India Pakistan conflict along LoC and counter terrorist operations

MIDKNIGHT FENERIR-00

VICTORIOUM AUT MORS
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
2,365
Likes
7,134
Country flag
This claim does not sound credible. Holes are there:

1. Why do we have to deny a deep strike? Almost all powerful countries have said that our retaliation is justified. So there really is no cost for us to PR the shit out of these strikes.
2. These casualties have happened in 1s and 2s. That does not imply a deep strike behind enemy lines where a bunch of soldiers would be KIA in one go.
3. No news ever is released of whether we have a defensive system like the Iron Dome which can 90% neutralize incoming projectiles from Porki Army. Why is this? Technology exists to neutralize Porki shells and we have access to that technology. And there is not a single bit of news about such deployments. Why?

My read is for us at this stage of our economic development, human lives are still cheaper and ok to lose in 1s and 2s than deploying a moderately expensive iron dome system. I think the entire setup is low tech with Porkis firing shells at us and we firing shells back at them and hoping that these unguided shells hit something worthwhile. I think when shells hit, soldiers evacuate posts and depending on timing of evacuation there's casualties or not. The whole thing, I hate to say, is low tech. Hence the random casualties. We simply dont want to invest in more expensive deterrence on LoC.

I also dont know if firing a bunch of Brahmos, other missiles from various locations and then losing a dozen soldiers at the same time signals anything other than we have a confusing defense strategy. Generally when countries test missiles it is to deter the enemies from taking any aggressive actions. In our case, test firing and losing of soldiers is happening at the same time. I have a feeling that IA is a brute force army, that is it operates on a strategy of overwhelming porkis with human numbers and taking human losses is cheap for us. And, therefore, sees no reason to deploy technology like Israelis do.
I support what you said Even the Chinese are deploying different types of Technology in high Numbers meanwhile we are still doing this same old crap. The Chinese are numbers army as well but they have improved alot on other areas were they are weak in.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
26,063
Likes
28,092
Country flag
This claim does not sound credible. Holes are there:

1. Why do we have to deny a deep strike? Almost all powerful countries have said that our retaliation is justified. So there really is no cost for us to PR the shit out of these strikes.
2. These casualties have happened in 1s and 2s. That does not imply a deep strike behind enemy lines where a bunch of soldiers would be KIA in one go.
3. No news ever is released of whether we have a defensive system like the Iron Dome which can 90% neutralize incoming projectiles from Porki Army. Why is this? Technology exists to neutralize Porki shells and we have access to that technology. And there is not a single bit of news about such deployments. Why?

My read is for us at this stage of our economic development, human lives are still cheaper and ok to lose in 1s and 2s than deploying a moderately expensive iron dome system. I think the entire setup is low tech with Porkis firing shells at us and we firing shells back at them and hoping that these unguided shells hit something worthwhile. I think when shells hit, soldiers evacuate posts and depending on timing of evacuation there's casualties or not. The whole thing, I hate to say, is low tech. Hence the random casualties. We simply dont want to invest in more expensive deterrence on LoC.

I also dont know if firing a bunch of Brahmos, other missiles from various locations and then losing a dozen soldiers at the same time signals anything other than we have a confusing defense strategy. Generally when countries test missiles it is to deter the enemies from taking any aggressive actions. In our case, test firing and losing of soldiers is happening at the same time. I have a feeling that IA is a brute force army, that is it operates on a strategy of overwhelming porkis with human numbers and taking human losses is cheap for us. And, therefore, sees no reason to deploy technology like Israelis do.
there are many theories to why India never fixed LOC issue these are some over the years:

1)corruption leaders to busy looting to worry about soldiers

2)no money

3)worried how will we look internationally and a goal to project a peaceful weak image

4) an effort to keep Kashmir issue burning for maximum political gain

5)unknown deals made with pak to keep status quo

6)technology hurdles (which no longer exist)

7)upsetting vote banks setup by parties
 

FalconSlayers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
1,815
Likes
4,647
Country flag
I have a feeling India interacts with OIC only to make Pakistan salty and butthurt about the attention and respect India receives from the OIC, that too being a non islamic nation, Jaishankar's full flex on pakis
OIC knows very well despite India being a non Islamic country it still has the second largest muslim population in the world after Indonesia. So India’s stand is stronger than Pakistan plus obviously the money and trade we get involved with. Pakistanis are bankrupt and have almost 0 trade relations with anyone.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
26,063
Likes
28,092
Country flag

Global tech giants threaten to leave Pakistan over new rules

Isolating Pakistan technologically and economically will secure the world
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top