Indian diplomat arrested, handcuffed in US for visa fraud

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
7,255
Likes
12,207
Country flag
Indian diplomat arrested, handcuffed in US for visa fraud -

See more at: Indian diplomat arrested, handcuffed in US for visa fraud - Hindustan Times
India's deputy consul general in New York was arrested by law enforcement authorities on charges of visa fraud but was released on a $250,000-bond after she pleaded not guilty in a court. Devyani Khobragade, 39, was taken into custody on Thursday after India-born US attorney for the southern district of New York Preet Bharara announced charges of visa fraud against her and alleged that she had made false statements in connection with the visa application of an Indian national employed by her as a babysitter and housekeeper.

Khobragade was also serving as the acting consul general at the Consulate General of India in New York at the time of her arrest.
She was charged with one count of visa fraud and one count of making false statements, which carry maximum sentences of 10 years and five years in prison, respectively.

Khobragade, mother of two daughters and a Chevening scholar, was taken into custody and produced before judge Debra Freeman late in the afternoon for an arraignment hearing.
The judge read out Khobragade her rights and the charges against her. Khobragade did not speak during the hearing except to say that she agrees with the terms and conditions of the bail. The next hearing has been set for January 13.


Wearing a purple sweater and dress, Khobragade appeared composed during the hearing but looked pale and stressed.
Khobragade submitted her diplomatic passport to the court. Freeman ordered that Khobragade cannot leave the country but can travel within the US only if she gives advance notification of her travels.
Her lawyer told the judge that his client is "not subject to prosecution" as she "enjoys immunity as a consulate officer". Her lawyer will be filing claims of diplomatic immunity in the case and relevant papers in court.
Announcing the charges against Khobragade, Bharara said, "Foreign nationals brought to the United States to serve as domestic workers are entitled to the same protections against exploitation as those afforded to United States citizens.
"The false statements and fraud alleged to have occurred here were designed to circumvent those protections so that a visa would issue for a domestic worker who was promised far less than a fair wage. This type of fraud on the United States and exploitation of an individual will not be tolerated."
Eminent Indian-American lawyer Ravi Batra said Bharara has "acted, as always, to defend the United States, while acknowledging that Constitutional presumptive innocence belongs to the accused."
"Absent the creation of a new legal category for diplomatic foreign domestic workers, which exempts them from US labor laws, including, wages and hours, American laws must be followed to avoid both criminal and civil liability as well as diaspora and foreign-sovereign embarrassment.

"Foreign nations who pay their workers at or near US labour rates are free from this risk, however of 194 countries, most nations are below US-mandated hours and wage standards, and to this later group's diplomatic corps - they remain at high risk to be in the cross-hairs of illegality and reputation-suicide," Batra said.

The Indian embassy in Washington released a statement saying it had "immediately conveyed its strong concern" to the US Government on action taken against Khobragade.

"The US side have been urged to resolve the matter with due sensitivity, taking into account... the diplomatic status of the officer concerned," the embassy said in the statement.

The embassy said it had been informed that Khobragade was taken into custody by law enforcement authorities.
It added that the action was apparently taken against Khobragade on the basis of allegations raised by the officer's former India-based domestic assistant, Sangeeta Richard, who is absconding since June this year.

In this context the Delhi high court had issued an-interim injunction in September to restrain Richard from instituting any actions or proceedings against Khobragade outside India on the terms or conditions of her employment.

"The US government had subsequently been requested to locate Richard and facilitate the service of an arrest warrant, issued by the metropolitan magistrate of the South District court in New Delhi under Sections 387, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code," the embassy said, adding that the existing court case in India against Richard has already been brought to the attention of the US government.

An 11-page criminal complaint unsealed in Manhattan federal court alleged Khobragade had made false statements about the salary and employment terms of the domestic help she had got from India. The complaint, however, did not name Richard.

Diplomats and consular officers can get domestic workers, personal employees and servants on A-3 visas. The diplomats have to submit proof that the helper will receive a fair wage, sufficient to support himself financially, comparable to that being offered in the area of employment in the US.

The complaint alleged that Khobragade prepared and electronically submitted an application for an A-3 visa for the Indian national who was to be her personal employee beginning in November 2012 in New York.

The visa application stated that the domestic help would to be paid $4,500 per month. Khobragade and the domestic help also signed an employment contract which stated that she would pay her the prevailing or minimum wage, whichever is greater, resulting in an hourly salary of $9.75.

