India may be offered a share in GLONASS

kseeker

Retired
New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
2,515
Likes
2,126
India may be offered a share in GLONASS | Russia & India Report

December 27, 2013 Ivan Cheberko, Izvestia
Moscow likely to invite New Delhi to be part of a broad international consortium to develop and expand the global navigation system.


India may become Russia's most important partner in relation to GLONASS. Source: Sergei Pyatakov / RIA Novosti

Russia is seriously considering building a broad international consortium for the development and implementation of the Russian GLONASS satellite navigation system on a global scale. The government is also seriously considering the possibility of selling a stake in the development of the system to foreign countries, among which India would be given a priority.
"We have prioritized the countries -firstly the states where GLONASS may be required for geopolitical reasons," says Navigation Information Systems (NIS, formerly NIS GLONASS) Chief Executive Alexander Gurko says. "We could invite India, Kazakhstan, Brazil, South Korea and several other countries into the consortium."
These countries have traditionally been considered as the priority markets for the GLONASS technology, except perhaps South Korea. The idea of bringing India as a strategic partner for the development of GLONASS was discussed several times at the highest level. In 2007, then-Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said that India was ready to participate in the development of GLONASS, providing rockets for launching satellites and helping to develop new spacecraft for the navigation system.

"In the early 2000's both the framework agreement on the use of GLONASS and specific contracts that were unattainable were signed with India," says an informed source at the Russian Space Agency. "It was an agreement where they would help us to develop the 'GLONASS-K;' the group would have been half-Indian, half-Russian. Under those conditions, such agreements were offered out of desperation; I had to save the system. Then came the idea of FTP GLONASS and the ideas of co-creation of the navigation system were left behind."
According Gurko in the early 2000s, India itself actively offered investments in GLONASS to the Russian government. "I met with the director of the Indian Space Agency at that time. He expressed bewilderment why Russia refused the idea of investment then, because it was obvious that this investment would offer many opportunities of opening a new and huge GLONASS market, and to build an appropriate technical regulation in the Indian market."
NIS, which has not met as much success as it would have liked in the Indian market, warned that hopes to capture the markets of other countries with the same methods as they conquered the Russian market cannot be justified. The company's representatives said that if in Russia, there are orders to use whatever equipment the government gives, this is not practiced in India, and the introduction of navigation systems are in the hands of private companies.


India may become Russia's most important partner in relation to GLONASS. Source: Sergei Pyatakov / RIA Novosti
Russia is seriously considering building a broad international consortium for the development and implementation of the Russian GLONASS satellite navigation system on a global scale. The government is also seriously considering the possibility of selling a stake in the development of the system to foreign countries, among which India would be given a priority.
"We have prioritized the countries -firstly the states where GLONASS may be required for geopolitical reasons," says Navigation Information Systems (NIS, formerly NIS GLONASS) Chief Executive Alexander Gurko says. "We could invite India, Kazakhstan, Brazil, South Korea and several other countries into the consortium."
These countries have traditionally been considered as the priority markets for the GLONASS technology, except perhaps South Korea. The idea of bringing India as a strategic partner for the development of GLONASS was discussed several times at the highest level. In 2007, then-Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said that India was ready to participate in the development of GLONASS, providing rockets for launching satellites and helping to develop new spacecraft for the navigation system.
Kudankulam Indo-Russian cooperation
"In the early 2000's both the framework agreement on the use of GLONASS and specific contracts that were unattainable were signed with India," says an informed source at the Russian Space Agency. "It was an agreement where they would help us to develop the 'GLONASS-K;' the group would have been half-Indian, half-Russian. Under those conditions, such agreements were offered out of desperation; I had to save the system. Then came the idea of FTP GLONASS and the ideas of co-creation of the navigation system were left behind."
According Gurko in the early 2000s, India itself actively offered investments in GLONASS to the Russian government. "I met with the director of the Indian Space Agency at that time. He expressed bewilderment why Russia refused the idea of investment then, because it was obvious that this investment would offer many opportunities of opening a new and huge GLONASS market, and to build an appropriate technical regulation in the Indian market."
NIS, which has not met as much success as it would have liked in the Indian market, warned that hopes to capture the markets of other countries with the same methods as they conquered the Russian market cannot be justified. The company's representatives said that if in Russia, there are orders to use whatever equipment the government gives, this is not practiced in India, and the introduction of navigation systems are in the hands of private companies.
"Availability of different consortia, joint ventures in itself does not guarantee the promotion of Russian interests in foreign markets," says Tatiana Kuleshova, Director of the press department at NIS. "The ability to promote Russian companies in India will depend on how the consortium is organized."
Equipment manufacturers perceive the idea of forming an international consortium with cautious optimism. "If the authorities agree on the introduction of GLONASS technologies in India and Brazil, we will be staked out by these markets, we, of course, will go there," says Anatoly Korkush, Chief Executive of Geostar navigation, which produces navigation receivers. "Americans were coming towards the domination of GPS for many years, popularizing their system. We now have a temporary advantage over Beidou and Galileo, which have not been launched yet. So today any GLONASS popularization is positive – because the wider the Russian system is used, the greater is the potential market for us, its commercial producers. All major Western vendors have already released the GLONASS chips, so we can assume that our technology is recognized worldwide. We need to expand its influence outside of the Customs Union."

