India Pakistan conflict along IB and LoC (July 2021 onwards)

[Indiandoctor]

I am quoting your post here as I don't want to derail the "Russia-Ukraine war thread".

Now coming to topic of F-16, Balakot etc fiasco.

F-16 was indeed shot down, and we have evidence for the shoot down, for example AWACS Radar data in which the blip of F-16 disappears from the screen after Abhinandan said "R-73 selected" and fired an R-73 at the F-16 shooting it down.

Coming to Balakot, there are many reasons as to why government of India is not willing to share satellite images to prove that Indian Airforce indeed hit their targets. One being that they don't want to disclose their surveillance capability to the world.

If Balakot strike was a miss according to you then tell me why Pakistan took 43 days to allow media near the site? Why not the next day? It was because they were covering up the fact that Indian Airforce successfully hit it's targets in Balakot. There are lot more evidence to support this theory, which I will not waste my time sharing here.

Pakistan was so traumatized that they closed their airspace for 6 months after this incident Lmao

 

[Varoon2]

"It was because they were covering up the fact that Indian Airforce successfully hit it's targets in Balakot. There are lot more evidence to support this theory, which I will not waste my time sharing here."

Yah, the idea that 'only trees and shrubs were hit' is so discredited and false, it's not worth going into. Mercifully, very few Indians are peddling that theory now, more were active back in the weeks following the strike.

 

[vidhwanshak]

Just check the sat images after the attack and you will get to know if it was a hit or miss

 

[mokoman]

I am quoting your post here as I don't want to derail the "Russia-Ukraine war thread".

Now coming to topic of F-16, Balakot etc fiasco.

F-16 was indeed shot down, and we have evidence for the shoot down, for example AWACS Radar data in which the blip of F-16 disappears from the screen after Abhinandan said "R-73 selected" and fired an R-73 at the F-16 shooting it down.

Coming to Balakot, there are many reasons as to why government of India is not willing to share satellite images to prove that Indian Airforce indeed hit their targets. One being that they don't want to disclose their surveillance capability to the world.

If Balakot strike was a miss according to you then tell me why Pakistan took 43 days to allow media near the site? Why not the next day? It was because they were covering up the fact that Indian Airforce successfully hit it's targets in Balakot. There are lot more evidence to support this theory, which I will not waste my time sharing here.

dont know if hit or not , but some of the pics released which is supposed to show damage show opposite.

i can show u exactly what i mean but why waste all our time

 

[Super Flanker]

The whole "bombs missing" narrative is hilarious. These are all GPS and laser guided smart bombs. At least 12 bombs were dropped by the strike package of 12 Mirage 2000s. One bomb may miss due to a chance malfunction. Maximum 2 may miss (even that's extremely unlikely). But all 12 missed their target magically? LOL. These aren't ww2 dumb bombs.

Pakistanis Believe that Indian Strikes at Balakot only destroyed some trees, shrubs, oh and there is another one, they say IAF only killed a few "crows" and nothing else. Pakistanis are some of the dumbest people that i have come across, some of them are so retarded that they will believe things like "Pakistan won all wars against India" etc.

Pakistanis must be smoking some really messed up weed to believe that Indian Airforces flew 6-16 Mirage-2000s deep inside Pak and dropped several spice-2000 guided munitions just to kill few "crows","Trees" and "shrubs".

 

[vidhwanshak]

dont know if hit or not , but some of the pics released which is supposed to show damage show opposite.

i can show u why exactly what i mean but why waste all our time

just write about it when you are free. We are all ears to you.

 

[Super Flanker]

dont know if hit or not , but some of the pics released which is supposed to show damage show opposite.

i can show u exactly what i mean but why waste all our time

If nothing had happened at Balakot and all the bombs missed according to "Gay-foora" then why did Pak allow media and International journalists to visit the site only after 43 days?

Also for the fact that all these visits were highly controlled and limited access was given to the media and journalists to review the Balakot site. Some of the nearby locals were strictly forbidden to talk with the media and journalists there. It was very much evident that Pakistan was hiding something there!

Anyways coming to those pics which you are mentioning, you can post and write about them here. We are ready to listen to what you want to say here.

 

[Varoon2]

This question is going to sound so basic to forum people, so please bear with me . The IAF dropped between 5-8 bombs on Balakot. If they had all missed, and only hit the ground near the terror compound, those bombs would leave distinct signatures as to what bombs they were, right? Where are those craters or mounds?

Well, they are inside the attacked terror base! Where they eliminated anywhere between 263-700 terrorists. Where else could they be.

 

[Butter Chicken]

 

[Automatic Kalashnikov]

 

[Vinash]

There's a very good chance that Pakis will send Hindus to India as refugees while keeping some of the family members of those Hindus as hostages in Pakistan.

I'm not telling India to ditch Pak H's but make sure that you give citizenship only to Hindus who come with their entire families.

 

[omaebakabaka]

Why you hate them so much

I have no respect for hindus that does not act to protect their sacred lines whether its family, religion(sanatan dharm) or country. This group just ran away without throwing even one punch....win or lose is secondary to me.

 

[Poseidon]

Pak trying to please EU establishment by sending Arms to Ukraine through Romania

 

[asaffronladoftherisingsun]

Fresh slaughter of paki gulam.

 

[Kumaoni]

I am quoting your post here as I don't want to derail the "Russia-Ukraine war thread".

Now coming to topic of F-16, Balakot etc fiasco.

F-16 was indeed shot down, and we have evidence for the shoot down, for example AWACS Radar data in which the blip of F-16 disappears from the screen after Abhinandan said "R-73 selected" and fired an R-73 at the F-16 shooting it down.

Coming to Balakot, there are many reasons as to why government of India is not willing to share satellite images to prove that Indian Airforce indeed hit their targets. One being that they don't want to disclose their surveillance capability to the world.

If Balakot strike was a miss according to you then tell me why Pakistan took 43 days to allow media near the site? Why not the next day? It was because they were covering up the fact that Indian Airforce successfully hit it's targets in Balakot. There are lot more evidence to support this theory, which I will not waste my time sharing here.

Plewse do share said evidence. It’s not time waste but valuable information

 

[Super Flanker]

Plewse do share said evidence. It’s not time waste but valuable information

All the evidence is there in the "MiG-21 shot down F-16 thread". Also check out few other threads too.

 

[Jimih]

27 Feb's incident has been discussed to death on this forum in the past.

Members are advised not to waste their further energies and focus on current topics.

 

[Butter Chicken]

 

[FalconSlayers]

 

[pankaj nema]