The complaint said that Khobragade knew that the employment contract that she caused her domestic help to submit to the US state department contained "materially false and fraudulent statements about hourly wage and hours worked."

Prior to the signing of the contract, it was agreed between Khobragade and her domestic help that she would be paid Rs. 30,000 per month. At 40 hours per week, it was equivalent to $573.07 monthly or $3.31 per hour.

However, Khobragade instructed the help to say that she would be paid $9.75 per hour, and not to say anything about being paid Rs. 30,000 per month. Khobragade also instructed the help to say that she would work 40 hours per week.

After the employment contract was submitted to the US department of state, Khobragade allegedly told her domestic help that she needed to sign another employment contract which provided that the domestic help's maximum salary per month including overtime allowance will not exceed Rs. 30,000 per month. The second employment contract did not contain any provision about the normal number of working hours per week.

The domestic help worked for Khobragade as a household employee from November 2012 through June 2013. The complaint said that regardless of the terms of the first employment contract, she worked far more than 40 hours per week and was paid less than $9.75 per hour by Khobragade.

Suneeta Dewan, an attorney present at the hearing, said Khorbragade had employed the domestic help in her personal capacity and not diplomatic capacity. This is why the reason of diplomatic immunity may not apply in the case.
Two officials from the consulate were also present during the hearing.
As she walked out of the courtroom after the hearing, Khobragade smiled and hugged a couple of her friends who had come for the hearing.
She told PTI that she cannot talk to the press since the matter is "subjudice" but said that she is doing fine. She was flanked by her attorney Daniel Arshack and her colleagues from the consulate who escorted her outside the court.
Dewan, a friend of Khorbragade who was among the first people she had called following the arrest, said it was "very unfortunate" that she was arrested.
"She is a very fine person, accomplished and hardworking."
Khobragade joined the consulate last year and was previously posted in Germany, Italy and Pakistan.
The arrest sent shock wave among the Indian diplomatic corps and some officers said it is unprecedented and inappropriate for a diplomat to be arrested.
- See more at: Indian diplomat arrested, handcuffed in US for visa fraud - Hindustan Times
==========================

Indian diplomat arrested, handcuffed in US for visa fraud - Hindustan Times
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
Not only her but most of Indians diplomats are corrupt and exploit there servants around the world
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Devyani Khobragade, a diplomat to the US from India, allegedly promised to pay the female servant at least $9.75 an hour but then reneged, giving her an hourly wage of just more than $3. She's been slapped with federal charges of making false statements and visa fraud.

A high-ranking Indian diplomat who speaks about gender issues and promotes women's rights was busted for paying her female housekeeper just $3.31 an hour.

Deputy Consul General Devyani Khobragade, 39, who rakes in more than $100,000 a year and lives in a luxury apartment paid for by the Indian government located on New York's East Side, pleaded not guilty to making false statements and visa fraud in Manhattan Federal Court.

Prosecutors said she submitted a bogus visa application for her housekeeper in which she said she'd be paid almost $10 an hour.
Women's-advocate, Indian diplomat paid housekeeper peanuts: Feds - NY Daily News
 

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
7,255
Likes
12,207
Country flag
Not only her but most of Indians diplomats are corrupt and exploit there servants around the world
That's not the question, but her being arrested and taken handcuffed.
 
Last edited:

Defenceindia2010

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
449
Likes
324
Country flag
She should be recalled and sacked, what is the policy of the Congress Govt on foreign personnel postings. Why are these charactor less individuals representing India. :frusty:
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
She should be recalled and sacked, what is the policy of the Congress Govt on foreign personnel postings. Why are these charactor less individuals representing India. :frusty:
most of indian diplomats and their staff i have seen are the most unprofessional and rude .

to give u 1 example.

i have seen one of the male staff in kurta pajama(casual one) roaming in Indian embassy visa counter section on working day:pound::pound::pound:
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,867
Country flag
I just don't understand the posters who are riling to get her arrested, sacked and etc etc, completely ignoring the fact the BIg Bad US of A has violated international law by arresting the Diplomat with immunity; and the Judge was so stupid that he/she asked for bail amount?!!!! Doesn't the USA people any longer needs to be educated to hold positions in Law Enforcement or Judiciary??
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,867
Country flag
I think the image of Indian Govt. has become so weak that nobody cares what they do to it anymore.


