One of them is not like the othersSo much opportunity in this event.
Fate and good leadership willing, we will see beautiful weapons of war, beautiful pieces of artillery of all variety, beautiful armored vehicles, beautiful fighter jets, PGMs, radars from the factories of Bharat Forge, TATAs, L&Ts, OFBs, HAL, etc.
Unfortunately, government policies still supports them.One of them is not like the others
Don't underestimate OFB. The things they produce can be chucked down to the Chinese, and maybe they'll kill themselves trying to operate it.Unfortunately, government policies still supports them.
(offtopic)Unfortunately, government policies still supports them.
Plis to summarize. TL;DWMust Watch!!! This is very interesting Analysis, this is so detailed and well explained you will realize how Panang and Shukla type people are lying!
Maybe so, but government still gives them contracts without even competing. Like in the case of AK203 which did no extensive trialing in LEH, etc. The Russians wanted to originally partner with the Adanis for the program as well.(offtopic)
Government is (slowly) ending its monopoly. Also, corporatization is the first to privatisation. No private player will buy an entity without proper balance sheets etc.
thats what i am trying to tell you.. pp14 is gonecan anyone confirm this image I am getting conflicting report??
The most underrated post. THIS.One must recall how sequence of events of siachen capture started, it started with pakis publishing maps tilting the straight line from Pt 9842 in their favour.
So if you see any one not belonging to GoI tilting LAC detrimental to indian interests as they are doing at galwan, you can be sure that the so called "neutral' third parties do not have indian interests at heart. and the opinions of these "neutral" third parties are of limited value beyond a point.
Haha, that's fine, I will stay mum till it becomes a bit more transparent. My source was friend who asked his friend which inturn asked another guy who is serving. Although i still have doubts about the authenticity of the info, but hey, we all are passing around the doobie here.People should stop pretending like they have sources, highly connected ...and this birdie shit.
Nitin Gokhale in his StratNews podcast told this. There is no secret source.
So, we control these structures already built by Chinese? What about the trail of vehicles towards China?Haha, that's fine, I will stay mum till it becomes a bit more transparent. My source was friend who asked his friend which inturn asked another guy who is serving. Although i still have doubts about the authenticity of the info, but hey, we all are passing around the doobie here.
They won't stop unless we start.its getting more and more confirmed..
Closer to strategic DBO, China opens new front at Depsang
Around 30 km south-east from the important airstrip of Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO), the Chinese army has moved and deployed in large numbers up to a place called Y-junction or Bottleneck on the Depsang plains.
the Chinese army has crossed the border in another strategic area to the north, the Depsang plains. This intrusion is seen as another attempt by the Chinese to shift the LAC further west on the disputed boundary.
When contacted, the Army’s media wing declined to comment on the matter, with an officer telling The Indian Express that “the report can neither be confirmed nor denied”.
Bottleneck is known as Y-junction because the track coming from Burtse forks into two tracks, one going northwards along the Raki Nala to Patrolling Point-10 (PP-10) and the other south-eastward towards PP-13. These two tracks are followed by Indian patrols on foot up to PP-10, PP-11, PP-11A, PP-12 and PP-13.
Those dealing with the situation contend that if China is able to link up from PP-10 to PP-13 via Bottleneck, it could easily shift the LAC further west of the present Indian Limit of Patrolling (LoP). This would deny India access to a significant part of the LAC close to the DBO airfield and bring the Chinese closer to the strategic DSDBO road.
All the patrolling points in this area – PP-10, PP-11, PP-11A, PP-12 and PP-13 – fall on the LoP, which is marked a few kilometres to the west of the LAC on Indian maps. This 20-km frontage is the only portion on the border where the LoP falls short of LAC. It has been done due to historical reasons, and the LoP has been approved by the China Study Group.
read full report at..
Closer to strategic DBO, China opens new front at Depsang
Around 30 km south-east from the important airstrip of Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO), the Chinese army has moved and deployed in large numbers up to a place called Y-junction or Bottleneck on the Depsang plains.indianexpress.com
10/15 brigade ... 1 brigade 3k soldiers . thats a war level mobilizationSo far what happened in last 2-3 days, based on open source media and news
- china promised peace and invited india on their side of loc for talks.
- china agreed to withdraw as per apr 2 status quo but...
- on the pretext of talks and withdrawal, they actually came in further and fortified pp-14 with 100s of new bunkers and structures with 4-5 brigade strength at galwan backed by heavies.
- they built additional bunkers from f4 to f8 in pangong tso lake backed by 3-5 brigade strength backed with heavies.
- they deployed heavy armors, artillery, heavy bombers and fighters across but close to LAC.
- Military sources have revealed that China has been blocking Indian army patrols from going up to patrolling points 10 to 13 in the Daulat Beg Oldi sector near the LAC.
- Today, Closer to strategic DBO, China opens new front at Depsang with atleast 10-15 brigade strength fully armed and backed by heavies.
- we have been back-stabbed again.
IT LOOKS LIKE, WE HAVE BEEN BACK STABBED AGAIN AND AGAIN.. COUPLE OF SAYS AGO, SOMEBODY ON THIS FORUM SAID "LAWDA DE-ESCALATION" AND HE WAS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT"
FROM NOW, IT LOOKS LIKE WAR IS NOT ONLY INEVITABLE, BUT NECESSARY.. CHINA WILL FIGHT TO SHOW OFF THE SIZE OF ITS EGO AND POWER BUT OUR FIGHT WILL BE FOR SURVIVAL.
JAI HIND.
may god stay with our armed forces.