India China LAC & International Border Discussions

[WARREN SS]

 

[Sehwag213]

Ok. War is inevitable. He has his sources in Beijing.

 

[garg_bharat]

It will be multi front allied attack on China.

Not yet. Europeans are too lovey-dovey with China. Europe is divided on China.
More time has to pass before Europe settles down.

Sabotage is happening in Iran now with a high frequency. Somebody has determined that Iran is too high a risk.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

Not yet. Europeans are too lovey-dovey with China. Europe is divided on China.
More time has to pass before Europe settles down.

Europe is not a factor mostly Asian nations.

 

[Proxy1234]

Europe is not a factor mostly Asian nations.

France can jump in, it is actively militarily too. Just destroyed a Turkish airbase in Libya allegedly. Apart from France, no other country in Europe which is militarily strong enough....
It can send in their Rafales with their pilots to India, if they feel like jumping in, lol
Wouldn't that be fun? @Tactical Frog

 

[LETHALFORCE]

France can jump in, it is actively militarily too. Just destroyed a Turkish airbase in Libya allegedly. Apart from France, no other country in Europe which is militarily strong enough....

If it is a NATO operation all will have to contribute.

 

[tarunraju]

Pompeo is laughing his ass out about chicoms disputing territory of Bhutan.

 

[utubekhiladi]

If it is a NATO operation all will have to contribute.

we also need to join gang bang if NATO is going after china

 

[Kalki2020]

I wish someone in official capacity in the gov could also use term like CCP gov instead chinese one..

 

[LETHALFORCE]

we also need to join gang bang if NATO is going after china

we already have interoperability with many NATO platforms.

 

[ezsasa]

My premonition is that a clash is very likely before this year is out. Look for events in middle-east and south china sea.

in case you are talking about clash between India & china.
i am sticking to my fundamental assessment, wars are mostly about trade and it's implications. India and china are not competitors in trade.

if you are talking about clash between china & somebody else.
sure, there is a possibility.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

in case you are talking about clash between India & china.
i am sticking to my fundamental assessment, wars are mostly about trade and it's implications. India and china are not competitors in trade.

if you are talking about clash between china & somebody else.
sure, there is a possibility.

wars are also over territory.

 

[fire starter]

Could The Indian Navy Strangle China’s Lifeline In The Malacca Strait?

India has enjoyed one area of strategic advantage over China for many years: its ability to interdict Chinese shipping at the Malacca Strait. But with a new port in Pakistan, and the opening of an Arctic route, China may be able to get around this.

www.forbes.com

Could The Indian Navy Strangle China’s Lifeline In The Malacca Strait?

gwadar and CPEC both are failed projects just look at the route that China has to follow ultimately it will not be feasible.

 

[mokoman]

we also need to join gang bang if NATO is going after china

If there is a chance of WW3 , we will create NAM 2.0 , with some useless small beggar nations and sit in side lines, its basically our destiny .

While china and US nuke each other , MEA will be giving out press release with phrase "peace and tranquality" in them .

 

[WARREN SS]

we also need to join gang bang if NATO is going after china

I think We Should better Join Treaty to individual countries than group

Quad is a good Step

But Individual treaty Will Not Make us look Making Elite group
that can backfire us against Russians

 

[ezsasa]

wars are also over territory.

the said territory should have strategic value for trade, only then it becomes a worthy investment for a military conflict.

 

[utubekhiladi]

in case you are talking about clash between India & china.
i am sticking to my fundamental assessment, wars are mostly about trade and it's implications. India and china are not competitors in trade.

if you are talking about clash between china & somebody else.
sure, there is a possibility.

sir, i still believe that china is not going to home empty hand and border tension will escalate which will lead to a bloody war.. the pull back is because they have realized that their position is prone to flooding and the valley is a easy targets for jags.

would you bet differently for a bottle of this?

 

[fire starter]

the said territory should have strategic value for trade, only then it becomes a worthy investment for a military conflict.

Not only for trade.

 

[Sanglamorre]

the said territory should have strategic value for trade, only then it becomes a worthy investment for a military conflict.

You mean how China has anxiety over CPEC and IOR on how India can choke their trade?

 

[LETHALFORCE]

the said territory should have strategic value for trade, only then it becomes a worthy investment for a military conflict.

I