Diplomatic immunity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Employer abuse[edit]
Diplomatic immunity from local employment and labor law when employing staff from the host country has precipitated abuse. The local staff are employed where local knowledge is needed (such as an administrative assistant, press/PR officer), or as menial staff like a cleaner, maid or mechanic. When the employer is a diplomat, the employees are in a legal limbo where the laws of neither the host country nor the diplomat's country are enforceable, so that an abusive diplomat employer can act with virtual impunity. Diplomats have ignored local laws concerning minimum wages, maximum working hours, vacation and holidays. The worst abusers have imprisoned the employees in their homes, deprived them of their earned wages, passports, and communication with the outside world, abused them physically and emotionally, deprived them of food and invaded their privacy.[51][52] In the case of corrupt countries and abusive diplomats, it has been virtually impossible to enforce payment of wages or any standards whatsoever. South Africa, for example, was criticised for claiming immunity from labor laws relating to a Ukrainian domestic worker at the residence of the South African ambassador to Ireland in Ireland.[53]
The American Civil Liberties Union filed an amicus brief in Swarna v. Al-Awadi to argue that human trafficking is a commercial activity engaged in for personal profit, which falls outside the scope of a diplomat's official functions, and therefore diplomatic immunity does not apply.[54]
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
I just don't understand the posters who are riling to get her arrested, sacked and etc etc, completely ignoring the fact the BIg Bad US of A has violated international law by arresting the Diplomat with immunity; and the Judge was so stupid that he/she asked for bail amount?!!!! Doesn't the USA people any longer needs to be educated to hold positions in Law Enforcement or Judiciary??
Perhaps not.

Devyani Khobragade, 39, was taken into custody on Thursday after India-born US attorney for the southern district of New York Preet Bharara announced charges of visa fraud against her ..
 

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
7,255
Likes
12,207
Country flag
I just don't understand the posters who are riling to get her arrested, sacked and etc etc, completely ignoring the fact the BIg Bad US of A has violated international law by arresting the Diplomat with immunity; and the Judge was so stupid that he/she asked for bail amount?!!!! Doesn't the USA people any longer needs to be educated to hold positions in Law Enforcement or Judiciary??
It isn't as straight forward case of breach of diplomatic immunity only.

three exceptions: 1. an action involving immovable property in the host state the diplomat is not holding on behalf of his state; 2. if the diplomat is involved as an executor, administrator, heir, or legatee as a private person and not on behalf of his country; and 3. any professional or commercial activity in the host state by the diplomat in his personal capacity, outside his official functions. Furthermore, as Article 32 states, a diplomat cannot claim immunity in the case of a counterclaim against a claim he has initiated.
Source :

Italian marines case: The question of diplomatic impunity | Tehelka.com

So, there are grey areas.

But, also this case is also not a simple case of forgery.

So, to act in a manner as USA has acted, needs to be discussed in detail before we can conclude.

Also, these matters are more a reflection of the relations between two countries and that takes precedence.
So, USA, was expected out of country relationship to have informed Indian counterparts before a public showdown.

As it's India, we might not take any rash action against the US diplomats, but any other country with less friendly relations wouldn't hesitate before fabricating charges.

As, molestation or rape or assault is always on personal capacity and not while representing a country isn't it?
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
So, to act in a manner as USA has acted, needs to be discussed in detail before we can conclude.

Also, these matters are more a reflection of the relations between two countries and that takes precedence.
So, USA, was expected out of country relationship to have informed Indian counterparts before a public showdown.

In the American system they have what is called the separation of the 3 co-equal branches of the government. The Courts there is not under the authority of the US President, which is in-charge of foreign relations.

Interestingly, this case is more of a showdown of Indians in American Court: the complainant is an Indian, the prosecutor is an Indian (naturalised American) and the defendant is Indian.
 

fallenwarrior

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Messages
200
Likes
164
Country flag
India summons US ambassador to protest diplomat being handcuffed


India has summoned US Ambassador Nancy Powell to lodge a strong protest against what it has called the "unacceptable treatment" of its high-ranking diplomat Devyani Khobragade, who was arrested and handcuffed in public in New York on Thursday for an alleged visa fraud.

"We are shocked and appalled at what the US did. India is forcefully taking up with the US the treatment of the arrested diplomat. It is not acceptable," the foreign ministry said.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is unacceptable.However guilty the diplomat may be the US had no right to arrest and handcuff the alleged diplomat.This is a clear breach of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations Article 29 which says Diplomats must not be liable to any form of arrest or detention. They are immune from civil or criminal prosecution, though the sending country may waive this right under Article.


Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
7,255
Likes
12,207
Country flag
In the American system they have what is called the separation of the 3 co-equal branches of the government. The Courts there is not under the authority of the US President, which is in-charge of foreign relations.

Interestingly, this case is more of a showdown of Indians in American Court: the complainant is an Indian, the prosecutor is an Indian (naturalised American) and the defendant is Indian.
Second things first.
Showdown of Indians only as in ethnically, as a naturalized US citizen is equivalent to US citizen by birth as far as his/her allegiance is concerned.

For, the first point
It's the same system as in India, where legislature has no control over judiciary.
Conveniently, our judicial system is dead slow, so even a false case against US diplomat will make them languish in India for long time.

Also, I haven't read US legal system, but their President do have considerable power, to shield against judiciary.
But, we aren't discussing at that realm.

A person's diplomatic immunity should be contested first before arresting, and not after.
If, a court has issued arrest warrant means that, it has taken due cognizance of her diplomatic immunity or
If, the court isn't aware of her diplomatic status and issued the warrant which seems to be the case ( as mentioned in the article, her immunity papers were submitted in the court after her arrest.) then the executive can't carryout the warrant if she waves/ cites her immunity status at the time of the arrest. And then the police officer can only ask her to volunteer, in which case she can't be handcuffed.

Also, if it's the former case where, the court has decided to issue the warrant in-spite of her immunity status, then the court must be confident that, immunity isn't applicable in this case. How did the court come to the conclusion when mr. Preet Bharara is arguing it after She has been arrested.

Also, how can court rule in favor of waiving-off or non-applicability of immunity, with out hearing the defense, on why it can't be done so.

All, I want to say is whether, immunity is applicable in this case should have been decided before arresting her and not after her being arresting.
Also, even if a diplomat wants he/she can't waive off the immunity on her by himself/herself, the state has to do it. In this case India.

So, in the case of whether Immunity is applicable or not, the party should be Indian High commission and not the diplomat himself/herself, which is in this case.

Technicalities of the case apart, the defense will argue, as what has been mentioned in the article, that she can't be prosecuted in the USA.

=======================
As I am not a lawyer or have studied law, I would mention @sayareakd, @A chauhan @arnabmit who can give possible legal angle and point out any deficiencies in my post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
7,255
Likes
12,207
Country flag
Remember him?


Strauss Kahn was the IMF Chief at the time he was arrested at the Kennedy International Airport.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/nyregion/imf-head-is-arrested-and-accused-of-sexual-attack.html
Strauss-Kahn's lawyers did not invoke his immunity from prosecution during the criminal case. Wigdor ridiculed the fact that they would invoke it in the civil case, but not the criminal case as "piecemeal immunity."
But, Mehta countered that Strauss-Kahn was eager to assert his innocence in the criminal proceedings, and so he didn't invoke whatever immunity he enjoyed as IMF chief.
Strauss-Kahn lawyers assert diplomatic immunity in New York civil case - CNN.com


Justice Douglas E. McKeon of State Supreme Court in the Bronx characterized Mr. Strauss-Kahn's attempt to claim diplomatic immunity as "his own version of a Hail Mary pass," noting that he had resigned from his position as the head of the International Monetary Fund before the suit was filed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/n...claim-of-diplomatic-immunity-is-rejected.html


But, the criminal case against Strauss-Kahn was later dropped by New York prosecutors, because of credibility issues they cited in Diallo's account.
He resigned his position soon after his arrest by New York police in May 2011, when he was charged with criminally assaulting a housekeeper in a Manhattan hotel suite.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/28/justice/dsk-civil-suit/
 
Last edited:

Razor

STABLE GENIUS
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
7,701
Likes
9,099
Country flag
Wait, I have a question, how can Kahn have diplomatic immunity ?
 

Free Karma

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
2,372
Likes
2,600
:hmm:

I didn't know that executives of international organizations can be considered as diplomats. I thought the idea of diplomats and diplomatic immunity pertained only to state-to-state relations.
So does this mean the head of FIFA can also use diplomatic immunity. Sounds ridiculous.
Dont think it applies to sporting bodies....maybe there is a list somewhere.

Otherwise imagine..Sharad Pawar wouldve had diplomatic immunity during his tenure as ICC CEO :lol:
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top