BangaliBabu
New Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2019
- Messages
- 775
- Likes
- 2,327
They downplayed it, or confirmed it was a missile hit only after examining debris?? I believe it's the latter.I am not sure what you are trying to say. Please elaborate.
I won't argue in favor of it being an accidental launch. The reason is I myself am not 100% convinced that it is. But at the same time, I do not believe our armed forces gathered enough guts to take such a huge risk. So, I will give salient points for both arguments -
The argument that it was an accidental fire :-
The argument that it was an intentional fire :-
- Our armed forces does not really have a reputation of being pro-active, but rather reactive. Shooting a cruise missile (which can be easily taken as nuclear first strike) at an nuclear-armed enemy requires balls equivalent to Israel and Russia, that too without any strong incentive (like Pulwama).
- That GoI itself admitted that it was an misfire (lets take it at its face value for now).
- GoI formally informed about the accidental launch to Pakistan through official channels.
- Others, including US & Nitin Gokhale (journalist connected with defence forces) admitted it was accidental.
- Missile lacked a warhead. A warhead would have done greater destruction and burn marks.
- Accidents like this do happen. I have seen AA guns of jets fired on the ground, A2A missiles being fired while on ground, bombs and fuel tanks dropping unintentionally, hell, USA has accidentally dropped nuclear bombs on itself as well as on different friendly countries.
List of military nuclear accidents - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
- The 2-key mechanism/safetly etc. as being touted by experts, they are not wrong, but fail to recognize the possibility of root-level failures, for example, software malfunction overriding safety, or hardware failure of the fire pin.
- All air exercises (Vayu Shakti) and defense events (Defence expo) canceled suspiciously. Although counter-argument is that it is due to the perceived fallout of the Ukraine-Russia conflict.
- "Accidentally" launching cruise missile is kind of extremely difficult, if not impossible. Same is reiterated by multiple defence personnel.
- Not initiating killswitch/self-destruct is suspicious.
- The missile hit a residential target when it could have hit anything, infact 100 meters north and south of the target is open field. The probability that it will "accidentally" fall on a highway-side house instead of open fields is extremely low.
- Delay in GoI's official response can indicate we were trying to gauge Pakistan's reaction first (and they downplayed it aswell).
- The missile hitting a close residential target while facing zero casaulties/injuries is pretty suspicious.