- Joined
- Aug 10, 2020
- Messages
- 29,497
- Likes
- 113,307
Ya'll Nibbiars it"s not i don't agree with your argument but in the farmers subsidy it's not targetd with the maximum utilization's. No production or the quality based targeting. Only a blanket subsidy which fails it's utilization's.No No. In that post also, I argued to uplift the poor and not making rich poor. I argued to uplift the farmers for which many guys had a problem. There are many guys who have a very narrow thinking and and they believe that if they are in particular profession, they should advocate its interest only. As I am service class guy, I can not argue for farmers. If someone does anything else, they find contradiction in that. You are one of them. I am a corporate profession working with a reputed group of India once a part of fortune 500 having 9 degrees or certifications from premier Institutes of India. When I saw the conditions of farmers by involving myself into it, I found that they get minimal compared to any other profession and the hardwork they put in. Nobody bothers when they buy Rs 15 a kg tomatoes that farmers gets less that Rs 5 for their hard work to grow it.
Nobody knows that hard work which goes into making one kg of wheat which you purchase at Rs 25 to 30 for which farmers get Rs 15.If you speaks for them. I advocate what I had told on that day.
And what about 5% GST? When, builders and restaurant holders charged 12% GST from customers without passing on input tax credit to end user, it was a cheating. Government reduced GST rate to 5% and removed input tax credit which I had been recommending for a long time. Government did it in restaurant and catering services first followed by Housing sectors. This protected the end users interest without affecting the government's revenue from GST. All cheaters who were cheating the end user by not passing on input tax credit to end user now can not do that. I argued for that only but those idiots and navies on the forum who has no knowledge of taxation or grass root realities attacked me personally rather than arguing on the issue. Our tax laws has a presumptive income clause under section 44AD. It provides a turnover based tax rather than tax on profit. I argued to expand it. Some idiots who does not have the knowledge of this law said that I argue in favor of the people who wants to hide the tax. If one has no knowledge, they can ask for reference. They can not discard other's point of view if they do not agree with them particularly with personal abuse. The problem with Idiot people is not that they do not know something but they believe that whatever they do not know does not exist. I kicked their back as I always do when the idiots try to be over smart and try to argue their nonsense point of view in offensive manner.
Last edited: