- Joined
- Aug 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,419
- Likes
- 2,819
I disagree with points 1 and 3.well,
1. 3 AC so so is enough for CHina to police its interest overseas ,including protects its sealane from bothers from regions powers like India.
2.If 3 AC groups were not prevent the bothering, then it would be time to show-hands,instead of police mission.
3.nuke subs/large birds say B2/ICBM are showing-hands weapons, instead of AC.
Counter-point 1: 3 ACs mean 2CVBGs operational at once (peacetime). You going to deploy them to your neighbour's backyard (Indian ocean) or keep your own backyard safe (south and east China seas)?
Counter-point 3: ICBM is not an option. Your leaders do not want to go down that road just to protect your SLOCs. ICBMs are a measure of last resort. SSBNs are again, not very effective if the Malacca straits are blocked as there is only one direction from where they can approach. Could you please explain large birds?
I agree with point no. 2.
This is regarding your Wu-14; when developed it can be a lethal weapon and perfect for showing-hands (if it could ever achieve a CEP that Df-21D claims to have).
But this is effective only in war-time as you will not simply launch a Wu-14 if the Navy tries to block Malacca.... right?