Making personal attacks is simply derailing a thread and trolling. I would probably refrain from it.
Let me address your points -
1. Just look at the state of India the British handed over to Indians and what India is after 74 years.... you will see lots of your pussies have vanished...
I don't disagree there. We have made a lot of progress. However, remember that in the context of India and China which we are discussing here - China's civil war had ended in 1949 and their country had been ravaged by the Japanese during WW2. Yet they attacked us in 1962. Economy wise both countries were on the same level during that period and militarily we were not that far off either.
2. More than hundreds of princely states. virtaul revolts in Tamilnadu, kerala and Bengal, Goa. Hydrabad, Communal roots, J&K, Tripura, Mizorm, Nagaland. Manipur, Assam, Sikkim, Punjab , J&K, five full-fledged wars,,, lots of internal conflicts...
Agreed on that. It took leaders like Sardar Patel to reunify all the princely states into India. We also fought wars with the pakis. But what does that have to do with India - china? Do the chinese give a rat's ass if we reunified our states? During that period they took tibet and aksai chin. Should we have told them to hold off until we consolidate, grow our military and our economy?