global trade of ASEAN nations is nearing 25% (up from <5% in the 90's) and ASEAN acts as a transit hub of chinese intermediates; with chinese value addition @ an weighted avg of ~ 13% (as of 2018) in finished goods consumed in ASEAN (up from 1% back in china's pre-WTO period). If exports originating from ASEAN are considered; especially textiles and electronics, the share of chinese value addition would go up many times (although the estimates vary from 25-30% to as high as 60% due to constantly evolving natures of supply chain post trade war and covid). Some portions of chinese supply chains were also relocating to economies like - IND, BAN etc and they still are but that is beyond the scope of this rebuttal.

The US admin knew they could not replace suppliers overnight. Hence, pushed whatever little pie they could into other economies and tariffs were specifically designed to hurt finished goods (were slated to be geared towards intermediates gradually).

Of course this is the picture post trade war and covid but as I already mentioned chinese supply chains were already being established in and around ASEAN even before 2010 and only idiots would fail to notice that.



That should have been an end goal in itself; it does not make any sense to play fair with a competitor. Does the chinese admin play buddies with JAP or Kor? It is precisely why India opted out of that RCEP shitshow; the interest of the GoI always lies in decoupling from china; to whatever extent it may be possible.



Take a prinout of their report, pack it with some lubes and send it to your local ccp shakha for all I care.

From publishing arbitray quality control measures in chinese (so that cannot be translated easily), very often handwritten to flooding foreign markets with goods produced at dirt cheap rates (old school predatory pricing); from restricting foreign tech giants in the name of muh western propaganda to kicking out foreign IT/consultancy farms, from forcing joint ventures on outsiders to mandatory sharing of know-how' and know-why; from opaque export subsidies to routine dumping and rerouting of cheap (often counterfeit) products; from threatening foreign manufacturers to abruptly halting trades over some random territorial disputes; not to mention the shear scale of industrial espionage and then routinely crying hoax at WTO sessions - all these add up to trade protectionism and no index can measure its true cost. Crying over India's tariffs does not help; at least we are transparent. Even then these so-called thinktanks do not talk about weighted avg tariffs (at par with competitors) which is an even better indicator and bangs their heads over simple avg tariffs (anyway declining since 2020).

Also, did not really intend to compare trade protectionsim; you were subtly trying to act like a typical wumao shitposter and delivering lectures on how India should get chummy with ballooning imports from ASEAN and how we would not be beating chinese exports otherwise while simultaneously ignoring that ASEAN nations have been rerouting chinese products with/without minor value additions for years.

Ultimately, seems alright if we are indeed being unfair to exporters (read ASEAN aka china); it is about time someone shows them the mirror.

Lastly, take a prinout of their report, pack it with some lubes and send it to your local ccp shakha for all I care. You were being arrogant and cocky; got replied in kind. You could consider writing posts on pakistani forums though; those mentally challenged self appointed custodians of Islam would anyway be happy receiving some copium materials amid an everlasting economic collapse or else, (as I already mentioned) pipe down.
Century of Humiliation but in forum post form :truestory:
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top