India Takes First Step Towards Indus Water Treaty Withdrawal

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
PAKISTAN NOT TO ACCEPT EXTERNAL PRESSURE ON INDUS WATERS TREATY
Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:55

ISLAMABAD: Minister for Defence, Water and Power Khawaja Muhammad Asif Tuesday said Pakistan would not accept any external pressure on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) reached with India in 1960 for distribution of water between the two countries.

"Each and every clause of the IWT should be followed by both the signatories in its letter and spirit," he said while talking to media persons after addressing a national seminar.

The seminar titled "Hydro Politics around Pakistan: Reassessing the Efficacy of IWT," was organized by the Institute of Strategic Studies, Research and Analysis (ISSRA) here at the National Defence University (NDU).

Commenting on India's latest move to build Ratle Dam on the River Chemnab after Baglihar and Kishanganga project, the minister said Pakistan did an extensive exercise in one and half years over the issue.

"Pakistan's case is stronger than that of India and we would safeguards its national interests at every cost," he asserted.

Answering a question, the minister underlined the need for conserving water, electricity and gas, highlighting the importance of developing habit of conservation at every level.

In the existing system, he said, Pakistan had sufficient water resources to meet its needs but "we will have to end the culture of wastage."

Replying to another question, Khawaja Asif said around 6,500 MW electricity would be added in the national grid during a period from April to December this year.

The electricity would be coming from five power generation plants, out of which two are coal-fired and three LNG-based. "This will help eliminate the power shortages in peak summer season," he said adding 3,500 MW more electricity would be added in the system from other resources by the end of the current year.

He expressed confidence that the commitment made by the Prime Minister with regard to overcoming the load-shedding in the given time would be fulfilled.

Earlier addressing participants of the seminar, Khawaja Asif said the waters regime as envisaged in the IWT continued to take the brunt of Indian mindset and their inclination to interfere with the waters, exclusively reserved for Pakistan.

"The potential to interfere is widened if not actualized, in the backdrop of conflicts between the two countries.
"

However, he said, treaty was an instrument which could avoid wars, so Pakistan's focus remained on implementation of the treaty in letter and spirit.

"The question of upper and lower riparian is essentially a misnomer in the IWT context. In the first place, Pakistan needs to stick to the treaty, while emphasizing on its true implementation. Secondly, we need to keep in mind that the country's water security dilemma is accentuated in the absence of an effective water storage capacity, water conservation and management strategy," he remarked.

The minister said situation could be improved through a multi- pronged and time efficient management; and a strong political will to translate plans into reality.

"We should put our house in order and take meaningful steps to enhance our storage capacity."

He said both the countries were bound to follow the IWT clauses in letter and spirit and no side could abrogate them unilaterally.

In his welcome address, President NDU Lt Gen Rizwan Akhtar said the IWT 1960 had been the most outstanding achievement that established a technical formula and mechanism for water division of the Indus basin river system in an otherwise politically volatile region.

The legal instrument, he said, had so far sustained and delivered despite ups and downs in Pakistan India relations.

Other participants of the seminar emphasised that water, being a lifeline" had become an important factor in shaping the relationship between co-riparian in the changing geo-strategic environment.

Pakistan and India share the waters of Indus River Basin which has been a major source of contention between the two states since independence.

In order to resolve the disputes, both countries signed IWT in 1960 with the help of World Bank which has survived over five decades of hostilities between the two states.

However, due to the recent indigenous upsurge in Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), water has once again become a divisive issue.

Indian statement "blood and water cannot flow together" and the threat of unilateral abrogating the treaty has resulted into a new wave of hydro politics around Pakistan and brought IWT under stress.

Highlighting Pakistan's primary concerns regarding the IWT, the seminar participants gave different suggestions to counter the Indian hydro hegemony in an effective manner.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
WB urged to fulfill its obligations in terms of IWT

ISLAMABAD: The Committee of the Whole of Senate of Pakistan has passed a resolution calling upon the World Bank (WB) to fulfill its obligations in terms of Indus Water Treaty (IWT).

The Committee of the Whole met at the Parliament House Tuesday which was presided over by Chairman Senate Mian Raza Rabbani to prepare policy guidelines in light of emerging regional realities.

The resolution says “Whereas the World Bank brokered the water accord between Pakistan and India; whereas under the treaty no party can ‘pause’ performance of the obligations under the treaty and the position taken by the World Bank would only prevent Pakistan from approaching a competent forum and having its grievances addressed; the Committee of the Whole of the Senate of Pakistan calls upon the World Bank to fulfill its obligations in terms of the IWT”.

