I guess it is only the HRC, however very very weird language in their verdict. Innocent person? What happened to him being arrested from an encounter site while throwing stones? Zoological culture? Which culture? Indian/Hindu/Dharmic culture? As opposed to civilized Islamic culture? Major cuckoldery here..
Citing several Supreme Court judgments, Justice Nazki observed: “As far as law on protection of human dignity is concerned, the law of this country, as a general principle, doesn’t permit even chaining and handcuffing of any person, including convicts. How can one approve making an innocent person a human shield and parading him in chains tied to a jeep for hours?”
Ending his judgement with an observation made by Justice V R Krishna Iyer that “zoological culture cannot be compatible with reverence for life, even of a terrible criminal”,