Member of advisory board of the Open Government Sergey Nedoroslev believes that successful implementation of the idea of the consortium will reduce the dependence of the GLONASS system budget by possible contributions from the parties. "Engaging countries other than Kazakhstan in the consortium alone would be a great success, and concluding such a technological alliance with India and Brazil is just a triumph. Then GLONASS will be able to consolidate itself as a global technology platform for a long time. Of course, much will depend on the position of the Ministry of Defence, which was supposed to possess GLONASS. However we already know of examples where in the framework of military and technical cooperation with other countries, as well as India, partners were guaranteed a military GLONASS signal level that is accurate and reliable in any situation."
India should be Russia's most important partner in relation to GLONASS, says Leonid Ivashov, the former head of the Main Department of International Cooperation Ministry of Defence.
Roscosmos must submit their proposals for the formation of a consortium to the government by the end of February 2014.
 

kseeker

Retired
New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
2,515
Likes
2,126
then what abt gagan which r isro is working..
At present, Neither Russia has formally offered us this opportunity nor India has accepted the offer. If at all Russia offers and we accept it, I guess, GAGAN work will go on in parallel with GLONASS involvement.

We cannot just simply rely on JVs always. We need to have our own independent indigenous system for self reliability as well as for redundancy.
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
So lets have system where we can have our local system + Glonass + GPS and data from all three are taken, with inbuild system where data from our system and Glonass is given preference over GPS.

Thus in any given area we can have uninterrupted coverage.
 

kseeker

Retired
New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
2,515
Likes
2,126
I think you might be confusing IRNSS with GAGAN. Gagan is not a standalone nav system.

Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System

The Indian government has stated that it intends to use the experience of creating the GAGAN system to enable the creation of an autonomous regional navigation system called the Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS).

IRNSS-1 Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS)-1, the first of the seven satellites of the IRNSS constellation, carries a Navigation payload and a C-band ranging transponder. The spacecraft employs an optimized I-1K structure with a power handling capability of around 1660W and a lift off mass of 1425 kg, and is designed for a nominal mission life of 10 years. The first satellite of IRNSS constellation was launched onboard PSLV (C22) on 1 July 2013 while the full constellation is planned to be realized during 2014 time frame.

Ref: GPS-aided geo-augmented navigation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
So lets have system where we can have our local system + Glonass + GPS and data from all three are taken, with inbuild system where data from our system and Glonass is given preference over GPS.

Thus in any given area we can have uninterrupted coverage.
I say forget GPS. They continue to use selective availability over regions they find hostile. Galileo has no selective availability scrambler designed into it making it the prime choice for independent navigation. Russia will give military grade signals more readily so I say go for that partnership and use the EU constellation for your navigation because i can guarantee you GLONASS will continue to be spotty. Russian space programme is having many issues in production QA so be wary.
 

EXPERT

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
503
Likes
329
I would say stay with IRNSS and later expand it upto globally . . .

Build our own market better than GLONASS or Chinese BOUEDUE ( or whatever) . .
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top