I disagree.
Why conflate land lost to China in past with current military action which India took and pushed China back on two occasions under current dispensation?
The grey areas existed all the time, patrolled by 2 soldiers before or 200 now, they were always grey.
You can argue that nuclear deterrence will fail once nukes are tossed and we will lose the precious numbers. But here you are surrendering them as non viable assets which do not make into any operational or tactical calculation leave alone strategic. I am sorry this sound simplistic and pessimistic.
Nuclear deterrence is not nuclear war fighting only because the numbers are said to be limited. In India’s case the ambiguity is quite thick, the know how is very advance, the fissile material is abundant, production cog wheels are well oiled, the threshold is quite low and prescription is well justifiable given Chinese and Pakistani nuclear posturing is only directed at us. These coward bat eaters Chinese do not even send their type 092 and 094 on deterrence patrol against USA.
Peaceniks always play safe and win by betting their money and guesses on deescalation without talking about aggressive posturing which includes nuclear trigger that actually brings about the so called de-escalation.
Please feel free to disagree but I will always bring in Nukes and bay for Chinese blood. Finding excuses not to fight them may be more popular with many but the Indian soilders and their leaders are ready to fight them even with pocket knives.
Yes I know grey areas always existed but what I was saying is that they don't exist anymore chinese have occupied those now.
My whole point is that they have even occupied those grey areas which was our former territory.
So where do we draw the line when do we say enough is enough?
Indian soldiers yes Indian leaders no this is where you are wrong Indian leaders have time and time again shown they don't have the appetite for a large war.
Balakot is the best example pakistan was defending terrorists they had attacked us everything was on our side they were the aggressors and yet when the best time to attack them arrived we backed out.
Your view of nukes is not wrong at all but what you are indeed getting wrong here is the will of the establishment to actually use them as a tool of diplomacy or deterrence.
You can say that the govt is willing to fight but all I am pointing out to you is the reality on the ground there are no updates except useless talks media has mostly left this topic the govt toio has been very careful to not bring out this topic.
I only point out to you what is happening right in front of my eyes.