A detailed briefing was given by the Minister for Water & Power Khawaja Muhammad Asif on the latest development regarding establishment of a Court of Arbitration by the World Bank which had brokered the accord to resolve water dispute between Pakistan and India including the status of proposal regarding visitation of sites of the hydro electric plant being constructed by India in violation of IWT. He also briefed the Committee on the construction of Kishen Ganga and Ratle hydro electric projects of India.

The Minister informed that Pakistan remains stick to the treaty and terms and conditions of the treaty are being followed. He said that the treaty should remain intact. The Minister said that Indian Prime Minister Modi was befooling his own public while making a statement about the eastern rivers. The three eastern rivers i.e Ravi, Sutlej and Biyass are already being used by India. He however, emphasized that there was a dire need to put our own house in order and avoid wastage of water.

Senators Mohsin Leghari, Taj Haider, Mir Kabeer Ahmad Muhammad Shahi, Keneth William, Ayesha Raza Farooq, Sussi Palijo, Saud Majeed and Karim Khawaja also took active part in the discussion and asked various pertinent questions with regard to IWT and its significance in the country.

Chairman Senate Mian Raza Rabbani appreciated Minister for Water and Power and Advisor to the Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs for apprising the Committee on an important issue which would help in preparing some concrete recommendations.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
Supreme Court to hear plea seeking revocation of Indus Water Treaty
Calling the treaty ‘unconstitutional’, the petition has called for a scrapping of the Indus Water Treaty between India and Pakistan.

By: ANI | New Delhi | Published:January 10, 2017 7:26 am

The Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear a plea filed by apex court lawyer Manohar Lal Sharma in the Indus Water Treaty issue. Calling the treaty ‘unconstitutional’, the petition has called for a scrapping of the Indus Water Treaty between India and Pakistan. Sharma says the treaty is invalid as it was signed by Nehru and Khan, and that it should have been signed by the President of India. The treaty was signed on September 19, 1960 by India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistan President Ayub Khan. It is one of the most liberal water-sharing pacts in the world.

The agreement covers six rivers – the three eastern rivers of Ravi, Beas, Sutlej and their tributaries and the three western rivers of Indus, Jhelum, Chenab and their tributaries. Water from the eastern rivers has been allocated to India, and New Delhi is obligated to let 80 percent water from the western rivers flow to Pakistan. The treaty gives the lower riparian Pakistan more ‘than four times’ the water available to India.


@LETHALFORCE @Indx TechStyle @Cutting Edge @LordOfTheUnderworlds
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
India’s intransigence in resolving IWT dispute
Water is indispensable to agriculture, as it is a critical input into agriculture of a country especially when it is situated in an arid or semi-arid zone



A report titled ‘India resists World Bank move to resolve Indus Water Treaty dispute’ authored by Zofeen T. Ebrahim and Joydeep Gupta was carried by a national English daily, which originally appeared on the website of The Third Pole. It stated: “India has asked the World Bank not to rush in to resolve a dispute with Pakistan over the Kishanganga and Ratle hydropower projects. Indian officials told a World Bank representative in New Delhi on 5th January2017 that “any differences over the projects can be resolved bilaterally or through a neutral expert.” Pakistan is averse to the appointment of neutral expert, as it takes only technical aspect into consideration. Pakistan therefore approached the World Bank — the designated IWT mediator and a guarantor — to adjudicate the case in the Court of Arbitration, as it takes into consideration legal as well as technical aspects.

Syed Jamaat Ali Shah, former Indus Water Commissioner on behalf of the Pakistani government, told thethirdpole.net that since the Kishanganga project has been going on for years, the inordinate delay by Islamabad to approach the World Bank would give India more time to complete its projects. He was of the view that the Pakistani side had put forward a request to the court of arbitration without doing its homework. The noted economist Kaiser Bengali without taking Jamaat Ali Shah’s name told thethirdpole.net that “Pakistan’s chief negotiator for more than a decade and a half had limited intellectual capacity to lead on such a strategically life and death issue.” Jamaat Ali Shah had drawn flak for his lackadaisicalness and ineptness during his long stint. Surprisingly, inquiry officer cleared him stating that he had performed his duties appropriately, and had not caused any national loss.

Of course, Syed Jamaat Ali Shah had objected to the design of the project as being against the provisions of the IWT, but he was accused of not taking timely action. Military Intelligence (MI) Directorate had informed the government on 6th June, 2005 that India was planning to construct the Nimoo-Bazgo hydroelectric project. The most alarming aspect of the report was that the PCIW team never visited the project before and during the construction period of the project. And only after the project had been completed, he started using all avenues, but was too late. The report also divulged that ISI had informed the government on 25th July, 2005 that the then Indian Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh visited Leh, Kargil and Siachen Glacier on June 11, 2005 and laid the foundation stone of Nimoo-Bazgo and Chutak hydroelectric power plants.

