All well and good but the point he made has nothing to do with 'siege mentality'. It is just an attempt to over intellectualize the situation and project because what was said may not be palatable to certain people.In sociology, siege mentality is a shared feeling of victimization and defensiveness—a term derived from the actual experience of military defences of real sieges. It is a collective state of mind in which a group of people believe themselves constantly attacked, oppressed, or isolated in the face of the negative intentions of the rest of the world. Although a group phenomenon, the term describes both the emotions and thoughts of the group as a whole, and as individuals.[1]
The result is a state of being overly fearful of surrounding peoples, and an intractably defensive attitude.
Adopting this attitude never leads to growth and prosperity but slow and systemic extinction. Kashmiri Pundits never went on the offensive or could get their lands back due to this reason. They simply adjusted to the circumstances and were continuously under attack.
going on the offensive requires a pro-india diaspora. Never leaving the land and putting head in the sand like an ostrich is what the Pandits did and look where they are today…
The way you go about it one would think it is optimal to only keep migrating and brag about how true you are to your roots. Not the way you win any 'culture war' nor address the true nature of the problem.