India Pakistan conflict along LoC and counter terrorist operations

Status
Not open for further replies.

t 90s

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 28, 2021
Messages
396
Likes
1,407
Country flag
Watch the documentary I posted earlier, the Americans had a role in 26/11, they could have prevented the attack but they had the ulterior motives
I always wonder why US & it's allie's don't give Pakistan the danda like they do to north Korea, Iran etc. Pakistan is directly responsible for more deaths of US military personnel's through its proxies than anyone else? Most Pakistani establishment, elites, rich politicians, military family members diplomats have good links in west.There's children live there, have properties, wealth there...as Pakistan allow dual citizenship. Business relations matter most.
 

Cheetah007

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Messages
165
Likes
581
Country flag
Indian must supplies brahmos anti ship missile to each and every countries in South East asia except Cambodia (similar case like sri Lanka almost a pseudo colony).
Pla navy is growing exponentially.
These small state can be very useful to degrade pla navy capabilities to operate in Indian Ocean .
These state will act as buffer against china in future
Only provide it to Taiwan and that will seal the deal. India along with major powers need to recognize Taiwan before it's too late.
 

iNorthernerOn9

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Messages
242
Likes
1,755
Country flag
Regarding the US targetting only the IAF’s procurement of the S-400 LR-SAM for CAATSA sanctions, certain fundamentals needs to be taken heed of. The S-400 being an LR-SAM is totally useless against tactical combat aircraft that can easily evade the S-200 by flying low. Consequently, the S-400 can be used only against high-flying & lumbering subsonic bombers & combat-support platforms like AEW & CS aircraft, MRTTs & dedicated standoff ISTR aircraft. But most importantly, the S-400’s Ka-band seeker-equipped hypersonic SAMs can intercept solid-fuelled TBMs & IRBMs as well. But for the S-400 to be effective as a BMD interceptor, it needs post-boost phase early warning cues (i.e. so-called geospatial data) that can only be supplied by a network of early-warning satellites, such as Russia’s OKO constellation & the US’ SBIRS-High. Between, these two, it is the latter that provides total coverage of the IOR area & was thus India’s preferred option for usage. That’s why the foundational Basic Exchange & Cooperation Agreement (BECA) was signed by India with the US on October 27, 2020. But for the India-specific BMD architecture to become optimal, the S-400 Batteries need to be seamlessly data-linked via the IACCCS with the India-based & US-supplied workstations & related CISCO-built servers responsible for receiving & disseminating the data from the SBIRS-High satellite constellation. And this is where the US is unwilling to authorise such data-linking for fear of Russia-origin software malware compromising the SBIRS-High’s performance. This was also the reason why the US objected to Turkey procuring the S-400 LR-SAMs. The US has no objection if the S-400s of both India & Turkey work as standalone systems devoid of any data-linked networking with the SBIRS-High. And that also explains why the DRDO has been hard at work on developing a ‘desi’ family of BMD interceptors & the XR-SAM, which can be networked with the SBIRS-High constellation without any objections from the US. And that is also the reason why the DRDO refused to cooperate with Russia for co-developing Ka-band seekers for such BMD interceptor-missiles, despite Russia making such an offer as early was 2011.

Thus, if India continues to be dependent on the S-400 LR-SAM for BMD interception capability, the SBIRS-High's early-warning cues will not be made available to India despite the inking of the BECA agreement.
 

Ayushraj

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
1,243
Likes
8,033
Country flag
Regarding the US targetting only the IAF’s procurement of the S-400 LR-SAM for CAATSA sanctions, certain fundamentals needs to be taken heed of. The S-400 being an LR-SAM is totally useless against tactical combat aircraft that can easily evade the S-200 by flying low. Consequently, the S-400 can be used only against high-flying & lumbering subsonic bombers & combat-support platforms like AEW & CS aircraft, MRTTs & dedicated standoff ISTR aircraft. But most importantly, the S-400’s Ka-band seeker-equipped hypersonic SAMs can intercept solid-fuelled TBMs & IRBMs as well. But for the S-400 to be effective as a BMD interceptor, it needs post-boost phase early warning cues (i.e. so-called geospatial data) that can only be supplied by a network of early-warning satellites, such as Russia’s OKO constellation & the US’ SBIRS-High. Between, these two, it is the latter that provides total coverage of the IOR area & was thus India’s preferred option for usage. That’s why the foundational Basic Exchange & Cooperation Agreement (BECA) was signed by India with the US on October 27, 2020. But for the India-specific BMD architecture to become optimal, the S-400 Batteries need to be seamlessly data-linked via the IACCCS with the India-based & US-supplied workstations & related CISCO-built servers responsible for receiving & disseminating the data from the SBIRS-High satellite constellation. And this is where the US is unwilling to authorise such data-linking for fear of Russia-origin software malware compromising the SBIRS-High’s performance. This was also the reason why the US objected to Turkey procuring the S-400 LR-SAMs. The US has no objection if the S-400s of both India & Turkey work as standalone systems devoid of any data-linked networking with the SBIRS-High. And that also explains why the DRDO has been hard at work on developing a ‘desi’ family of BMD interceptors & the XR-SAM, which can be networked with the SBIRS-High constellation without any objections from the US. And that is also the reason why the DRDO refused to cooperate with Russia for co-developing Ka-band seekers for such BMD interceptor-missiles, despite Russia making such an offer as early was 2011.