The report had also revealed that the PCIW headed by Syed Jamaat Ali Shah remained silent during 2007, 2008, 2009 about the project. Anyhow, India is resorting to devious methods since it has completed some mega projects on River Indus, Jhelum and Chenab. India continues building dams on Pakistan’s rivers, and its projects are of a size and scope that many Pakistanis fear could be used to disrupt their hydropower efforts as well as the timing of the flows on which Pakistani crops rely. India has to understand that it is also a lower riparian state, as three rivers namely Sutlej, Indus and Brahamputra (in China its name is Tsangpo) from China to India. If India threatens Pakistan of withdrawing from Indus Water Treaty or violates its stipulations and provisions, China the upper riparian state could also impact water flows into the lower riparian countries like India.

The Lalho project on Xiabuqu River in Tibet, a tributary of Yarlung Zangbo (Brahmaputra) involves an investment of $740 million. The construction began in June 2014, and was scheduled to be completed in 2019.It is not clear yet what impact the blockade of the river will have on the flow of water from the Brahmaputra in the lower riparian countries like India and Bangladesh. In 2015, China had operationalised the $1.5 billion Zam Hydropower Station, the largest in Tibet, built on the Brahmaputra River, which had raised concerns in India. But China has been maintaining that it has taken into consideration India’s concerns and allayed apprehensions of restricting the flow of water, saying its dams are ‘run of the river’ projects not designed to hold water. On the other hand, India persistently shrugged off Pakistan’s reservations about the projects on western rivers.

In December 2016, Commissioner for Indus Waters Mirza Asif Baig said: “We have received a letter from the World Bank that has halted the process of the court of arbitration, as was requested earlier by Pakistan. Instead it has asked both governments to resolve the dispute bilaterally.” One does not have to be an agricultural scientist to know that water is life as one can live without food for months but cannot live without water for days or weeks. Water is indispensable to agriculture, as it is a critical input into agriculture of a country especially when it is situated in an arid or semi-arid zone. Loss of storage capacity due to sedimentation in Tarbela and Mangla Dams is causing serious drop even for existing agricultural production. Food shortages and energy shortfall has already blighted Pakistan with the result that industry in all the provinces has also been adversely impacted.

Water issue between India and Pakistan is a serious matter and needs attention of the policy makers, as India is trying to use water as a weapon against Pakistan. India is resorting to devious methods since it has completed some mega projects on River Indus, Jhelum and Chenab. India continues building dams on Pakistan’s rivers, and its projects are of a size and scope that many Pakistanis fear could be used to disrupt their hydropower efforts as well as the timing of the flows on which Pakistani crops rely. In this context a comprehensive report published by English daily last year presented an extremely depressing state of affairs for Pakistan, as India usurps Pakistani share of water. India openly violated Indus Water Treaty showing utter disregard to the rights of Pakistan. Of course, Pakistan’s water administration also failed to pursue the matter diligently with the result that India benefited from UN mediators’ verdicts.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
'Indus Waters Treaty made peaceful cooperation possible between India, Pakistan'

At a weekly briefing of the US state department, Spokesperson John Kirby said: "The Indus Waters Treaty has served... as a model for peaceful cooperation between India and Pakistan for now 50 years."

When asked whether the US has offered to mediate on the issue between the two countries, Kirby said the US "encourage India and Pakistan to work together bilaterally to resolve their differences."

Without giving details whether the US government spoke to Indian officials about the water dispute, Kirby said the US was "in regular communication with the Indian and Pakistani governments on a wide range of issues".
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
Indus Water Treaty tangle: World Bank representatives meets Indian interlocutors
Thu, 5 Jan 2017-11:40pm , New Delhi , PTI

as clearly explained its position to World Bank representatives.


Aiming to break the Indo-Pak deadlock over Kishenganga and Ratle project, a World Bank representative today held talks with India, which explained its position on the matter and insisted the differences can be resolved through a bilateral mechanism or by appointment of a neutral expert.

India's position was conveyed during a meeting World Bank representative Ian H Solomon had with senior officials of the External Affairs and Water Resources ministries. Solomon is here as part of World Bank's efforts to break the deadlock between the two neighbours on the Kishenganga and Ratle projects which are coming up in Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian side, led by Joint Secretary in the MEA, Gopal Baglay, gave a presentation on the two projects and insisted that a neutral expert should go into the issue as Pakistan has reised objections on technical grounds, government sources said.

India has been maintaining that the issue can also be settled bilaterally and sources said the World Bank should not rush in to try and resolve the differences between the two countries. They said India also maintained that the design of the projects do not violate the Indo-Pak Indus Water Treaty (IWT). Under the IWT, signed by India and Pakistan in 1960, the World Bank has a specific role of dispute resolution between the two countries.

