First of all UNSC is of limited value power speaks not being member of some group filled with people of diverging interests.its just like SAARC.UNSC will not come through begging the P5. For it to happen we should hasten the demise of China. If China implodes like ussr India will surely get its place among P5 wih veto power from day 1.
There will never be a unipolar world, as that would mean no justification for the untold sums of money spend by the US on its military capabilities. The US would always need an enemy - that enemy, whether it be a single entity such as the USSR or China, or an axis of evil such as during WWII.First of all UNSC is of limited value power speaks not being member of some group filled with people of diverging interests.its just like SAARC.
Second China going down is bad for India.
Like it or not any multi polar world is better for India India will never be allowed to be above USA in a unipolar world.in a multipolar world USA will waste money and resourcesjence weakening itself to control China and Russia which can be used by India to grow.otherwise it will attest be a lackey like Japan or korea.we will have to accept sj movements and/or Christian movements,etc.
Really? Name 3 resolutions that you f**k up.This pussy f*cked many of its resolutions in front of your eyes.
You will know only after you become a member of this group.What ya did yourself except hiding behind this org like pussy? From targeting arsenals of specific countries to even the lows defending terrorists.
Initial case was regarding WMD which I don't guess could have sanctioned India to degrade it's arsenal.Really? Name 3 resolutions that you f**k up.
We already do,You will know only after you become a member of this group.
North Korea and Iran did the similar thing, so maybe India should gang up with them for permanent membership.Initial case was regarding WMD which I don't guess could have sanctioned India to degrade it's arsenal.
That means you didn't do much thing. In other words, the world will be the same without India, UN will be the same without India too.Regarding "Name 3 resolutions", three couldn't either be passed against India.
Which one did you challenged without those regarding India? In other words, did India undermine any resolution for the sake of other countries?Some can be challenged with varying meanings and others which have been brought.
You already do? Last time I check, India is still begging for the seat while China is still sitting in the room. So, better remember what is already happened and what is not happening yet.We already do,
the way China has messed up with everyone for it's lust of land, it will itself be sanctioned by others without UNSC.
without political power of UNSC, China simply can't do anything itself for resisting what India does, it'll have to face a dozen others.
If you ask these questions, that means you are too young to understand it.China wasn't joined for any of it merits, it was a totally screwed place and was invited only for being puppet of winning parties. And tell me at first place, who is driving nonsense of defending terrorists or attacking seas? Cuz veto reverts action.
I would blame Yankees more than Chinkies. They most likely (no not likely but definitely) support those terrorist whom they claim to be on same page with India. They support China from behind the scene.And tell me at first place, who is driving nonsense of defending terrorists or attacking seas?
I'm yet to see them having own series of reactors or independent research programs.North Korea and Iran did the similar thing, so maybe India should gang up with them for permanent membership.
We were first country outside security council or NATO to test nuclear weapons, having nuke subs or having different sorts of WMD at large scale or having a large scale integrated missile program. For the org made in wake of India's tests, India is itself applying to be a member today.That means you didn't do much thing. In other words, the world will be the same without India, UN will be the same without India too.
Or in other words, the country who can contribute something gets a wavier.In other words, the world will be the same without India, UN will be the same without India too.
If happens, then, justified for own interest, be it trade with Iran or membership of Bangladesh and it's yet less disgusting against defending a person like Azhar.Which one did you challenged without those regarding India? In other words, did India undermine any resolution for the sake of other countries?
Already do "know"!You already do?
Your words India begging for room or my words that ya hiding yourself behind the veto power like cowards which you got for know reason and yet chest thumpingLast time I check, India is still begging for the seat
This room was created 7 decades ago after a decisive, it's yet retaining it's old aging members, world has come a long way since then.while China is still sitting in the room. So, better remember what is already happened and what is not happening yet.
Then, explain me, I don't remember if China was even autonomous strategically, leave alone fighting on own.:biggrin2:If you ask these questions, that means you are too young to understand it.
I won't differentiate anyone here, matter here is with China these days feeling jihad in India has some sort of fair militancy or doing just for interest.I would blame Yankees more than Chinkies. They most likely (no not likely but definitely) support those terrorist whom they claim to be on same page with India. They support China from behind the scene.
Even if Russia and China falls, india will get only TENGA!!!!UNSC will not come through begging the P5. For it to happen we should hasten the demise of China. If China implodes like ussr India will surely get its place among P5 wih veto power from day 1.
Dar...ye dar Acha hai!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
#modi_hai_toh_mumkin_hai
To get some perks by showing "we are good and just people" simply to get out of terrorism sanctions.