Thus, if India continues to be dependent on the S-400 LR-SAM for BMD interception capability, the SBIRS-High's early-warning cues will not be made available to India despite the inking of the BECA agreement.
Extreme buuuuullllll shiiiiitttttttt
Indian missile defence is far better.
Pad is made for interception missile in 1 st stage of 2 nd stage.
AAD will be used for interception in 3 rd phase of ballistic missile
That's why our missile defence shield is 2 tier shield.
Indian cruise missile defence
S400 ,XRSAM and LRSAM will be used for cruise missile defence and are 1 st layer of defence
2 nd layer consist of MRSAM can also be used against crusie missile , SRBM and tactical ballistic missile. Armenia Azerbaijan conflict proves this.
3 rd layer consist of akash.
4 layer is made up of qrsam mostly useful for tactical level operation and against tactical missile.
5 layer consist of igla and stinger manpads
6 layer consist of AA guns.
US made air defence system are useless since houthis cheap drones can easily evaded against saudis them so what is use of having them.
 

iNorthernerOn9

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Messages
242
Likes
1,755
Country flag
Extreme buuuuullllll shiiiiitttttttt
Indian missile defence is far better.
Pad is made for interception missile in 1 st stage of 2 nd stage.
AAD will be used for interception in 3 rd phase of ballistic missile
That's why our missile defence shield is 2 tier shield.
Indian cruise missile defence
S400 ,XRSAM and LRSAM will be used for cruise missile defence and are 1 st layer of defence
2 nd layer consist of MRSAM can also be used against crusie missile , SRBM and tactical ballistic missile. Armenia Azerbaijan conflict proves this.
3 rd layer consist of akash.
4 layer is made up of qrsam mostly useful for tactical level operation and against tactical missile.
5 layer consist of igla and stinger manpads
6 layer consist of AA guns.
US made air defence system are useless since houthis cheap drones can easily evaded against saudis them so what is use of having them.
jao beta... LKG mein admission lo

jab samajh naa ho kisi baat ki ... to bakwas mat karo
 

t 90s

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 28, 2021
Messages
396
Likes
1,407
Country flag
Regarding the US targetting only the IAF’s procurement of the S-400 LR-SAM for CAATSA sanctions, certain fundamentals needs to be taken heed of. The S-400 being an LR-SAM is totally useless against tactical combat aircraft that can easily evade the S-200 by flying low. Consequently, the S-400 can be used only against high-flying & lumbering subsonic bombers & combat-support platforms like AEW & CS aircraft, MRTTs & dedicated standoff ISTR aircraft. But most importantly, the S-400’s Ka-band seeker-equipped hypersonic SAMs can intercept solid-fuelled TBMs & IRBMs as well. But for the S-400 to be effective as a BMD interceptor, it needs post-boost phase early warning cues (i.e. so-called geospatial data) that can only be supplied by a network of early-warning satellites, such as Russia’s OKO constellation & the US’ SBIRS-High. Between, these two, it is the latter that provides total coverage of the IOR area & was thus India’s preferred option for usage. That’s why the foundational Basic Exchange & Cooperation Agreement (BECA) was signed by India with the US on October 27, 2020. But for the India-specific BMD architecture to become optimal, the S-400 Batteries need to be seamlessly data-linked via the IACCCS with the India-based & US-supplied workstations & related CISCO-built servers responsible for receiving & disseminating the data from the SBIRS-High satellite constellation. And this is where the US is unwilling to authorise such data-linking for fear of Russia-origin software malware compromising the SBIRS-High’s performance. This was also the reason why the US objected to Turkey procuring the S-400 LR-SAMs. The US has no objection if the S-400s of both India & Turkey work as standalone systems devoid of any data-linked networking with the SBIRS-High. And that also explains why the DRDO has been hard at work on developing a ‘desi’ family of BMD interceptors & the XR-SAM, which can be networked with the SBIRS-High constellation without any objections from the US. And that is also the reason why the DRDO refused to cooperate with Russia for co-developing Ka-band seekers for such BMD interceptor-missiles, despite Russia making such an offer as early was 2011.