Soloman, on his part, tried to explore ways on how to move forward, the sources said, adding he did not raise any query regarding designs of the two projects. "We made presentation. We stick to our position that there be a neutral expert to look into the issue as objections raised by Pakistan relating to the projects concerned are technical in nature. We also maintained that the project designs do not violate the IWT. Nothing was decided in the meeting," said a source.

The World Bank had decided to set up a Court of Arbitration (CoA) to settle the disputes following Pakistan's demand and also agreed to appoint a neutral expert sought by India. India had reacted strongly to the decision to appoint the CoA and last month the World Bank announced it would temporarily halt the two simultaneous processes to resolve the differences. India has been maintaining that it is fully conscious of its international obligations and is ready to engage in further consultations to resolve the differences regarding the two projects.
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,930
Likes
23,094
Country flag

Prashant12

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
3,027
Likes
15,002
Country flag
Expert panel clears hydel project in Jammu and Kashmir

The final decision on granting clearance to the Sawalkote hydropower project will be taken by the environment ministry but it rarely overturns the recommendations of the expert panel



The Jammu and Kashmir State Power Development Corp. Ltd (JKSPDC) project is estimated to cost over Rs22,000 crore. Photo: Reuters

New Delhi: In line with a decision to step up exploitation of India’s share of water in the Indus Water Treaty (IWT), an environment ministry expert panel has recommended clearance to the 1,856 MW Sawalkote hydropower project in Kashmir.

The Jammu and Kashmir State Power Development Corp. Ltd (JKSPDC) project is estimated to cost over Rs22,000 crore. It was recommended for environment clearance by the environment ministry’s Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects during its latest meeting on 30-31 January, according to the minutes of the meeting.

The final decision on granting clearance will be taken by the environment ministry but it rarely overturns the recommendations of the expert panel.

In September, 18 soldiers were killed when militants stormed an Indian Army battalion headquarters in northern Jammu and Kashmir (Uri region), close to Line of Control. Following that, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had directed the government to step up exploitation of India’s share of water in the IWT. Signed by India and Pakistan in 1960, IWT gives a detailed framework for sharing the waters from the Beas, Ravi, Sutlej, Indus, Chenab and Jhelum rivers .

The project in the Ramban district of Jammu and Kashmir envisages construction of a 192.5m high concrete gravity dam to utilize water of Chenab River. An underground powerhouse has been proposed whose installed capacity would be 1,856 MW. It involves utilization of flow of Chenab River for generation of electrical power in a run-of-the-river scheme.

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/xI...lears-hydel-project-in-Jammu-and-Kashmir.html
 

The Ultranationalist

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Jan 30, 2017
Messages
996
Likes
2,453
Country flag
Why the hell the rivers of Indus system are not the part of river interlinking project? We have many parts in our country like Bundelkhand having drought like situation and we are giving 80% of Indus system water to the terrorist porkies! Helluva policy; I wonder which fool came up with this idea.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,138
Likes
16,048
Country flag
Why the hell the rivers of Indus system are not the part of river interlinking project? We have many parts in our country like Bundelkhand having drought like situation and we are giving 80% of Indus system water to the terrorist porkies! Helluva policy; I wonder which fool came up with this idea.
The great and one and only jawaharlal nehru came up with this idea.
 

F-14B

#iamPUROHIT
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
2,076
Likes
4,006
Country flag
Addressing a press conference in Lahore, a farmers' group in Pakistan has urged the United Nations (UN), the United States and the World Bank to ensure non-stop supply of water to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).

Central leaders of the Pakistan Mutahidda Kissan Mehaz (PMKM) underscored that fair distribution of water between India and Pakistan had immense importance not only for the survival and livelihood of people, but also for peace in this region.

Construction of several water and power projects on Indus, Jhelum and Chenab rivers by India were a serious threat to river flows towards Pakistan, a lower riparian state.

They said farmers from across the country would gather in Islamabad on October 19 to lodge their protest on what they termed India's failure to comply with the Indus Waters Treaty.

The farmers claimed that that Indian hegemonic policies in South Asia had resulted in a squeezing of water supplies to Pakistan from western rivers.

They said it was unfortunate that India had openly threatened to stop flow of the rivers and that a series of dams and hydropower projects have been planned or already been constructed on Western rivers allotted to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty.

The farmers stated such huge infrastructure can be manipulated to restrict flows of river towards Pakistan. The stance of the Indian leadership is aggressive as far as the flow of western rivers was concerned, PMKM leaders said.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...mplying-with-indus-water-treaty/1/948377.html
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top