Thus, if India continues to be dependent on the S-400 LR-SAM for BMD interception capability, the SBIRS-High's early-warning cues will not be made available to India despite the inking of the BECA agreement.
S 400 useless against tactical combat aircraft since they can fly low ? If you force you adversary to fly low he has already lost half the battle. If 40N6E , 48N6 make Paki AWACS, F 16 fly low they are fckd. Even than they can be detected at longer ranges , since there something called radar mast , AWACS flying deep in indian airspace. Those shiny F 16 & there AMRAAM's range will be reduced drastically. no more swift retreats. You do realise that S 400 do carry 2 more missile which are more maneuvering 9M96E2 & 9M96E right. Let's not even talk about MRSAM which is being deployed. With upcoming Akash NG & other SAM system it's basically game over.
 

Maharaj samudragupt

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2020
Messages
5,107
Likes
13,135
Country flag
Regarding the US targetting only the IAF’s procurement of the S-400 LR-SAM for CAATSA sanctions, certain fundamentals needs to be taken heed of. The S-400 being an LR-SAM is totally useless against tactical combat aircraft that can easily evade the S-200 by flying low. Consequently, the S-400 can be used only against high-flying & lumbering subsonic bombers & combat-support platforms like AEW & CS aircraft, MRTTs & dedicated standoff ISTR aircraft. But most importantly, the S-400’s Ka-band seeker-equipped hypersonic SAMs can intercept solid-fuelled TBMs & IRBMs as well. But for the S-400 to be effective as a BMD interceptor, it needs post-boost phase early warning cues (i.e. so-called geospatial data) that can only be supplied by a network of early-warning satellites, such as Russia’s OKO constellation & the US’ SBIRS-High. Between, these two, it is the latter that provides total coverage of the IOR area & was thus India’s preferred option for usage. That’s why the foundational Basic Exchange & Cooperation Agreement (BECA) was signed by India with the US on October 27, 2020. But for the India-specific BMD architecture to become optimal, the S-400 Batteries need to be seamlessly data-linked via the IACCCS with the India-based & US-supplied workstations & related CISCO-built servers responsible for receiving & disseminating the data from the SBIRS-High satellite constellation. And this is where the US is unwilling to authorise such data-linking for fear of Russia-origin software malware compromising the SBIRS-High’s performance. This was also the reason why the US objected to Turkey procuring the S-400 LR-SAMs. The US has no objection if the S-400s of both India & Turkey work as standalone systems devoid of any data-linked networking with the SBIRS-High. And that also explains why the DRDO has been hard at work on developing a ‘desi’ family of BMD interceptors & the XR-SAM, which can be networked with the SBIRS-High constellation without any objections from the US. And that is also the reason why the DRDO refused to cooperate with Russia for co-developing Ka-band seekers for such BMD interceptor-missiles, despite Russia making such an offer as early was 2011.

Thus, if India continues to be dependent on the S-400 LR-SAM for BMD interception capability, the SBIRS-High's early-warning cues will not be made available to India despite the inking of the BECA agreement.
Bro , you might be correct for all this techNcal part, but won't it be good enough if it forces an enemy to fly at a low height where even qrsam or manpads or mrsam can target it ?
 

Villager

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
986
Likes
1,134
Country flag
Watch the documentary I posted earlier, the Americans had a role in 26/11, they could have prevented the attack but they had the ulterior motives
Americans never wanted democracy in Pakistan. A parliamentary democracy, no matter how corrupt, would never allow itself to become a lackey of foreign powers. Pakistan is serving the purpose for which it was created. The mercenary army that served Britain first, then Saudis and Americans, then Chinese. USA, however, is India's biggest enemy. The credit for Pakistan's existence despite no history and no commitment to secular democracy and the military run state is due to the deal that Pak Mercenaries have with US, why else are these people always looking to settle in US after serving in army. They have been so much concerned with Russians and Chinese and Burma but never with Pakistan. It's the same reason they supported Bengali genocide so they can weaken India through Pakistan to such a level where India would be forced to American bidding. India needs to stand up to American savages, irrespective of the price that we may have to pay. Stop looking for American support. Our enemy from day 1 of independent Indian movement has been US and UK. We are engaged in conflict with ourselves while the conspirators try to play mediator's role.
 

iNorthernerOn9

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Messages
242
Likes
1,755
Country flag
S 400 useless against tactical combat aircraft since they can fly low ? If you force you adversary to fly low he has already lost half the battle. If 40N6E , 48N6 make Paki AWACS, F 16 fly low they are fckd. Even than they can be detected at longer ranges , since there something called radar mast , AWACS flying deep in indian airspace. Those shiny F 16 & there AMRAAM's range will be reduced drastically. no more swift retreats. You do realise that S 400 do carry 2 more missile which are more maneuvering 9M96E2 & 9M96E right. Let's not even talk about MRSAM which is being deployed. With upcoming Akash NG & other SAM system it's basically game over.
@Maharaj samudragupt

what I have posted is a realistic assessment of impact of BECA on our capability & not meant for criticising S-400... & S-400 was never meant for fighter jets... & according to reliable online sources... India only purchased the 40n6e & 48n6e missiles & none of the lower range versions
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top